From: owner-oppositeview-digest@smoe.org (oppositeview-digest) To: oppositeview-digest@smoe.org Subject: oppositeview-digest V5 #153 Reply-To: oppositeview@smoe.org Sender: owner-oppositeview-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-oppositeview-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk oppositeview-digest Saturday, November 8 2003 Volume 05 : Number 153 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: OV: Leah vs. Lea [doug brown ] Re: OV: Leah vs. Lea ["scott wallace" ] Re: OV: Leah vs. Lea ["Rachel Wifall" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 06:51:24 -0800 (PST) From: doug brown Subject: Re: OV: Leah vs. Lea I would like to point out that for once I had nothing to do with this! Go Doug! :) nancieh@aol.com wrote:Administritiva please? I have been on this list for many years (1998?), and I can honestly say that this is the only time I wanted to unsubscribe.. - -Doug ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 18:52:59 +0000 From: "scott wallace" Subject: Re: OV: Leah vs. Lea There's more bollocks, as you so nicely put it, on the sites. So really you're stuck with it. But chill. So you had to read a couple more messages than normal, no reason to leave. S >From: nancieh@aol.com >To: A.Yap@isu.usyd.edu.au >CC: oppositeview@smoe.org >Subject: Re: OV: Leah vs. Lea >Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 20:44:19 -0500 > >I was merely asking for some consideration because I don't want to have to read non Dels related posts. My mistake, I thought I remembered this being a long established rule. So I don't want to read that, so what? > >In the future, I will stick to the sites for my information. Carry on with the bollocks. > > >In a message dated 11/6/2003 8:09:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, A.Yap@isu.usyd.edu.au writes: > > > > > > > While i don't mean to single Nancy out,i can't believe how sensitive some > > of you are. So someone shot their mouth off, and got a bit of a bollocking > > for it. I mean, so what? > > > > This from Del fans, who should be masters of the snappy, sharp and > > bittersweet comeback. > > > > Come on, guys... > > > > ALPHA > > > > > > - > > > > "I think not being born is ecologically responsible." > > - Alice, 'The quick & the dead' > > > > http://rant.iced-dodo.com > > > > On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 nancieh@aol.com wrote: > > > > > Administritiva please? > > > > > > I have been on this list for many years (1998?), and I can honestly > > > say that this is the only time I wanted to unsubscribe.. but this is > > > my only avenue for DA news. Please don't take this away from me, so > > > if you are only going to be posting rudeness or name calling please > > > put OT in the subject line so those of us who are only > > subscribed for > > > news can skip those posts. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Nancy - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thinking of changing jobs? Click here to search through thousands of vacancies. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 13:59:00 -0500 From: "Rachel Wifall" Subject: Re: OV: Leah vs. Lea Wow--this is so exciting I don't know what to do with myself! There's been more going on on OV in the last couple of weeks than there's been in God-knows-how-long. It was productive at first, but now that it's turned to bollocks, I'm finding it quite entertaining! ;-) RW >From: "scott wallace" >To: nancieh@aol.com, A.Yap@isu.usyd.edu.au >CC: oppositeview@smoe.org >Subject: Re: OV: Leah vs. Lea >Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 18:52:59 +0000 > >There's more bollocks, as you so nicely put it, on the sites. So really >you're stuck with it. But chill. So you had to read a couple more >messages than normal, no reason to leave. > >S > > >From: nancieh@aol.com >To: A.Yap@isu.usyd.edu.au >CC: >oppositeview@smoe.org >Subject: Re: OV: Leah vs. Lea >Date: Thu, 06 Nov >2003 20:44:19 -0500 > >I was merely asking for some consideration because >I don't want to have to read non Dels related posts. My mistake, I >thought I remembered this being a long established rule. So I don't want >to read that, so what? > >In the future, I will stick to the sites for my >information. Carry on with the bollocks. > > >In a message dated >11/6/2003 8:09:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, A.Yap@isu.usyd.edu.au writes: > > > > > > > > While i don't mean to single Nancy out,i can't believe how >sensitive some > > of you are. So someone shot their mouth off, and got a >bit of a bollocking > > for it. I mean, so what? > > > > This from Del >fans, who should be masters of the snappy, sharp and > > bittersweet >comeback. > > > > Come on, guys... > > > > ALPHA > > > > > > - > > > > "I >think not being born is ecologically responsible." > > - Alice, 'The >quick & the dead' > > > > http://rant.iced-dodo.com > > > > On Thu, 6 Nov >2003 nancieh@aol.com wrote: > > > > > Administritiva please? > > > > > > >I have been on this list for many years (1998?), and I can honestly > > > >say that this is the only time I wanted to unsubscribe.. but this is > > > > my only avenue for DA news. Please don't take this away from me, so > > > > if you are only going to be posting rudeness or name calling please > > > > put OT in the subject line so those of us who are only > > subscribed >for > > > news can skip those posts. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > >Nancy > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >Thinking of changing jobs? Click here to search through thousands of >vacancies. _________________________________________________________________ Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $26.95. https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.) ------------------------------ End of oppositeview-digest V5 #153 **********************************