From: owner-loud-fans-digest@smoe.org (loud-fans-digest) To: loud-fans-digest@smoe.org Subject: loud-fans-digest V2 #64 Reply-To: loud-fans@smoe.org Sender: owner-loud-fans-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-loud-fans-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk loud-fans-digest Tuesday, February 12 2002 Volume 02 : Number 064 Today's Subjects: ----------------- [loud-fans] ISO: 'nother band name [rlewis@nethere.com (Russ Lewis)] Re: [loud-fans] ISO: 'nother band name [timv@triad.rr.com] Re: [loud-fans] ISO: 'nother band name [Roger Winston ] Re: [loud-fans] ISO: 'nother band name [JRT456@aol.com] Re: [loud-fans] ISO: 'nother band name [timv@triad.rr.com] [loud-fans] Richard Thompson on Prarie Home Companion ["O Geier" ] [loud-fans] CD claimed [Jer Fairall ] Re: [loud-fans] You Can Count On Me ["Andrew Hamlin" ] [loud-fans] new pornographers help [DOUDIE@aol.com] [loud-fans] paging Phil F. [Matthew Weber ] Re: [loud-fans] new pornographers help ["Roger Winston" ] Re: [loud-fans] new pornographers help [Cindy Alvarez ] Re: [loud-fans] You Can Count On Me [Dan Sallitt ] Re: [loud-fans] Swap Review [Dan Sallitt ] [loud-fans] Geek TV (ns) [Dana L Paoli ] [loud-fans] Fit/fat cities [Sue Trowbridge ] Re: [loud-fans] new pornographers help [AWeiss4338@aol.com] [loud-fans] a fine bit of pop singalong ["Vallor" ] Re: [loud-fans] Swap Review: "How September Came for Sinatra" [steve A friend of mine wants to know what song this is and who did it. It's an > early-'80s new wave hit -- with a female singer, I recall -- with the > refrain, "Drop you pants around your ankles / You make me shiver when you > deliver." Anyone? Anyone? I remembered the song ("Drop Your Pants") and that it was done by a one-named singer. Allmusic.com had the rest: Hillary, from the EP _Kinetic_, produced by Stephen Hague. > While we're at it, did I miss the fallout here from the Terry Gross vs. > Gene Simmons fiasco on _Fresh Air_ last week, or was there none on the Loud > list? Can't help you there, but I'm off to check it out if the archived audio is on line. Tim ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 06:53:58 -0700 From: Roger Winston Subject: Re: [loud-fans] ISO: 'nother band name At Monday 2/11/2002 08:46 AM -0500, timv@triad.rr.com wrote: >On 11 Feb 2002, at 4:35, Russ Lewis wrote: > > While we're at it, did I miss the fallout here from the Terry Gross vs. > > Gene Simmons fiasco on _Fresh Air_ last week, or was there none on the Loud > > list? >Can't help you there, but I'm off to check it out if the archived audio is >on line. Another list I'm on posted a link to an MP3 version: http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~danh/npr/GeneSimmons_TerryGross_NPR_FreshAir_broadcast_02-04-2002.mp3 Latre. --Rog ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:53:18 EST From: JRT456@aol.com Subject: Re: [loud-fans] ISO: 'nother band name In a message dated 2/11/02 5:43:14 AM, timv@triad.rr.com writes of Simmons vs. Gross: << Can't help you there, but I'm off to check it out if the archived audio is on line. >> It wasn't as of Friday, but NPR claims it isn't a cover-up. Gene Simmons just didn't sign the release. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:20:59 -0500 From: timv@triad.rr.com Subject: Re: [loud-fans] ISO: 'nother band name On 11 Feb 2002, at 6:53, Roger Winston wrote: > At Monday 2/11/2002 08:46 AM -0500, timv@triad.rr.com wrote: > >On 11 Feb 2002, at 4:35, Russ Lewis wrote: > > > While we're at it, did I miss the fallout here from the Terry Gross vs. > > > Gene Simmons fiasco on _Fresh Air_ last week, or was there none on the Loud > > > list? > >Can't help you there, but I'm off to check it out if the archived audio is > >on line. > > Another list I'm on posted a link to an MP3 version: > http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~danh/npr/GeneSimmons_TerryGross_NPR_FreshAir_broadcast_02-04-2002.mp3 Thanks for the help, Rog. That one didn't work but this one did: http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~danh/npr/TerryGross_GeneSimmons_NPR_FreshAir_broadcast_02-04-2002.mp3 Listening to the first two minutes and reading the NYPost story linked from that site was enough for me. Pretty sad stuff really. Tim ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:05:15 +0000 From: "O Geier" Subject: [loud-fans] Richard Thompson on Prarie Home Companion March 2nd. Support anti-Spam legislation. Join the fight http://www.cauce.org/ - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:16:14 -0800 (PST) From: Jer Fairall Subject: [loud-fans] Free CD mix! I accidentally burned two copies of a mix that I made for Andrea so now I have an extra to give away. First person who responds with their address gets it. The track listing-- The Cure, "Cut Here" Hey Mercedes, "Every Turn" Bill Janovitz, "Best Kept Secret" Sorry About Dresden, "It's Morning Again In America" Anton Barbeau, "Sula2" Shouting Distance, "Inverness" Aimee Mann, "Backfire" Elvis Costello, "World's Great Optimist" Kings of Convenience, "I Don't Know What I Could Save You From" Orange Humble Band, "Annie Run Run Run" Amanda Kravat, "Steady Now" Atom & His Package, "If You Own The Washington Redskins, You're a Cock" Jimmy Eat World, "Splash Turn and Twist" Robert Pollard & Soft Rock Renegades, "Edison Memos" Dashboard Confessional, "Again I Go Unnoticed" Teenage Fanclub, "Tell Me What You See" Josie & the Pussycats, "Spin Around" Black Box Recorder, "Sex Life" Melissa Etheridge, "I Wanna Be In Love" Luka Bloom, "Dancing Queen" Jer ===== Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:27:51 -0800 (PST) From: Jer Fairall Subject: [loud-fans] CD claimed That was fast! Jer ===== Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:35:05 -0800 From: "Andrew Hamlin" Subject: Re: [loud-fans] You Can Count On Me >In other news, specifically an update in the "Jeff finally sees movies >everyone else was talking about last year" column, we watched _You Can >Count on Me_ last night. I thought it was a fine, if flawed, movie: Laura >Linney's performance was excellent, but the whole prologue seemed >completely redundant and unnecessary to me (given that about everything in >it is revealed in a couple of scenes later, notably the Terry and Rudy >seatbelt scene) Welllll...not to bust your chops, but I think you'd agree with me on the vast difference between showing and telling. Would you be satisfied with two dudes sitting in a car chuckling, "Yeah, that whippersnapper let the geezer have it the gut with ol' Rosebud"? Two guys at a 7-11 coffee machine puzzling over a little girl with dead flowers in one pocket? More specifically, I think bringing the parents on for just twenty seconds before wiping them off the face of the earth serves several purposes. The obvious shock and novelty values, yes, but beyond that, seeing them as people, instead of offstage abstractions, encourages us to think of them as people, as who they were and how they lived before the last twenty seconds of their lives, and, elliptically, their impact as people, as parents, on the brother and sister. In similar fashion, the brother's undoubtedly-convoluted relationship with the town sheriff gets presented in two simple scenes, one in the brother's childhood, one in adulthood. It's possible, thinking back over it, that the film is a little too elliptical for its own good. I felt such pleasure, though, over an American film that encouraged thinking, and feeling, instead of boxing up hamburgers to shove through a slot. Feeling like a cheeseburger myself (maybe it's the Elvis jumpsuit), Andy "I usually take a two-hour nap, from one o'clock to four." - --Yogi Berra ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:35:00 EST From: DOUDIE@aol.com Subject: [loud-fans] new pornographers help Hey there, Does anyone know how to get a copy of the lyrics to Mass Romantic? I really want one. Cheers, Steven Matrick ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:13:37 -0800 From: Matthew Weber Subject: [loud-fans] paging Phil F. (Apologies for the mass-media approach) Phil--my emails to you keep getting bounced. I need to contact you about the tape swap. Send me a message if you're here, okay? Matthew Weber Curatorial Assistant Music Library University of California, Berkeley And the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea upon the dry ground: and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left. _The Holy Bible: The Old Testament_, The Second Book of Moses, Called Exodus, chapter 14, verse 22 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:35:59 -0700 From: "Roger Winston" Subject: Re: [loud-fans] new pornographers help DOUDIE@aol.com on 2/11/2002 11:35:00 AM wrote: > Does anyone know how to get a copy of the lyrics to Mass Romantic? I really > want one. I periodically post this query and have never gotten an answer. Someone is doing a REALLY good job of keeping those lyrics off the Internet. Either that or NO ONE can figure them all out and the NPs themselves aren't revealing... Latre. --Rog ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:46:42 -0600 From: "Keegstra, Russell" Subject: RE: [loud-fans] new pornographers help This fall's like ammonia electrical lights. Does that help? ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:52:43 -0800 From: Cindy Alvarez Subject: Re: [loud-fans] new pornographers help At 11:35 AM -0800 2/11/02, Roger Winston wrote: >DOUDIE@aol.com on 2/11/2002 11:35:00 AM wrote: > >> Does anyone know how to get a copy of the lyrics to Mass Romantic? I >>really >> want one. > >I periodically post this query and have never gotten an answer. Someone >is doing a REALLY good job of keeping those lyrics off the Internet. >Either that or NO ONE can figure them all out and the NPs themselves >aren't revealing... I'm not convinced that the New Pornographers know all the words either, but boy do they sound good. c ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:12:14 -0700 From: "Roger Winston" Subject: Re: [loud-fans] new pornographers help Cindy Alvarez on 2/11/2002 12:52:43 PM wrote: > I'm not convinced that the New Pornographers know all the words either, but > boy do they sound good. Ah... so this is an "early R.E.M." type deal, eh? Could someone at least please intrepret the chorus of Letter From An Occupant for me? Thanks. (BTW, a snippet of LFAO was used in last week's Chris Isaak Show - the episode with Chris doing jury duty and the Billy Jack/One Tin Soldier ending. Wasn't it also used in JAY & SILENT BOB STRIKE BACK?) Latre. --Rog ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:18:54 -0800 From: Cindy Alvarez Subject: Re: [loud-fans] new pornographers help >Cindy Alvarez on 2/11/2002 12:52:43 PM wrote: > >> I'm not convinced that the New Pornographers know all the words either, but >> boy do they sound good. > >Ah... so this is an "early R.E.M." type deal, eh? > >Could someone at least please intrepret the chorus of Letter From An >Occupant for me? Thanks. My impression is this: For the love of a god, you said Not a letter from an occupant [woo-ooos] Where've all sensations gone? x4 [repeat first two lines] 'scuse me while I kiss this guy, c ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:28:32 -0700 From: "Roger Winston" Subject: Re: [loud-fans] new pornographers help Cindy Alvarez on 2/11/2002 1:18:54 PM wrote: > My impression is this: > > For the love of a god, you said I could never figure if it was supposed to be "god" or "guy". I'm assuming it's whatever makes sense in context with the rest of the song... > Not a letter from an occupant > [woo-ooos] > Where've all sensations gone? x4 I always intrepreted this as a non-question statement "Where all sensations gone..." > [repeat first two lines] > 'scuse me while I kiss this guy, Please, no PDAs on the List. Latre. --Rog ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:42:32 -0600 (CST) From: Jeffrey with 2 Fs Jeffrey Subject: Re: [loud-fans] You Can Count On Me On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Andrew Hamlin wrote: the whole prologue seemed > >completely redundant and unnecessary to me (given that about everything in > >it is revealed in a couple of scenes later, notably the Terry and Rudy > >seatbelt scene) > > Welllll...not to bust your chops, but I think you'd agree with me on the > vast difference between showing and telling. Exactly...sorta. More below: > More specifically, I think bringing the parents on for just twenty seconds > before wiping them off the face of the earth serves several purposes. The > obvious shock and novelty values, yes, but beyond that, seeing them as > people, instead of offstage abstractions, encourages us to think of them as > people, as who they were and how they lived before the last twenty seconds > of their lives, and, elliptically, their impact as people, as parents, on > the brother and sister. In this case, the prologue comes closer to telling than showing, I'd argue. For me, it worked like this: the opening scene sets up some expectations re the parents and their roles - not only in their children's lives, but in the movie. Specifically, it made me imagine that the parents themselves, or the effect of their fatal accident, would play a more direct and literal role in what followed than turned out to be the case. > It's possible, thinking back over it, that the film is a little too > elliptical for its own good. I felt such pleasure, though, over an American > film that encouraged thinking, and feeling, instead of boxing up hamburgers > to shove through a slot. I agree completely w/your second sentence. But concerning the prologue, your first sentence nails the problem for me: it wasn't elliptical enough. I, at least, felt that I would rather have myself added up the peculiar emotional intensity of the first scene of the siblings meeting, a similar intensity in the scene in which Terry tells Rudy to put his seatbelt on, and a few other scenes to deduce the effect of the accident on the siblings. Actually seeing the parents chatting, the truck coming, etc., added nothing to the movie for me. It was a distraction, in other words. Okay, so what about the Broderick/Linney thing? I think it would have worked better if (choose one or more) a.) there had been some inkling of attraction between them beforehand; b.) he hadn't been such a complete ass; c.) she had been shown not only to make poor decisions re lovers, but to do so almost perversely, and not just as a young (late teens/early twenties - Rudy Sr.) woman but into her adulthood. The last is *almost* but not really implied as she's talking w/Father Ray about the situation...but it's *so* vague - and the movie doesn't treat Broderick/Linney as unexplainable - that it doesn't feel like a possible explanation or more like a not-quite-clear reference to... I'm being picky - I liked it, way better than the utterly abysmal, what's-the-nearest-cliche-plot-we-can-slot-this-into description on the video rental box (not that I ever rely much on those), and view these problems - esp. the parents thing - as minor distraction that really didn't hinder my enjoyment of the movie much. - --Jeff J e f f r e y N o r m a n The Architectural Dance Society www.uwm.edu/~jenor/ADS.html ::I suspect that the first dictator of this country will be called "Coach":: __William Gass__ np: Kirstin Hersh...uh, I forget the title: orange CD label ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:16:26 -0800 (PST) From: "Pete O." Subject: Re: [loud-fans] You Can Count On Me - --- Jeffrey with 2 Fs Jeffrey wrote: > np: Kirstin Hersh...uh, I forget the title: orange CD label Sunny Orange Border. - - Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:03:53 -0500 From: Dan Sallitt Subject: Re: [loud-fans] You Can Count On Me > I agree completely w/your second sentence. But concerning the prologue, > your first sentence nails the problem for me: it wasn't elliptical enough. > I, at least, felt that I would rather have myself added up the peculiar > emotional intensity of the first scene of the siblings meeting, a similar > intensity in the scene in which Terry tells Rudy to put his seatbelt on, > and a few other scenes to deduce the effect of the accident on the > siblings. Actually seeing the parents chatting, the truck coming, etc., > added nothing to the movie for me. It was a distraction, in other words. I don't know if I thought the prologue was redundant, but I remember it got me off to a bad start with the film: the parents' brief exchange in the car struck me somehow as not very real, more a fictional kind of telegraphing. I can't remember the details of the moment well enough to go into it, though. > Okay, so what about the Broderick/Linney thing? I think it would have > worked better if (choose one or more) a.) there had been some inkling of > attraction between them beforehand; b.) he hadn't been such a complete > ass What bothered me is that he seemed to get nice when she was having the affair, and resumed being an ass when the affair was on the way out. I would have liked it better had he seemed like an ass while she was being attracted to him. So common in real life, so rare in movies! > I'm being picky - I liked it Yeah, I'm basically okay with it too, despite a whole raft of problems I had with it. - Dan ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:42:33 -0800 (PST) From: Jon Gabriel Subject: [loud-fans] Swap Review: "How September Came for Sinatra" Mr. Jer Fairall mailed me an amazing collection of tunes called, "How September Came for Sinatra." People in my office liked the artwork, asking me, "So, you're not listening to the weird stuff today?" After casting a withering glance, I replied, "Yep, you sure can't beat the Chairman of the Board. Ha ha." I have such contempt for these Philistines that it's often hard to bear. Onto the review... Buffalo Tom "Summer" - Excellent starter. I haven't heard much of BT's catalogue. Rainer Maria "Thought I Was" - At first I hated this chick's (is "chick" inappropriate these days?) -- I mean dame's -- voice, but it quickly grew on me. I can see why do many loud-fans think so highly of Rainer Maria. Which album do I buy first? Jimmy Eat World "The Middle" - J.E.W. (what an odd abbreviation) hails from my fair city, Mesa, Arizona, but BLEED AMERICAN was the first album of theirs that I purchased. They kick hiney. We haven't had a major label band in this town since the Gin Blossoms. Well, Alice Cooper and Stevie Nicks live here too, but they don't count. (Remind me to tell you about the time my friend attended a Sunday School class taught by Alice.) The Go-Go's "Unforgiven" - Damn, this is good. A much harder, indie edge than their '80s stuff. Great hooks throughout. Radiohead "Thinking About You" - What album is this off of? Sounds like the Boss, fer cryin' out loud. Sponge "1,000 Times" - Definately Sponge-worthy. I've often been tempted to purchase a CD by them, but always chickened out. Is all their stuff this good? Matthew Sweet "Faith in You" - Good for Matthew Sweet, but I just can't get into his stuff. I can't figure out why, but it jus' don't work for me. Beulah "Emma Blowgun's Last Stand" - I bought my first Beulah album last month (The Coast Is Never Clear) and it's nearly welded to my stereo. Is this from "Handsome Western States?" Rufus Wainwright "Poses" - Very nice. An Eitzel feel, but I like this more. Semisonic "Chemistry" - Pretty good, but not my favorite. Home "Contract" - Wacky kinda prog-rock kinda thing.It's pretty good. Home "Displaying Prisms" - Same band. I like this track better. Cool name. Staccato sentences. The Promise Ring "Things Just Getting Good" - A few years ago, I purchased a Promise Ring album and sold it back within a week. Either my tastes have changed, or I got the wrong album. This is pretty good. Also, the CD title stems from this song's lyrics. Wheat "Off the Pedestal" - I know I'm getting redundant, but this song great too. I really like the cool, hushed vox. Where do I buy? Aimee Mann "Ray" - Does Amy Ray have a song called "Mann"? I used to have Aimee Mann on my "CDs to Buy" list, but with the frequency she shows up on Loud-Fans CD's, I should have her entire catalogue by year's end. Another excellent song. Is that harpsichord I'm hearing? Autoharp, perhaps? Barcelona "I Know What You Think of Me" - Another purchase. I've heard various songs by this band and adore each one. Which album do I get first? Atom & His Package "Atari Track & Field/New Controller Conspiracy"- New Wave fun. This sound reminds me of someone, but I can't place it. Kind of like MagFields or Joy Electric... maybe a little Heavenly thrown in. The Weakerthans "My Favorite Chords" - What a brilliant band name! Jimmy Eat World "Anderson Mesa" - See, I told you they were from Mesa! I work for the City of Mesa, the 42nd largest and the 26th fattest city (according to Men's Fitness magazine) in the nation. Please visit, shop and spend money here so I can get another raise. Good song, btw. Frank Sinatra "My Way" - A hidden track! A first for a Swap CD in my experience. - - - - Jer, you make one hell of a swap CD. Thanks for giving me a lot of new sounds to buy! Best, Jon ===== 777777777777777777777777777777 JON GABRIEL mesa, arizona usa inkling communication + design 777777777777777777777777777777 Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:53:46 -0700 From: "Roger Winston" Subject: Re: [loud-fans] Swap Review: Jon Gabriel on 2/11/2002 7:42:33 AM wrote: > I work for the City of Mesa, the 42nd > largest and the 26th fattest city (according to Men's > Fitness magazine) in the nation. Too bad you don't live in the Most Romantic City, which according to last night's Futurama, is Milwaukee. I guess Jeff is going to have a real rockin' Valentine's Day. Latre. --Rog "What is it about psychopaths that draws them to collage art?" -- Grace Hall, The Chronicle ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:09:18 -0500 From: Dan Sallitt Subject: Re: [loud-fans] Swap Review > > I work for the City of Mesa, the 42nd > > largest and the 26th fattest city (according to Men's > > Fitness magazine) in the nation. I don't suppose you remember the fattest and thinnest cities? - Dan np: Rick Gagnon's excellent mix CD of French pop ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:47:59 -0500 From: Dana L Paoli Subject: [loud-fans] Geek TV (ns) (Did anyone post about this already?) Without the internet I'm in no position know the real story. But, for anyone who's interested, this is from the latest Matador newsletter: >>>>>>>>>>> In television news, the February 12 plot of "The Gilmore Girls" centers around the struggle to get BELLE AND SEBASTIAN'S latest EP while grounded. "Legal Man" will hopefully play in the episode as well. This coming Tuesday on the WB, 8:00 PM EST. >>>>>>>>>>> My guess is that it's a fake news item, 'cause who would possible want to risk extra grounding for such a boring EP. My guess is that the episode is *really* about trying to score tickets to see the Strokes while grounded. Oh, wait, that doesn't make sense either. Ok, my guess is that it's *really* about trying to score heroin while grounded. - --dana ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:41:31 -0500 (EST) From: Sue Trowbridge Subject: [loud-fans] Fit/fat cities On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Dan Sallitt wrote: > > > I work for the City of Mesa, the 42nd > > > largest and the 26th fattest city (according to Men's > > > Fitness magazine) in the nation. > > I don't suppose you remember the fattest and thinnest cities? - Dan I saw an article recently mentioning that Houston has been named the fattest city for two years in a row. Philadelphia used to be #1 (cheese steaks!), but the city actually hired somebody to lead a citywide effort to get folks to shape up. I seemed to remember that Denver was the fittest city (well, Rog does ride an exercise bike...) but a web search revealed that it's actually Colorado Springs, and Denver is #2, followed by San Diego, Seattle and San Francisco. The other "fat cities" are #2 Chicago, #3 Detroit, #4 Philadelphia, #5 Dallas. Having experienced restaurant portion sizes in the midwest, I'm not surprised. A couple other items of possible interest to loud-fans: I heard some of Anton Barbeau's new demos yesterday, and one of the tracks was called "Stewart Mason." It consists of the words "Stewart Mason" repeated over and over again, along with some typically obtuse Anton lyrics, which didn't seem to have anything to do with Stewart Mason. It's quite a catchy little number. 125 Records is down to eleven copies (!) of Paula Carino's AQUACADE, so if you have been meaning to buy one, now would be the time. It's possible we may do another run at some point, but probably not anytime soon, as we're focusing other projects. We also have some copies of Paula's band Regular Einstein's EP, SEVEN DEADLY SONGS, available at 125records.com. - --Sue ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:33:26 EST From: AWeiss4338@aol.com Subject: Re: [loud-fans] new pornographers help In a message dated 2/11/02 3:13:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, rwinston@tde.com writes: > Could someone at least please intrepret the chorus of Letter From An > Occupant for me? Thanks. > > I think it sounds like 'for the love of (a) god he said, not a letter from an occupant.' Andrea ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:17:47 -0500 From: "Vallor" Subject: [loud-fans] a fine bit of pop singalong Go on try it... http://www.dr.dk/skum/cigarfar/growl.htm Dan V ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:21:14 -0600 From: steve Subject: Re: [loud-fans] Swap Review: "How September Came for Sinatra" On Monday, February 11, 2002, at 04:42 PM, Jon Gabriel wrote: > Good for Matthew Sweet, but I just can't get into his stuff. > I can't figure out why, but it jus' don't work for me. Maybe this will help - - - Steve __________ I know that it's cynical, but I feel that civil liberties-for a lot of these people in Congress-are either an inconvenience or a campaign slogan. They care only about money and power. - Wil Wheaton ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:14:01 -0600 (CST) From: Jeffrey with 2 Fs Jeffrey Subject: Re: [loud-fans] new pornographers help On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 AWeiss4338@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 2/11/02 3:13:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, rwinston@tde.com > writes: > > > Could someone at least please intrepret the chorus of Letter From An > > Occupant for me? Thanks. > > > > I think it sounds like 'for the love of (a) god he said, not a letter from an > occupant.' *I* think it's "snort the banana - devil nose!" Or maybe that's only when it's played backwards. - --Jeff, being a smart-ass because Rogre isn't yet J e f f r e y N o r m a n The Architectural Dance Society www.uwm.edu/~jenor/ADS.html ::SCENE 2: ::Aunt Fritzi applies lipstick in the mirror. In the next room, Sluggo ::removes his ever-present cap and blows his nose in a red handkerchief. ::Nancy enters the room and accuses Sluggo of stealing the donuts that ::Aunt Fritzi made for her. Sluggo looks at the clock, which reads 8:54, ::and says he'd better hurry or he'll be late for his trombone lesson. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:17:00 -0600 (CST) From: Jeffrey with 2 Fs Jeffrey Subject: Re: [loud-fans] Swap Review: On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Roger Winston wrote: > Too bad you don't live in the Most Romantic City, which according to > last night's Futurama, is Milwaukee. I guess Jeff is going to have a > real rockin' Valentine's Day. Oh yeah The general impression of the skyline and lakeshore were more or less accurate (allowing, of course, for about a thousand years of new buildings) - spec., the Firstar (now USBank) Building, 100 East, and the now-famous Calatrava addition to the art museum, all obvious & visible in that shot. Rose works for the architecture firm that was the US architect for the Calatrava - unfortunately, she forgot to tell all her cow-orkers that their project has been immortalized in a Fox primetime show... - --Jeffrey with 2 Fs Jeffrey J e f f r e y N o r m a n The Architectural Dance Society www.uwm.edu/~jenor/ADS.html ::sex, drugs, revolt, Eskimos, atheism:: ------------------------------ End of loud-fans-digest V2 #64 ******************************