From: owner-precious-things-digest@smoe.org (precious-things-digest) To: precious-things-digest@smoe.org Subject: precious-things-digest V8 #206 Reply-To: precious-things@smoe.org Sender: owner-precious-things-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-precious-things-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "precious-things-digest-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. precious-things-digest Friday, September 5 2003 Volume 08 : Number 206 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: Tori Naked?!?! [shaman@eskimo.com] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 15:41:11 +0300 From: shaman@eskimo.com Subject: Re: Tori Naked?!?! On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 19:01:09 EDT, you wrote: > >In a message dated 09/01/2003 11:41:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time, >ToriVolta@aol.com writes: > > >> I KNOW that >> she would never degrade herself enough to pose nude, and I know now that she >> >> wouldn't lower herself to eliminate these low class solicitations. > >actually, no one "knows" what tori would do except tori..... >also, most photos that claim to be nude celebrities are quite obviously fake, >so why worry..... >finally, posing nude is not "degrading". the human body is art, and your >comment is offensive. i happen to be an artist's model and i pose nude quite >often, and i don't feel like i am "lowering" myself at all..... >thanks, > ~jennifer~ Actually, I few years ago she probably would have but no one asked. Today, I suspect she'd be less likely. Personally, I just need a good picture of her face to get all dreamy but that's just me. She has eyes I get lost in and those lips are so . ------------------------------ End of precious-things-digest V8 #206 *************************************