From: owner-stillpt-digest@smoe.org (stillpt-digest) To: stillpt-digest@smoe.org Subject: stillpt-digest V3 #52 Reply-To: stillpt@smoe.org Sender: owner-stillpt-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-stillpt-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk stillpt-digest Sunday, March 25 2001 Volume 03 : Number 052 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: b/ny daily news article [Todd Huff ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 07:49:26 -0800 (PST) From: Todd Huff Subject: Re: b/ny daily news article - --- meredith wrote: > Hi! > > David ruminated: > > >And what would happen to _Angel_ then? (Y'know, > Broody Angel.) Would it > >stay on WB? I can just see them deliberately > putting it opposite BTVS ... > > One scenario that has been floated is that if > _Buffy_ were to go to, say, > the Fox network, the WB may cancel its other Fox > Studios-produced shows, > _Roswell_ and _Angel_ just to be pissy. I doubt > they'd do that -- they > would probably deliberately schedule it opposite > _Buffy_ instead, then use > the excuse of "low ratings" to give it the boot > later on. > I don't see either of these things happening. WB doesn't have money to burn, and if Angel is making them money they'd be crazy to try to schedule it opposite Buffy. OTOH, Whedon would scream bloody murder if Fox scheduled Buffy opposite Angel. Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ End of stillpt-digest V3 #52 ****************************