From: owner-jinglejangle-digest@smoe.org (jinglejangle-digest) To: jinglejangle-digest@smoe.org Subject: jinglejangle-digest V4 #89 Reply-To: jinglejangle@smoe.org Sender: owner-jinglejangle-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-jinglejangle-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk jinglejangle-digest Monday, July 16 2001 Volume 04 : Number 089 Today's Subjects: ----------------- [MLL] webcast passim [STB ] Re: [MLL] webcast passim [Lee Kilpatrick ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 08:06:22 -0700 (PDT) From: STB Subject: [MLL] webcast passim i think it's time for radioboston.com to beef up it's webcast technology. at least when mary lou is performing. the webcast worked perfectly for me during a jo davidson's opening set - but became very dodgy AFTERWORDS when it really mattered. could it be that all of us virtual jinglejanglers logging on to listen to mary lou overtaxed the system? if anyone got a clean tape of the show, please contact me offline. thanx. ~stephen~ = Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:57:43 -0400 From: Lee Kilpatrick Subject: Re: [MLL] webcast passim Wasn't it bad last time she had a show, too? I'd be interested in a tape, too. The sound seemed okay in Passim itself. Lee At 8:06 AM -0700 7/15/01, STB wrote: >i think it's time for radioboston.com to beef >up it's webcast technology. at least when >mary lou is performing. > >the webcast worked perfectly for me during a jo >davidson's opening set - but became very dodgy >AFTERWORDS when it really mattered. could it be that >all of us virtual jinglejanglers logging on to listen >to mary lou overtaxed the system? > >if anyone got a clean tape of the show, please >contact me offline. thanx. ------------------------------ End of jinglejangle-digest V4 #89 *********************************