From: owner-onlyjoni-digest@smoe.org (onlyJMDL Digest) To: onlyjoni-digest@smoe.org Subject: onlyJMDL Digest V2013 #73 Reply-To: joni@smoe.org Sender: owner-onlyjoni-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-onlyjoni-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk Website:http://www.jonimitchell.com Unsubscribe:mailto:onlyjoni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe onlyJMDL Digest Tuesday, February 26 2013 Volume 2013 : Number 073 ========== TOPICS and authors in this Digest: -------- Re: Litigation [Anita ] Urge for Going [Paul Ivice ] Re: Litigation [mflaher3@yahoo.com] Litigation ["kbhla" ] Re: Other photographers take on litigation [LC Stanley ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:57:30 +0000 From: Anita Subject: Re: Litigation That is wonderful news to wake up to on a cold,grey day here. I am so delighted, dear Les. The thought of such a nice bloke being so bullied was ghastly. And I am with Dave here. Donate what we can. I am sure everything helps. Anita x On 25 Feb 2013, at 01:32, Catherine wrote: > Yes!!! > > > > Les Irvin wrote: > >> As of a few hours ago, my legal statement regarding the copyright >> infringement case is: >> >> "It has been settled and I cannot talk about it." >> >> Thanks to everyone for your help and support! >> Les >> >> >> >> On 2/24/2013 4:50 PM, Gerald Kent wrote: >>> I would be happy to donate if funds become an issue. Gerry ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:01:49 -0500 (EST) From: Paul Ivice Subject: Urge for Going n the song "Urge for Going": does the line, "And not another man in town my darling's heart could win" -- does this mean no man other than the singer was able to win over his darling's heart? Or does it mean the opposite: that his darling was not able to win over the heart of any other man in town? (which is what I had always assumed, as it emphasizes the pitiful situation of the singer) Name: Robert Rotstein email: rrotstein@verizon.net It means no other man could win her heart. He was the only man for her. Paul Ivice ;>) - - ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:10:01 -0600 From: mflaher3@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Litigation With hopes that what you can't talk about is good news, I am happy to see this awful chapter end. Michael F. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 24, 2013, at 6:04 PM, Les Irvin wrote: > As of a few hours ago, my legal statement regarding the copyright infringement case is: > > "It has been settled and I cannot talk about it." > > Thanks to everyone for your help and support! > Les > > > > On 2/24/2013 4:50 PM, Gerald Kent wrote: >> I would be happy to donate if funds become an issue. Gerry ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 00:22:59 -0800 From: "kbhla" Subject: Litigation I agree with David M. and David P. I've assumed that Les has consulted with an attorney, but if not, that is the only way to resolve the matter if the other side has not already agreed to drop the claim. Even lawyers and people who know law have to consult an outside lawyer when they need one. Also agree it may be as simple as an attorney writing a letter and that is not very costly. We can all help out with donations, if needed. Kakki ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:38:01 -0800 (PST) From: LC Stanley Subject: Re: Other photographers take on litigation Quote from the article: "Les Irvin, the man behind the biggest Joni Mitchell fan site on the internet, is being sued by celebrity photographer Charlyn Zlotnik over four photos that were uploaded anonymously in the comments section of his website." Anonymously?!! Well then whose to say that Charlyn Zlotnik didn't post them herself for her own marketing gain? And if it can't be proven that she or somebody acting as her agent didn't post them, then can't she be counter sued for attempting to use the power of the law to extort money from Les? There has got to be a lawyer here among us... helloooooOOOOOO Love, Laura From: Anita To: joni@smoe.org Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 3:05 AM Subject: Other photographers take on litigation I heard about the current issues when a friend sent this link to me. Apologies if this has already been posted. There is a lot of additional outrage out there, I am glad to discover. Anita >> >> http://www.petapixel.com/2013/02/21/photographer-sues-blogger-for-600k-over-f our-commenter-uploaded-photos/ ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:33:21 +0000 From: Lori Renee Fye Subject: Re: lawsuit Sorry ... typo ... that should've been www.jonimitchell.com/justice.cfm Lori Wales - -- If there are lots of typos, I'm emailing from my phone. ------------------------------ End of onlyJMDL Digest V2013 #73 ******************************** ------- Post messages to the list by clicking here:mailto:joni@smoe.org Unsubscribe by clicking here: mailto:onlyjoni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe