From: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org (JMDL Digest) To: joni-digest@smoe.org Subject: JMDL Digest V2006 #284 Reply-To: joni@smoe.org Sender: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-joni-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk Unsubscribe: mailto:joni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe Archives: http://www.smoe.org/lists/joni Website: http://jonimitchell.com JMDL Digest Friday, August 11 2006 Volume 2006 : Number 284 ========== TOPICS and authors in this Digest: -------- lamont and lieberman, njc ["Kate Bennett" ] Re: "Your notches, liberation doll" - Don't Interrupt the Sorrow [Rebecca] new tom waits show added! (njc) [Victor Johnson ] Re: another Twisted cover [Bob.Muller@Fluor.com] Re: Joni dreambook [Bob.Muller@Fluor.com] Re: A Case of You [LCStanley7@aol.com] got it [LCStanley7@aol.com] Re: Misc but includes some Joni Content [Bobsart48@aol.com] Israel, njc ["Marianne Rizzo" ] Joni citation in local weekly newspaper ["Timothy Spong" ] Re: A Case of You ["Jim L'Hommedieu, Lama" ] Re: Misc but includes some Joni Content, now njc? ["Patti Parlette" ] Re: got it ["Randy Remote" ] Israel, njc ["XLSecurity02" ] "Hotel California" review on this flight tonight ["Patti Parlette" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:26:53 -0700 From: "Kate Bennett" Subject: lamont and lieberman, njc >Lieberman... he just bugged me. . . as he does every time I see and him. . I can't explain why I just do not trust this guy. . . XO Marianne < Trust your intuition... because (in the words of another genius songwriter)... he's an ugly man ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:09:44 +1200 From: Rebecca Blundell Subject: Re: "Your notches, liberation doll" - Don't Interrupt the Sorrow Hey Bob I'd always heard it as 'You're not just liberation, doll', but checking out the lyrics I see I'm wrong. What comes to mind for me is Joni's succession of relationships, and the image of notches in the belt/ bedpost. Are notches in the bedpost for women liberation? A slightly tongue-in-cheek reference to women's sexual freedom? - That's how I'd read it in the context of that song I think. Rebecca > Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:48:29 -0400 > From: Bob.Muller@Fluor.com > Subject: Re: A Case of You > > (thanks Bob)> > > No sweat, my man - we're all in this thing together. Now if you'll just > explain the "your notches liberation doll" thingy to me we'll call it > even. > > Bob ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:43:41 -0400 From: Victor Johnson Subject: new tom waits show added! (njc) Cleveland show added Another show has just been announced: Cleveland, Sunday August 13 at the House of Blues. This is a late night show (there's a ''regular'' show in Akron the same night). Doors in Cleveland open at 11 pm, the show is scheduled to start an hour later. Tickets ($56.00 - $76.00) go on sale on Ticketmaster on Thursday (August 10) at noon (local time). According to Ticketmaster ,,House of Blues is a general admission venue, with a seated, reserved balcony. All floor tickets are for standing room only.'' ,,Special information'' (as indicated on the House of Blues site): 2 TICKET MAXIMUM DUPLICATE ORDERS WILL BE CANCELLED. WILL CALL ONLY NO TICKETS WILL BE GIVEN TO PATRONS UNTIL DOOR TIME DAY OF SHOW. WILL CALL SEATS: All ticket orders may only be retrieved through WILL CALL and can be picked up at the box office on the night of the event at door times (11 PM). These tickets cannot be delivered via any other method. There is a two (2) ticket maximum per household, and the guest of ticket purchaser MUST BE PRESENT at the time of will-call ticket pickup. These tickets are non-transferable and may not be picked up by any other individual - NO EXCEPTIONS. Once purchaser and guest have picked up tickets, they must immediately enter the venue. All patrons will be required to present a valid government-issued photo ID matching the name given at the time of purchase AND the credit card used for the ticket purchase in order to receive their tickets and gain admittance to the show. NO REFUNDS WILL BE MADE TO PERSONS IGNORING THESE INSTRUCTIONS. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:22:44 -0400 From: Bob.Muller@Fluor.com Subject: Re: another Twisted cover Hi Joseph - thanks much for the tip on the Twisted cover. I have found quite a few, but they can be a bit elusive since there have been lots of songs titled "Twisted" recorded that are not the Wardell-Gray composition. A search for "Twisted" yields many results and can leave you...well, twisted. I'll be on the lookout for the live Ann Sally as well. Yes, Japanese CD's can be a little pricy most times. Ebay is a good source for them at a more reasonable price, although I admit I have sprung and spent top dollar for quite a few (Takada Ren's "California" being the most recent). I'll be anxious to see if Sally can handle the phonics of singing "unraveling" better live than in the studio. Bob NP: Peter Gabriel, "Blood Of Eden" - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:26:48 -0400 From: Bob.Muller@Fluor.com Subject: Re: Joni dreambook Thanks for this link, Michael - very creative artwork. I hope everyone figured out that there were three different journal entries/pictures to examine. I'm a sucker for that folk-art collage style, and the fact that it's Joni-based makes it that much more enjoyable. Bob NP: DMB, "Ants Marching" (live) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:43:35 EDT From: LCStanley7@aol.com Subject: Re: A Case of You Ain't nothin' but poetic license is what I was thinkin. But is it a song or a poem, or could it be a song poem, poem song, or, or, or.... as the seals say. Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:48:57 +0100 From: "Jamie's Box of Paints" Subject: Re: A Case of You Hurrah... like playwrighting, it's streetspeak sometimes, sometimes it's business idiom. Just depends on the character you're writing. The line that always confuses me is 'It's all a dream she has awake' never made grammatical sense to me but I know what she means, like she's elliding two senses 'she has waken herself' and 'she has awoken the dream' but it never bothered me. My sentences are littered with my teacher's circled 'grammar' markings On 09/08/06, Victor Johnson wrote: > I do not agree that "those ones *THAT* ain't afraid" is a > purposeful grammatical error. She simply doesn't care period. The > rules of grammar don't apply at all. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:51:24 EDT From: LCStanley7@aol.com Subject: got it Hi Ya'll, I got the Joni Mitchell Complete guitar book finally after ordering it over a month ago. Anybody else get it? Has it really been recalled? Are they going to come to my house and try to get mine back? Should I hide it? It was an innocent mistake on my part to get it because I didn't know it was whatever, but now that I got it, I don't want to send it back. I like it. The cover is pretty but so was the apple in the garden of Eden. Am I going to JMDL hell for this? Save me Joni, save meeeeee!!!! Love, Laura ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:18:16 EDT From: Bobsart48@aol.com Subject: Re: Misc but includes some Joni Content Jim reported "Yeah, that was a fine hour. Were the extra tracks these? Aircheck- Tape Source (UK Broadcast) 12 Hunter JM 13 River JM 14 My Old Man JM 15 A Case Of You JM + JT 16 Carey (w/complete intro) JM If so, tracks 12- 16 were taped from the radio in the UK. No one I know has the playlist for that show; no way to know the order." Answer - yes. Bobsart PS - Obsessive Compulsive Quoting Disorder ? Just because I do that once or twice or three times over the course of a month or a day or an hour ? I think the real problem is that I talk too loose, and tend to repeat myself. ;-) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:33:00 -0400 From: "Marianne Rizzo" Subject: Israel, njc From: mackwatsonbush@charter.net >Well Marianne, I don't trust the motives of our corrupt government >concerning anything. As for Israel, . . . >But lets put it in perspective. For instance the >state of New York was surrounded by states and people that hated them just >for existing. Hi Mack, I am listening to everything you say . . . and I have an open mind. . >people that hated them just >for existing. I have heard this before about Israel. . . or about Jews. . that they are hated for WHO THEY ARE or for existing. (I think perhaps something is missing here in the analysis). I mean, I believe that most people are hated for WHAT they DO, not for who they are. .. . I mean, yes there are predjudices. . (but perhaps these are based on actions that are then generalized) but I assume the Arabs do not like the jews because they tried occupy their land. . what is not to like about the jews in and of themselves? I think it is the ACTION/BEHAVIOR of a person or group that is not to like. again, I am open to listening to what ever anyone has to say. . Marianne _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:58:06 +0000 From: "Timothy Spong" Subject: Joni citation in local weekly newspaper Joniphiles, The Aug. 3 issue of Milford Chronicle, a weekly newspaper of strictly local news for the eponymous small central Delaware city and surrounding communities -- from the same publisher as the daily with which I am employed - -- has this as the top-of-page-1 article (excerpted): Planning could get prettier Milford embraces urban expert's vision By Cathianne Werner-Porterfield MILFORD -- It's been hard to turn on a radio for the past three decades as [sic; "and" apparently intended] not catch this musical verse: "Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got till it's gone. They've paved paradise and put up a parking lot." The song "Big Yellow Taxi," originally performed by Joni Mitchell, seems to pop up periodically with new artists choosing to remake the song, maybe because it seems to have such timeless appeal. It's an issue-oriented ditty that touches on the perils of pollution, and overdevelopment and eventually, love lost. But it could be the soundtrack for the way things may have been, but won't be anymore in Milford. Just last week at the Carlisle Fire Co., Milford residents and city officials sat rapt as they listened to Ed McMahon, a recoginzed national speaker and expert on "smart growth." A home on a tree-lined street apprciates faster than a home in a tree-cleared subdivision, regardless of lot size. And perhaps one of the most important aspects of development, whether it be residential or commercial, is trees. He said developers might balk at first if a town clings to its trees, but new construction and exisging trees can, do, and should coexist, even if that means a parking lot is poured around them instead of on top of where they used to grow. There are no references to American Family Publishers or any TV shows; I think it's safe to assume that the Ed McMahon in the article, a "senior resident fellow at the Urban Land Institute in Washington" ... "who has written 15 books and 150 articles on the subject" (smart growth), is a separate person. Tim Spong Dover, Del., U.S.A. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:24:24 -0400 From: Bob.Muller@Fluor.com Subject: Re: "Your notches, liberation doll" - Don't Interrupt the Sorrow Hey Rebecca, you said: And "you're not just" the only one who's heard them this way...it's certainly one of Joni's more cryptic lines in one of her most cryptic songs, and it's been discussed here several times and is sort of a running gag when it comes to lyrical discussions. Still, one of the nice things about this group is that it's perfectly fine to re-hash old topics, especially given the constant influx of new voices. I'd love to hear what other newbies have to say about 'Don't Interrrupt The Sorrow'. I think the over-riding theme/subject of the song is pretty clear, but breaking it down line-by-line can be a very weighty exercise indeed. Thanks Joni for the challenge! Bob NP: Drive-By Truckers, "Never Gonna Change" - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:36:33 -0400 From: Bob.Muller@Fluor.com Subject: Twisted about Twisted Joseph, Upon closer examination, the cover of "Twisted" is already in our database and collection. Robin must have changed her name from McElhatten to McKelle. If you look at the CD cover it still says 'Robin McElhatten'. This recording appeared on our Volume 15, compiled by Simon. Bob - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:06:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Flaherty Subject: Re: got it LCStanley7@aol.com wrote: > Are >they going to come to my house and try to get mine back? Should I hide it? Lol! Laura, I'm pretty sure that if you don't ask for a refund they'll let you keep it. :-) Michael Flaherty Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:28:41 -0400 From: "Jim L'Hommedieu, Lama" Subject: Re: A Case of You She's saying "it's all a daydream," but that's not an artful way to put it, right? Joni often puts contrasting things together: dream/awake perils/benefactors blessings/parasites etc. In contrast, some writers are very direct, even when writing about a daydream. James from North Carolina said, >well they tell me it's only a dream in Rio.> >nothing could be as sweet as it seems on this very first day down> (BTW, The album track had Bill Payne on keys.) All the best, Jim Jamie said, >The line that always confuses me is 'It's all a dream she has awake' never made grammatical sense to me but I know what she means, like she's elliding two senses 'she has waken herself' and 'she has awoken the dream'> ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:56:33 +0000 From: "Patti Parlette" Subject: Re: Misc but includes some Joni Content, now njc? >Bobsart wrote: > >PS - Obsessive Compulsive Quoting Disorder ? Just because I do that once or >twice or three times over the course of a month or a day or an hour ? I >think >the real problem is that I talk too loose, and tend to repeat myself. > Well, it IS is a repetitious danger, you know! Then again, there's no need to explain. It's just as natural as the weather in this moody sky today. Love, Patti P., just a particle of change P.S. Hey....LOL....did I write the word "change"? As in: "Change the course?" YEAH! Woooo hooooo! GO NED!! NPIMH: "We can chay-ay-aynge the world! Rearrange the world!" (I can't WAIT to see CSNY next week!) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:20:35 +0100 (BST) From: "Garret" Subject: Sufjan njc Yup Bob, Sufjan really is a breath of fresh air. I find his oringinality striking, the songs haunting, the ideas immense, the melodies just magical (of course Dermot says it's like listening to a theme record for kids, and nicknamed him, once, Soporific Stevens;-) Tickets for a concert here in november went on sale a few weeks ago, 9am on a wednesday mornging. I had it all planned - book tickets as soon as i get to the office. It just happened to be a big day in work and it slipped my mind until after lunch. Of course all the tickets were sold out:-( I have a friend who might be able to get me in for free.... fingers crossed. On the verge of a rant heer.... I went onto to ticketbastard today to book two Paul Simon tickets and it totted to almost two hundred euro. I just couldn't do it. GARRET Bob.Muller@Fluor.com wrote NP: Sufjan Stevens, "The Upper Peninsula" (I absolutely love love love Sufjan - what a fresh and unique sound) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:35:20 -0700 From: "Randy Remote" Subject: Re: got it Got mine this week, too. There is no printing date inside or out-so, is it original or revised? Will there be a revised version? Don't know & no info has come forth yet. The book is quite a loaf-must be a good 8 lbs of Joni songs. No photos save the cover. The beginning of the book has a nice analysis of her tunings, grouped in families. All in all, an essential Jonisong reference, but I want the fixed one if there's going to be one. RR - ----- Original Message ----- From: > Hi Ya'll, > > I got the Joni Mitchell Complete guitar book finally after ordering it > over a month ago. Anybody else get it? Has it really been recalled? > Are > they going to come to my house and try to get mine back? Should I hide > it? It > was an innocent mistake on my part to get it because I didn't know it was > whatever, but now that I got it, I don't want to send it back. I like > it. The > cover is pretty but so was the apple in the garden of Eden. Am I going > to > JMDL hell for this? Save me Joni, save meeeeee!!!! > > Love, > Laura ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 03:17:04 +0200 From: "XLSecurity02" Subject: Israel, njc JR wrote: Well, maybe they should have thought longer and harder back in 1948 about where the diaspora should be put. It seems that they couldn't have picked a stupider place than Palestine. They HAD to have known the hatred and animosity that could ensue, esp. considering the continued occupation of Arab lands. What a mistake THAT was. It just seems to me to be an untenable provocation to put them where they are and them arm them and back them with $300B+ every year just for the sake of a base in the area from which we can maintain a watch over "our" energy resources. How pitifully shortsighted. And this is not bashing of the Jewish people by any means (as I haven't a shred of anti-Semitism), any more than my contempt for the policies of this country is some kind of bashing of the American people (well, that doesn't count neoconservatives). Hi, I am simply appalled by all this talk for several reasons: First you think of Israel as a "stupid place to give the jews". What are they? A peon people that the U.S. or the UN could choose to locate anywhere? Second, you open the door to the idea that the existence of Israel itself is a debatable topic and I find it unacceptable. Israel was not created by the U.S. Zionism originated in Germany at the turn of the 20th century and its goal was to allow the jewish people to establish a state in their religious homeland, from which they were forced into exile 2000 years ago and have been praying to return ever since. There was always a jewish presence in the area, and very few arabs lived there. As jews began to immigrate in the first 3 decades of the century, they bought the land from local arab landowners, and arab labor force came into the area attracted by economic opportunities. So much for the supposed "arab land" and the attachment of "Palestinians" to the land of their ancestors, I mean the ties are 2-3 generations old. Several options were suggested by international organizations where to "put" the jews: Ouganda and some remote Russian territory. Jews had no religious ties with those areas, and even if they did you could bet that some local ougandan or central asian would be angry. After all, where do you "put" a people that nobody wanted for 2000 years? Simply nowhere, it's easier to kill them and not offend any local population who might get displaced. However it's OK when the jews get expelled from an (arab among others) country with only their shirt on. I am not sure about which occupation of arab land you are referring to. Anyway the whole Middle East area was shaped into totally artificial states by the British, the French. If you are referring to the territories occupied since 67. I find the current arab claim preposterous. For instance, the very day of Israel's independence, all surrounding coutries attacked the young state for the purpose of destroying it. Same thing happened in 67. At the time Israel was occupying neither the West Bank nor Jerusalem (Jordan did). Gaza and the Sinai were Egyptian. So what were the arabs trying to "liberate" then? Tel Aviv? Back in the early pre-1948 days, the jews themselves realized that their presence in the middle of arab countries would never be accepted as the old progrom and massacres took place regularly. But "Palestine" was the only land mentioned in the Bible (Jerusalem is never mentioned in the Koran) and so no other territory was acceptable. Finally, let me assure you that the Israelis are totally aware that political alliances never last forever (i.e the USSR supported Israel at first) and they have thought of a way to survive should the U.S. turn around. I would like to add a comment to Mack's reply to Marianne's post about killing of civilians. The Hezbollah has deliberately chosen the clever media strategy of hiding rockets behind human shields. Israel has warned that any area from which a rocket is launched is a legitimate target. That is precisely what the Hezbollah wants to win public opinion support and they succeed. Also note that Israel was hit with 600 rockets before beginning its military campaign! How long would NYC stand still? And where else do you see a country send tracts to warn civilians before a bombing? I am sorry I cannot spend more time to elaborate on all these issues. . Being on holiday I have limited internet access so I may not reply right away. Laurent ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:20:41 +0000 From: "Patti Parlette" Subject: "Hotel California" review on this flight tonight Bon soir, Joniami(e)s! I've been wanting to share this with you aging children for *weeks* but I had no time with all the traveling traveling traveling and then the crazy campaigning. Now I can be a defector from the petty political wars for a little while. Phew. It's a jungle (line) out there! I had been saving "Hotel California" for vacation so I could savor it without too many interruptions. (Okay, okay -- I must confess to taking many sneak Joni peeks, though, before reading it in its entirety. I plead JMOCD...couldn't help myself!). So on July 20th I settled down into Seat 12B on American Airlines flight number whatever, shut off my cellphone and other electronic devices as instructed, nodded and smiled at my seatmate, took a slug of my water ("don't it always seem to go, you don't know what you've got til it's gone?" -- safe travels to everyone today!!!), and settled down into the clickety clack, oops, I mean the drone of flying engines. I figured I'd flip through the "American Way" flight magazine to ease me into the voyage as the captain and crew made all their announcements. You never know, there just might be something interesting. (Did any of you see that Mermaid Tavern article in July of, oh, I think it was 2001, in the Delta Sky magazine?) Well, what to my wondering eyes should appear but a review of "Hotel California"! Quelle belle synchronicite! There is a startling (at least to me) description of Joni that made my eyes pop out, but I'll let y'all read it for yourselves. Voila: Hotel California: The True-life Adventures of Crosby, Stills, Nash, Young, Mitchell, Taylor, Browne, Ronstadt, Geffen, the Eagles, and Their Many Friends By Barney Hoskyns (Wiley, $26) British music critic Barney Hoskyns, who previously chronicled the Los Angeles rock zeitgeist in his survey Waiting for the Sun, crafts this vibrant history of the early 70s SoCal scene and the rise of the canyon cowboys and self--confessional singer-songwriters who came to dominate the music of the me-decade. As Hoskyns observes, it was an era populated by an unusual mix of characters: from the earnest Jackson Browne to the brilliant but bed-hopping Joni Mitchell, the mercurial Neil Young to the innocent Linda Ronstadt, and the wickedly ambitious duo of Don Henley and Glenn Frey. Graduating from hoot nights and folk-rock to private Learjets and sold-out stadium shows in just a few short years, they prospered by selling an illusory dream of California as a sun-kissed paradise, even though practically none of the key players was a native of the state. Setting the music and the musicians aside, the story here is really about a dramatic shift within the entertainment industry itself. Its a tale dominated by a new kind of management and executive figures like David Geffen, Elliot Roberts, and Irving Azoff, the first generation of record men to merge an artist-friendly hippie demeanor with a ruthless business sense. Hoskyns provides both a broad overview and plenty of finely etched detail, showing how this small, incestuous community of individuals ultimately came to dominate American music. He charts their path to multiplatinum success and their later descent into madness and death, a farrago fueled by a combination of drugs and rampant egos. Despite the authors best efforts to make a case for the artistic merits of the era, at books end youre left with a feeling that the lasting legacy of this peaceful easy period isnt in the music at all but rather in the bank accounts of those who prospered. Still, it makes for a juicy and engrossing read.  Bob Bozorgmehr from: http://www.americanwaymag.com/PastIssues/July152006/DownLow/tabid/1773/Default.aspx "...the brilliant but bed-hopping Joni Mitchell"???!!! Oh MY! I enjoyed the book very much. The details about the music business stuff were not particularly interesting to me, but the stories about the musicians and their relationships were interesting from a psychological and a sociological perspective. (LOL! I use those words to class up the experience, which was actually pretty "gossipy".) I also liked how some of the chapter titles and subtitles used Joni lyrics, such as "Back to the Garden", "A Case of Me", "The Machinery vs. the Popular Song", "Old Ladies of the Canyon", "Both Sides Then", "Don't Interrupt the Sorrow", etc. Oh, yeah, and the pictures! They are great! Joni sitting on the edge of a brick patio, drink and cigarette in hand, w/ Jack Nicholson in the background; Joni at the window of "Our House"; and "Ladies of the canyon: Bonnie Raitt, Linda Ronstadt, and Maria Muldaur at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium in 1974". Midnight at the oasis. Send your camels to bed. Pleasant dreamland, everyone! Love, Patti P. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:35:17 -0700 From: Subject: Joni Mitchell Songbook I received the Joni Mitchell Complete songbook today from Amazon. I believe it is the "incomplete" version so it looks like one of the "recalls" may have slipped through to me. Nonetheless is is very impressive and very large - about 11" x 14" and an inch and a half thick. It has tons of her songs from every album and a chart of all her tunings along with groupings of songs that are in the same tuning. (You could play a whole set and not have to retune ;-) If you can see it in a bookstore, you should check it out. It is quite a piece of work (and that is meant in a good way!) Kakki ------------------------------ End of JMDL Digest V2006 #284 ***************************** ------- Post messages to the list by clicking here: mailto:joni@smoe.org Unsubscribe by clicking here: mailto:joni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe -------