From: owner-precious-things-digest@smoe.org (precious-things-digest) To: precious-things-digest@smoe.org Subject: precious-things-digest V15 #8 Reply-To: precious-things@smoe.org Sender: owner-precious-things-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-precious-things-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "precious-things-digest-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. precious-things-digest Friday, July 6 2012 Volume 15 : Number 008 Today's Subjects: ----------------- [pt] gold dust (was Re: precious-things-digest V15 #7) [sergeant redacted] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 11:58:08 -0400 From: sergeant redacted Subject: [pt] gold dust (was Re: precious-things-digest V15 #7) >Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 15:00:17 -0400 (EDT) >From: ange816@aol.com >Subject: [none] sorry about that junk mail -- it was sent from a subscribed address so it snuck through the filter and got to the list. bugger. while i'm here, what does everything thing about _gold dust_? i haven't given it a whole lot of thought (aside from posting about it on undented as news drips out) but my first blush reaction is that i'd rather tori spend time working on new material than reworking/revisiting old material...even with vast reworking that orchestral arrangements will bring. but, i'm willing to be surprised by whatever it ends up being. (if you don't know what i am talking about, see http://undented.com/news/2709/we-held-gold-dust-in-our-hands.) woj ------------------------------ End of precious-things-digest V15 #8 ************************************