From: owner-jewel-digest@smoe.org (jewel-digest)
To: jewel-digest@smoe.org
Subject: jewel-digest V6 #562
Reply-To: jewel@smoe.org
Sender: owner-jewel-digest@smoe.org
Errors-To: owner-jewel-digest@smoe.org
Precedence: bulk


jewel-digest         Monday, November 12 2001         Volume 06 : Number 562




* If you ever wish to unsubscribe from this digest, send an email to
* jewel-digest-request@smoe.org     with ONLY the word
*    unsubscribe       in the BODY of the email
* .
* For the latest news on what Jewel is up to, go to
* the OFFICIAL Jewel web site at http://www.jeweljk.com
* and click on "calendar"
* .
* PLEASE :) when you reply to this digest to send a post TO the list,
* change the subject to reflect what your post is about. A subject
* of   Re: jewel-digest V6 #xxx   or the like gives fellow list readers
* no clue as to what your message is about.

                               Today's Subjects:
                               -----------------
  [EDA] Re : SJC :LA Times is respected!!!           [Wigglytooth523@aol.com]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 00:45:34 EST
From: Wigglytooth523@aol.com
Subject: [EDA] Re : SJC :LA Times is respected!!!

*thinks to self* "whoa! I caused controversy! thats kinda cool- never done 
that before.

Hey EDAs,

       Im sorry if I urked some Journalism students with my LA Times comment- 
my basic point was this is one guys column, okay he does work for a respected 
paper, but it's still one guys opinion. Even if he does work for the #3 paper 
in the country. News to me... Ive never even see the LA Times (guess thats 
what i get for living on the right coast) Oh well

Eliot 
the angel sorry for raising the newsies bloodpressure-no hard feelings?

------------------------------

End of jewel-digest V6 #562
***************************