From: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org (JMDL Digest)
To: joni-digest@smoe.org
Subject: JMDL Digest V2013 #277
Reply-To: joni@smoe.org
Sender: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org
Errors-To: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org
Precedence: bulk
Unsubscribe:mailto:joni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe
Website:http://jonimitchell.com


JMDL Digest       Thursday, February 21 2013       Volume 2013 : Number 277



==========

TOPICS and authors in this Digest:
--------
  Joni Mitchell.com 1996-2013                    [jlhommedieu@insight.rr.com]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:55:53 -0500
From: jlhommedieu@insight.rr.com
Subject: Joni Mitchell.com 1996-2013

I don't know anything about the law but I know a little about pictures. 

Screen resolution is 72dpi but it takes 300dpi to make a good print. 

If a web page has a picture that is the size of a Post-It note, it will look lousy at that size as a print. In theory, I could make a 300dpi print from it, but the length and width would shrink to 1/4 of the original dimensions.  The print would be about the size of a postage stamp. 

If pictures are posted at 72dpi, in my opinion, there is no danger that anyone is going to be able to sell prints.  There just are not enough pixels. 

Jim L'Hommedieu

------------------------------

End of JMDL Digest V2013 #277
*****************************

-------
To post messages to the list, sendtojoni@smoe.org.
Unsubscribe by clicking here:
mailto:joni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe
-------