From: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org (idealcopy-digest)
To: idealcopy-digest@smoe.org
Subject: idealcopy-digest V11 #42
Reply-To: idealcopy@smoe.org
Sender: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org
Errors-To: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org
Precedence: bulk


idealcopy-digest         Sunday, March 8 2009         Volume 11 : Number 042



                               Today's Subjects:
                               -----------------
  Re: [idealcopy] The Monks                              [eardrumbuz@aol.com]
  Re: [idealcopy] The Shaggs [was Monks]  [David McKenzie <davidmack@gmail.c]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:19:28 -0500
From: eardrumbuz@aol.com
Subject: Re: [idealcopy] The Monks

I agree. Haven't listened to The Shaggs in about 20 years, but there is definitely something there. Can you just remind me what it is? :o)



- -another the Paul






- -----Original Message-----
From: David McKenzie <davidmack@gmail.com>
To: Cambra, Robert <Robert.Cambra@harpercollins.com>
Cc: idealcopy@smoe.org <idealcopy@smoe.org>
Sent: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 7:45 pm
Subject: Re: [idealcopy] The Monks








Beg to differ on The ShaggsNot kitsch
Genuine singularity
Not everyone's cuppa, I realize, but listening for kitsch is the wrong
approach to hear what is there.

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Cambra, Robert <
Robert.Cambra@harpercollins.com> wrote:

> Wow, I've just heard<and seen!<The Monks for the first time.  How did that
> come out of 1966? Can anyone tell me the title of The Monks tribute album
> 27/11 contributed to? I will have to hear that after hearing "Black Monk
> Time."
>
> Heard The Shaggs for the first time a few months ago. Not even any kitch
> value there, just bad.
>
> Cheers,
> Robert (another)
>
>
> ******************************************************
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This E-Mail is intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information
> that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law. If you have received this communication in error, please do not
> distribute and delete the original message. Please notify the sender by
> E-Mail at the address shown. Thank you for your compliance.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:41:33 -0600
From: David McKenzie <davidmack@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [idealcopy] The Shaggs [was Monks]

There is what I call "an authentic voice"Not unlike the accordion player who
has haunted various downtown Chicago corners for 2 decades now
The music is not technically correct, but it is repeatable and distinctive
And with repetition comes familiarity and in some cases affection

On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 2:19 PM, <eardrumbuz@aol.com> wrote:

> I agree. Haven't listened to The Shaggs in about 20 years, but there is
> definitely something there. Can you just remind me what it is? :o)
>
>
>
> -another the Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David McKenzie <davidmack@gmail.com>
> To: Cambra, Robert <Robert.Cambra@harpercollins.com>
> Cc: idealcopy@smoe.org <idealcopy@smoe.org>
> Sent: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 7:45 pm
> Subject: Re: [idealcopy] The Monks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Beg to differ on The ShaggsNot kitsch
> Genuine singularity
> Not everyone's cuppa, I realize, but listening for kitsch is the wrong
> approach to hear what is there.
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Cambra, Robert <
> Robert.Cambra@harpercollins.com> wrote:
>
> > Wow, I've just heard<and seen!<The Monks for the first time.  How did
> that
> > come out of 1966? Can anyone tell me the title of The Monks tribute album
> > 27/11 contributed to? I will have to hear that after hearing "Black Monk
> > Time."
> >
> > Heard The Shaggs for the first time a few months ago. Not even any kitch
> > value there, just bad.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Robert (another)
> >
> >
> > ******************************************************
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This E-Mail is intended only for the use of the
> > individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information
> > that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable
> > law. If you have received this communication in error, please do not
> > distribute and delete the original message. Please notify the sender by
> > E-Mail at the address shown. Thank you for your compliance.

------------------------------

End of idealcopy-digest V11 #42
*******************************