From: owner-loud-fans-digest@smoe.org (loud-fans-digest) To: loud-fans-digest@smoe.org Subject: loud-fans-digest V4 #34 Reply-To: loud-fans@smoe.org Sender: owner-loud-fans-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-loud-fans-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk loud-fans-digest Thursday, February 5 2004 Volume 04 : Number 034 Today's Subjects: ----------------- [loud-fans] New Pharmacologists ["Rex.Broome" ] Re: [loud-fans] New Pharmacologists ["Joseph M. Mallon" ] Re: [loud-fans] poll results?? ["Joseph M. Mallon" Subject: [loud-fans] New Pharmacologists Michael W: >>So last week I pick up this nifty little album "The New Pornographers - >>Electric Version" and I'm thinking 'Wow, this is great...how come nobody >>told me about this?' I mean, geez...I figured this group would have been all >>over it. Am I really that far ahead of the curve on this one? Hmmm, thought I was the last one. Err, first one. >>Michael "and how about that Ted Leo and Pharoah...Photog...Pornogra... >>oh, never mind" Wells Dammit, still don't have this full-length... every time I go to Virgin they just have copy after copy of the EP. Could I go to a different record store? Sure, but not at lunch. Do I want to shop in any form after work? No, not considering the fact that the ongoing grocery workers' strike in LA makes just plain stocking the pantry a damned pilgrimage to Mecca... grumble grumble... - -Rex ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:12:30 -0800 From: Steve Holtebeck Subject: Re: [loud-fans] poll results Aaron Mandel wrote: > Chris Murtland's "most normal loudfan" standing is mostly due to him > only voting for two albums. You might want to mentally disqualify him if > you find that unsavory. I think we should.. I want to keep my "most normal loud-fan" standing! This is the first year I haven't held either the "raw" or "weighted" "most normal loud-fan" crown. I *knew* I should have either ranked Ted Leo and/or the New Pornographers ahead of Fountains of Wayne, or not padded my top 15 with all those extra one-point albums. Thanks again to Aaron for running the poll, and everyone for voting. - -Steve ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:47:34 -0800 (PST) From: "Joseph M. Mallon" Subject: Re: [loud-fans] New Pharmacologists On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Rex.Broome wrote: > Dammit, still don't have this full-length... every time I go to Virgin > they just have copy after copy of the EP. Could I go to a different > record store? Sure, but not at lunch. Do I want to shop in any form > after work? No, not considering the fact that the ongoing grocery > workers' strike in LA makes just plain stocking the pantry a damned > pilgrimage to Mecca... grumble grumble... This seems to be a popular way of phrasing nowadays - the Q&A. Is it a trend? I don't know. Have I done it myself? Apparently. Is this the influence of DOONESBURY's lampooning of Donald Rumsfeld? Could be... Joe Mallon jmmallon@joescafe.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:29:43 -0800 (PST) From: Phil Fleming Subject: [loud-fans] poll results?? what's the link for the poll results again? Phil F. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:34:53 -0800 (PST) From: "Joseph M. Mallon" Subject: Re: [loud-fans] poll results?? On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Phil Fleming wrote: > what's the link for the poll results again? For any question about stuff that's been posted to the list, there's an archive: http://www.escribe.com/music/loudfans/ The poll results: http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~aaron/poll/lf03/results.txt http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~aaron/poll/lf03/full-results.txt Joe Mallon jmmallon@joescafe.com ------------------------------ End of loud-fans-digest V4 #34 ******************************