From: owner-oztori-digest@smoe.org (oztori-digest) To: oztori-digest@smoe.org Subject: oztori-digest V2 #6 Reply-To: oztori@smoe.org Sender: owner-oztori-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-oztori-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk oztori-digest Sunday, January 6 2002 Volume 02 : Number 006 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: [oztori] OT: Siren Lyrics - [AndrewR ] Re: [oztori] [ozYOU SUCK] [Zac Ariel ] [oztori] Fwd: Sarah McLachlan January 2002 update... [Dan Stapleton Subject: Re: [oztori] OT: Siren Lyrics - At 15:11 4/01/2002 EST, Mysterilady2001@cs.com wrote: >In a message dated 1/4/02 4:27:17 AM Pacific Standard Time, >nathanisoncrack@yahoo.com writes: > FINN, its calming. Riley Finn on the otherhand, is BLOODY annoying. > >~ Tessa > >*** ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 04:16:47 +1000 From: Zac Ariel Subject: Re: [oztori] [ozYOU SUCK] Saturday, January 05, 2002, 9:49:22 AM, Dan muttered: DS> zac "i'd rather talk about computers" ariel wrote: no, i wouldn't. computers bore the crap outta me. requoting me, to reference: >>people, so far as i'm aware, oztori isn't a dick >>swinging contest. speaking for myself, i really don't >>care to know (and i know, i know, if i don't care to >>read, just delete) .. but really. it's starting to take >>off-topic beyond a joke. >> >>mr. dan stapleton, will you kindly just go and fuck >>someone? i'm sick of hearing about your supposed manlihood. dan then replied: DS> why the fuck am i the only one to be shouted at for DS> this? if everyone (and that is EVERYONE) stopped DS> making fun of my age for ONE SECOND, then maybe i DS> wouldn't have to retaliate. that aside, dylan's and DS> nathan's sexual banter is just as explicit and DS> nauseating as mine - why did they not get attacked for DS> this? dan, take a look at what i wrote. yes, i mean beyond the last paragraph. you'll note that it was a _general_ comment, aimed at several people. you included. the reason i then lambasted (god, i love that word) you personally is primarily that your e-mail was "the one that broke the horses back", and secondarily that you have been making a habit of putting sexual innuendo in to pretty much each and every post you make. and you don't have to retaliate. the choice to hit the reply button is yours entirely. furthermore, i am *not* suggesting that you are any better or worse than nathan or dylan. oh, and kindly point out exactly where in my last e-mail that i made an age reference. essentially, prove to me i have done wrong and i'll think about apologising. but not before. innocent until proven otherwise and all that. DS> how can certain list members (and owners) mock my age i didn't. DS> and lack of experience (supposedly) in the same breath i did? where? DS> that they chastise the list for being too "sexual" or DS> "off-topic"? DS> l'il dan DS> ~ dan, it's signatures like that and "retaliations" like that which are why you get the age comments. to put it nicely, grow up. (note the token age reference, although this time it's directed at mental age rather than physical age.) if you want to discuss this further, i suggest you e-mail me off-list. it's up to you. zac ================================================== zac ariel - web junkie m: 0414 229 299 e: zac@comcen.com.au w: www.level21.net ================================================== ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 17:20:45 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Stapleton Subject: [oztori] Fwd: Sarah McLachlan January 2002 update... - --- Nettwerk Communications wrote: > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:14:21 -0800 > To: Recipient List Suppressed:; > From: Nettwerk Communications > Subject: Sarah McLachlan January 2002 update... > > Hello everyone, and Happy New Year! > > For those of you who missed it, a recent JAM!Showbiz > article had > Sarah's manager, Terry McBride, give us an update on > the status of > her new album, and other info related to Sarah. > > Go here to read it: > http://www.canoe.ca/JamMusicSarahMcLachlan/dec18_sarah-can.html > > In TV news, you can see Sarah, Sheryl Crow, Jewel > and the Indigo > Girls in the previously aired concert special, > 'Sarah McLachlan & > Friends' on the Women's Entertainment Channel > (http://www.we-womensentertainment.com/) on *Friday, > January 11th* at > 10pm EST and on *Saturday, January 12th* at 3am EST. > > Also on *Saturday, January 12th* is another repeat > of Sarah > performing on Trio TV (http://www.triotv.com/) at > 4pm EST. > > And finally, as in previous years, we always like to > mention new > female artists (as we often did with Lilith Fair) > and as we have a > new female artist that will be releasing her debut > album in 2002, > we'd like to offer you a FREE MP3 of one of her > songs to download at > this location: http://www.nightlightmusic.com/ > > Tell us what you think! Share the MP3 with friends! > > For the moment, we're keeping mum on the identity of > this artist, but > more details will be revealed over the coming weeks, > including > details on a remix contest, so stay tuned! > > thanks for reading... > > > > > Armand S. > Internet Services/ > Management Communications > Nettwerk Productions > info@nettwerk.com > http://www.nettwerk.com > > > ***************************************************************************** > > Visit the official Sarah McLachlan web site: > http://www.sarahmclachlan.com > > To UNSUBSCRIBE from our email lists, please go to: > http://www.nettweb.com/lists/index.html ===== So then I thought I'd make some plans But fire thought she'd really rather be water instead. - -Tori Amos Blissful Bubbles of Poetry: http://learthquakes.proboards.com/ Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ ------------------------------ End of oztori-digest V2 #6 **************************