From: owner-stillpt-digest@smoe.org (stillpt-digest) To: stillpt-digest@smoe.org Subject: stillpt-digest V5 #85 Reply-To: stillpt@smoe.org Sender: owner-stillpt-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-stillpt-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk stillpt-digest Monday, May 12 2003 Volume 05 : Number 085 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: a/home ["marty" ] Re: a/home ["marty" ] Re: a/home ["marty" ] Re: a/home ["marty" ] Re: a/home ["marty" ] Re: a/home [meredith ] Re: a/home [meredith ] Re: a/home ["jzitt@metatronpress.com" ] Re: a/home ["marty" ] Re: a/home ["marty" ] Re: a/home ["jzitt@metatronpress.com" ] Angel renewed, moving to Wednesdays, Spike in and Cordy out. [Todd Huff <] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 09:06:54 -0700 From: "marty" Subject: Re: a/home These may not be what you are wanting, but they are what I have.. 4 parts. marty [TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 09:09:37 -0700 From: "marty" Subject: Re: a/home Note: I didn't realize I had picked up the entire page of conversations. Dana's post with the script bit is about the middle. More in a bit ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 09:12:12 -0700 From: "marty" Subject: Re: a/home Second one [TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 09:18:03 -0700 From: "marty" Subject: Re: a/home This one seems to be a duplicate of the last one I sent... Still, here it is. [TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 09:23:50 -0700 From: "marty" Subject: Re: a/home 4th, and last one I collected. It also seems to be a duplicate. Interesting note; if you scroll down to the last 'post' you can hit the next and continue lurking in on the discussion. I am not certain that all of the "quotes" from the show are actually from the show. This is a free wheeling group who write Buffy and Angel fan fiction very well at times. Bet you could do the same with the previous button. The discussion, btw, is now over 9000 posts and is considering what to call the next incarnation of the thread. It moves very quickly. Often over 150 posts a day. [TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 13:18:08 -0400 From: meredith Subject: Re: a/home Hi, Marty posted: >These may not be what you are wanting, but they are what I have.. 4 parts. > >marty >[TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN] Mailing lists at smoe.org are set up to screen out attachments as an anti-spam and virus-protection measure. Somehow whatever you pasted in came through as an attachment, so it all got screened out. Are you able to paste it in as plain text? If not, can you just point us to an URL? =============================================== Meredith Tarr New Haven, CT USA mailto:meth@smoe.org http://www.smoe.org/meth =============================================== Live At The House O'Muzak House Concert Series http://muzak.smoe.org =============================================== ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 13:23:34 -0400 From: meredith Subject: Re: a/home Hi, Berni responded: >I did not catch the reference. What was it? When Connor walked up to the church where Jasmine had Cordy hidden away, the sign out front read: "GOD IS NOWHERE JASMINE IS THE WAY!" >Which Cordy? I feel we've seen a variety of Cordelias the past few season. >She's been written very inconsistently. That's definitely an open question. Was it really Cordy all along? Did she really come back down from the higher plane? And if that really was her, was she being controlled by Jasmine all along? I tend to believe the latter. It may have been a corporeal Cordelia that would have stood up to a DNA test, but it wasn't Cordelia from a personality standpoint at all. >She might get on her moral high >horse and express outrage or she might resort to her valley girl gimme or >she might be wise and jaded and say deal with it. My guess is she'll wake up in W&H and say "What the HELL is going on?!" Then once she finds out, she'll be the one who constantly questions the gang's judgement in taking the deal. ("Angel, what the HELL were you THINKING?!") =============================================== Meredith Tarr New Haven, CT USA mailto:meth@smoe.org http://www.smoe.org/meth =============================================== Live At The House O'Muzak House Concert Series http://muzak.smoe.org =============================================== ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 23:33:13 -0400 From: "jzitt@metatronpress.com" Subject: Re: a/home Wah! All the messages came through as shown below. Any chance the stuff can be sent in some readable form? Or maybe a URL to the source? Original Message: - ----------------- From: marty sf-marty@dm.net Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 09:06:54 -0700 To: stillpt@smoe.org Subject: Re: a/home These may not be what you are wanting, but they are what I have.. 4 parts. marty [TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN] - -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 21:14:55 -0700 From: "marty" Subject: Re: a/home > >These may not be what you are wanting, but they are what I have.. 4 parts. Lets see if this works [TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN][TABLE NOT SHOWN] ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 21:24:43 -0700 From: "marty" Subject: Re: a/home > Wah! All the messages came through as shown below. Any chance the stuff can > be sent in some readable form? Or maybe a URL to the source? Working on it. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 00:36:57 -0400 From: "jzitt@metatronpress.com" Subject: Re: a/home FWIW, the shooting script at http://studiesinwords.de/shooting/home.html seems to have a heap of unshown material. Is it all in there? Original Message: - ----------------- From: marty sf-marty@dm.net Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 21:24:43 -0700 To: stillpt@smoe.org Subject: Re: a/home > Wah! All the messages came through as shown below. Any chance the stuff can > be sent in some readable form? Or maybe a URL to the source? Working on it. - -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 22:39:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Todd Huff Subject: Angel renewed, moving to Wednesdays, Spike in and Cordy out. from variety.com: NBC extends 'ER' deal, 'Angel' stays aloft Medical drama scheduled through 2006 By JOSEF ADALIAN Warner Bros. TV's "ER" will remain open on NBC until at least May 2006, while 20th Century Fox's "Angel" -- with new cast addition James Marsters-- is taking flight for a fifth season on the WB. Peacock has struck a new deal with WBTV and John Wells Prods. guaranteeing "ER" two more seasons beyond the show's current pact, due to expire in May 2004. This means the hit medical drama, which remains a Nielsen powerhouse after 200 episodes, is guaranteed to be a part of NBC's sked through the 2005-06 season -- the show's 12th. NBC Entertainment prexy Jeff Zucker will announce the deal today at the web's annual upfront presentation to advertisers. Neither NBC nor WBTV would confirm details, though industry insiders said the Peacock won't pay any more than it had been shelling out. Peacock's last license fee deal, inked in 2000, was for roughly $8 million per seg; it's possible the new deal is worth a tad less. Whatever the pricetag, losing "ER" wasn't an option for Zucker. Strong season "It's been No. 1 in adults 18-49 every season it's been on the air," Zucker said Sunday. "It's had a fantastic season this year, with both a creative renaissance and in the ratings. It's truly amazing how strong the show still is." While CBS has been chipping away at "ER" in total viewers with its Jerry Bruckheimer-produced "Without a Trace," "ER" remains dominant in the key demo of adults 18-49. Its 200th episode last week outdrew both "Trace" and ABC's "PrimeTime Live" combined among younger viewers. Nothing that "from the day ('ER') went on the air . . . it hasn't looked back," Zucker said "ER" and the "Law & Order" mothership have proven to be enduring hits because of the auspices behind them. "You have two incredible visionaries running these shows, both of whom have masterfully navigated the ups and downs of the last decade and kept their shows humming at a higher level than anything else on TV," he said. WBTV prexy Peter Roth said his studio was "thrilled to be part of the phenominal success that is 'ER.'" "This two-year pick up is yet another affirmation of the enormous value that this show holds to our studio, the network and to our audience," Roth said. 'Angel' wings in As for "Angel," Frog has ordered another full season of the Joss Whedon-creative skein and will air the show Wednesdays at 9 p.m., with relocated hit "Smallville" as its lead-in. Frog has an option for a sixth season. What's more, Paradigm-repped Marsters has signed on to reprise his "Buffy" role as punker vamp Spike. Other "Buffy" regulars may also make guest appearances next season, while Whedon has vowed to write several scripts and direct episodes of the show. Jeffrey Bell and Tim Minear will be exec producers/showrunners. Charisma Carpenter, who plays Cordelia, is not expected to return as a series regular. "Angel's" recent ratings perfomance should have made it a shoo-in for a renewal. Still, WB execs wanted to see how their drama development turned out, and, more importantly, needed to hammer out a new license fee deal with 20th. While "Angel" isn't a particularly expensive skein to produce, it doesn't do very well in repeats, making it tougher for the Frog to turn a profit on the show. "Until we knew at what price we could close a deal for the series, as well as what the rest of our schedule cost, we couldn't make the call," WB Entertainment chief Jordan Levin said. Still, unlike the rancorous Frog-20th negotiation over "Angel" sibling "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," Levin said the "Angel" talks repped "a cordial, non-emotional negotiation. "It's a deal that's acceptable for both of us, and also ultimately respects the fans of the collective 'Buffy' and 'Angel' mythologies," Levin said. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com ------------------------------ End of stillpt-digest V5 #85 ****************************