From: owner-oztori-digest@smoe.org (oztori-digest) To: oztori-digest@smoe.org Subject: oztori-digest V3 #296 Reply-To: oztori@smoe.org Sender: owner-oztori-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-oztori-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk oztori-digest Sunday, December 14 2003 Volume 03 : Number 296 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: [oztori] c*mquat [and yes, before anybody 'corrects' me on it, I am aware that it actually starts with a 'k'] [] [oztori] walk like an egyptian [Nathan "®" ] Re: [oztori] walk like an egyptian [Rebecca Appleton ] Re: [oztori] wank like an egyptian [Rebecca Appleton ] Re: [oztori] stalk like an egyptian [Rebecca Appleton ] Re: [oztori] "Ellen Amos" debuts at no. 10 [Jonceski Jasmina ] Re: [oztori] pretentious [AndrewR ] Re: [oztori] stalk like an moron [AndrewR ] Re: [oztori] hmm [AndrewR ] Re: [oztori] stalk like an moron [Nathan "®" ] [oztori] 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445 9230781640628620899862803482534211706798214808651328230664709384460955 0582231725359408128481117450284102701938521105559644622948954930381964 4288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456485669234603486104 5432664821339360726024914127372458700660631558817488152092096282925409 1715364367892590360011330530548820466521384146951941511609433057270365 7595919530921861173819326117931051185480744623799627495673518857527248 9122793818301194912 [] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:19:11 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: [oztori] c*mquat [and yes, before anybody 'corrects' me on it, I am aware that it actually starts with a 'k'] At 04:32 PM 13/12/2003, Nathan =?UNKNOWN?B?rg==?= wrote: >AndrewR wrote: > > > Looks like Nathan got something wrong!! > >Never!! ;) > >Actually whoever typed the LE booklet got something >wrong - it says "..let them break their hold OVER me" >when it's 'on' (corrected in the lyrics beneath the >notes in the LE sheet muzak book, and in the TOAL >lyrics). > >So much for being "official" (see similar gripe re the >supposed shade beneath the pepperment "TRAY" [sic] in >Daisy Dead Petals). > >*thwacks Andrew over the head with a peppermint tray* > > >Nathan. Tori could have just changed her mind when recording the song and handed her written lyrics to Cyndi Palmano. And where are DDP lyrics printed? ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:58:40 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan "®" Subject: [oztori] walk like an egyptian AndrewR wrote: > Tori could have just changed her mind when recording > the song and handed > her written lyrics to Cyndi Palmano. Maybe she did it deliberately to fuck with the minds of her fans... and then bit her knuckle & looked to the side (a new 'thing' of mine... referring to the rather extreme side-ways glances that Susanna Hoffs of the Bangles gives in their "Walk Like An Egyptian vid right near the end - as if she has just made some hugely profound statement & has to look sideways to divert attention from her so that her audience can spend a moment thinking about/digesting what mammothly important/controversial thing she just said - go d'load the vid now if you don't have it stashed away on tape to see what I mean) afterwards. > And where are DDP lyrics printed? In "The Bee Sides" sheet-music book... and presumably also in the "Lyrics" book which I haven't bothered to buy. ??? you're obviously not musical then Andrew? ;) (although I think you said you playe/d something? "Playing that organ must count for something". If not, make it your New Year's Resolution to take up an instrument... and ask your folks for "The Bee Sides" music book for Xmas!). Nathan. ===== "So what are your 'feelings' re last night? Wonder how Lal is feeling about it all? I went to Dr this morning for tetanus booster." - Jarrod, 15/3/03. When asked about [Jennifer] Lopez's claim to get eight hours sleep every night, Carey said: "If I had the luxury of not actually having to sing my own songs, I'd do that too." - Mariah Carey, 2001. "I don't eat. I don't sleep. I just rant." - Siobhan Fahey. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:17:21 GMT From: Rebecca Appleton Subject: Re: [oztori] walk like an egyptian On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:58:40 -0800 (PST), Nathan ". wrote: >Maybe she did it deliberately to fuck with the minds >of her fans... and then bit her knuckle & looked to >the side (a new 'thing' of mine... Ah, Nathan, Nathan, Nathan.... it's not a new thing of yours. My thoughts on the matter are that however it's spelt, it SHOULD be spelt "come" -- this being a perfectly good word that doesn't need to be spelt incorrectly for its meaning to be quite clear. And in fact, the correct spelling is descriptive of situation (path/goal) where "cum" is totally bland. So to speak. (Though there's another thing that shits me about c-u-m: it also becomes uses as a noun, one that only refers to men's fluids.) Isn't it the double entendre that makes the line (in 'Precious Things') worth a crooked smile? Isn't the double entendre completely banished when it's spelt c-u-m? Becc - -- www.crappism.org ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:31:04 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan "®" Subject: Re: [oztori] wank like an egyptian Rebecca Appleton wrote: > On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:58:40 -0800 (PST), Nathan ". > wrote: > >Maybe she did it deliberately to fuck with the > minds > >of her fans... and then bit her knuckle & looked to > >the side (a new 'thing' of mine... > > Ah, Nathan, Nathan, Nathan.... it's not a new thing > of yours. ??? um what are we referring to? That the Susanna looking-to-the-side thing is not 'new'; that it is not only 'yours' (ie, mine); or did you mis-read me entirely & thought I was talking about c*m?!??! > My thoughts on the matter are that however it's > spelt, it SHOULD be > spelt "come" -- this being a perfectly good word > that doesn't need to > be spelt incorrectly for its meaning to be quite > clear. And in fact, > the correct spelling is descriptive of situation > (path/goal) where > "cum" is totally bland. So to speak. (Though > there's another thing > that shits me about c-u-m: it also becomes uses as a > noun, one that > only refers to men's fluids.) BUT MAYBE Tori meant that he could make her turn into semen? ;) Or maybe 'make her cum' as in 'make her a milkshake' - ie, she's with some guy who is so skillful that he knows how to make Tori a bowl of cum just the way she likes it. But it still doesn't mean that he's Jesus! Or my 'alternative' lyrics that I prefer: "so you can make meek, um, that doesn't may queue Jesus" > Isn't it the double entendre that makes the line (in > 'Precious > Things') worth a crooked smile? Isn't the double > entendre completely > banished when it's spelt c-u-m? I once read somebody's mis-interp (what a surprise!) of this line on @forumz which I thought was rather amusing... Innocent then 12 year old or something thought it meant "so you can make me come (to church) - - that doesn't make you Jesus." "get off on the cross - we need your wood!" N. ===== "So what are your 'feelings' re last night? Wonder how Lal is feeling about it all? I went to Dr this morning for tetanus booster." - Jarrod, 15/3/03. When asked about [Jennifer] Lopez's claim to get eight hours sleep every night, Carey said: "If I had the luxury of not actually having to sing my own songs, I'd do that too." - Mariah Carey, 2001. "I don't eat. I don't sleep. I just rant." - Siobhan Fahey. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:49:32 GMT From: Rebecca Appleton Subject: Re: [oztori] wank like an egyptian On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:31:04 -0800 (PST), Nathan ". wrote: >??? um what are we referring to? That the Susanna >looking-to-the-side thing is not 'new'; That the biting knuckle thing isn't new. Looking to the side's a mere garnish. Salads at McDonald's are still McDonald's. Though, thankfully, I've no cause to argue that the action IS only 'yours'. :P >I once read somebody's mis-interp (what a surprise!) >of this line on @forumz which I thought was rather >amusing... Innocent then 12 year old or something >thought it meant "so you can make me come (to church) >- that doesn't make you Jesus." Maybe getting forced to go to church was a useful subject for that 12-year-old to hear someone singing about. They'd have worked out other interpretations in time when they became more pertinent. Different interpretations aren't always MISinterpretations. But as I said (or implied), I like words/phrases/sentences that have more than one meaning. If I didn't, I'd listen to Celine and be done with it. Becc :-) - -- www.crappism.org ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:08:57 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan "®" Subject: Re: [oztori] stalk like an egyptian Rebecca Appleton wrote: > That the biting knuckle thing isn't new. I *NEVER SAID* the biting knuckle thing was new! I meant the "*looks to the side*". That *IS* (relatively) new! > Looking to > the side's a > mere garnish. BAH! BLASPHEMY!! Looking to the side is the best thing invented since, well... sliced.. knuckle-biting :P > Maybe getting forced to go to church was a useful > subject for that > 12-year-old to hear someone singing about. They'd > have worked out > other interpretations in time when they became more > pertinent. > Different interpretations aren't always > MISinterpretations. But as I > said (or implied), I like words/phrases/sentences > that have more than > one meaning. If I didn't, I'd listen to Celine and > be done with it. I have 2 words (albeit it could be argued that one is a numeral rather than a word) for you Becc: "1000 Oceans". N. ===== "So what are your 'feelings' re last night? Wonder how Lal is feeling about it all? I went to Dr this morning for tetanus booster." - Jarrod, 15/3/03. When asked about [Jennifer] Lopez's claim to get eight hours sleep every night, Carey said: "If I had the luxury of not actually having to sing my own songs, I'd do that too." - Mariah Carey, 2001. "I don't eat. I don't sleep. I just rant." - Siobhan Fahey. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 10:36:12 GMT From: Rebecca Appleton Subject: Re: [oztori] stalk like an egyptian On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:08:57 -0800 (PST), Nathan ". wrote: >I have 2 words (albeit it could be argued that one is >a numeral rather than a word) for you Becc: > >"1000 Oceans". Yeah but we all know that's not REAL Tori. That one of these days she's gonna put out another BFP and make all our dedication worthwhile.... ~(andpeoplesay)Becc(isnotanoptimist!) - -- www.crappism.org ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:38:16 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan "®" Subject: Re: [oztori] stank like an egyptian Rebecca Appleton wrote: > Yeah but we all know that's not REAL Tori. That one > of these days > she's gonna put out another BFP and make all our > dedication > worthwhile.... Speak for yourself! IMNSHO, after track 7, that album goes a bit 'pear-shaped'. Naph. ===== "So what are your 'feelings' re last night? Wonder how Lal is feeling about it all? I went to Dr this morning for tetanus booster." - Jarrod, 15/3/03. When asked about [Jennifer] Lopez's claim to get eight hours sleep every night, Carey said: "If I had the luxury of not actually having to sing my own songs, I'd do that too." - Mariah Carey, 2001. "I don't eat. I don't sleep. I just rant." - Siobhan Fahey. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:40:06 +1100 From: Jonceski Jasmina Subject: Re: [oztori] "Ellen Amos" debuts at no. 10 > AndrewR wrote: > > > And nothing could be as bad as lyrics by that > > insipid "band" - "Live" please don't associate me with that band. i saw half of one of their sets during their recent tour here, it appears ed thinks he is god - they've become as annoying as nickleback. live's early stuff was okay, their current stuff is appalling. (no offence to nickleback fans, and no offence to live fans either). also, if you want bad lyrics, you picked the wrong album. check out the lyrics to their fifth album V. you'll be ROFL in no time. Nathan wrote: > You see there usedta be a group devoted to Live > lyrics, 'lyricsfromtherosegarden', moderated by none > other than Jaz's sister Valentina... Which I made now > c&p this email from, dated 11th July 2002: Nathan, this has no relevance here at all. Stop bringing up my sister on this list. She doesn't appreciate it. Neither do I. Get a life of your own and stop focusing on the lives of other people. Jas P.S. If you're going to reply to this take it off-list. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:46:15 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan "®" Subject: Re: [oztori] "Ellen Amos" debuts at no. 10 Jaz wrote: > Nathan, this has no relevance here at all. Stop > bringing up my sister on this list. She doesn't > appreciate it. Neither do I. > Get a life of your own and stop focusing on the > lives of other people. LMAO. I should incorporate the above into my sig.... *sigh*... So many great sig-worthy comments... so little amount of space that ppl will tolerate. Nathan. ===== "So what are your 'feelings' re last night? Wonder how Lal is feeling about it all? I went to Dr this morning for tetanus booster." - Jarrod, 15/3/03. "When did the loser get to be rich? What is a salesman with nothing to pitch? When did the fool get to be king? Why did you leave when they asked you to sing?" - - Moloko, 'Where Is The What If The What Is In Why'. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 10:54:07 GMT From: Rebecca Appleton Subject: Re: [oztori] "Ellen Amos" debuts at no. 10 On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:46:15 -0800 (PST), Nathan ". wrote: >*sigh*... So many great sig-worthy comments... so >little amount of space that ppl will tolerate. Honey, sigs are sooooo 1997. ~Becc - -- www.crappism.org ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:52:30 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan "®" Subject: Re: [oztori] "Ellen Amos" debuts at no. 10 Rebecca Appleton wrote: > Honey, sigs are sooooo 1997. Saying "Honey" prior to every statement is sooooo 1996. ~Nath ===== "So what are your 'feelings' re last night? Wonder how Lal is feeling about it all? I went to Dr this morning for tetanus booster." - Jarrod, 15/3/03. "When did the loser get to be rich? What is a salesman with nothing to pitch? When did the fool get to be king? Why did you leave when they asked you to sing?" - - Moloko, 'Where Is The What If The What Is In Why'. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:03:33 GMT From: Rebecca Appleton Subject: Re: [oztori] "Ellen Amos" debuts at no. 10 On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:52:30 -0800 (PST), Nathan ". wrote: >Saying "Honey" prior to every statement is sooooo >1996. Then my choice of phraseology hearkening back to the era in which I was accusing you of being stuck, is pretty apt, isn't it? *smiles sweetly, then vanishes; gotta get out of the house SOMEtime today!* ~Becc - -- www.crappism.org ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 17:15:53 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan "®" Subject: Re: [oztori] "Ellen Amos" debuts at no. 3.14159265358979323846... Rebecca Appleton wrote: > Then my choice of phraseology hearkening back to the > era in which I > was accusing you of being stuck, is pretty apt, > isn't it? No. Saying things are "soooo [insert year of your choice]" is so 893 B.C. ;) > *smiles > sweetly, then vanishes; gotta get out of the house > SOMEtime today!* GLTYB. n. ===== "So what are your 'feelings' re last night? Wonder how Lal is feeling about it all? I went to Dr this morning for tetanus booster." - Jarrod, 15/3/03. "When did the loser get to be rich? What is a salesman with nothing to pitch? When did the fool get to be king? Why did you leave when they asked you to sing?" - - Moloko, 'Where Is The What If The What Is In Why'. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:44:05 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: [oztori] "Ellen "The Smellin'" Amos" debuts at no. 10 At 08:54 PM 14/12/2003, Rebecca Appleton wrote: >On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:46:15 -0800 (PST), Nathan ". wrote: > >*sigh*... So many great sig-worthy comments... so > >little amount of space that ppl will tolerate. > >Honey, sigs are sooooo 1997. > >~Becc Woooooo Becc!! Two for two. That is right on target. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:45:53 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: [oztori] Nathan probably knows Pi to 200 decimal places. At 11:15 AM 14/12/2003, Nathan =?UNKNOWN?B?rg==?= wrote: >Rebecca Appleton wrote: > > > Then my choice of phraseology hearkening back to the > > era in which I > > was accusing you of being stuck, is pretty apt, > > isn't it? > >No. Saying things are "soooo [insert year of your >choice]" is so 893 B.C. ;) In the words of Kath Day-Night Give it a bone, Nathan. > > *smiles > > sweetly, then vanishes; gotta get out of the house > > SOMEtime today!* > >GLTYB. Now what the fuck does that supposed to stand for? ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:42:19 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: [oztori] skank At 10:38 AM 14/12/2003, Nathan =?UNKNOWN?B?rg==?= wrote: >Rebecca Appleton wrote: > > > Yeah but we all know that's not REAL Tori. That one > > of these days > > she's gonna put out another BFP and make all our > > dedication > > worthwhile.... > >Speak for yourself! IMNSHO, after track 7, that album >goes a bit 'pear-shaped'. So you say... I would be willing to surmise that a majority of people on here and around the world who like Pele would seriously disagree with you. Opinion noted for the 50th time already. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:38:56 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: [oztori] pretentious At 07:49 PM 14/12/2003, Rebecca Appleton wrote: >On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:31:04 -0800 (PST), Nathan ". wrote: > >??? um what are we referring to? That the Susanna > >looking-to-the-side thing is not 'new'; > >That the biting knuckle thing isn't new. Looking to the side's a >mere garnish. Salads at McDonald's are still McDonald's. Though, >thankfully, I've no cause to argue that the action IS only 'yours'. >:P > > >I once read somebody's mis-interp (what a surprise!) > >of this line on @forumz which I thought was rather > >amusing... Innocent then 12 year old or something > >thought it meant "so you can make me come (to church) > >- that doesn't make you Jesus." > >Maybe getting forced to go to church was a useful subject for that >12-year-old to hear someone singing about. They'd have worked out >other interpretations in time when they became more pertinent. >Different interpretations aren't always MISinterpretations. But as I >said (or implied), I like words/phrases/sentences that have more than >one meaning. If I didn't, I'd listen to Celine and be done with it. Oh my GOD Becc!! You are now my hero... thankyou for explaining this to our dearly obsessed Nathan. His infernal bagging of everything is really becoming nauseating. I agree with you 100% I always thought it was "Virgins always get backstabbed" - which makes more sense than "Virgins always get backstage". I don't analyse lyrics - I think it really ruins the experience - especially when you are getting to know a song. I pity your dry, obsessed, over-ANALytical treatement of Tori and music in general Nathan. Lyrics aren't always 100% correct in booklets, artists take liberties - which is why Tori is good. Do you even LIKE any of her live stuff?? Or do you demand that her live stuff has to match her recordings 100%. Thankyou Becc. >Becc :-) > >-- >www.crappism.org ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:40:24 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: [oztori] stalk like an moron At 10:08 AM 14/12/2003, Nathan =?UNKNOWN?B?rg==?= wrote: >Rebecca Appleton wrote: > > > That the biting knuckle thing isn't new. > >I *NEVER SAID* the biting knuckle thing was new! I >meant the "*looks to the side*". That *IS* >(relatively) new! You are so 1985. YES The song was from 1985. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:33:09 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: [oztori] hmm At 08:58 AM 14/12/2003, Nathan =?UNKNOWN?B?rg==?= wrote: >AndrewR wrote: > > > And where are DDP lyrics printed? > >In "The Bee Sides" sheet-music book... and presumably >also in the "Lyrics" book which I haven't bothered to >buy. > >??? you're obviously not musical then Andrew? ;) >(although I think you said you playe/d something? >"Playing that organ must count for something". If >not, make it your New Year's Resolution to take up an >instrument... and ask your folks for "The Bee Sides" >music book for Xmas!). Nathan, fuck off. One doesn't have to know every line of every song or every note of every song or possess every release of every artist to enjoy something. If I wanted to by those books I would have already friggin' just bought them. Now make some annoying Speech Pathology quip and shut up. Sheesh - ask a simple question. Sorry but you are REALLY becoming infuriating. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:29:13 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan "®" Subject: Re: [oztori] stalk like an moron AndrewR wrote: > At 10:08 AM 14/12/2003, Nathan =?UNKNOWN?B?rg==?= > wrote: > >Rebecca Appleton wrote: > > > > > That the biting knuckle thing isn't new. > > > >I *NEVER SAID* the biting knuckle thing was new! I > >meant the "*looks to the side*". That *IS* > >(relatively) new! > > You are so 1985. YES The song was from 1985. No, Walk Like An Egyptian is actually from 1986. Although it didn't reach #1 here until Feb 1987. Nathan. ===== "So what are your 'feelings' re last night? Wonder how Lal is feeling about it all? I went to Dr this morning for tetanus booster." - Jarrod, 15/3/03. "I pity your dry, obsessed, over-ANALytical treatement of Tori and music in general Nathan." - Andrew R, 14/12/03. "When did the loser get to be rich? What is a salesman with nothing to pitch? When did the fool get to be king? Why did you leave when they asked you to sing?" - - Moloko, 'Where Is The What If The What Is In Why' (1995). __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:42:10 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan "®" Subject: [oztori] 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445 9230781640628620899862803482534211706798214808651328230664709384460955 0582231725359408128481117450284102701938521105559644622948954930381964 4288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456485669234603486104 5432664821339360726024914127372458700660631558817488152092096282925409 1715364367892590360011330530548820466521384146951941511609433057270365 7595919530921861173819326117931051185480744623799627495673518857527248 9122793818301194912 AngryR wrote: > Nathan, fuck off. One doesn't have to know every > line of every song or > every note of every song or possess every release of > every artist to enjoy > something. If I wanted to by those books I would > have already friggin' just > bought them. Now make some annoying Speech Pathology > quip and shut up. > > Sheesh - ask a simple question. > > Sorry but you are REALLY becoming infuriating. "Ouch." > I don't > analyse lyrics - I think > it really ruins the experience - There's a difference between analysing lyrics & merely stating the correct ones. > I pity your dry, obsessed, over-ANALytical > treatement of Tori and > music in general Nathan. 'tis not my fault I have an over-active left cerebral hemisphere ;) > Do you even LIKE any of > her live stuff?? y. > Or do > you demand that her live stuff has to match her > recordings 100%. n. > Thankyou Becc. Thank + you = 2 words. > >GLTYB. > Now what the fuck does that supposed to stand for? "Good luck to you Becc." You can get pi accurate to 50,000 decimal places at http://www.cacr.caltech.edu/~roy/upi/pi.50000.html GLTYA. Nathan :) ===== "So what are your 'feelings' re last night? Wonder how Lal is feeling about it all? I went to Dr this morning for tetanus booster." - Jarrod, 15/3/03. "I pity your dry, obsessed, over-ANALytical treatement of Tori and music in general Nathan." - Andrew R, 14/12/03. "When did the loser get to be rich? What is a salesman with nothing to pitch? When did the fool get to be king? Why did you leave when they asked you to sing?" - - Moloko, 'Where Is The What If The What Is In Why' (1995). __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ End of oztori-digest V3 #296 ****************************