From: owner-jewel-digest@smoe.org (jewel-digest) To: jewel-digest@smoe.org Subject: jewel-digest V10 #225 Reply-To: jewel@smoe.org Sender: owner-jewel-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-jewel-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk jewel-digest Sunday, September 25 2005 Volume 10 : Number 225 * If you ever wish to unsubscribe from this digest, send an email to * jewel-digest-request@smoe.org with ONLY the word * unsubscribe in the BODY of the email * . * For the latest news on what Jewel is up to, go to * the OFFICIAL Jewel web site at http://www.jeweljk.com * and click on "calendar" * . * PLEASE :) when you reply to this digest to send a post TO the list, * change the subject to reflect what your post is about. A subject * of Re: jewel-digest V9 #___ gives fellow list readers * no clue as to what your message is about. Today's Subjects: ----------------- [EDA] Re: unedited [Theresa Bolger Gubrud ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 01:26:37 -0500 From: Theresa Bolger Gubrud Subject: [EDA] Re: unedited Ditto -- Last time we did end up getting a signed photo way after the fact, but still within the year. This time it has been longer already. Hardly any updates, the same photos have been up forever, songs and video are better but if I can't download them they are worthless to me. That was one of the things I thought we should get for the $$ we spent - -- just a few downloadable, independent (ie: NOT RA's) files. To me this is almost worse than the last Unedited. T On Saturday, September 24, 2005, at 12:05 AM, jewel-digest wrote: > SOO, I emailed them again today, 4 months later and asked them what > the heck > was taking so long to put it together? My membership expires in 4 > months and I > Guarantee I wont get anything before it happens. ------------------------------ End of jewel-digest V10 #225 ****************************