From: owner-mad-mission-digest@smoe.org (mad-mission-digest) To: mad-mission-digest@smoe.org Subject: mad-mission-digest V5 #74 Reply-To: mad-mission@smoe.org Sender: owner-mad-mission-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-mad-mission-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk * If you ever wish to unsubscribe, send an email to * mad-mission-digest-request@smoe.org * with ONLY the word unsubscribe in the body of the email * . * For the latest information on Patty's tour dates, go to: * http://www.quackquack.net/pattyg * OR * go to http://www.amrecords.com * then click "tour" and fill in the blanks :) * . * PLEASE :) when you reply to this digest to send a post TO the list, * change the subject to reflect what your post is about. A subject * of Re: mad-mission-digest V4 #xxx or the like gives readers no clue * as to what your message is about. mad-mission-digest Friday, March 23 2001 Volume 05 : Number 074 Today's Subjects: ----------------- MM: RE: RE: The album ["Jackson, Ryan" ] MM: a little of nothing i guess ["zeeke5" ] Re: MM: Silver Bell and the Record Company [David Lewis Subject: MM: RE: RE: The album <> Lord, if this isn't the story of my life. I'm one of a million sitting at a desk in an office while some bag-o-nuts like Marylin Manson is hogging a spotlight. Alas, opportunity is a cruel illusion. - -Ryan P.S. It is a nice desk though, I should admit. Nice, plastic, simulated grain. I really shouldn't complain. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:53:21 -0800 From: "zeeke5" Subject: MM: a little of nothing i guess for your info.... I asked a friend of mine who works for Sony Music if she could get info from her friends at Universal....here goes... she wrote: I just had this very conversation with my friend over at Universal. They have moved the album to a TBA (to be announced) streetdate rather than a firm date in May or June. That doesn't look good. She has also heard rumors that the label may drop her, and that the album is finished. The problem is that Universal owns the album and even if a smaller label (Razor & Tie, Rounder,) wanted to release it they would have to buy the album from Universal. She does have a 2 song sampler, which is making me crazy because she keeps "forgeting" to give it to me. for what it's worth zeeke - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jackson, Ryan" To: Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 2:01 PM Subject: MM: RE: RE: The album > < not have anyone hear it because it didn't get airplay. And face it, unless > you're a "hot artist" at the time, radio typically will not start playing > your single unless they see a demand for it. It's makes me mad sometimes > when some artists get radio play right away, while others either never do or > only get it once the music gets out there through some other venue that the > radio stations later pick up on. - ~ Riff>> > > > > > Lord, if this isn't the story of my life. I'm one of a million sitting at a > desk in an office while some bag-o-nuts like Marylin Manson is hogging a > spotlight. Alas, opportunity is a cruel illusion. > > -Ryan > > P.S. It is a nice desk though, I should admit. Nice, plastic, simulated > grain. I really shouldn't complain. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:33:44 -0400 From: David Lewis Subject: Re: MM: Silver Bell and the Record Company Hey All... sorry if I started a LWG vs. FR thread! I didn't mean to. I just personally felt that a few of the arrangements... not all, but a few of the arrangements on FR were over done and that maybe that was part of the problem with Silver Bell... if there is in fact a "problem" with Silver Bell at all... which there may not be!! The other factor is, I knew most of the songs on FR from hearing them as live solos before the record came out... so it comes down to again, preferring whatever you hear first. In fact, it always seems like people who heard FR first prefer FR and people who heard LWG first prefer LWG. I personally love both... but let's put it this way... I don't know if I will still be listening to FR 10 years from now :) I'm pretty certain though that I will always return to LWG. Anyway... didn't mean to stir up what is most likely an old topic which has probably been beaten to death here over the years!! I love Patty with a band and as a soloist... I just want to see the band thing done as good as it possibly can be! p.s. If anyone here hasn't heard Edie Carey... you don't know what you're missing! Just discovered her music a month or so ago and she's just wonderful! She's not as wild and passionate as Patty... but she's pretty amazing. Reminds me a lot of Shawn Colvin. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:38:51 -0400 From: David Lewis Subject: Re: MM: Silver Bell and the Record Company Gary Jacques at jacques@colorite-resins.com wrote: > electric Patty is great but LWG is not just a good record. It is the > best solo acoustic record or CD ever. Period. I could agree with that :) Then again, "The Freewheelin' Bob Dylan" and "The Times They Are a-Changin'" weren't half bad either :) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:42:25 -0800 From: "vchenevey" Subject: Re: MM: Silver Bell and the Record Company >>>Hey All... sorry if I started a LWG vs. FR thread! I didn't mean to. >>>> Well, that's not necessarily a bad thing, David, even if we have done it before. If you've heard Patty live and heard her do "Every Little Bit" with the band, it is an awesome thing. I got hooked on PG with that very song, acoustically, from LWG. When I saw her live with the band and they did that same song, I fell in love with the song all over again and for completely different reasons. A perfect world? Two LWG's, one acoustic, one with the band; two FR's, one acoustic, one with the band. Just send me to a desert island! Vickie ------------------------------ End of mad-mission-digest V5 #74 ********************************