From: owner-stillpt-digest@smoe.org (stillpt-digest) To: stillpt-digest@smoe.org Subject: stillpt-digest V6 #5 Reply-To: stillpt@smoe.org Sender: owner-stillpt-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-stillpt-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk stillpt-digest Thursday, January 29 2004 Volume 06 : Number 005 Today's Subjects: ----------------- ANGEL eps ["Susan Kroupa" ] Re: ANGEL eps [Todd Huff ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:11:56 -0700 From: "Susan Kroupa" Subject: ANGEL eps I have to say that I've been lukewarm about ANGEL for a long time, but I think the last two episodes have been very good. Andrew, guesting on tonight's show, was hilarious as usual, and there were lots of references to BUFFY which I always like, but the best thing, imo, is the persistant question: does the end (doing good) justify the means (using Wolfram & Hart) or is the good compromised or even corrupted? Anyway, two good episodes, imo. Sue ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 20:55:58 -0800 (PST) From: Todd Huff Subject: Re: ANGEL eps - --- Susan Kroupa wrote: > I have to say that I've been lukewarm about ANGEL > for a long time, but I think > the last two episodes have been very good. Andrew, > guesting on tonight's > show, was hilarious as usual, and there were lots of > references to BUFFY which > I always like, but the best thing, imo, is the > persistant question: does the > end (doing good) justify the means (using Wolfram & > Hart) or is the good > compromised or even corrupted? > > Anyway, two good episodes, imo. I loved this episode, especially the "slayer-power" vibe at the end that was so evocative of the better episodes in season seven. Andrew is growing like Wesley, notice that? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ ------------------------------ End of stillpt-digest V6 #5 ***************************