From: owner-shindell-list-digest@smoe.org (shindell-list-digest) To: shindell-list-digest@smoe.org Subject: shindell-list-digest V10 #122 Reply-To: shindell-list@smoe.org Sender: owner-shindell-list-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-shindell-list-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk shindell-list-digest Friday, June 19 2009 Volume 10 : Number 122 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: [RS] RS DVD. [Carol Love ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:47:45 -0400 From: Carol Love Subject: Re: [RS] RS DVD. Johannes, (You're not related to the Von Trapps, are you???) I think I'm going to go with your option "D". You never know what those wily Argentinians are going to do next and Lord knows I don't trust my own government. ;-) Peace, ....Carol On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Johannes Schult wrote: > >.......So why would it go???? > > Just a theory: > > -Some people ask the venue (and possibly Richard) ahead of time for > permission to set up a camera. > -They get there early and make sure to get a soundboard recording. > -They ask Richard if it's okay to film his gig. > -He says, Sure. > -They ask if they might pass it on to fans afterwards. > -He says, Sounds good, but I'd to see it before you do so. Just in case. > -Once the show is wrapped the video person(s) put out the "trailer" to > figure out the demand. > -Now there are various scenarios: > a) Richard's veto made them pull it. > b) They drowned in requests and want to/have to keep it in a reasonable > scale. > c) They are just not satisfied with the camera sound (e.g., coughing > noises) and will sooner or later come up with a mind-blowing board sound. > d) It's a big conspiracy involving the American embassy in Argentina and > the International Canary Association. > e) Something completely different. > > > Johannes ------------------------------ End of shindell-list-digest V10 #122 ************************************