From: owner-lucy-list-digest@smoe.org (lucy-list-digest) To: lucy-list-digest@smoe.org Subject: lucy-list-digest V2 #87 Reply-To: lucy-list@smoe.org Sender: owner-lucy-list-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-lucy-list-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk lucy-list-digest Thursday, April 6 2000 Volume 02 : Number 087 In this issue: [lucy-list] Punishment Re: [lucy-list] the first trial of the 21st century [lucy-list] Re: the first trial of the 21st century Re: [lucy-list] Advances In Cloning Not Coming Soon Enough Re: [lucy-list] the first trial of the 21st century [lucy-list] the first trial of the 21st century ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 08:56:06 EDT From: Asdalin@aol.com Subject: [lucy-list] Punishment <> Then punish me, too!! Anne in NJ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 09:05:23 +0100 From: "dunfionn" Subject: Re: [lucy-list] the first trial of the 21st century Well, Sharon, I've been reading your posts for months. Its nice to meet you at last! Your messages always reminded me of the Latke character played by Andy Kauffman in 'Taxi'-he talked gibberish, but everyone liked him anyway! Here in Britain we have a system whereby you can get your sentence commuted by nearly half, for good behaviour. It was clear from your post that you ran out of Capital Letters as you went on. As a jury member who speaks English proper, some more caps would shorten your sentences considerably! Don't appeal, there could be a backlash! Regards Walter from Glasgow - ----- Original Message ----- From: sharon g To: Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 3:51 AM Subject: [lucy-list] the first trial of the 21st century > > NewYork NewYork ( a hellava town) > April 4, 2000 > Supreme Court > > Today as expected the jury came in at 4:35 with the antcipated > verdict of guilty. The screams were heard as far off as the lily pad across > the pond. The jury comprised of assorted anal retentive > english majors, editors, journalists and all round beacons of propriety were > interviewed and reported that there was no choice > it was a clear and clean verdict- > abiding with the judges wished the verdict must have been > returned as guilty. > MS. Sharong was tried and convicted on crimes against > grammer in the first degree, lack of punctuation, and captials > and givin certain folkies a Headache.. > with the trial was over the judge ordered ms goldberg on house arrest& to > spend her normal nightcrawling, folk clubbing activities in her residence. > she was carted off vowing civil disobedience and rebellion and will appeal > the verdict.. > the judge ordered sharong to community service and she will not > be able to road buddy with E. timothy in winnepeg, she will not > be at steve earle in scotland. > her appeal will include a desire to attend appel farm and see > mary chapin, the lucy bottomline show, any dar appearance > in driving distance, falcon ridge, > she has vowed community service at clearwater by volunteering all > weekend and will attend lucy and Gorka as her punishment... > > > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 19:22:56 -0700 From: ptpower@juno.com Subject: [lucy-list] Re: the first trial of the 21st century Sharon wrote: <> I thought this thread had gone its merciful way. Since it hasn't . . . On behalf of myself and the rest of the insensitive "anal retentive english majors, editors, journalists and all round beacons of propriety" I'd like to apologize to Sharon (and anyone else caught in our lines of fire) for creating such a major conflagration. While *my* comments weren't intended to insult, villify or hurt Ms. G (or anyone else), it's apparent that they did. Pat ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 23:44:06 -0400 From: michael epstein Subject: Re: [lucy-list] Advances In Cloning Not Coming Soon Enough > ....I imagine that the two festivals are probably fighting right now over the very soul of Richard Shindell!... nope...... New Bedford has him. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 23:56:37 -0400 From: Howie Lyhte Subject: Re: [lucy-list] the first trial of the 21st century At 09:05 AM 4/5/2000 +0100, Walter wrote: >It was clear from your post that you ran >out of Capital Letters as you went on. As a jury member who speaks English >proper, some more caps would shorten your sentences considerably! Actually capital letters will lengthen a sentence, especially if you're using a proportionally spaced font. howie (briefly) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Academic training was instrumental. You have to understand the language of society before you can start stretching and subverting it and ripping and tearing it and burning it and watching the plastic drip on the ants." Mark Pauline ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 21:32:40 -0700 From: Katie Stohlmann Subject: [lucy-list] the first trial of the 21st century Howie said, >>Actually capital letters will lengthen a sentence, especially if you're using a proportionally spaced font.<< If only I could write a paper for school with all capitalized letters, now that would be a miracle. However, most teachers probably wouldn't go for that. Too bad for me (luckily I have some paper lengthening tricks up my sleeve...) Lucy content....I'm really upset that Lucy is NOT coming to Northern CA when she comes to the state next week. It makes me REALLY SAD actually. I hope the rumour that she is coming to Northern CA in the fall is true. katie stohlmann ------------------ "I'm no loser, I'm no whore, I'm through being his concubine" --Eddie From Ohio http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~stohlman ------------------ ------------------------------ End of lucy-list-digest V2 #87 ****************************** This has been a posting from the Lucy Kaplansky mail list digest To unsubscribe send mail to Majordomo@smoe.org with "unsubscribe lucy-list-digest" in the body of the message