From: owner-seven-seas@smoe.org (seven-seas-digest) To: seven-seas-digest@smoe.org Subject: seven-seas-digest V2 #109 Reply-To: seven-seas@smoe.org Sender: owner-seven-seas@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-seven-seas@smoe.org Precedence: bulk seven-seas-digest Wednesday, April 2 2003 Volume 02 : Number 109 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:14:28 +0100 From: matt.harkness@bt.com Subject: RE: seven-seas Radiohead Revisited >And a big thumbs up for the new album, too. It's fantastic. I wouldn't go that far, Barry! It's okay in parts, and at least they appear to have remembered how to turn their guitars on, but Thom's voice still sounds a shadow of its former powerful self, and there's still too much knob-twiddling in the same vein as Kid A/Amnesiac. Having said that, the track they've chosen as the first single is a clever choice, because it is ALMOST a return to old form. Shame the rest of the album doesn't live up to it. Or maybe I'm just bitter that I couldn't get tix for the tour..... Oh, and if anyone else wants the album and is as unscrupulous as me, it was still available at the following site a few minutes ago..... http://das.caltech.edu/baz/radiohead/radio.html ====================================== http://www.bunnymenlist.com ====================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 06:38:33 -0500 From: Red Subject: RE: seven-seas Radiohead Revisited At 12:14 PM 4/2/03 +0100, you wrote: > >Oh, and if anyone else wants the album and is as unscrupulous as me, it was >still available at the following site a few minutes ago..... > >http://das.caltech.edu/baz/radiohead/radio.html It's available here too, as well as some live stuff from Glasgow: http://www.idioteque.it/multimedia/audio.htm But ya gotta change the .rad files to .mp3 after you DL them. No biggie. Red ====================================== http://www.bunnymenlist.com ====================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:43:22 +0100 From: matt.harkness@bt.com Subject: RE: seven-seas Radiohead Revisited >It's available here too, as well as some live stuff from Glasgow: >http://www.idioteque.it/multimedia/audio.htm Excellent! Thanks for the link - I shall d/l the live stuff this evening (um.....before the footie, obviously......COME ON ENGLAND!!!) ====================================== http://www.bunnymenlist.com ====================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 07:08:22 -0500 From: Red Subject: RE: seven-seas Radiohead Revisited At 12:14 PM 4/2/03 +0100, you wrote: >>And a big thumbs up for the new album, too. It's fantastic. > >I wouldn't go that far, Barry! Well, I like it! Has some great stuff on it! 'There There' is fucking awesome! Red ====================================== http://www.bunnymenlist.com ====================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 13:03:39 +0100 From: matt.harkness@bt.com Subject: RE: seven-seas Radiohead Revisited >Well, I like it! >Has some great stuff on it! >'There There' is fucking awesome! I *did* say that the track they have chosen as the first single (There There) is good..... ====================================== http://www.bunnymenlist.com ====================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 07:19:22 -0500 From: Red Subject: RE: seven-seas Radiohead Revisited At 01:03 PM 4/2/03 +0100, you wrote: > >I *did* say that the track they have chosen as the first single (There >There) is good..... well, There There is listed as Track 9 on the other link..... ====================================== http://www.bunnymenlist.com ====================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 07:25:11 -0500 From: Red Subject: RE: seven-seas Radiohead Revisited At 01:03 PM 4/2/03 +0100, you wrote: > >I *did* say that the track they have chosen as the first single (There >There) is good..... And.....the one this link lists as the opening track...(2+2=5) sounds a LOT like their older stuff to me. So I didn't realize you were talking about There There. I never saw an official track listing.....so I don't have a clue. I hope I didn't burn my cd in the wrong order......I hate that! I accidently taped Crocodiles with the B-side of the album first....when I first bought it, and it took me years to get used to it the correct way! argh! Red ====================================== http://www.bunnymenlist.com ====================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 13:18:14 +0100 From: matt.harkness@bt.com Subject: RE: seven-seas Radiohead Revisited >well, There There is listed as Track 9 on the other link..... Your point being? It's Track 9 whichever link you look at, because it's track 9 on the album, simple as that. It's a good song, the best on the album, and IN MY OPINION the rest of the album is not as good. ====================================== http://www.bunnymenlist.com ====================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 07:28:00 -0500 From: Red Subject: RE: seven-seas Radiohead Revisited At 01:03 PM 4/2/03 +0100, you wrote: >I *did* say that the track they have chosen as the first single (There >There) is good..... OH...you said first SINGLE..... hahahaahhahaa.....I was thinking you said first TRACCDFdfc/<----my cat typed that! first TRACK........sorry.....my mistake. But even so...I didn't know that was their first single. Red ====================================== http://www.bunnymenlist.com ====================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 07:29:39 -0500 From: Red Subject: RE: seven-seas Radiohead Revisited At 01:18 PM 4/2/03 +0100, you wrote: >>well, There There is listed as Track 9 on the other link..... > >Your point being? SEE NEXT POST! argh!! *&^$%#$@# ====================================== http://www.bunnymenlist.com ====================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 07:30:12 -0500 From: Red Subject: RE: seven-seas Radiohead Revisited At 01:18 PM 4/2/03 +0100, you wrote: >>well, There There is listed as Track 9 on the other link..... > >Your point being? My point being....I made a fucking MISTAKE, and I said so! ====================================== http://www.bunnymenlist.com ====================================== ------------------------------ End of seven-seas-digest V2 #109 ********************************