From: owner-oztori-digest@smoe.org (oztori-digest) To: oztori-digest@smoe.org Subject: oztori-digest V2 #101 Reply-To: oztori@smoe.org Sender: owner-oztori-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-oztori-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk oztori-digest Thursday, April 4 2002 Volume 02 : Number 101 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: [oztori] The Game's Afoot! [AndrewR ] Re: [oztori] The Game's Afoot! [AndrewR ] Re: [oztori] LE the album for 1991??? [AndrewR ] Re: [oztori] [ON topic!] ["li-sycophant" ] Re: [oztori] [ON topic!] [Jonceski Jasmina ] Re: [oztori] [ON topic!] [Nathan R ] Re: [oztori] hahahaha - we all agree here! [ON topic!] ["li-sycophant" ] [oztori] Little Drummer Bitch [Nathan R ] Re: [oztori] Little Drummer Bitch [AndrewR ] Re: [oztori] hahahaha - we all agree here! [ON topic!] ["riot poofter" ] Re: [oztori] The Game's Afoot! ["Pamela Collom" ] Re: [oztori] The Game's Afoot! ["nina riddel" ] Re[2]: [oztori] The Game's Afoot! [Daniel Hirning ] [oztori] [ot] brislotr ["nina riddel" ] Re: [oztori] hahahaha - we all agree here! [ON topic!] [AndrewR ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 18:46:36 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: [oztori] The Game's Afoot! At 10:03 3/04/2002 +1000, Double Serpent wrote: >~Bindy > >- who still can't believe Andrew didn't show on Friday to the meet he >organised! Slack arse! HEY! *I* didn't organise that 'meeting' at all... On Wed or Thurs I mentioned that the Two Towers preview was going to be on new reels of the LOTR:FOTR... Then I get on the net on Sunday Night/Monday see my phone in my car - and found that there had been a 'meeting'... so n'ya. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 18:48:11 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: [oztori] The Game's Afoot! At 10:07 3/04/2002 +1000, Pamela Collom wrote: >Yeah, I'll bribe someone to get a paper or something and we'll see times on >Sunday. The paper wont DEFINATELY say if that session will have the trailer/preview - - you'll have to ask/double check with the cinema - like ring or when you buy your ticket. Does anyone know if the new Star Wars trailer is showing ONLY with Ice Age? Andrew ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 18:50:49 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: [oztori] LE the album for 1991??? At 22:15 2/04/2002 -0800, Nathan R wrote: >Lavenda wrote: > >> You'll love this Nayth. How can it be the album to >> own for that year if it >> wasn't even out then??? >> >> http://thedent.com/cosmo0302.html > >LOL I saw that, and yes it did make my blood boil... >But, for once I thought I'd take a deep breath and >count to 10. > >(loses control) NOT HAPPY DAN!!! > Like that stupid Stuff magazine saying Enya was the what ever... most not needed album of 2001... it came out in like September 2000. Grrrrrr. > >I love how those airheads say LE was "the" album to >have in '91... which might hold true if you were a >lucky music journo who got an advance promo copy in >maybe December. > > >Typical bunch of airheads who know nothing about music >(& release dates, might I add ;) > > >File under K for Kingsmill. > LOL! Exactly. All these people were also Nirvana Fans waaaay before "Nevermind" or Smashing Pumpkins Fans WAAAAAY before "Siamese Dream". They'd probably even say - if they were old enough they were Quarrymen groupies. > >Nathan. > >. >Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax >http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 18:58:03 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: [oztori] [ON topic!] At 17:58 3/04/2002 +1000, Jonceski Jasmina wrote: >Nathan said: >NR> WHY could she not have instead agreed >NR> to: >NR> 1) allow them to release a 'greatest hits' in its >NR> place > >perhaps perhaps, i hate greatest hits albums they are just WRONG. How >can they be the artist's 'greatest hits' if they are still recording >tunes...it is just STUPID!!! (okay, that just pisses me off how they do >that....) > It's always funny when you see 'sections' in a music store for bands/artists that you've NEVER EVER heard of and all that 'section' has are 'best of's' ;o) >NR> 2) allowed them to re-release YKTR (it's not that bad >NR> Tori!) > >*cough* the fact that it isn't THAT bad in comparison to the crap that >was out then does not mean it is not shite (okay, we all know that the >majority of y'all have some shocking taste in 80's crap *ducks for >cover*). NO, no I reckon it should be re-released on the merit of ITSELF! Seriously. I've said it before, YKTR is a more enjoyable album than SLG... (except for a few SLG tracks - which as Nayth said I think should have made an EP not an Album). YKTR probably SUCKED at the time - but funly enough, I think it is quite good now. > It was a ridiculous attempt. If she were proud of that album >then we would know there was something SERIOUSLY wrong with the lady. I >can't believe she stooped sop low with it, neither cans he apparently >which is why she doesn't want to go back to it ;) > I think she should re-release it... it'd be more "Daring" to do so than the "Daringness" of SLG. > >NR> Would have been so *easy*, and she wouldn't have had >NR> to inflict SLuG on the world, tarnishing her record in >NR> the process. > >StrangeLittleGirls was not THAT bad. It has some *okay* tracks and some >shockers but ummm...so do the best of her releases > > I don't think... I think her 'best releases' are LE, UTP, BFP and More Pink single's disk... those four do not have ANY 'shockers'. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 19:00:16 +0930 From: "li-sycophant" Subject: Re: [oztori] [ON topic!] > I don't think... I think her 'best releases' are LE, UTP, BFP and More Pink > single's disk... those four do not have ANY 'shockers'. FTCH is so underrated. I don't think there are any 'shockers' on that album. I love it. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 19:07:55 +1000 From: Jonceski Jasmina Subject: Re: [oztori] [ON topic!] Andrew replied to me.... AR> It's always funny when you see 'sections' in a music store for AR> bands/artists that you've NEVER EVER heard of and all that AR> 'section' has AR> are 'best of's' ;o) in that case, 'best of's are okay. I mean they possibly the only think the person has released so must be their best :P AR> NO, no I reckon it should be re-released on the merit of ITSELF! AR> Seriously.I've said it before, YKTR is a more enjoyable album than AR> SLG... (except for AR> a few SLG tracks - which as Nayth said I think should have made an AR> EP not AR> an Album). AR> AR> YKTR probably SUCKED at the time - but funly enough, I think it is AR> quitegood now. No, I think at the time it could have been great if it wasn't so 'wannabe' of a lot of the *crap* out then. That is what prevented it from being anything great. AR> I think she should re-release it... it'd be more "Daring" to do so AR> than the AR> "Daringness" of SLG. Very true!!! But she isn't so daring is she. She is a flake (who makes some good music) (i can bitch about Tori a lot at the moment, I've come to realise a lot of things about her that if I said may offend many people, so shall shut up to keep the peace:)) AR> I don't think... I think her 'best releases' are LE, UTP, BFP and AR> More Pink AR> single's disk... those four do not have ANY 'shockers'. Oh come on, BFP has some absoltely appalLing tracks... and UTP just does not flow, and LE, is quite good I just HATE Leather (I detest it *cringes* at thought of song), and TVaB, well ummm....its easier to pick the really good tracks...but it is still a good album Then Li said: >FTCH is so underrated. I don't think there are any 'shockers' on that >album. I love it. Absolutely TRUE!!! From all the albums it is the only one which has no bad tunes on it. I adore every track on it (well, perhaps two of them don't get the same adoration as the rest but, they just aren't so good) Jas ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 01:11:09 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan R Subject: Re: [oztori] hahahaha - we all agree here! [ON topic!] Jasmina "folks are dumb where I come from (ie, Canberra - well namely Parliament House)" Jonceski wrote: > perhaps perhaps, i hate greatest hits albums they > are just WRONG. How > can they be the artist's 'greatest hits' if they are > still recording > tunes...it is just STUPID!!! (okay, that just pisses > me off how they do > that....) Well they're "Greatest Hits (so far)" really. > but releasing something decent would have been a > good thing for > Atlantic...and why do that if you are leaving? Well it may be less damage/'harm' on your career than releasing a 'shite' release such as SLuG. > StrangeLittleGirls was not THAT bad. It has some > *okay* tracks Yes agreed. Emphasis on 'some' (ie, not 'many' ;) Dylan "camp as a row of tents" Plant wrote: > Hello!!! This is moi we're talking about here honey, > I couldn't be str8 > if I tried...which I did once, with disatrous > results! Oh *dear*. Dylan, that was probably waaaaaaay more info than is tasteful on this list.... although we're now all desperate to hear the 'editor's cut' version in private e-mail ;) Andrew "Nathan can't think of anything to put into inverted commas about me at this point in time" R wrote: > I don't think... I think her 'best releases' are LE, > UTP, BFP and More Pink > single's disk... those four do not have ANY > 'shockers'. *cough*The Waitress*cough*Agent Orange*cough*Muhammad My Friend*cough*Little Amsterdam*cough*Talula*cough*China*cough*Hey Jupiter* (PS - thanks Roozi for the *cough* idea). Nathan. . Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 19:12:43 +1000 From: Jonceski Jasmina Subject: Re: [oztori] [ON topic!] > in that case, 'best of's are okay. I mean they possibly the only > think > the person has released so must be their best :P I'm a shocker....I need to start making sense. I can't ever remember what the sentence was supposed to read... But let me try again: in that case, 'best of's are okay. I mean they are possibly the only songs the person has released so it must be their best :P That shall do :) Jas ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 01:14:21 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan R Subject: Re: [oztori] [ON topic!] li-sycophant wrote: > FTCH is so underrated. I don't think there are any > 'shockers' on that album. > I love it. *cough*Liquid Diamonds*cough*Northern Lad*cough*Pandora's Aquarium. Though 9/12 good'unz ain't bad. Probably a higher ratio than Boys For Pele, Venus, and SLuG. And musically it's less stale than LE IMNSHO. Nathan. . Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 01:20:50 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan R Subject: Re: [oztori] [ON topic!] Jonceski Jasmina wrote: > in that case, 'best of's are okay. I mean they > possibly the only think > the person has released so must be their best :P Well in that case, 'Y Kant Tori Read' is really a best of ;) They should re-package it as "The Best of Y Kant Tori Read", and add some 'new' bonus-tracks: 'Looking For Eldorado' and 'Car Full of Boys'... and release them as singles to promote the album! LOL. The video-clips to them can be made up of a montage of shots from the 'The Big Picture' clip. > No, I think at the time it could have been great if > it wasn't > so 'wannabe' of a lot of the *crap* out then. That > is what prevented it > from being anything great. Childe, you weren't old enough to appreciate the true muzak briliance of the late 80's. You think music is Lincoln (sp?) Park, Limp Bizkit. etc. (OK sadly the neighbours were playing Linkin Park this arvo and it wasn't that bad.. heeheh). There was no glitz n' glamour in 90's music. "Pop" turned into manufactured groups & puppetz by then. > (i can bitch about Tori a lot at > the moment, I've come > to realise a lot of things about her that if I said > may offend many > people, so shall shut up to keep the peace:)) Hehehe you're all turning into ME! > Oh come on, BFP has some absoltely appalLing > tracks... Yes agreed. Some of it is great (mainly the first 7 songs), and some of it is zzzzzzzzzworthy. It's rather over-rated, I think, by her fan-base. > and UTP just > does not flow, I think UTP is possibly her most under-rated work. I love it all ('cept The Waitress). The strings.. the piano.. it was well-produced. > and LE, is quite good I just HATE > Leather Oh but it looks so thexthy on you ;) > (I detest it > *cringes* at thought of song), and TVaB, well > ummm....its easier to > pick the really good tracks...but it is still a good > album Yeah minus the live disc, 1000 Oceans, and GOT80's. > Then Li said: > >FTCH is so underrated. I don't think there are any > 'shockers' on that > >album. I love it. > > Absolutely TRUE!!! From all the albums it is the > only one which has no > bad tunes on it. There are none I totally DETEST on FTCH. Just a coupla sleepy tunes, which I already *cough*-mentioned in my reply to li. Nafan. . Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 21:12:49 +0930 From: "li-sycophant" Subject: Re: [oztori] hahahaha - we all agree here! [ON topic!] Someone blabbed: > Well it may be less damage/'harm' on your career than > releasing a 'shite' release such as SLuG. Oh please, as if it is going to do ANYTHING to her career. Her career isn't based on sales, Nath. Its based on psycho fans who absolutely love her regardless. > > Hello!!! This is moi we're talking about here honey, > > I couldn't be str8 > > if I tried...which I did once, with disatrous > > results! > > Oh *dear*. Dylan, that was probably waaaaaaay more > info than is tasteful on this list.... although we're > now all desperate to hear the 'editor's cut' version > in private e-mail ;) Yeah I'll second that. Private email with details please!! > *cough*The Waitress*cough*Agent Orange*cough*Muhammad > My Friend*cough*Little > Amsterdam*cough*Talula*cough*China*cough*Hey Jupiter* !!!! SACRILEGE!!! !!!! Especially in regard to the waitress, muhammad my friend, and hey jupiter. They are classic tracks. They're just above you. > (PS - thanks Roozi for the *cough* idea). Yeah. Nathan missed out on the juvenility of the *cough* idea during his teenage years because he was too busy on IRC. /li [impersonatingennuiandannoyingnathanandannoyingnathanandannoyingnathanetcete ra] ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 03:22:36 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan R Subject: Re: [oztori] hahahaha - we all agree here! [ON topic!] li-psychopath wrote: > Someone blabbed: > > > Well it may be less damage/'harm' on your career > than > > releasing a 'shite' release such as SLuG. > > Oh please, as if it is going to do ANYTHING to her > career. Her career isn't > based on sales, Nath. Its based on psycho fans who > absolutely love her > regardless. Well 'they' can only love her unconditionally to a point. I'm afraid SLuG tests the boundaries of that ;) > > > Hello!!! This is moi we're talking about here > honey, > > > I couldn't be str8 > > > if I tried...which I did once, with disatrous > > > results! > > > > Oh *dear*. Dylan, that was probably waaaaaaay > more > > info than is tasteful on this list.... although > we're > > now all desperate to hear the 'editor's cut' > version > > in private e-mail ;) > > Yeah I'll second that. Private email with details > please!! Hahaha.. I think we need a spin-off of this mailing list: [ozjuicygossiptoonaughtytopostonthemainlist] > SACRILEGE!!! > > !!!! > > Especially in regard to the waitress, muhammad my > friend, and hey jupiter. > They are classic tracks. They're just above you. *yawn* Here's 40 cents - tell someone who cares ;) > Yeah. Nathan missed out on the juvenility of the > *cough* idea during his > teenage years because he was too busy on IRC. LMAO! Wrong honey - I first experienced the 'joys' of IRC at 19. Which I guess is kinda teens. Um you might have a point :P Nathan. . Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 21:45:58 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: [oztori] [ON topic!] At 19:00 3/04/2002 +0930, li-sycophant wrote: >> I don't think... I think her 'best releases' are LE, UTP, BFP and More >Pink >> single's disk... those four do not have ANY 'shockers'. > > >FTCH is so underrated. I don't think there are any 'shockers' on that album. >I love it. > *cough* Liquid Diamonds... She's Your Cocaine... *cough* What really annoys me with FTCH and TVAB is the over-use of drums. I've said this before but Josephine, Lust, Purple People etc. is SO much better without the intrusive drumming. (See the Musique plus recordings - just Tori and a Piano... I've got them on mp3 - except for the ?interview bits? Andrew ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 05:13:14 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan R Subject: [oztori] Little Drummer Bitch AndrewR wrote: > *cough* Liquid Diamonds... She's Your Cocaine... > *cough* Bleh. I actually like SYC (yes, I know I'm probably in the minority). With you on LD though ;) > What really annoys me with FTCH and TVAB is the > over-use of drums. I've > said this before but Josephine, Lust, Purple People > etc. is SO much better > without the intrusive drumming. Yes Purple People is great live with just the piano.. 'though I do like the studio version (but the live one on TVAB is pointless). Don't mind the drums on Lust - they're a bit different at least. The drums on Josephine are a tad pointless. Maybe Tori should do a 'drums & vocal only' album to piss us all off ;) Nathan. . Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 00:07:53 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: [oztori] Little Drummer Bitch At 05:13 3/04/2002 -0800, Nathan R wrote: >AndrewR wrote: LOL @ title subject. >Maybe Tori should do a 'drums & vocal only' album to >piss us all off ;) OMG! *TOTALLY CRINGED* LOL! Yeah, I can see the setlist Beauty Queen/Horse M&AG Yes, Anastasia Over It Thoughts Winter Famous Blue Raincoat Father Lucifer Datura Little Earthquakes Merman Cooling Butterfly Silent All These Years Encore: Josephine Purple People Sister Named Desire ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 00:19:11 +1000 From: "riot poofter" Subject: Re: [oztori] hahahaha - we all agree here! [ON topic!] >Bastards bagging Enya... just because she sold umpteen million records in >the past year... PLUS its clear they are trying to bag her to 'sound cool' >or 'alternative' - considering A Day Without Rain came out in 2000. maybe its beacuse enya is twee fucking crap?? i mean, how does anyone hold back teh vomit when they hear shockers like "only time"... september 11... boo bloody hoo! _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 00:27:58 +1000 From: Rebecca Appleton Subject: Re[2]: [oztori] Little Drummer Bitch On 4/04/2002, at 12:07 AM, AndrewR wrote: A> Yeah, I can see the setlist A> Beauty Queen/Horse Only one horse? A> M&AG Wouldn't sound any different... A> Yes, Anastasia A> Over It 'Over It' on solo drums... heh heh! Then on 4/04/2002, at 12:19 AM, roozi wrote: >>Bastards bagging Enya... just because she sold umpteen million records in >>the past year... PLUS its clear they are trying to bag her to 'sound cool' >>or 'alternative' - considering A Day Without Rain came out in 2000. rp> maybe its beacuse enya is twee fucking crap?? I quite like Enya stuff if I'm in the right mood for it. I don't tend to get that, "Ooh, I'd really like to listen to Enya!" feeling very often at all, but when I hear her I'm not at all offended. BUT, I do think I understand why it was voted "most unnecessary". I don't think the vote was meant in a derogatory sense, but more as saying, c'mon, all Enya music is the same. Another album may be nice and all, and it's not going to make may people hiss, "Oh, that bloody Enya woman! She really irks me!" but it IS, in a sense, unnecessary. That's how I took it, anyway. ~Becc :) - -- www.crappism.org/blog ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 07:38:51 +1000 From: Daniel G Subject: [oztori] forwarded message "*ahem*" for some reason this message from ennui bounced: "everyone got a bought of influenza brought on by a miserable, grumpy old Nathan// I'm sorry, I think I'm in the wrong room. Could someone please direct me to the Tori Amos appreciation society? ennui [ barbarian ]" ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:34:38 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan R Subject: Re: [oztori] forwarded message "*ahem*" 'ennui' wrote via Dan G proxy: (Dan G): > for some reason this message from ennui bounced: LOL I think it's OBVIOUS why it bounced... 'Cuz it doesn't match the stringent "quality" standards we have for e-mails to be published on this list :) ('ennui'): > "everyone got a bought of influenza Think you mean bout. > brought on by > a miserable, grumpy old Nathan// > I'm sorry, I think I'm in the wrong room. Could > someone > please direct me to the Tori Amos appreciation > society? > ennui [ barbarian ]" That society discintigrated, ennui [wow it just struck me your 'nick' looks like 'eminem' kinda] - following the realisation that 'SLuG' was not worthy of any 'appreciation'. Nathan. . Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 09:46:09 +0930 From: "li-sycophant" Subject: Re: [oztori] forwarded message "*ahem*" Nathan blabbed: > That society discintigrated I suppose that was you being "ironic" again. riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhttttttt ttttt. Sorry about the three liner. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:46:37 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan R Subject: Re: Re[2]: [oztori] Little Drummer Bitch Rebecca Appleton wrote: > On 4/04/2002, at 12:07 AM, AndrewR wrote: > > A> Yeah, I can see the setlist > > A> Beauty Queen/Horse > > Only one horse? LMAO. "I got me a horse to ride on, to ride on" > A> M&AG Hehehe.. It just struck me that "M&AG" looks suspiciously like "M&G"... "Meet and a Greet" anyone?? :P (Tori): "Was meet and a greet And 10 000 psychos on my back I've forgotten how to make decent records Still I can't get out of this Yes I played a 9 foot Bose Does that mean I should sing? Baltimore, The Big Picture Skirts On Fire, anything?" > 'Over It' on solo drums... heh heh! Hahaha. Yeah Tori could go 'sick' on the drums or something. Nathan. . Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:48:48 -0800 (PST) From: Nathan R Subject: Re: [oztori] forwarded message "*ahem*" li-sycophant wrote: > Sorry about the three liner. 'twas actually 10 lines including spaces :P Nathan. . Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 14:44:25 +1000 From: Daniel G Subject: [oztori] the breeders [ot] hey all i got the new breeders EP today (ltd ed 10" vinyl only...190gm pressing...shiny metallic sleeve...i mean...even if it WASN'T a band i love...limited edition vinyl! shiny!! hello!!! and a TAD to boot!!! if you want an explanation of TAD just ask i can't be bothered going into it now). its three album tracks, so nothing "exclusive" on it but...oh my god! its fantastic!!!! if the whole album is as good as these three songs ("off you", "little fury" and "the she") it may just rival "last splash" as best album. hell, it probably is already. i'm all excited now! whee! www.4ad.com and go to the breeders page you can listen to (surprisingly good quality) real audio streams of a few songs. if you're quick, the 4AD shop may still have a few copies of the EP too. its only four pounds + three pounds postage. xoxo dan ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 15:19:57 +1000 From: "Pamela Collom" Subject: Re: [oztori] The Game's Afoot! Well, this meet will probably continue in the fashion of others and double the time spent. 20 hours on Sunday anyone? Heh. Have fun you guys. Pam >From: "Double Serpent" >To: aeon16@hotmail.com >Subject: Re: [oztori] The Game's Afoot! >Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 14:04:58 +1000 > >>OZTORI BRISSY PEOPLES: >> >>>Here's the proposal. Meet Sunday, 10 am at fatbois ( think you can all do >>>it?) for dinner/breakfast ( heehee!) and then lotr after that. >Good? >> >>Not too good at all. Gonna be at the Coast. Won't be back in time and >>still not going to see LOTR again. Might be there a little later, like >>after 3pm, but that is not guaranteed. > > >Also, Pam, Zac will be down the coast with me and I'm his transport, so >he's going to have the same excuse. We got given a free stay at Jupiters >Casino. It's been planned for a while and we certainly weren't going to >refuse that! We might, as I said, make a detour (it took me 3 attempts to >type that word and it still doesn't look right) to Fatboys for REAL coffee >when we come back. Might be a bit late to catch all you guys but we can >always try. No promises though. > > >~Bindy > My Livejournal! :- www.livejournal.com/~aeon16 "We've met before, haven't we?" Robert Blake - Lost Highway "I was a teenage werewolf. With braces on my fangs" The Cramps _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 15:34:05 +1000 From: "nina riddel" Subject: Re: [oztori] The Game's Afoot! >Does anyone know if the new Star Wars trailer is showing ONLY with Ice Age? > >Andrew I don't get this because I saw a tralier for Star Wars before Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings! That was months ago! Anyone know when it comes out? http://www.angelfire.com/journal2/n26 _________________________________________________________________ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 16:11:19 +1000 From: Daniel Hirning Subject: Re[2]: [oztori] The Game's Afoot! Thursday, April 4, 2002, 3:34:05 PM, nina wrote: nr> I don't get this because I saw a tralier for Star Wars before nr> Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings! That was months ago! no you didn't. The trainer is at least at first ONLY for ice age, fox are using it as a sort of ploy to get people to see Ice Age. (perhaps you saw a very very brief preview of something of star wars, but you definitely didn't see THE official trailer.) apparently fox have something to try and prove with the success of Ice Age. - -- dan. - dan@danhirning.com - http://www.danhirning.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 17:52:45 +1000 From: "nina riddel" Subject: [oztori] [ot] brislotr the only sessions of lotr on sunday are 12:30pm at chermside/indro and 12:20pm at balmoral. I think it's just becc, pam and i, but i'm sending it to the list (sorry) in case anyone else hasn't spoken but wants to come. So meeting at fatbois at 10am, then i guess we'll work out where we're going and get a bus? there's nothing on in the city :( http://www.angelfire.com/journal2/n26 _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 18:05:26 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: [oztori] hahahaha - we all agree here! [ON topic!] At 00:19 4/04/2002 +1000, riot poofter wrote: >>Bastards bagging Enya... just because she sold umpteen million records in >>the past year... PLUS its clear they are trying to bag her to 'sound cool' >>or 'alternative' - considering A Day Without Rain came out in 2000. > >maybe its beacuse enya is twee fucking crap?? > in your opinion. >i mean, how does anyone hold back teh vomit when they hear shockers like >"only time"... september 11... boo bloody hoo! That wasn't her - that was some stupid newsstation, they put her music to the events of sep 11. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 18:08:55 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: Re[2]: [oztori] Little Drummer Bitch At 00:27 4/04/2002 +1000, Rebecca Appleton wrote: >On 4/04/2002, at 12:07 AM, AndrewR wrote: > >A> Yeah, I can see the setlist > >A> Beauty Queen/Horse > >Only one horse? > LOL! >A> M&AG > >Wouldn't sound any different... > heh, with vocals and crash symbols only ;o) >A> Yes, Anastasia >A> Over It > > >'Over It' on solo drums... heh heh! > >Then on 4/04/2002, at 12:19 AM, roozi wrote: > >>>Bastards bagging Enya... just because she sold umpteen million records in >>>the past year... PLUS its clear they are trying to bag her to 'sound cool' >>>or 'alternative' - considering A Day Without Rain came out in 2000. > >rp> maybe its beacuse enya is twee fucking crap?? > >I quite like Enya stuff if I'm in the right mood for it. I don't tend to >get that, "Ooh, I'd really like to listen to Enya!" feeling very often >at all, but when I hear her I'm not at all offended. BUT, I do think >I understand why it was voted "most unnecessary". I don't think the >vote was meant in a derogatory sense, but more as saying, c'mon, all Enya >music is the same. Another album may be nice and all, and it's not >going to make may people hiss, "Oh, that bloody Enya woman! She >really irks me!" but it IS, in a sense, unnecessary. > Ahhhh, but does all music have to 'irk' people? >That's how I took it, anyway. > >~Becc :) > > >-- >www.crappism.org/blog ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 18:12:44 +1000 From: AndrewR Subject: Re: [oztori] The Game's Afoot! At 15:34 4/04/2002 +1000, nina riddel wrote: >>Does anyone know if the new Star Wars trailer is showing ONLY with Ice Age? >> >>Andrew > >I don't get this because I saw a tralier for Star Wars before Harry Potter >and Lord of the Rings! That was months ago! > >Anyone know when it comes out? No, no the new proper long trailer, it only came out a few weeks ago... I had lots of jedi fighting etc. etc. I saw about 2 seconds of it on seven news I think - I had accidently over taped something and was rewinding when I caught that little bit. ------------------------------ End of oztori-digest V2 #101 ****************************