From: owner-st-digest@smoe.org (st-digest) To: st-digest@smoe.org Subject: st-digest V3 #13 Reply-To: st@smoe.org Sender: owner-st-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-st-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk st-digest Sunday, July 5 1998 Volume 03 : Number 013 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: ST! News... [neoncap ] Re: ST! News... [Heather ] Re: ST! News... ["mr. pointy" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 4 Jul 1998 04:10:47 -0400 (EDT) From: neoncap Subject: Re: ST! News... At 12:31 PM -0400 7/1/98, Keith Abbott wrote: >> How much are they asking for the ST! album? > >Those details were not disclosed to me. I'm sure it would be a few >thousand dollars at >least...but I could be way wrong..it could be a lot higher if they want a >piece of the future >cut. > I'd definitely pay $50 for the new ST album if the alternative was to never hear it. I might even pay more. If we flooded WB with ST-supportive e-mail (or a petition of sorts), would that encourage them to release the disc? I wonder if ST were to add a kazooist to their band and change their name that would release them from their contract. It would also have the side effect of them no longer having the stupidest band name in history. tk ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 04 Jul 1998 14:23:17 From: Heather Subject: Re: ST! News... At 12:31 PM -0400 7/1/98, Keith Abbott wrote: > How much are they asking for the ST! album? I have only a little knowledge of the music industry so maybe someone here can enlighten me. Why in the world would a record company that obviously doesn't want a band/artist anymore prevent them from going elsewhere?? Heather ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 04 Jul 1998 15:23:26 -0400 From: "mr. pointy" Subject: Re: ST! News... also sprach Heather: >At 12:31 PM -0400 7/1/98, Keith Abbott wrote: >> How much are they asking for the ST! album? > >I have only a little knowledge of the music industry so maybe someone here >can enlighten me. Why in the world would a record company that obviously >doesn't want a band/artist anymore prevent them from going elsewhere?? $$$$$ +w ------------------------------ End of st-digest V3 #13 ***********************