From: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org (idealcopy-digest) To: idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Subject: idealcopy-digest V11 #47 Reply-To: idealcopy@smoe.org Sender: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk idealcopy-digest Friday, March 13 2009 Volume 11 : Number 047 Today's Subjects: ----------------- re: [idealcopy] disc of the day [cc ] RE: [idealcopy] disc of the day ["keith a" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT) From: cc Subject: re: [idealcopy] disc of the day - - ----- Original Message ---- > From: keith a > To: Creatured ; idealcopy@smoe.org > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 2:12:16 PM > Subject: RE: [idealcopy] disc of the day > > On the other hand someone who wouldn't generally listen to Wire may have > logged onto the Mojo website and decided to investigate, so that's surely a > good thing? > > K. > yeah, but where in this constipated review would any reader find cause to investigate? I don't understand how in an internet era, people are still paid to churn out verbiage like this. No original research and no original thoughts. - - cc ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:20:02 -0000 From: "keith a" Subject: RE: [idealcopy] disc of the day It's a 30 yr old album. How many people are going to have original thoughts about it? And what original research would you like? Maybe I should email Graham and ask what colour undies he was wearing when he sang I Should Have Known Better. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-idealcopy@smoe.org [mailto:owner-idealcopy@smoe.org] On Behalf Of cc Sent: 12 March 2009 20:51 To: idealcopy@smoe.org Subject: re: [idealcopy] disc of the day - - ----- Original Message ---- > From: keith a > To: Creatured ; idealcopy@smoe.org > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 2:12:16 PM > Subject: RE: [idealcopy] disc of the day > > On the other hand someone who wouldn't generally listen to Wire may have > logged onto the Mojo website and decided to investigate, so that's surely a > good thing? > > K. > yeah, but where in this constipated review would any reader find cause to investigate? I don't understand how in an internet era, people are still paid to churn out verbiage like this. No original research and no original thoughts. - - cc ------------------------------ End of idealcopy-digest V11 #47 *******************************