From: owner-sheryl-crew-digest@smoe.org (sheryl-crew-digest) To: sheryl-crew-digest@smoe.org Subject: sheryl-crew-digest V6 #143 Reply-To: sheryl-crew@smoe.org Sender: owner-sheryl-crew-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-sheryl-crew-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk sheryl-crew-digest Friday, December 5 2003 Volume 06 : Number 143 Today's Subjects: ----------------- [sheryl-crew] No Noms for Sheryl [FadedSign@aol.com] Re: [sheryl-crew] No Noms for Sheryl [XMystery79@aol.com] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:50:43 -0500 From: FadedSign@aol.com Subject: [sheryl-crew] No Noms for Sheryl I just checked the site and Sheryl did not receive any nominations for the 2004 grammy awards. I thought she had a chance with 'picture' or even 'First Cut' but maybe they were not eligible. Oh well! ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:08:36 EST From: XMystery79@aol.com Subject: Re: [sheryl-crew] No Noms for Sheryl In a message dated 12/4/2003 1:51:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, FadedSign@aol.com writes: I just checked the site and Sheryl did not receive any nominations for the 2004 grammy awards. I thought she had a chance with 'picture' or even 'First Cut' but maybe they were not eligible. Oh well! I don't think First Cut was eligible, but I definitely thought Picture would have been nominated. Oh well, she'll be eligible next year and has a good shot of getting nominated for FC I would think. ------------------------------ End of sheryl-crew-digest V6 #143 *********************************