From: owner-precious-things-digest@smoe.org (precious-things-digest) To: precious-things-digest@smoe.org Subject: precious-things-digest V4 #294 Reply-To: precious-things@smoe.org Sender: owner-precious-things-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-precious-things-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send mail to "precious-things-digest-request@smoe.org" X-To-Unsubscribe: with "unsubscribe" as the body. precious-things-digest Thursday, September 30 1999 Volume 04 : Number 294 Today's Subjects: ----------------- TVAB debuts at #12, not #2 ["gina" (by way of p] Re: "not tonight..." [zoey68@mindspring.com (pani)] Datura [Beth Winegarner ] I wasn't attacking Sarah. ["Wake UpNeo" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 21:46:36 -0400 From: "gina" (by way of puppycakes ) Subject: TVAB debuts at #12, not #2 according to Spin.com: http://spin.com/noise/news/1999/09/29/1/index.html Charts: NIN's The Fragile Debuts At No. 1 Nine Inch Nails first album of new material since 1994's The Downward Spiral will debut at No. 1 on the top 200 album charts for the week ending September 26. According to SoundScan, The Fragile sold 228,746 units in it's first week in stores. Backstreet Boys Millennium holds at No. 2, while Santana's comeback hit Supernatural climbs into the No. 3 spot. Christina Aguilera's self-titled debut drops a notch to No. 4. Last week's No. 1, Eve's Eve- First Lady of the Ruff Ryders falls to No. 5. The week's second highest debut belongs to Barbra Streisand, whose latest, A Love Like Ours, bows at No. 6. Brian McKnight's Back At One enters the charts at No. 7. The Dixie Chicks's Fly, Kid Rock's Devil Without a Cause and Britney Spears's Baby One More Time round out that Top 10 at No's. 8,9, and 10 respectively. In other notable chart news, Tori Amos's double disc to venus and back debuts at No. 12, Adam Sandler's Stan and Judy's Kid debuts at No. 16, and Chris Cornell's solo debut Euphoria Morning comes in at No. 18. Further down the charts, Ben Harper's latest, Burn to Shine is at No.67 and Stereolab's Cobra and Phases Group... debuts at No. 153. ____________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from ToriNews, e-mail torinews-request@smoe.org with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 03:19:33 GMT From: zoey68@mindspring.com (pani) Subject: Re: "not tonight..." On Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:02:37 +0100, you wrote: > >"so a strange victory" - she won his hand in marriage (let's face it, he was >quite a catch), but he's off In The Last Extremity - her beauty (vienna?) >*her* definition of value meaning nothing to him with his conquests and >campaigns - until the last when maybe he realises... has one of them died, >or is maybe dying, during this song? she was unfaithful, she cheated on him. "just when you escape you have yourself to fear" Tori Amos ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 19:32:21 -0700 From: Beth Winegarner Subject: Datura Mike Gray recently made reference to a collection of material I gathered on the subject of Datura, and quoted briefly from it. I wanted to let people know that I still have the complete post -- which was disapproved from the list for being too long -- and am happy to email it to anyone who is interested. I would also like to stress that Datura is understood to be one of the most dangerous drugs out there, and should not be toyed with. Beth - -- "8. If you could be any piece of office equipment, what would you be? I think I'm already considered a piece of office equipment, but just for laughs let's say: shredder." (Scotch's web site: http://www.erasing.org/) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 02:51:17 GMT From: "Wake UpNeo" Subject: I wasn't attacking Sarah. I was *not* attacking Sarah. I was speaking in defense of anyone who's ever had his/her rape report doubted, including for Tori. This isn't the first time someone has asked this on the lists, as the page on the Dent attests. (And I still don't see why) That page (the one /nad referenced) says what I wanted to say perfectly. Wish I'd known it was there. I'd read the article it quotes elsewhere on the 'net ages ago. I even *said* "nothing personal Sarah" and told her (and everyone) I'm a bit touchy on the subject. There is more than one such qualifier in my letter, for those who would skim it and totally misinterpret it. Sarah, if I upset you in any way, a thousand apologies. It *wasn't my intent*. Peace, K. PS) I did say this would open up a can of worms ! But I was *trying to answer the question she asked*. (I could have simply ignored it !) If someone doesn't want the answers from the people on the open forum they post to asking the question, perhaps they should simply do their own net research ? **************** > >I think everyone should back off of Sarah. She asked a question, a simple > >question... maybe the consequences of asking it were not well-thought, >but a >simple question nonetheless. I'm sure she meant no offense by this. >Some of you just get so irate! I think you should be a bit more >understanding. > >had to stick my nose in >j ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ End of precious-things-digest V4 #294 *************************************