From: owner-trailer-park-digest@smoe.org (trailer-park-digest) To: trailer-park-digest@smoe.org Subject: trailer-park-digest V1 #139 Reply-To: trailer-park Sender: owner-trailer-park-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-trailer-park-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk trailer-park-digest Saturday, November 18 2000 Volume 01 : Number 139 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 20:30:55 -0000 From: "untruth" Subject: Re: British Vogue article 1/00 >Wa? Eh? Wo? Whe? (and other such astonished noises). You interviewed >beth? What for? Thats cool. Oh, and are there really a lot of beth sites >out there? Didnt seem many to me. I mean, have u ever looked up Bush on >the internet? That's a LOT of sites. Ok, how did I get onto Bush. Hmm.... I expect that's because 'Bush' appears in many non-musical contexts. (Well, there's American politics for a start) ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 01:08:08 -0000 From: "Adam Carrel" Subject: Re: British Vogue article 1/00 > >Wa? Eh? Wo? Whe? (and other such astonished noises). You interviewed > >beth? What for? Thats cool. Oh, and are there really a lot of beth sites > >out there? Didnt seem many to me. I mean, have u ever looked up Bush on > >the internet? That's a LOT of sites. Ok, how did I get onto Bush. > Hmm.... > > > > I expect that's because 'Bush' appears in many non-musical contexts. (Well, > there's American politics for a start) Em nope. There really are a lot of sites for the band Bush. But you do get categories for Bushes Kate, George, Dubya, and no doubt numerous porn sites. Ah, the wonders of technology. Adam ------------------------------ End of trailer-park-digest V1 #139 **********************************