From: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org (idealcopy-digest) To: idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Subject: idealcopy-digest V10 #155 Reply-To: idealcopy@smoe.org Sender: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk idealcopy-digest Friday, August 3 2007 Volume 10 : Number 155 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: [idealcopy] Emailing: home ["David McKenzie" ] RE: [idealcopy] Emailing: home ["Keith Knight" ] Re: [idealcopy] Emailing: home ["Paul Pietromonaco" Subject: Re: [idealcopy] Emailing: home I see they have the new Tenniscoats Recommended On 8/2/07, Ari wrote: > > Looks like a tabloid if y'ask me (not that anyone did)........... A > Governments always take what was never given,and never give what was > taken. > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Keith A > To: > idealcopy@smoe.org > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 8:00:05 PM > Subject: [idealcopy] > Emailing: home > > Blimey. Posteverything has changed a bit hasn't it? > > I've just > logged on and...well as Morrissey once said after seeing James = > on Wogan, "I > nearly dropped the teapot". > > Very nice, mind. Just not as distinctive. And at > my time of life, I'm = > not very good with change! ; ) > > Keith > > > > NP The new > free with the newspaper Prince cd. Funny - I made the effort = > to buy the Mail > On Sunday especially for it a couple of weeks back, and = > then haven't > bothered playing it till now. First play...Better than I = > expected if I'm > honest. =20 > > > > =20 > The message is ready to be sent with the following file > or link = > attachments: > Shortcut to: http://www.posteverything.com/home > > Note: > To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent = > sending or > receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your = > e-mail security > settings to determine how attachments are handled. > > [demime 0.97c-p1 removed > an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of > home.url] > > _____________________________________________________________________________ > _______ > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who > knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. > http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469 ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 23:09:31 +0100 From: "Keith Knight" Subject: RE: [idealcopy] Emailing: home I'm off to see Prince tomorrow night - may report back. Another the Keith - -----Original Message----- From: owner-idealcopy@smoe.org [mailto:owner-idealcopy@smoe.org] On Behalf Of Keith A NP The new free with the newspaper Prince cd. Funny - I made the effort = to buy the Mail On Sunday especially for it a couple of weeks back, and = then haven't bothered playing it till now. First play...Better than I = expected if I'm honest. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:25:42 -0700 From: "Paul Pietromonaco" Subject: Re: [idealcopy] Emailing: home > I'm off to see Prince tomorrow night - may report back. > If you don't report back, are we to assume that you failed your mission, and you're now a prisoner of "The Purple One"? Should we arrange a seach party in Minneapolis? (^_-) Cheers, Paul ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 23:24:25 +0100 From: "Keith Knight" Subject: RE: [idealcopy] OT - Ingmar Bergman RIP According to a book I have on Blow-Up (which remarkably is right to hand) it was shot in April - August 66. The first VU album was recorded in April 66 according to Wikipedia so they were simultaneous works. Another the Keith - -----Original Message----- From: owner-idealcopy@smoe.org [mailto:owner-idealcopy@smoe.org] On Behalf Of MarkBursa@aol.com Sent: 01 August 2007 19:01 To: giluzzz@gmail.com; idealcopy@smoe.org Subject: Re: [idealcopy] OT - Ingmar Bergman RIP >>Velvets started performing sometime in 1965 and recorded their first album in 1966,<< But it wasn't released until after Blow-up was released. And I can't quite work out why a 50-something Italian film director would have specifically wanted to cast an obscure American band that had never played in Europe and had made no records. Unless he'd seen them live and was smitten by them - unlikely but possible I guess if he'd been to a Warhol party. A more likely scenario is that Warhol heard at a party that Antonioni wanted to cast a rock band in his new film, and put the VU forward, but got turned down, probably for logistics reasons (film budget not stretching to plane tickets, Sterling's alleged drugs rap etc). Vic & Lou have turned this into a hipster myth that the VU was Antonioni's first choice. IMO, of course! Antonioni probably didn't care who the band was - he just wanted to depict an undergound scene involving a dramatic axe-smashing incident. Given that requirement, surely the Who was the obvious choice? Failing that, a similar band prepared to do a Who impersonation? John Cale was a few years off his 70s piano-smashing and chicken-beheading pomp at that point. Likewise Lou and his tai-chi master, which would have had less dramatic effect ;-) Mark, (cynical as ever about "rock mythology!") ------------------------------ End of idealcopy-digest V10 #155 ********************************