From: owner-shindell-list-digest@smoe.org (shindell-list-digest) To: shindell-list-digest@smoe.org Subject: shindell-list-digest V12 #181 Reply-To: shindell-list@smoe.org Sender: owner-shindell-list-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-shindell-list-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk shindell-list-digest Wednesday, October 17 2012 Volume 12 : Number 181 Today's Subjects: ----------------- [RS] RE: Last Fare 1 v. 2 couples [John Walkey ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:48:48 -0400 From: John Walkey Subject: [RS] RE: Last Fare 1 v. 2 couples Well, if the man himself says it's two different couples, I guess that was the "framer's original intent" to get all Supremes about it. But in the music video of my mind's eye I see a couple with the woman enormously pregnant (which is why he helps her into the cab) in some time period shortly after 9-11 (have to check meteorological records to see if it rained in the days following, I don't recall). Then months later he sees "them" meaning the same couple in front of Saint Luke's at the baptism of the baby who was born in the intervening months. It makes for a better video than two different couples, in my head at least... But then I've never been much of an originalist.... ~John ------------------------------ End of shindell-list-digest V12 #181 ************************************