From: owner-jewel-digest@smoe.org (jewel-digest) To: jewel-digest@smoe.org Subject: jewel-digest V10 #266 Reply-To: jewel@smoe.org Sender: owner-jewel-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-jewel-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk jewel-digest Saturday, November 19 2005 Volume 10 : Number 266 * If you ever wish to unsubscribe from this digest, send an email to * jewel-digest-request@smoe.org with ONLY the word * unsubscribe in the BODY of the email * . * For the latest news on what Jewel is up to, go to * the OFFICIAL Jewel web site at http://www.jeweljk.com * and click on "calendar" * . * PLEASE :) when you reply to this digest to send a post TO the list, * change the subject to reflect what your post is about. A subject * of Re: jewel-digest V9 #___ gives fellow list readers * no clue as to what your message is about. Today's Subjects: ----------------- [EDA] NJC: Re: fiona apple ["Michael Lewis" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:50:10 -0500 From: "Michael Lewis" Subject: [EDA] NJC: Re: fiona apple I have both versions. The songs are basically the same...some of the "unreleased" (ok, "leaked") version sounds unpolished...some of the released version sounds a bit overpolished. With only a couple of exceptions, I prefer the released version of the songs. > did anyone ever get a copy or listen to the original extraordinary > machine cd that wasn't released? Is it better than the released version? > Any other thoughts? Thanks. ------------------------------ End of jewel-digest V10 #266 ****************************