From: les@jmdl.com (JMDL Digest) To: joni-digest@smoe.org Subject: JMDL Digest V2000 #653 Reply-To: joni@smoe.org Sender: les@jmdl.com Errors-To: les@jmdl.com Precedence: bulk Unsubscribe: mailto:joni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe Archives: http://www.smoe.org/lists/joni Websites: http://www.jmdl.com http://www.jonimitchell.com JMDL Digest Wednesday, December 13 2000 Volume 2000 : Number 653 The 'Official' Joni Mitchell Homepage, created by Wally Breese, can be found at http://www.jonimitchell.com. It contains the latest news, a detailed bio, Original Interviews, essays, lyrics and much much more. The JMDL website can be found at http://www.jmdl.com and contains interviews, articles, the member gallery, archives, and much more. ========== TOPICS and authors in this Digest: -------- Re: irregardless/regardless NJC [Dflahm@aol.com] Re: LJC -- Story of a Randaholic--LONG [Dflahm@aol.com] Re: LJC -- Story of a Randaholic--LONG [Dflahm@aol.com] NJC Banks [Bob.Muller@fluor.com] Re: NJC Banks [RoseMJoy@aol.com] Re: NJC Banks [Bob.Muller@fluor.com] Re: Ayn Rand and HUAC-NJC ["Megan" ] Digital Camera (NJC) ["Happy The Man" ] CD Burner Question... ["Christopher J. Treacy" ] Re: Saving jm.com ["Megan" ] sonicnet (very NJC) [Alison E ] Re: irregardless/regardless NJC ["Lori R. Fye" ] Re: missed opportunity for 80's flashback (njc) [Alison E ] irregardless/regardless/Homer NJC [Steve Dulson ] Today in Joni History - December 13 [Today in Joni History ] nov 13 ooops!!! njc ["Wally Kairuz" ] Re: LJC -- Story of a Randaholic--LONG [catman ] down to you revisited [Michael Bellavia ] Re: Ayn Rand and HUAC-NJC [catman ] Re: CD Burner Question...NJC [catman ] Re: irregardless/regardless NJC [catman ] Re: irregardless/regardless NJC [catman ] Re: Digital Camera (NJC) [catman ] RE: regardless/irregardless (NJC) ["Pitassi, Mary" ] Re: CD Burner Question...NJC [Jerry Notaro ] Re: irregardless/regardless NJC ["Lori R. Fye" ] Re: CD Burner Question... [Mark Domyancich ] Re: irregardless/regardless NJC [catman ] Re: CD Burner Question... Forgot to mention... [Mark Domyancich ] Re: Saving jm.com [AsharaJM@aol.com] Re: down to you revisited NJC [michael w yarbrough ] CD Burner Question (NJC) ["Christopher J. Treacy" ] Re: NJC Banks [Catherine McKay ] RE: irregardless/regardless NJC [john low ] A little help from my friends (NJC) ["Lori R. Fye" ] Best of 2000 VLJC & Long [Bob.Muller@fluor.com] NJ: my brother is pissed [db.ireland@usa.net] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:38:17 EST From: Dflahm@aol.com Subject: Re: irregardless/regardless NJC I'm an amateur at this, but I'd say that "replicate" means "to reproduce exactly(in every detail)" while "reproduce" indicates a similarity that is great but not absolute. Living things reproduce (their offspring); only laboratories replicate (clones). "Replicate" appears to be an offspring of the marriage between "reproduce" and "duplicate." DAVID LAHM ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 08:21:34 EST From: Dflahm@aol.com Subject: Re: LJC -- Story of a Randaholic--LONG Al, I hope you'll trust me that I'm not raising these questions in a belligerent tone. But I'm having great difficulty with the meaning of words in your post. What is volition? What is objective (the adjective)? How can a value be objective? How can your "one objective value" be something so few people, at least in the northwest quarter of the globe, actually practice? The "value" that says "don't seek to dominate and control others" seems to me at best a RECOGNITION that humans have an innate drive to dominate and control others. The "value" signifies that somewhere we find this drive unattractive in itself and tragic in its consequences. What makes us human, completely contrary to what you say, IMO, is that we possess something that mediates between desire and the taking of actions to fulfill that desire. What was Ayn Rand's view of the Freud's writings on neurosis, by the way? Respectfully, DAVID LAHM who believes that we cannot meaningfully talk about knowledge without considering language-the means by which we communicate and perhaps even think at all. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 08:24:47 EST From: Dflahm@aol.com Subject: Re: LJC -- Story of a Randaholic--LONG PS--does your experience as a parent confirm that you should not abrogate (at least temporarily) the volition of your child? ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 08:30:18 -0500 From: Bob.Muller@fluor.com Subject: NJC Banks <> Don't get me started on banks! The bank that I've been using for the past 16 years was bought and consolidated with another one, and now the service charges are going outta the roof! Checking used to be free, now there's going to be an $8/mo. "maintenance fee". I had overdraft protection, now they charge a fee everytime it's drawn. I was paying $1/mo. for unlimited debit card use, now there's going to be a .40 charge everytime I use the debit card! Anyway, the bottom line is that I'm going to switch banks. Fluor has an alignment with a local bank that offers the whole gallery of services for no service charges. The hassle is now all the things that direct deposit and draft from my checking account are going to have to be transferred. I hope it's less complicated than I think it's going to be. Time was, changing banks was simple...you closed out your account, took your money & ran. Now it's a much larger animal. Anybody have any bank-changing experiences they want to share to either reassure me that it's no big deal or scare the hell outta me? I guess money *IS* the root of all evil after all! ;~) Bob NP: Neil Young, "Loose Change" - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:16:10 EST From: RoseMJoy@aol.com Subject: Re: NJC Banks In a message dated 12/13/00 8:36:27 AM Eastern Standard Time, Bob.Muller@fluor.com writes: << Don't get me started on banks! The bank that I've been using for the past 16 years was bought and consolidated with another one, and now the service charges are going outta the roof! Checking used to be free, now there's going to be an $8/mo. "maintenance fee". I had overdraft protection, now they charge a fee everytime it's drawn. I was paying $1/mo. for unlimited debit card use, now there's going to be a .40 charge everytime I use the debit card! >> Bob, I work for a Credit Union and believe me they have all the services that these huge Banks do. They have direct deposit, ATM, check cards, auto loans and leases, 2nd mortgages, home equity loans and home banking, to name a few of these services. Check to see if there is a Community Credit Union in your area. Usually all you have to do to become a member, is you must work, live or worship in that community and keep 5.00 in a savings account. The fees are much less than these huge Financial Institutions charge because they are "not for profit organization." Checking is free and you only get charged if you use a foreign ATM and usually they give you 5 free transactions per month! My credit union only charges 15.00 for a return check fee versus First Union's 32.00. I'll never go back to a Bank. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:20:23 -0500 From: Bob.Muller@fluor.com Subject: Re: NJC Banks <> Thanks for the tip, Rose! Matter of fact, we have a Credit Union affiliated with the company that is in the same building, and they offer all that stuff to employees for free. So that certainly is a do-able option. If I get a free toaster or something for switching my account, I'll send it your way! ;~) Bob NP: Neil Young, "Stringman" - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 08:42:04 -0500 From: "Megan" Subject: Re: Ayn Rand and HUAC-NJC ----- Original Message ----- From: catman To: Megan Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 5:34 AM Subject: Re: Ayn Rand and HUAC-NJC Hi meagn-firstly, of course I foorgive you! It was hardly a major incident and I had forgotten it till you mentioned it here! STOP feeling guilty! you have no need. It is okay to get pleasure from what you do. It would not be natural for you not to get good feelings from your work God, or whatever you believe in, is not to be frightened of. She will not punish you because you feel good! Actually, God doesn't punish anyone, no matter what. We do that ourselves. Everything we do, and all we think, rebounds on us-be it good or bad. Thus we are punished or rewarded. God just gives us Her pwoer and Love-unconditonally. Thank you for your comments about what others have said about me. I am sure tho that others would say the opposite! I have my enemies! take care colin Hi Colin, You're right again, we do punish ourselves- God loves us to much to do that.And I agree, it does rebound on us, it's like that old saying, " What goes around, comes around." As for you having enemies, I doubt it, and if you do, let them be banished! Anyone on this list for any length of time can see you for the deeply spiritual & good person that you are-- you just like to challenge others and we need to be challenged! It is both thought - -provoking as well as forces us to re-examine perhaps our own long-held convictions.I have always felt it is a healthy thing to look at something from someone else's point of view--it has only enriched my own. All the best------------Megan ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 08:35:21 -0700 From: "Happy The Man" Subject: Digital Camera (NJC) Okay any of you photography people (Leslie, Michael, etc.) I budgeted a digital camera for 2001 and of course I can put it on the company credit card after today and it will show up on January's bill so. What would you recommend I have $900 to work with. Peace, Craig ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:42:34 -0500 From: "Christopher J. Treacy" Subject: CD Burner Question... Maybe one of you can answer this - Every now and again, I find a disc that I've traded for will not play well on my stereo CD player, but will sound fine on my burner. When played on the stereo or in my discman, the CD is marred by awful crackling that waxes and wanes throughout the entire playback, getting louder and softer will the fluctuating volume of the recording. Is this because the disc(s) in question are only meant to be played in CD Burners? Is there a way I can load the music into my hard drive and transfer it to a multipurpose CD and get rid of the noise? I waited 2 months for this guy to finally send me these Shawn Colvin CDs, and 2 of them are crackling away; they sound great on the computer, though! -Chris NP:-"Kathy's Song"-Shawn Colvin Live @ McCabes 7-1-92 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:27:13 -0500 From: "Megan" Subject: Re: Saving jm.com Rose, I'm with you- if we had an auction we could conceivably raise quite a bit of money for jm.com. I for one would be willing to donate some of my Joni memorabilia as well as donate whatever I can $ wise.I was a phone friend of Wally Breese's since 1990, long before the site was even up,( I answered his ad in Goldmine about contacting other Joni -lovers) and saw firsthand the blood, sweat and tears he put into getting that site up & running.Knowing what that site meant to him, and now what it means to all of us, there's pretty much nothing I would'nt sacrifice or do to keep it going.For all of us who loved Wally, let's do what we have to in his memory. Sincerely---------------Megan ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:09:17 -0800 (PST) From: Alison E Subject: sonicnet (very NJC) hey guys, sorry to take up bandwidth, but whenever i try to play the station i created in sonicnet (or any one else's station, for that matter) it sounds as though the chipmunks are doing renditions of all the songs. does anyone know what might make this extra-speedy tempo situation happen? i am on a computer at work. any advice would be helpful. thanks, alison e. Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:09:15 -0800 (PST) From: "Lori R. Fye" Subject: Re: irregardless/regardless NJC My pet peeves in the land of diction: Envirement vs. enviroNment. Goverment vs. goverNment. Excape vs. escape. And yes, realator vs. realtor. Then there are my pet peeves in the land of overuse. I've mentioned the first one previously. "Actually" (Apparently this lends importance or veracity to the rest of the sentence. "She's ACTUALLY on the phone right now." As opposed to what?) "Know what I'm sayin'?" (Often spoken so quickly it sounds more like a strange Asian dialect: "Naumsayn?") "Know what I mean?" ("Naumeen?") "I hear that!" ===== Lori in DC http://radio.sonicnet.com/mymusiclisten.asp?name=jmdlnet http://radio.sonicnet.com/mymusiclisten.asp?name=lrfye http://www.art101.com/flame/taxfree.htm (not my own, but very cool) Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:13:43 -0800 (PST) From: Alison E Subject: Re: missed opportunity for 80's flashback (njc) oh, big mistake victor! my sister and her her husband went to see this show in salt lake and said it was fantastic! i actually would have gone, i was a big dio fan back in the day... i scared the piss out of some east village ultra cools by singing dio in a bar one drunken night... i am sure they thought i was from jersey. little did they know i come from a land far away....where west valley city hair kicks the snot out of any bad jersey 'do! alison e. (like a rainbow in the dark....) - --- Victor Johnson wrote: > I actually thought about going tonight to see Ronnie > James Dio with opening > act Yngwie M. at the Masquerade in Atlanta *only* > because I saw the same > show way back in 1985 at the Lakeland Civic Center > in Florida. I even still > have the tour shirt I bought(and wore to school the > next day along with a > dozen other people). > I was thinking how nostalgic it would be to go a > heavy metal show and > pretend that I had slipped back in time 15 years. > Victor Johnson Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:17:53 -0500 From: Jerry Notaro Subject: Re: irregardless/regardless NJC Newest redundancy making the current rounds: Because of the fact that.... Yuch! How about just "because...." ? Jerry ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:28:35 -0800 (PST) From: "Lori R. Fye" Subject: Re: irregardless/regardless NJC Jerry wrote: > Newest redundancy making the current rounds: > > Because of the fact that.... I occasionally wonder if people who speak languages other than English find themselves aggravated with their fellow citizens over these same issues. Then I wonder what our butchered English sounds like to visiting foreigners who are trying to understand what the hell we're talking about. What would our crappy diction and redundant speech sound like if translated into another tongue? ===== Lori in DC http://radio.sonicnet.com/mymusiclisten.asp?name=jmdlnet http://radio.sonicnet.com/mymusiclisten.asp?name=lrfye http://www.art101.com/flame/taxfree.htm (not my own, but very cool) Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:56:00 -0800 From: Steve Dulson Subject: irregardless/regardless/Homer NJC Bob wrote; >People also seem to use the incorrect "preventitive," more often than >"preventive." I have even heard "preventitive" used in TV and radio ads You all should get a REAL kick out of Presidential press conferences in the new year! :) and Victor wrote: >I thought Homer Simpson coined the phrase "woo-hoo".... Homer who? Sorry Victor, noone of that name on this list.... :) - -- ######################################################## Steve Dulson Costa Mesa CA steve@psitech.com "The Tinker's Own" http://www.tinkersown.com "Southern California Dulcimer Heritage" http://members.aol.com/scdulcimer/ "The Living Tradition Concert Series" http://www.thelivingtradition.org/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 03:49:00 -0700 From: Today in Joni History Subject: Today in Joni History - December 13 1969: Today's issue of Rolling Stone announces that Joni is hanging it up. An excerpt: "Joni Mitchell has announced her public retirement, claiming her performance schedule has made it impossible to continue a song writing career and develop her interest in painting. "She hasn't been able to write since trying to become a super star," [Elliot] Roberts said. "Next fall, after she gets some more material together, she may want to do some isolated concerts again, but I doubt it. Performing just isn't what she wants these days." Read the article: http://www.jmdl.com/articles/docs/691213rs.cfm - -------- Know a date or month specific Joni tidbit? Send it off to JoniFact@jmdl.com and we'll add it to the list. - -------- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:52:41 -0300 From: "Wally Kairuz" Subject: nov 13 ooops!!! njc today is NOT november 13, i just realized, but DECEMBER 13. it is still andy's birthday, though. sorry, andy! wallyK ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:22:22 +0000 From: catman Subject: Re: LJC -- Story of a Randaholic--LONG > who believes that we cannot meaningfully talk about knowledge without > considering language-the means by which we communicate and perhaps even think > at all. too true-language is everything-almost. The words we use create meanings b ut hose meanings are different according to the person sauing the words and the person hearing them. As for objectivity-we can't be objective about anything. We each create our meaning structures from our experience. That is subjective and always will be. People who think they are objective, are mistaken. - -- bw colin colin@tantra.fsbusiness.co.uk http://www.geocities.com/tantra_apso/index.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:41:46 -0500 From: "Megan" Subject: Fw: Saving jm.com - ----- Original Message ----- From: Megan To: Cc: Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 11:37 AM Subject: Re: Saving jm.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 10:15 AM > Subject: Re: Saving jm.com > > > > Megan, > > The site is back up! I think we should still help Jim out financially > though. > > Thanks. > > Rose in NJ > > Hi Rose, > I agree with you; maybe this just scared us all into not taking the > maintenance of the site for granted. Jim has done a superb job of this & in > carrying on Wally's legacy.We should all show our gratitude & support in > what ever way we can.This goes for Les too, who also does an unbelievable > job.I remember Wally telling me way back in '94-'95 how expensive things > were in getting the site up & going, and @ that time, I just used to send > him $ donations whenever I could- he never asked, I just did it because I > believed in his mission.Well, after going thru an expensive divorce & > getting my life back on track, I was (finally!) able to afford a good system > so I could actually benefit from all of Wally's hard work! Before that ,I > just frequented cyber-cafes.My main motivation for being on-line was jm.com > &jmdl.com in the first place,so I don't want to lose either one ever > again.So,if Jim and/or Les want to give us an idea of how we can help, let > us know. > Rejoicing happily, > Megan ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:28:20 -0500 From: Michael Bellavia Subject: down to you revisited so for those who were helping me out with the different translations of down to you, i have an update on the story. we're back together again, and it's better than before. decided not to give the lyrics to him right away. after listening to dty for another 50 or so times and re-reading the lyrics and writing them out and totally becoming an obsessive freak, i decided to take a chill out approach. i wound up writing my own words to smooth things over and it worked. but this morning i did spring dty on him. i slipped it into the cd player easing in first with a peppy raised on robbery and then decided to quickly tone down the mood and played dty for him. he listened intently and even started reading the liner notes. during the musical bridge, i told him that the song helped me think through him. it helped me also think thru me and what i am about or can be about. he started talking about the lyrics and immediately grasped that it wasnt me saying that "hey, joseph, it's down to you," but more so that i was saying to myself that it all comes down to me in the end. and yeah i have my flaws and all, but i am flawless at being me (gosh, i just wrote a hallmark card line). the song came across very well and he said it was touching. then we turned on the radio and caught the last verse of britney spears' "stronger". britney is such a lyrical genius we were both besides ourselves. (just kidding - don't get yourselves in a tizzy. joni is still my genie in the bottle.) michael. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:25:06 +0000 From: catman Subject: Re: Ayn Rand and HUAC-NJC oops! When I replied to this I assumed it had just come to me, not the list,(I only saw one copy) hence my reply wnet to megan and to the list. Megan wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: catman > To: Megan > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 5:34 AM > Subject: Re: Ayn Rand and HUAC-NJC > Hi meagn-firstly, of course I foorgive you! It was hardly a major incident > and I had forgotten it till you mentioned it here! > > STOP feeling guilty! you have no need. It is okay to get pleasure from what > you do. It would not be natural for you not to get good feelings from your > work God, or whatever you believe in, is not to be frightened of. She will not > punish you because you feel good! Actually, God doesn't punish anyone, no > matter what. We do that ourselves. Everything we do, and all we think, > rebounds on us-be it good or bad. Thus we are punished or rewarded. God just > gives us Her pwoer and Love-unconditonally. > > Thank you for your comments about what others have said about me. I am sure > tho that others would say the opposite! I have my enemies! > > take care > colin ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:28:15 +0000 From: catman Subject: Re: CD Burner Question...NJC It isn't the cd's-it is the stereo system. My car cd wouldn't play burned cd's at all soemtimes. When you burn a cd for use on Hi Fi systems, use only 2x speed and preferably record at 1x, although you should be okay with 2x. The trouble is in the chips in the hi fi system not being able to read these burned cd's well. the newest ones can with no trouble. the older the system the less likely it is that it can read the info correctly. "Christopher J. Treacy" wrote: > Maybe one of you can answer this - > Every now and again, I find a disc that I've traded for will not play > well on my stereo CD player, but will sound fine on my burner. When > played on the stereo or in my discman, the CD is marred by awful > crackling that waxes and wanes throughout the entire playback, getting > louder and softer will the fluctuating volume of the recording. Is this > because the disc(s) in question are only meant to be played in CD > Burners? Is there a way I can load the music into my hard drive and > transfer it to a multipurpose CD and get rid of the noise? I waited 2 > months for this guy to finally send me these Shawn Colvin CDs, and 2 of > them are crackling away; they sound great on the computer, though! -Chris > NP:-"Kathy's Song"-Shawn Colvin Live @ McCabes 7-1-92 - -- bw colin colin@tantra.fsbusiness.co.uk http://www.geocities.com/tantra_apso/index.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:32:09 +0000 From: catman Subject: Re: irregardless/regardless NJC > "Actually" (Apparently this lends importance or > veracity to the rest of the sentence. "She's ACTUALLY > on the phone right now." As opposed to what?) > > " Actually, the word that gets to me most(at this time) is controversy. Many pronounce it contraVERSY wheras I am more used to conTROVersy. I think it can be said either way. Either in this case said ITHER!! Not EETHER! As for your name, I guess Americans would say Loori whearas we say LORRY as in big truck. I prefer your way. bw colin(not Colon) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:32:58 +0000 From: catman Subject: Re: irregardless/regardless NJC > How about just "because...." ? That's correct. it must be. Parents say it all the time! > > > Jerry - -- bw colin colin@tantra.fsbusiness.co.uk http://www.geocities.com/tantra_apso/index.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 17:34:43 +0000 From: catman Subject: Re: Digital Camera (NJC) Genrally the more you spend the better the equipment. I bough a Fugifilm mx1200 for about $500 which I am happy with. Happy The Man wrote: > Okay any of you photography people (Leslie, Michael, etc.) I budgeted a > digital camera for 2001 and of course I can put it on the company credit > card after today and it will show up on January's bill so. What would you > recommend I have $900 to work with. > > Peace, Craig - -- bw colin colin@tantra.fsbusiness.co.uk http://www.geocities.com/tantra_apso/index.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:37:17 -0600 From: "Pitassi, Mary" Subject: RE: regardless/irregardless (NJC) Mr. Bob wrote: "And while I've gotten used to "nu-cu-lar", I'll never be able to be comfortable with "re-la-tor" as opposed to "re-al-tor". Even Joni says "relator" when she's talking about Magdalene Laundries." Bob, a humble question. Maybe the nurses or other health care professionals on the list can answer it. If reactors can be "nucular," can lungs riddled with TB be "tuburclear"?? Inquiring minds want to know. Mary P. P.S. My favorite "WHAAAT?" moment in advertising in the last five years are so are those Slim-Fast ads which promise that their product will deliver "calcium like in milk, protein (or something) like in fish." The construction itself sounds "fishy" grammatically, but in addition to that, isn't the nutrient either calcium, or not?? This kind of reminds me of one reviewer's comment on Madonna's "Like A Virgin" release many years ago: "It's not false advertising. She never said she *was* a virgin." ;-) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:49:21 -0500 From: Jerry Notaro Subject: Re: CD Burner Question...NJC And I find that cd-r's and cd-rw's skip much more in my car ( a very good Bose system) than do factory recorded cd's. Jerry ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:09:02 -0800 (PST) From: "Lori R. Fye" Subject: Re: irregardless/regardless NJC Colin wrote: > As for your name, I guess Americans would say Loori > whearas we say LORRY as in big truck. > I prefer your way. Once upon a time I was going to change my name to Loori, then sign it with a vertical line coming down from each "o" and a horizontal line connecting them, to emulate the a symbol for lesbianism. But I've digressed ... no, Colin, it's pronounced Lo-ree, like the truck. (Lucky me.) L o o r i -|-|- (who's over her "diesel dyke" phase) in DC Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:16:54 -0600 From: Mark Domyancich Subject: Re: CD Burner Question... Hey Chris, CD burners are much better at extracting audio to the hard disk than the internal CD drive. It's possible when whoever converted the DAT or cassette to CD, they had the levels too high which created clipping (compared to distortion on analog sources, where saturation occurs, the highs are clipped on digital sources). I don't know what to say, but try cleaning the disc, I find a dust cloth or washing the disc in a dish detergent/warm water mixture to be the best. Try cleaning the laser on your stereo and discman. If all else fails, extract the audio to your hard disk from your burner, and reduce your extract speed to 1x. This will minimize any pops or clicks. Hope this helps! NP-The Slip, Rick's Place, Denton TX 10/18/96 - Invisible Man (my favorite band!) At 9:42 AM -0500 12/13/00, Christopher J. Treacy wrote: >Maybe one of you can answer this - >Every now and again, I find a disc that I've traded for will not play >well on my stereo CD player, but will sound fine on my burner. When >played on the stereo or in my discman, the CD is marred by awful >crackling that waxes and wanes throughout the entire playback, getting >louder and softer will the fluctuating volume of the recording. Is this >because the disc(s) in question are only meant to be played in CD >Burners? Is there a way I can load the music into my hard drive and >transfer it to a multipurpose CD and get rid of the noise? I waited 2 >months for this guy to finally send me these Shawn Colvin CDs, and 2 of >them are crackling away; they sound great on the computer, though! -Chris >NP:-"Kathy's Song"-Shawn Colvin Live @ McCabes 7-1-92 - -- Mark Domyancich Harpua@revealed.net tape trading: http://homepage.mac.com/mtd/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 19:08:17 +0000 From: catman Subject: Re: irregardless/regardless NJC > But I've digressed ... no, Colin, it's pronounced > Lo-ree, like the truck. (Lucky me.) Bu I have never heard an American use a short o! It always sounds like loori not lorry. > > > L o o r i > -|-|- > > (who's over her "diesel dyke" phase) > in DC > Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. > http://shopping.yahoo.com/ - -- bw colin colin@tantra.fsbusiness.co.uk http://www.geocities.com/tantra_apso/index.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:08:46 -0600 From: Mark Domyancich Subject: Re: CD Burner Question... Forgot to mention... I wouldn't suggest washing your discs in the dish detergent/water mixture. I did it once to a few and some spots started to appear on the discs. Also, and I think this may be the culprit: make sure you are using very good quality cables, like Monster. They make a huge difference in the sound quality. Make sure your connections are good too, no dust or dirt in the cable or the RCA jacks. I saw a three-foot pair of Monster cables at Target today for $8 that I'm thinking about going to get, if I can pull out of my driveway safely with all this snow. :) NP still-The Slip 10/18/96-Farmgirl At 12:16 PM -0600 12/13/00, I wrote: >Hey Chris, > >CD burners are much better at extracting audio to the hard disk than >the internal CD drive. It's possible when whoever converted the DAT >or cassette to CD, they had the levels too high which created >clipping (compared to distortion on analog sources, where saturation >occurs, the highs are clipped on digital sources). > >I don't know what to say, but try cleaning the disc, I find a dust >cloth or washing the disc in a dish detergent/warm water mixture to >be the best. Try cleaning the laser on your stereo and discman. If >all else fails, extract the audio to your hard disk from your >burner, and reduce your extract speed to 1x. This will minimize any >pops or clicks. > >Hope this helps! > >NP-The Slip, Rick's Place, Denton TX 10/18/96 - Invisible Man (my >favorite band!) - -- Mark Domyancich Harpua@revealed.net tape trading: http://homepage.mac.com/mtd/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:24:00 -0800 (PST) From: "Lori R. Fye" Subject: Re: irregardless/regardless NJC > Bu I have never heard an American use a short o! It > always sounds like loori not lorry. Well, perhaps the correct phonetic presentation is: Lor-ee. But it still sounds like the British word for truck. Lori in DC Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:30:48 EST From: AsharaJM@aol.com Subject: Re: Saving jm.com Megan wrote: << We should all show our gratitude & support in > what ever way we can.This goes for Les too, who also does an unbelievable > job. >> It is expensive and time-consuming to keep these websites going, which is why I continue to fundraise for both these sites. A reminder that there is a fundraiser going on right now. Please take a moment to go to this webpage and check it out: or: The fact is, I have a lot of money tied up in this particular fundraiser, and I need to recoup my money before the proceeds are split between the two sites. If you are interested in one or more of these incredible prints, please order them ASAP! They are really wonderful. If you would like to receive your print before the Holidays, I would need to have your check and order form by Tuesday, December 19th. Thanks! Hugs, Ashara ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:32:15 -0600 (CST) From: michael w yarbrough Subject: Re: down to you revisited NJC On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Michael Bellavia wrote: > turned on the radio and caught the last verse of britney spears' > "stronger". britney is such a lyrical genius we were both besides I'm so pleased to hear that things are going well for your relationship and that you were able to share DTY. "Stronger," though--as far as I know that's not a Britney Spears song. There is a recent Kristine W single with that title, however. Was this what you heard? On the radio? If so, I need to move to where you live--I would LOVE to hear Kristine W on the radio!! Cheers-- - --Michael NP: Mary J. Blige, _Mary_ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:46:58 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) From: Andy Stancliffe Subject: Re: nov 13!!!! On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 03:10:45 -0300 Wally Kairuz wrote: > andy andy > you're a lurker > you're a dandy > > you are > more exclusive > than napoleon brandy!!!! Since this is the birthday greeting that brought the biggest smile to my (gasp!) 47 year old face, I really do need to come out of lurker mode, and even add some Joni content to the message. First, Wally, you're a sweetheart to compare me to Napoleon Brandy. Though I guess it's a very aged brandy, isn't it? But on to the Joni content. My sister, Karen, called me last week to say she was going to see k.d. lang in Denver, and because Karen's new beau knows her pedal steel player, she'd get to go backstage. I asked her if his name is Greg Liesz, and she asked me how I knew, and I said Greg Liesz had played with Joni on TTT and PWWAM and was in the band when Karen flew to LA for one night in '98 to see Joni, Van and Dylan at Pauley Pavilion with me. Anyway, when Karen met Greg, she told him she had seen him 2 years ago when he played with Joni at Pauley Pavilion. She said his face lit up and he became very animated, and told her playing with Joni was different than playing with anyone else, because Joni is truly an artist and instead of giving him specific instructions about what she wanted, she encouraged him to be creative and make his own contribution when he played with her. But, thanks again, Wally, you birthday angel. Andy ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:38:29 -0500 From: "Christopher J. Treacy" Subject: CD Burner Question (NJC) Thanks all. Catman wrote "It isn't the cd's-it is the stereo system. My car cd wouldn't play burned cd's at all soemtimes. When you burn a cd for use on Hi Fi systems, use only 2x speed and preferably record at 1x, although you should be okay with 2x. The trouble is in the chips in the hi fi system not being able to read these burned cd's well. the newest ones can with no trouble. the older the system the less likely it is that it can read the info correctly." This sounds most like the explanation - I will reload and reburn at a slower speed and see if that doesn't reduce the 'noise'. Cheers! -Chris ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:42:55 -0500 (EST) From: Catherine McKay Subject: Re: NJC Banks - --- Bob.Muller@fluor.com wrote: >Fluor has an > alignment with a local bank The thing I really want to know is, just how do you pronounce "Fluor" anyway? Is it like "One Flew o'er the Cuckoo's nest"? Or more like, "Just set that right down on the floor right over there?" Is it like "fluoride" without the "ide"? As a matter of fact, maybe I do need to get a life, but I REALLY wanna know! Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 8:39 +1000 From: john low Subject: RE: irregardless/regardless NJC Alot of Australians (particularly sports people) are now pronouncing the name of their country as - 'Austrayia'! Did anyone notice this during the Olympic coverage? Cheers, John (in Sydney). __________________________________________________________________ Get your free Australian email account at http://www.start.com.au ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:50:59 -0800 (PST) From: "Lori R. Fye" Subject: A little help from my friends (NJC) I need some feedback ... is it clear to you AT FIRST GLANCE whose website this is? http://www.onlineworkshop.com/fordham3/ Please email me privately with your comments. Thanks, Lori in DC Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:13:51 -0500 From: Bob.Muller@fluor.com Subject: Best of 2000 VLJC & Long I suppose it's time to round up those "Top 10" lists for the year's best tunes. And I'll get to that, but I'll get the easy one out of the way first...the year's best movies. I don't think there's ever been a worse year for films. Maybe some of the late December releases will give the Academy enough choices for some Oscar picks, but it HAS been pretty bleak & weak. My faves: 1. Chuck & Buck 2. Wonder Boys 3. Eyes of Tammie Fay (not sure if this is officially a 2000 release or not) Now, on to the music, and happily this was a superb year for new music. Whittling down from the discs I bought this year was VERY tough, and sadly many didn't make my top 10 but are still excellent records. Here's my 10, in alphabetical order, not in order of preference. It would be impossible for me to do that as I couldn't pit any of these against the other: 1. Erykah Badu, "Mama's Gun": This is a fine if not overly long awaited follow up to Baduizm. She could've played it safe and made Baduizm II but instead she branches out all over the place. Some of these selections sound like Billie Holiday singing Stevie Wonder songs. Imagine how sublime that would be and you have a sense of the beauty of this record. 2. Brian Blade Fellowship, "Perceptual": Between Brian's quiet leadership, truly outstanding musicianship and solos throughout, accessible melodies, and the skillful production of Daniel Lanois, this is one memorable disc. The highlight for me is "Steadfast" with the Joni vocal. Haunting as can be, it hints at how creative a partnering of Joni and Lanois would be. 3. Ani Difranco, "To The Teeth": My discovery (thanks to you guys) of the year! Ani is the Joni of her generation, with her lyrics ranging from light and humorous to poignant to enraged and sometimes all at the same time. Musically she's all over the map, introducing new colors and sounds on every track. This disc features rock, jazz, funk, hip-hop, and folk sounds and she makes every second of it work. And I love her guitar playing, she uses it almost as a percussion instrument sometimes! On the strength of this one, I bought about 7 more Ani's and none of them disappoint! 4. EmmyLou Harris, "Red Dirt Girl": EmmyLou proves herself to be an excellent songwriter as well as an interpreter of others' songs. Her songs here are all memorable, her singing is strong and sensitive, and her duet with Dave Mathews on "My Antonia" is simply beautiful. Trying to pick a favorite song on this one is tough because each song you hear seems to top the one you just heard! 5. Rickie Lee Jones, "It's Like This": Rickie recruits some crack talent; Joe Jackson, Ben Folds, Dan Hicks, Taj Mahal, and takes songs that are familiar yet instantly makes them her own. Great production, the various instrumental arrangements and sometimes sparse instrumentation (I LOVE just her voice with a stand-up bass) keeps the record fresh and surprising. "One Hand, One Heart" w/Joe Jackson is the duet of the year. 6. Shelby Lynne, "I Am Shelby Lynne": I've enjoyed this one all year long - she's been described as a cross between Dusty Springfield & Patsy Cline, and that's pretty accurate. Especially "Dusty in Memphis". My only complaint with this one is that it only runs a little over 30 minutes. The songs are all instantly likeable. Typically after hearing it, I give it a second run-through, and that's rare for me. She does some great Phil Spector wall of sound harmonies as well. 7. Radiohead, "Kid A": Rolling Stone described Thom Yorke's vocals as sounding like mercury, and that's pretty apt. I'm not sure what the "concept" of this record is, except that it's about alienation, or so I've been told. It's hypnotic and cryptic. It's rock, it's electronica, it's space music. It's Pink Floyd for the 21st century. And has anyone else discovered the booklet hidden under the disc holder? This record is derivative of nothing, and I'm curious to see where Radiohead will go next. 8. Patti Smith, "Gung Ho": This one was my #1 for a goodly portion of the year. Patti is at the top of her game, and this band rocks hard and seems to push her vocally even as her emotional vocals push back. "Strange Messengers" is one of the most moving things I heard this year, and in a perfect world would be a rock anthem like Stairway to Heaven & Free Bird. I'm a sucker for a powerful guitar hook and this disc is loaded with them. Of course, you know that lyrically Patti's gonna be on the mark, and she doesn't disappoint in that arena either. 9. Steely Dan, "Two Against Nature": Whodathunk the Dan was gonna make a "comeback" like this! It's like they fell asleep for 20 years, and woke up and decided to make a record on their own terms with no assimilating the last 20 years of pop music, and thank God for that! They're still writing about obscure things like "Gaslighting Abbie" and still playing the roles of the dirty leering uncles. Same clean guitars, same state of the art production. They don't show any signs of growth, but who cares when they can be this stellar! And congrats to them for landing their rightful spot in the R&R Hall of Fame! 10. XTC, "Wasp Star/Apple Venus Volume 2": This was the second collection of songs they've released since joining TVT records. Where AV1 was orchestral and more acoustic, this is more power-pop and "Black-Sea"-ish. And can these guys write hooks! "The Wheel & The Maypole" alone has more brilliant ideas than most artists come up with on an entire disc. Honorable mentions: Bubbling under the top ten, I have to mention these discs which didn't crack the top but are really fine nonetheless: 1. Eels, "Daisies of the Galaxy" 2. Joan Osborne, "Righteous Love" 3. Paul Simon, "You're The One" 4. Elliott Smith, "Figure 8" 5. U2, "All That You Can't Leave Behind" (just haven't listened to it enough but it's probably top 10...a great return to form!) Bob NP: Neil Young, "Farmer's Song" - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: 13 Dec 00 15:54:07 MST From: db.ireland@usa.net Subject: NJ: my brother is pissed ____________________________________________________________________ Received: from usmlsu12.arrow.com [12.39.65.2] by mx29 via mtad (34FM.0700.12.01) with ESMTP id 882eLmT3E0592M29; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 19:54:30 GMT Received: from mh52616 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by usmlsu12.arrow.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA12182; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:54:21 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: From: "Mike Brennan" To: , , , , , , , Subject: We have a new definition of Chutzpah.... Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:56:50 -0500 Message-ID: <001501c0653e$d54dfe50$98c8010a@arrow.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 LESSONS TO LEARN FROM THIS RIDICULOUS ELECTION By M.B. The classic definition of chutzpah has always been killing your parents and throwing yourself on the mercy of the court because you're an orphan. We now have a new one: stopping a recount until just before the deadline and then saying you can't recount because the deadline is too close or over. ____________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________ I thought I would preface this rant with the above statement by me. Well, now that this debacle is FINALLY going to come to an unceremoneous conclusion, I think it's time to look back a bit and ask what we have learned from this sham, and what will happen in the future. Before I begin, let me start by saying (as many of you have known from past rants {Phil}) that I can't stand either candidate for President, and did not put in a vote for either Candidate, but rather for another individual who will remain nameless (and might not be who you think). I do not affiliate myself with either Political Party (it's not worth receiving the junk mail from them). I have tried to remain objective throughout this entire thing, since watching History unfold in front of your eyes should not be done with colored glasses. If it appears from this that I tend to lean support towards one or the other, THAT IS ONLY HOW IT APPEARS!! I let the facts speak for themselves, and let the Devil be his own Advocate. Although it is true that both candidates agreed to abide by the laws set before the election, it is truly a sad state that the rules weren't changed well before this. It is sad that this is supposed to be a nation "By the People", yet the people's choice will not sit in the Oval office. It is sad that a Presidential Election is decided not by the people, but instead by a branch of the Government (doesn't this defeat the whole purpose of an election?). What's even more sad, is that it is decided by 2 branches of Government who until just now, couldn't even agree on how to screw the American public out of the process!!! It's pathetic that no matter which way this went, Republican or Democrat, justice would not be served. If Gore had won, then the "ex-post facto" of the laws would be invalidated, and Bush (who is the rightful winner by a technicality) would have his Presidency stolen. When Bush wins, Gore will also be correct that the will of the People will have been expressed, not not followed. It's pathetic that the Parties were allowed to drag this through the courts for eons longer than was prudent, under the "veil" of "due process". This should have been over, or at least decided, weeks ago. It's pathetic that the Florida Supreme Court didn't set clear and uniform, concise guidelines under which the recount was to take place. If they had, the US Supreme court would have had even less of a leg to stand on in sending the decision back (unsigned, I might add). What's more, it's pathetic that uniform guidelines were not in place before the Election started!!!!! It is horribly pathetic that in their ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court basically said that since the Dec. 12th deadline has/had now passed, that under Florida Law it appears that a recount cannot take place. However, if the Supreme Court hadn't put a stay on the recount over the weekend, or at least had heard the case over the weekend, the recount that has/had now passed deadline could have been done. By blocking the recount over the weekend, the U.S. Supreme Court essentially lesislated its own deadline not of Dec. 12th, but of Dec. 9th (the day they stopped the count). The recount could have occured before the deadline, but not under the newly created deadline. How is this due process??? It's sad that the choice of who would be the leader of the World (essentially), was decided by old, confused senior citizens that can't even read a ballot card, and who either: 1) punched for the wrong guy, or who; 2) for some reason, after God knows how many elections in which they voted in their LONG, LONG lives, thought it was "OK" to punch 2 holes!!! Then they wouldn't ask for help because they were scared?!?!? What are they, children!?!?!?. You know, children are not allowed to vote!!!! Why do you think that is?!? A main reason is they don't have the mental capacity (by means of maturity), to have a say in how things should be run. If you can't punch a hole correctly, or if you're to proud or scared to ask for help in this day and age, then you shouldn't vote!!!! Then this all would have been decided with Bush as the winner on Nov. 7th!!! It's truly saddening that the result of all this (and don't let anyone tell you otherwise), is that NOTHING is going to get done over the next 2-4 years, no matter who the President is going to be. And both sides will blame each other for the stalemates. Forget the fact that it will be ALL OF THEIR FAULTS for nothing getting done. When the next Election takes place, the Dems will say that nothing got done under a Republican presidency!!! The Republicans will blame the Dems for not allowing anything to get done!!! And once again, the cycle will repeat, and the American public will be the poor child watching its pathetic, dysfunctional parents argue, when both are wrong. Just shut the h e l l up and LEAD for Christ's sake!!!!! What's going to end up happening is that the next Election will have a HUGE turnout, the biggest we've ever seen, especially with the 18-24 group (some now 14-15). The advertising for getting the vote out will go non-stop for 4 years. This will be good for the Dems, since the majority of young people tend to be liberal, and people get more conservative as they get older. The Dems tend to be more liberal, and generally pull more of the young vote, anyway. MTV will probably play a large role in this. The Republicans know that this is a 4-and-out term, since nothing will get done, and the President has always taken the blame for inaction, regardless of whether or not the blame actually should fall to him. They also know that disenfranchised voters will turn out in droves next time, and alot of the 22-29 group that is always fed up with Government as it is, will vote for a change. That's what makes the US Supreme Court decision more pathetic. They know the Dems are going to take the office back, so Lady Justice took her blindfold off just this once so that a Republican could pack the Court with replacements. There is no other reason for stopping the recount on Friday. I don't necessarily disagree with the choice to not count the non-votes (if the Constitutionality of this issue needs to be analyzed, so be it), but once Florida said to recount all non-votes in the state, the US Supreme Court should have heard arguments over the weekend, to at least give a fighting chance for the recount to finish before Dec. 12th. To halt the count, to wait until the deadline comes to hear the argument, and then announce that it's too late seems like a coward's approach to Jurisprudence. It may not be their true intention, but it sure doesn't look good. Bottom line, Bush should win under the laws as they are now, he has my respect as our Commander-in-Chief to-be, but nothing more. Gore is DEFINITELY a shmoe, but RIGHTFULLY believes that most people wanted him to be the President. Democracy took a BIG hit in all this, since we finally showed the world that we are NOT a Democracy, but a Republic (and one that almost resembled a banana). A Republic works for the everyday goings-on of running things, but for a Presidential election, is as antequated and inefficient as the Combustion Engine (something that has served its purpose, but is due to step aside). To top it off, it is the most pathetic thing in the world that the American public is still not trusted enough to pick its own leader. Canadian passports, anyone?!?! Maybe Irish?!?!? Maybe Jupiter!?!?!? Where do I sign (as long as registering doesn't require me to dimple any chads)???? ~Mike ------------------------------ End of JMDL Digest V2000 #653 ***************************** ------- Post messages to the list by clicking here: mailto:joni@smoe.org Unsubscribe by clicking here: mailto:joni-digest-request@smoe.org?body=unsubscribe ------- Siquomb, isn't she?