From: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org (idealcopy-digest) To: idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Subject: idealcopy-digest V6 #162 Reply-To: idealcopy@smoe.org Sender: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-idealcopy-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk idealcopy-digest Tuesday, June 3 2003 Volume 06 : Number 162 Today's Subjects: ----------------- [idealcopy] Re: Broadcast/Bardots [fernando ] [idealcopy] OGWT 1982 ["sean bowen" ] RE: [idealcopy] Re:Stereophonics/ [Alistair Tear Subject: [idealcopy] Re: Broadcast/Bardots Oh, what has come of the Bardots... in wanting to thin my stuff, I was considering getting rid of my Bardots stuff (sure cannot get money for it now). I only got their first album and 3 or 4 CD singles. Was there more? - -fernando At 18:45p +0100 05.30.2003, Ian Grant wrote: >At 04:30 30/05/03 -0400, Tim wrote: >>Whats wrong with a band being 'Detached'? >>I want to be excited by the performance...I don't want to make friends with >>the fucking band! >>Be aloof and stroppy (like Wire)! I don't want to be thanked for buying >>tickets..just play some music and stimulate my brain...thats what i've paid >>for. > >Absolutely. Admittedly, I greatly prefer Broadcast's recorded >output to their live performances...on previous evidence, at least. >But there's absolutely nowt wrong with a bit of distance. Quite the >reverse, if anything. > >To stray further off-topic, I distinctly remember a review of an >early Bardots gig in Melody Maker - by Steve Sutherland, I think - >that heavily criticised them for being aloof, detached, and >generally self-absorbed. And he was quite right, too. I was sold >on the idea instantly, of course...and a trip to see them in action >a few weeks later revealed a band entirely shrouded in projections >of red roses and razor blades, apparently oblivious to the fact that >precisely two people were paying them any attention. Bloody >marvellous, and much missed (by me, if not the rest of the world). > >Cheers, > >ig. > >np: Ed Rush & Optical - The Original Dr Shade (and flippin' splendid >it is too...) ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 08:45:28 +0100 From: "sean bowen" Subject: [idealcopy] OGWT 1982 Just seen the OGWT '82 show a week after all UK idealcopyists have been discussing it. I thought Soft Cell & King Crimson were alright. The most embarassing bit was at the end of Bauhaus's "Ziggy", where Daniel Ash tried to get feedback from the amp, and failed miserably - complete silence - and stormed off in a huff. Cringed when I saw it 21 years ago, and it's just as nasty now. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 09:11:08 +0100 From: Alistair Tear Subject: RE: [idealcopy] Re:Stereophonics/ About three years ago the best they could come up with was the Corrs and a Feargal Sharkey-less Undertones oh dear! A > > > > In a message dated 6/2/03 6:02:58 PM GMT Daylight Time, > keith.astbury10@virgin.net writes: > > > > Still as someone who was born in Wales, Jules might just qualify for > > fleadh... > > > /////i think if you've visited wales once you could probably > get on the > bill.......... > ************************************************************************* The contents of the e-mail and any transmitted files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Transport for London Street Management hereby excludes any warranty and any liability as to the quality or accuracy of the contents of this e-mail and any attached transmitted files. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify postmaster@Streetmanagement.org.uk. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ************************************************************************* ------------------------------ End of idealcopy-digest V6 #162 *******************************