From: owner-loud-fans-digest@smoe.org (loud-fans-digest)
To: loud-fans-digest@smoe.org
Subject: loud-fans-digest V6 #64
Reply-To: loud-fans@smoe.org
Sender: owner-loud-fans-digest@smoe.org
Errors-To: owner-loud-fans-digest@smoe.org
Precedence: bulk


loud-fans-digest       Thursday, March 30 2006       Volume 06 : Number 064



                               Today's Subjects:
                               -----------------
  [loud-fans] Re: loud-fans-digest V6 #63                [GlenSarvad@aol.com]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:32:01 EST
From: GlenSarvad@aol.com
Subject: [loud-fans] Re: loud-fans-digest V6 #63

I saw it too- I have no idea whether Alex gets the cash (or had veto  power) 
but I actually feel OK about this one- it's a rare case where the lyrics  and 
tone of the song sync up with the commercial, and it's pretty subtle.
 
On the other end of the spectrum, I'm still amazed every time I see that  
Carnival Cruise spot that uses Iggy's "Lust for Life" in a family vacation  
context- did no one notice the next line talks about "liquor and drugs," or do  
they just assume 95% of consumers are too oblivious to care?
 
Mark writes:

Wast  that Big Star's "I'm in Love with a Girl" I heard on a Heineken
commercial  the other night?  If so, good for Alex Chilton, assuming he's
getting  some money out of it.  If he isn't, then I'm against  it.

------------------------------

End of loud-fans-digest V6 #64
******************************