From: owner-onlyjoni-digest@smoe.org (onlyJMDL Digest) To: onlyjoni-digest@smoe.org Subject: onlyJMDL Digest V2014 #193 Reply-To: joni@smoe.org Sender: owner-onlyjoni-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-onlyjoni-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk Website:http://www.jonimitchell.com Unsubscribe:mailto:onlyjoni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe onlyJMDL Digest Wednesday, June 4 2014 Volume 2014 : Number 193 ========== TOPICS and authors in this Digest: -------- =?UTF-8?Q?New_Library_item:_Joni_Mitchell:_=E2=80=98Pr?= =?UTF-8?Q?eaching_Platitudes_to_the_Converted=E2=80=99?= [] RE: JMDL Digest V2014 #802 [Ingrid Lochrenberg ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:51:46 -0600 (MDT) From: TheStaff@JoniMitchell.com Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?New_Library_item:_Joni_Mitchell:_=E2=80=98Pr?= =?UTF-8?Q?eaching_Platitudes_to_the_Converted=E2=80=99?= Title: Joni Mitchell: bPreaching Platitudes to the Convertedb Publication: New York Herald Tribune Date: 1970.1.19 http://jonimitchell.com/library/view.cfm?id=2793 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 21:09:18 +0200 From: Ingrid Lochrenberg Subject: RE: JMDL Digest V2014 #802 There are many contradictions showing up in the 'fact's around Joni's daughter, specifically where the dates are concerned.....I wouldn't say that joni discovered that she was thee months pregnant in autumn and that she could then give birth in February already..... I suspect that Joni's lyrics refer to a far different reality (for her) than what comes across on the surface. Thinking of all the romantic references... > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:55:07 -0400 > From: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org > To: joni-digest@smoe.org > Subject: JMDL Digest V2014 #802 > > > JMDL Digest Tuesday, June 3 2014 Volume 2014 : Number 802 > > > > ========== > > TOPICS and authors in this Digest: > -------- > =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IE5ldyBMaWJyYXJ5IGl0ZW06IEpvbmkgTWl0Y2hlbGw6IOKAm A==?= =?UTF-8?B?UHJlYWNoaW5nIFBsYXRpdHVkZXMgdG8gdGhlIENvbnZlcnRlZOKAmQ==?= [] > Joni' daughter [Ingrid Lochrenberg ] > =?UTF-8?Q?New_Library_item:_Joni_Mitchell:_=E2=80=98Pr?= =?UTF-8?Q?eaching_Platitudes_to_the_Converted=E2=80=99?= [] > Re: Joni' daughter ["johnnybgoode@lineone.net" ] > my new CD available soon (NJC) [Anne Sandstrom ] > Re: IFTKOMS and C&S vs. HOSL ["Susan E. McNamara" ] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:12:30 -0400 > From: Bob.Muller@Fluor.com > Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IE5ldyBMaWJyYXJ5IGl0ZW06IEpvbmkgTWl0Y2hlbGw6IOKAm A==?= =?UTF-8?B?UHJlYWNoaW5nIFBsYXRpdHVkZXMgdG8gdGhlIENvbnZlcnRlZOKAmQ==?= > > LOL, methinks the reviewer was a bit too highbrow for this show. > > Bob > > NP: Joe Henry, "Swayed" > > > > From: TheStaff@JoniMitchell.com > To: joni@smoe.org, > Date: 06/03/2014 10:56 AM > Subject: New Library item: Joni Mitchell: ?Preaching Platitudes to > the Converted? > Sent by: owner-joni@smoe.org > > > > Title: Joni Mitchell: bPreaching Platitudes to the Convertedb > Publication: New York Herald Tribune > Date: 1970.1.19 > > http://jonimitchell.com/library/view.cfm?id=2793 > > - ------------------------------------------------------------ > The information transmitted is intended only for the person > or entity to which it is addressed and may contain > proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. > If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are > hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, > distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon > this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please > contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual > sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. > - ------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:19:20 +0200 > From: Ingrid Lochrenberg > Subject: Joni' daughter > > She has said that her birthday is on the 19th of February and that there were > no photographs of her before the age of 8 months, supposing there were some > since then. She has also said that Joni gave her daughter up for adoption in > 1965 at that age, so this rules out a birth on the 19th Febuary 1964. She was > born in Toronto. On the 19th February 1965 the moon was nowhere near Cancer. > > Perhaps Kilauren took some birthday given to her by her adoptive parents? Or > perhaps Joni got sick and tired of being contacted by all and sundry claiming > and wanting to be her daughter, and then made an arrangement with Kilauren, > who had been a model, to pose as her daughter so that she could continue her > search in private. > > I suppose this sounds slightly disrespectful, but it is worth taking note of: > no moon in Cancer on Kilauren's birthday. Or perhaps the moon was new when > Kilauren was born in June of the preceding year , 8 months prior to > February, so that she was born with the moon (the new moon) , in Cancer, since > there ? "Moons, and Junes, and ....." > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:51:46 -0600 (MDT) > From: TheStaff@JoniMitchell.com > Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?New_Library_item:_Joni_Mitchell:_=E2=80=98Pr?= =?UTF-8?Q?eaching_Platitudes_to_the_Converted=E2=80=99?= > > Title: Joni Mitchell: bPreaching Platitudes to the Convertedb > Publication: New York Herald Tribune > Date: 1970.1.19 > > http://jonimitchell.com/library/view.cfm?id=2793 > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 19:53:09 +0100 (BST) > From: "johnnybgoode@lineone.net" > Subject: Re: Joni' daughter > > Ingrid, > > > It may well be that the lyrics to Little Green contain some > poetic licence. A tragic story for both of them. The alternative > birthday sounds credible though, but why bother, as any assessment of > child development could be skewed. An interesting point to consider > though definitely. > > The idea of having an actor to play people in her > personal life has set off my imagination though, in a surreal way. Many > of her boyfriends could have been replaced with actors without > addictions, or more prosiac bad habits. Against this the classic songs > would have had less angst. The cost of hiring them would have been > cheaper than the drug habits of the originals by far:-) > > John > > >---- > Original Message---- > >From: low-tide@outlook.com > >Date: 03/06/2014 15: > 19 > >To: "joni@smoe.org" > >Subj: Joni' daughter > > > >She > has said that her birthday is on the 19th of February and that there > were > >no photographs of her before the age of 8 months, supposing there > were some > >since then. She has also said that Joni gave her daughter up > for adoption in > >1965 at that age, so this rules out a birth on the > 19th Febuary 1964. She was > >born in Toronto. On the 19th February 1965 > the moon was nowhere near Cancer. > > > >Perhaps Kilauren took some > birthday given to her by her adoptive parents? Or > >perhaps Joni got > sick and tired of being contacted by all and sundry claiming > >and > wanting to be her daughter, and then made an arrangement with Kilauren, > > >who had been a model, to pose as her daughter so that she could > continue her > >search in private. > > > >I suppose this sounds slightly > disrespectful, but it is worth taking note of: > >no moon in Cancer on > Kilauren's birthday. Or perhaps the moon was new when > >Kilauren was > born in June of the preceding year , 8 months prior to > >February, so > that she was born with the moon (the new moon) , in Cancer, since > > >there ? "Moons, and Junes, and ....." > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:51:15 +0000 (UTC) > From: Anne Sandstrom > Subject: my new CD available soon (NJC) > > At long last, my CD "Monochrome" will be available soon. It should be on > cdbaby this week. In the meantime, you can hear clips on my web site at > www.annesandstrom.com. Oh, and I know I said NJC, but notice what famous > street the cover photo was taken on... lots of love,Anne > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 20:57:31 +0000 > From: "Susan E. McNamara" > Subject: Re: IFTKOMS and C&S vs. HOSL > > Yes Garret, I agree with you about MOA ... Actually I said Rainy Night House thinking of the MOA version although I guess I made it sound like it was on FTR ... Ever since I heard Mutts of the Planet do RNH with the MOA arrangement I prefer that version ... Plus it does give the song the feel that it could have been off C&S! :-) > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 29, 2014, at 3:24 PM, "Garret" wrote: > > > > Hi Bob, > > > > I think I would have to work MoA into your scheme. For me, that's > > essential listening (well, for a few of us here I'd say). It sort of ties > > things up in my mind. It ties together various musical threads from the > > preceding albums and works in the new band. I'm still a bit in awe that she > > did not load it with C&S songs. In a sense, I see it as a companion to C&S > > actually, so this works well. I also think her voice may be at it's most > > appealing for me on MoA over all other albums. > > > > I see where you are going with C&S and HOSL being connected, In France is a > > definite bridge. However, in my mind, HOSL is more of a transitional album > > (and what a transition!) that allows for the sonic shift that is Hejira. > > The door then opens for DJRD which I always pair with Mingus and S&L more > > than Hejira funnily. > > > > Like you, Sue, I love the progression across these albums. No other artists > > progression fascinates me as much (hopefully that will redeem me for my > > Joni criticism a few weeks back;-) > > > > I think I will have to listen to C&S and HOSL together now, thanks:) > > GARRET > > > > NP - Eddi Reader, Back the Dogs (from her latest album - I think so many of > > you guys would love this) > > > > > >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:48 PM, wrote: > >> > >> Hi Laura - glad you heard "Help Me", I agree it's always like a cool > >> summer breeze unto my ears when I hear that guitar intro. Unfortunately I > >> did NOT hear Joni on the radio yesterday so my streak ended, but if we > >> want to talk a JMDL streak, we are still going strong with 4 days thanks > >> to your report. Let's see who hears Joni on the radio TODAY and maybe we > >> can keep the streak alive. > >> > >> Bob > >> > >> NP: Aretha Franklin, "Baby I Love You" > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ > >> The information transmitted is intended only for the person > >> or entity to which it is addressed and may contain > >> proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. > >> If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are > >> hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, > >> distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon > >> this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please > >> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. > >> > >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual > >> sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------ > > End of JMDL Digest V2014 #802 > ***************************** > > ------- > To post messages to the list,sendtojoni@smoe.org. > Unsubscribe by clicking here: > mailto:joni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe > ------- ------------------------------ End of onlyJMDL Digest V2014 #193 ********************************* ------- Post messages to the list by clicking here:mailto:joni@smoe.org Unsubscribe by clicking here: mailto:onlyjoni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe