From: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org (idealcopy-digest) To: idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Subject: idealcopy-digest V9 #61 Reply-To: idealcopy@smoe.org Sender: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk idealcopy-digest Saturday, March 4 2006 Volume 09 : Number 061 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: Fwd: Re: [idealcopy] ipod [PAUL RABJOHN ] Re: [idealcopy] WIRE IN MOJO 149 [giluz ] Re: Fwd: Re: [idealcopy] ipod [Andrew Walkingshaw ] Re: Fwd: Re: [idealcopy] ipod ["Keith A" ] Re: [idealcopy] (OT) Hey! ["Keith A" ] Re: [idealcopy] People who collect Sex Pistols records are c*nts ["Keith ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:12:48 +0000 (GMT) From: PAUL RABJOHN Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [idealcopy] ipod > //////even warmer. you've named almost every track in mark 3 wire > except the right one ;-) p Surely not Being Watched? Mr. Marx's Table I could go with. :) Being Watched I just don't get on with. A (throwing darts) - -- http://www.lexical.org.uk/ | http://covertmusic.com/ | work: ///////// yes , you got there. mr marx's table it is. well i do like it , but i thought it was a pretty odd choice as the only track from the Mk2/Mk3 era's. i think from Mk3 i'd have gone for germ ship or spent , but that's just me. p ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:08:44 +0200 From: giluz Subject: Re: [idealcopy] WIRE IN MOJO 149 On 3/3/06, Tim wrote: > Couldn't quite work out where the interview came from, seems to have > quotes from all 4...even Mr Gotobed, and refers to a meeting in June > 2004! Mojo presumably have been sitting on the interview for nearly 2 > years waiting for some re-issues. Well, they do talk about Graham's departure which is quite recent, so at least some of the interview took place not long ago. - -- Now playing: http://www.last.fm/user/giluz/ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:25:04 +0000 From: Andrew Walkingshaw Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [idealcopy] ipod On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:12:48AM +0000, PAUL RABJOHN wrote: > ///////// yes , you got there. mr marx's table it is. well i do > like it , but i thought it was a pretty odd choice as the only > track from the Mk2/Mk3 era's. i think from Mk3 i'd have gone for > germ ship or spent , but that's just me. p I'm still waiting for R+B03 with baited breath. :) It's interesting to revisit with the benefit of hindsight, though. If I had free choice of R+B-era tracks, I'd probably go for; In The Art Of Stopping / Raft Ants / I Don't Understand / Comet / Germ Ship / The Agfers of Kodack / Mr Marx's Table / You Can't Leave Now / Trash/Treasure / 99.9 / Spent For me, Spent and 99.9 are the standout tracks of the lot, though it's all Swiss-watch precision workmanship. I feel disingenuous "criticising" other peoples' work, especially when I think it's better than my own! Andrew ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:24:11 +0200 From: giluz Subject: Re: [idealcopy] People who collect Sex Pistols records are c*nts On 3/3/06, Tim wrote: > > $11,000 for a record as an artifact? > > Never understood this sort of Record Collecting. Its the point where > records become currency. Whoever bought this saw it as an investment. I dunno, in a sort of lopsided twisted way it's very much in the vein of SP and makes more sense than buying Beatles memorabilia for those sums. And it's even more so because the 'cynical musicians' make no money out of it but just some 'cynical e-bayer' giluz - -- Now playing: http://www.last.fm/user/giluz/ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 08:26:24 -0600 From: "David McKenzie" Subject: Re: [idealcopy] People who collect Sex Pistols records are c*nts filthy lucre indeed being that, at the time, the pistols meant less than nothing to me (the stooges and the dolls having twisted my musical/aesthetic sensibilities a few years earlier) i find the idea of an artifact of a cultural revolution formented in a fashion boutique fetching such a sum really rather obvious ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 07:27:20 -0800 (PST) From: Jan Noorda Subject: Re: [idealcopy] People who collect Sex Pistols records are c*nts $11,000 for a record as an artifact? > > Never understood this sort of Record Collecting. Its the point where > records become currency. Whoever bought this saw it as an investment. I would say people who are paying that much for a Sex Pistols item are rich. Some have bollocks and other are c*nts. And I loved the Sex Pistols attacking that squared major music industry as teenagers. First album is still a mile stone in pop history. And Johnny Rotten with Sid Vicious are icons. You still cant ignore that. And I can imagine if you have that much money and like them you would try to get such items. But strange thing is maybe. Most people who did like them didnt have that much I suppose. And certainly no dollars. I cant hardly believe this kind of 1977 hype will be repeated. Or I would not care for it probably. I am not bored teenager anymore, but more a bored mid-life criticaster. j I dunno, in a sort of lopsided twisted way it's very much in the vein of SP and makes more sense than buying Beatles memorabilia for those sums. And it's even more so because the 'cynical musicians' make no money out of it but just some 'cynical e-bayer' giluz - --------------------------------- Brings words and photos together (easily) with PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:55:12 +0000 (GMT) From: Monochromatic Man Subject: [idealcopy] (OT) Hey! http://billboard.com/bbcom/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002115520 ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 21:54:36 -0000 From: "Keith A" Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [idealcopy] ipod > For me, Spent and 99.9 are the standout tracks of the lot Me, too. Along with I Don't Understand. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 21:58:54 -0000 From: "Keith A" Subject: Re: [idealcopy] (OT) Hey! Yeah, saw this on the news. "I haven't done anything. I'm innocent. It's a conspiracy by you know who," Glitter shouted. You know who? Come on (come on!) I thought. Name names... But then realised that if you want to start a conspiracy theory then you have to leave things open a little, let people's imagination wander a little. Saying "I haven't done anything. I'm innocent. It's a conspiracy by Dave from number 23 down the road", just doesn't have the same ring to it. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Monochromatic Man" To: Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 5:55 PM Subject: [idealcopy] (OT) Hey! > http://billboard.com/bbcom/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=100211552 0 > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/272 - Release Date: 01/03/2006 ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 21:47:41 -0000 From: "Keith A" Subject: Re: [idealcopy] People who collect Sex Pistols records are c*nts > We've all heard God Save the Queen. Somewhere along the line and the end > of this miserable monetary chain is a very sad man (I can't imagine any > Woman being stupid enough to pay 10 grand for 7" record...thats not > sexist its true) who just has to have this so he can wank over it > despite the fact that the very act of spending 10 grand for a Sex > Pistols record makes a mockery of the whole point of the records very > existence and in an ideal world would automatically devalue it. That man > makes this record very valuable to a cynical ebayer. The same buyer > would probably pay twice that to have Sid stab him to death...if only. You're absolutely right, Tim. BUT... If money was no object, I'd buy it. No matter how daft it is. K. np Broken Social Scene ------------------------------ End of idealcopy-digest V9 #61 ******************************