From: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org (JMDL Digest) To: joni-digest@smoe.org Subject: JMDL Digest V2014 #612 Reply-To: joni@smoe.org Sender: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk Unsubscribe:mailto:joni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe Website:http://jonimitchell.com JMDL Digest Monday, May 5 2014 Volume 2014 : Number 612 ========== TOPICS and authors in this Digest: -------- Re: CMIARS a masterwork? ["David J. Phillips" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 09:17:27 -0400 From: "David J. Phillips" Subject: Re: CMIARS a masterwork? Just to be pedantic, isn't (or wasn't) a masterwork the single piece that proved one was no longer an apprentice (and, in another system of craft production, could set up shop on one's own, and take on apprentices)? So perhaps Song to a Seagull is Mitchell's masterwork, or Court and Spark. Certainly nothing later. djp On 05/05/14 08:5018, Bob.Muller@Fluor.com wrote: > I just don't think it's fair to label something as a masterwork 'just > because' one says so. > > You can refer to Citizen Kane, Rhapsody In Blue, The Mona Lisa, Gone With > The Wind, The Sistine Chapel, To Kill A Mockingbird as masterworks and > nobody would bat an eye because they are recognized as such over time. I > think it dilutes the meaning of the word to put CMIARS in that category. > > Bob > > NP: Sinead O'Connor, "Nothing Compares To You" > > > > From: Jamie Zubairi Home > To: ingrid lochrenberg, > Cc: Joni JMDL > Date: 05/05/2014 08:32 AM > Subject: Re: CMIARS > Sent by: owner-joni@smoe.org > > > > Or even "the work of a master" > On 5 May 2014 13:13, "ingrid lochrenberg" wrote: > >> Something can be regarded by a person as a masterwork based solely on > it's >> impact....with no criteria or intellectualization in-mind. > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > The information transmitted is intended only for the person > or entity to which it is addressed and may contain > proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. > If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are > hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, > distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon > this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please > contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual > sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. > ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------ End of JMDL Digest V2014 #612 ***************************** ------- To post messages to the list,sendtojoni@smoe.org. Unsubscribe by clicking here: mailto:joni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe -------