From: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org (JMDL Digest) To: joni-digest@smoe.org Subject: JMDL Digest V2011 #529 Reply-To: joni@smoe.org Sender: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk Unsubscribe: mailto:joni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe Website: http://jmdl.com JMDL Digest Wednesday, November 16 2011 Volume 2011 : Number 529 ========== TOPICS and authors in this Digest: -------- Re: SMOE [Dan Olson ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:13:41 -0600 From: Dan Olson Subject: Re: SMOE I'm not really sure what the issue is, not being a digest receiver; But I would like to state that, having once been a digest receiver, but then having switched over to the "every email as it's sent" approach, I would highly recommend the latter. Yes, it's sometimes a lot of emails, but the subject line is meaningful, so it's easy to choose the ones I want to read. I find it particular great now that my email is gmail, because all of the messages in a given thread are kept together. I also have a filter set up, so all of my joni emails go into one "inbox". They are also isolated on my phone, so if I'm ever stuck in a line, I can then catch up on all of my Joni email. I would argue strongly in favor of NOT going to some alternative Yahoo universe which might involve changing my paradigm. I resent the way Yahoo periodically takes over my browser with it's logo feces. On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Sharon Watkins wrote: > I vote for the present format; changing may just bring it's own set of > problems. > I delete the emails after I've read them, saving only the ones in which I > have a particular interest. > Sharon > > Sent from my iPhone ------------------------------ End of JMDL Digest V2011 #529 ***************************** ------- To post messages to the list, send to joni@smoe.org. Unsubscribe by clicking here: mailto:joni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe -------