From: owner-shindell-list-digest@smoe.org (shindell-list-digest)
To: shindell-list-digest@smoe.org
Subject: shindell-list-digest V3 #227
Reply-To: shindell-list@smoe.org
Sender: owner-shindell-list-digest@smoe.org
Errors-To: owner-shindell-list-digest@smoe.org
Precedence: bulk


shindell-list-digest      Thursday, July 19 2001      Volume 03 : Number 227



                               Today's Subjects:
                               -----------------
  Re: [RS] Re: Reduced to a handful of songs . . .  [Jeff Gilson <jgilson@ja]
  [RS] Hidden Tracks                                     [Tricia9999@aol.com]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 00:41:28 -0400
From: Jeff Gilson <jgilson@javanet.com>
Subject: Re: [RS] Re: Reduced to a handful of songs . . .

Katie wrote:
>Katie
><who did not dream about Richard in a Kenworth at the Texaco of her
>dreams . . . although he was holding a small child and standing with a
>woman (who hopefully was his wife!)>

All this dreaming about Richard makes me wonder if Ellis is getting 
jealous. Or have you broken up? :-}

jeff.

- --
I'm sitting here in Dallas, a dive in Texas
with an ache like a forearm for the spoon
I am peeling back the labels
I'm spinning empty bottles on the bar
lonely litters the room -- Beth Amsel
- --
writing by osmosis
    http://www.onefreeradical.com/osmosis/

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 02:01:30 EDT
From: Tricia9999@aol.com
Subject: [RS] Hidden Tracks

I would just like to say that I think this is a silly trend. What is the 
purpose of including "hidden" tracks? 

Might have been clever at first, but now don't get it,
Tricia

------------------------------

End of shindell-list-digest V3 #227
***********************************