From: owner-mad-mission-digest@smoe.org (mad-mission-digest) To: mad-mission-digest@smoe.org Subject: mad-mission-digest V3 #30 Reply-To: mad-mission@smoe.org Sender: owner-mad-mission-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-mad-mission-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk * If you ever wish to unsubscribe, send an email to * mad-mission-digest-request@smoe.org * with ONLY the word unsubscribe in the body of the email * . * For the latest information on Patty's tour dates, go to: * http://www.spectra.net/~ducksoup/pattyg/patttyg.htm * OR * go to http://www.amrecords.com * then click "tour" and fill in the blanks :) * . * PLEASE :) when you reply to this digest to send a post TO the list, * change the subject to reflect what your post is about. A subject * of Re: mad-mission-digest V3 #xxx or the like gives readers no clue * as to what your message is about. mad-mission-digest Friday, February 5 1999 Volume 03 : Number 030 Today's Subjects: ----------------- MM: Re: jewel is no diamond in the rough [Ponybat@aol.com] MM: RE: Re: jewel is no diamond in the rough [Mark Cicero > Look at some of the bands who have achieved "commercial success" and think long and hard about whether you really want to make this statement. Success is not necessarily a reflection of musical integrity and should certainly not be autimatically cogratulated. stef ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 16:15:08 -0600 From: Mark Cicero Subject: MM: RE: Re: jewel is no diamond in the rough Musical integrity is way too subjective and I won't go there. But I stand by my statements. I don't care for Marilyn Manson or Rap music, but it certainly has it's place in the overall scheme of things and I congradulate those artists for having the perservernce to stay with it and find there place. I just don't find any value in dis'ing any kind of Music. "To each their own". Regards, Mark Nashville,TN - -----Original Message----- From: Ponybat@aol.com [mailto:Ponybat@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 1999 3:58 PM To: mad-mission@smoe.org Subject: MM: Re: jewel is no diamond in the rough In a message dated 2/4/99, 3:02:03 PM, mad-mission@smoe.org writes: <> Look at some of the bands who have achieved "commercial success" and think long and hard about whether you really want to make this statement. Success is not necessarily a reflection of musical integrity and should certainly not be autimatically cogratulated. stef ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 20:18:55 EST From: SaucyBoy@aol.com Subject: MM: Right On Mark (MC1) ! Couldnt have put it better myself Mark..... Different strokes for different folks.... Thanks for the clarity amid the fog of stylistic narrowmindedness. Tipper Gore and the DAR would be proud of the all the cultural, commercial and gender tribalism posted here..... Typical.... " ifin you ain't wif us. you must be agin us"......and of course..... ALL the millions and millions of people around the world that bought every "worthless" spice girls, or backstreet boys cd were forced to walk in to their record store and plunk down their $15 so therefore THEY'RE just helpless sheep and not to be held responsible for they're actions and NOT the tastless morons that some people on this list would make them out to be for their listening choices..... By the way .... I love Patty Griffin AND Marylin Manson AND Rap of all colors ..... go figure.... ------------------------------ End of mad-mission-digest V3 #30 ********************************