From: owner-shindell-list-digest@smoe.org (shindell-list-digest) To: shindell-list-digest@smoe.org Subject: shindell-list-digest V9 #202 Reply-To: shindell-list@smoe.org Sender: owner-shindell-list-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-shindell-list-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk shindell-list-digest Wednesday, February 6 2008 Volume 09 : Number 202 Today's Subjects: ----------------- [RS] Archives? [rongrittz@aol.com] Re: [RS] Archives? ["Tom Neff" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:20:30 -0500 From: rongrittz@aol.com Subject: [RS] Archives? As far as I can tell, the Shindell archives still haven't been updated for going on seven months now. Tom, is there any word on when they might be back up and running? I'm thinking that in the list FAQ, I'm gonna need to advise folks to use the smoe.org archives instead, although they're not as friendly to use as your Grassyhill archives. Any news? Thanks. RG ________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:17:28 -0700 From: "Tom Neff" Subject: Re: [RS] Archives? I have every RS posting for the period in question and the archives will be updated. I am at war with the provider. The war will end. I believe it was General George Patton who said, "The object of war is not to die nobly for your country; it is to make the other poor SOB die nobly for his." On Feb 5, 2008 10:20 PM, wrote: > As far as I can tell, the Shindell archives still haven't been updated > for going on seven months now. Tom, is there any word on when they > might be back up and running? ------------------------------ End of shindell-list-digest V9 #202 ***********************************