From: owner-headline-girl-digest@smoe.org (headline-girl-digest) To: headline-girl-digest@smoe.org Subject: headline-girl-digest V6 #52 Reply-To: headline-girl@smoe.org Sender: owner-headline-girl-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-headline-girl-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk headline-girl-digest Thursday, March 20 2003 Volume 06 : Number 052 Today's Subjects: ----------------- NEC: feist [Im sick ] Re: NEC: feist [JewelEDA21@aol.com] War...and a Happy Birthday [TrishTLC@aol.com] Re: War...and a Happy Birthday [] Re: NEC: feist ["Tab Siddiqui" ] RE: War...and a Happy Birthday ["Morris, Vivian E" ] Re: War...and a Happy Birthday [Greg Teltschik ] Re: War...and a Happy Birthday [John Gustilo ] Re: NEC: feist [Im sick ] Re: War...and a Happy Birthday [Greg Teltschik ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:24:29 -0800 (PST) From: Im sick Subject: NEC: feist so nice to see ms. feist back on stage, esp. with BSS. does anyone know what else she's been up to? sounds like she has a second album recorded. Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 07:28:14 EST From: JewelEDA21@aol.com Subject: Re: NEC: feist live album with some friends out soon, and b-a-c-k in the studio for a second release within a year (Hopefully) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:27:42 EST From: TrishTLC@aol.com Subject: War...and a Happy Birthday First of all, I wanted to wish Alvin a Happy Birthday today! Secondly, for all you Canadians, what are your views on this soon-to-be war? My cousin Marc is a U.S. Marine and he just turned 24 the day that he got sent to Kuwait (on St. Patrick's day). If we do go to war, I hope he kicks some ass and comes home soon and safe. TLC In a message dated 3/18/2003 11:39:24 PM Eastern Standard Time, jdunn@aquezada.com writes: > On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 23:22, secret agent kr wrote: > >hey all > >i just wanted to send love to everyone on this list and their families in > >lieu of the recent declaration of war or whatever that speach was last > >night. > >i definetly count myself among the confused, but anti-war citizens of the > >world and hope that things will end as peacefully as possible. > > To all Torontonians on the list: on the first full day of bombing, there > will be a protest outside the US Consulate at 360 University Avenue > (Queen and University) at 5 p.m. Check out www.tcaswi.org for more > information. > > www.moveon.org also has details on a number of actions, protests, etc. > related to the conflict, including this list > [http://www.moveon.org/musiciansunited/] of Musicians United Against The > War. > > I now return you to your regularly scheduled Emm programming. > > - Julian ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:34:20 -0500 From: Subject: Re: War...and a Happy Birthday i apologize to the citizens of canada for our butthead, eyes-too-close, nefarious, war-mongering, pinheaded, dork-faced, small-minded twit of a bush. it must be nice to be him... and not to be encumbered by a nuanced and complex understanding of the world. (we now return to our regular programming) me. ** ** ** ** ** ** I'm a famous artist. Honest!: http://smirky.com/ SmirkyStuff! - http://cafepress.com/smirkybooteek ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 21:42:50 +0000 From: "Tab Siddiqui" Subject: Re: NEC: feist JewelEDA21@aol.com wrote: >live album with some friends out soon, and b-a-c-k in the studio for a > >second release within a year (Hopefully) Hmm... Not sure where that info came from, but I think the 'live CD' you're referring to is a small one-off EP that she put out at shows over a year and a half ago (it was recorded at the Rivoli with her pal Tony Scherr on guitar, she was opening for Danny Michel). It's a bare-bones little gem, she only pressed about 300 and sold them at shows (then again, she hasn't really played any shows save for the occasional live date at home and opening slots for Peaches and Gonzales in Europe)... As for 'back in the studio', she's BEEN in the studio - for over 2 years now! ;) She did an initial session here at home at a big farm studio in Hamilton, but didn't really like those demos, so has been sporadically recording in Paris and Germany ever since with her pal Gonzales (Jason Beck) producing. She keeps *saying* it will be out within the year, so here's hoping. As for the 'new' sound, it's a little more spacey, low-key, much quieter than the "Monarch" stuff... I don't think you're going to hear any 'rocking out' on this record... Think Cat Power with way better songs and vocals. ;P - - Tab. _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:56:10 -0500 From: "Morris, Vivian E" Subject: RE: War...and a Happy Birthday I totally agree with smirky...I guess they think he has something to prove that ol' daddy-bush couldn't. Like father...like son...unfortunately! Such a disastrous, greedy mistake! ------------------------------ Date: 19 Mar 2003 18:10:16 -0500 From: "Julian C. Dunn" Subject: RE: War...and a Happy Birthday On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 16:56, Morris, Vivian E wrote: > I totally agree with smirky...I guess they think he has something to prove > that ol' daddy-bush couldn't. Like father...like son...unfortunately! Such a > disastrous, greedy mistake! The irony is that you possess a US Army e-mail address. :-) While I concur with your stance, it might be wise to post comments critical of the Army from a location outside of the Army. - - Julian - -- [ Julian C. Dunn * ] [ WWW: http://www.aquezada.com/staff/julian/ * PGP: 0xFDC205B9 ] [ "let's have a god who likes to party" - disappear fear ] ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:14:47 -0600 From: Greg Teltschik Subject: Re: War...and a Happy Birthday I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with the sentiment expressed by Smirky. He has nothing constructive to say, choosing instead to just ridicule a man he doesn't know. I'm reminded of an series of interviews I saw several weeks ago about the anti-war demonstrations. Many of the interviews went like this: (At an anti-war rally in New York) Interviewer: Do you think that the US should go to war against Iraq? Demonstrator: NO! Interviewer: What should we do about the situation in Iraq, then? Demonstrator: I don't know. The fact was that people were opposed to the idea of war because they've been told all their life "war is bad," "war never solves anything," "there is always an alternative to war." If we all lived in the world of the Tele-tubbies, with some cute-faced cherub looking down on us, that would undoubtably be true. But this is the real world, and in the real world sometimes war is a brutal reality. I'm not saying that I'm 100% behind the war against Iraq, but I do acknowledge several things: 1. I haven't been privy to all the relevant information. Listening to the major networks newscast is not enough. Reading only your local paper is not enough. You have to find sources from all over the place, who will each give you a different perspective on things. 2. I have no idea what secret information has been shared with the president by the intelligence agencies. Maybe it's all a front, but maybe they know something that they aren't telling for any number of reasons: national security, security of the source, reluctance to cause panic. 3. Everyone that offers a simple explanation hasn't really bothered to educate themselves: "It's all about oil." - As the British would say, "bollocks!" If it was about oil, there are lots of better ways to go about it. "H'e just finishing what his father started." - Yes, that's why he's risking so much negative opinion, so that he can "show Daddy." I hate to tell you, but Daddy's been here in Houston catching the rodeo and other sporting events. "He doesn't understand the world." - Well, maybe he understands it better than you think. I've known in the back of my mind that Iraq has been involved with terrorism for years. I don't remember the details, but I remember the reference. Anyone care to comment on the terrorism camps that Saddam has set up in Iraq, at least one with a 737 in the back yard for aircraft hijacking exercises? The reality is that Saddam is a man who has overtly flaunted his promises to the international community. He's had well over ten years to get his act together. He's like the little child, who after being berated for having his hand in the cookie jar, waits until his mother's back is turned before trying again. This is a man who has oppressed the Kurds living in Northern Iraq, and used chemical weapons on them. Rape squads, beatings, you name it has been allowed to happen in his country. He hordes most of the wealth for himself and his friends and lets the general populace starve. There is no doubt that this is a very evil man. The question then becomes a question of what should the US do, if anything? Personally, I think the US would be better off if we could find a reasonable position in world events that did not make us the world's police. I'd almost like to see what would happen when a government said "America go home," and we did, dropping all aid, humanitarian and otherwise. You have to wonder if so many people hate us, why are so many of them doing whatever it takes to get in, whether it's in a cargo container, through an underground tunnel, or walking miles and miles through the western desert states. I have to believe that the US government has good reasons for what they are doing. I don't think Bush made this decision lightly, but I also think he probably could have handled some things better. He is not known for his subtlety, which is surprising given the amount of deviousness his detractors seem to credit him with. If anything, Bush is pretty much a straight-shooter. He's got a hard enough time trying to say what he wants to say without looking like a buffoon in the public perception, much less engage in the crafty double-speak of his infamous predecessor (C:"I did not have sex with that woman." Media:"Well, then, define sex."). Let's face it, the war isn't doing anything for the economy, it's doing nothing for international opinion, and it certainly isn't helping the president's popularity numbers, so there's got be another reason. If it were me in the White House, I'd probably make sure Saddam knows there's an ICBM submarine sitting somewhere off the coast ready and able to take huge chunks out of his country, and that, just like in WW2, we're willing to accept the high casualty rate to keep the final count down. In the end, I think this war is an action designed to do just that - keep the eventual body count down to an acceptable number. For whatever reason, our government has decided that to allow Saddam to remain in power is a direct threat to the citizens of the United States and our allies. To sit back and do nothing as Clinton often did over 8 years would be a huge mistake, that will come to haunt us as much as Spet. 11 has (for reference, during Clinton's tenure, he had many opportunities to act that would have likely averted 9/11). Greg Greg Teltschik gteltschik@mindspring.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:23:02 -0500 From: Subject: Re: War...and a Happy Birthday you're right. i'm sorry. bush's eyes aren't too close together. Dr. Mark N. Crislip Ph.d International Relations, University of South Carolina - ---- Original message ---- >Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:14:47 -0600 >From: Greg Teltschik >Subject: Re: War...and a Happy Birthday >To: headline-girl@smoe.org >Cc: headline-girl@smoe.org > >I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with the sentiment expressed by >Smirky. He has nothing constructive to say, choosing instead to just >ridicule a man he doesn't know. I'm reminded of an series of interviews I >saw several weeks ago about the anti-war demonstrations. Many of the >interviews went like this: > >(At an anti-war rally in New York) >Interviewer: Do you think that the US should go to war against Iraq? >Demonstrator: NO! >Interviewer: What should we do about the situation in Iraq, then? >Demonstrator: I don't know. > >The fact was that people were opposed to the idea of war because they've >been told all their life "war is bad," "war never solves anything," "there >is always an alternative to war." If we all lived in the world of the >Tele-tubbies, with some cute-faced cherub looking down on us, that would >undoubtably be true. But this is the real world, and in the real world >sometimes war is a brutal reality. > >I'm not saying that I'm 100% behind the war against Iraq, but I do >acknowledge several things: > >1. I haven't been privy to all the relevant information. Listening to the >major networks newscast is not enough. Reading only your local paper is >not enough. You have to find sources from all over the place, who will >each give you a different perspective on things. >2. I have no idea what secret information has been shared with the >president by the intelligence agencies. Maybe it's all a front, but maybe >they know something that they aren't telling for any number of reasons: >national security, security of the source, reluctance to cause panic. >3. Everyone that offers a simple explanation hasn't really bothered to >educate themselves: > > "It's all about oil." - As the British would say, "bollocks!" If >it was about oil, there are lots of better ways to go about it. > "H'e just finishing what his father started." - Yes, that's why >he's risking so much negative opinion, so that he can "show Daddy." I hate >to tell you, but Daddy's been here in Houston catching the rodeo and other >sporting events. > "He doesn't understand the world." - Well, maybe he understands it >better than you think. I've known in the back of my mind that Iraq has >been involved with terrorism for years. I don't remember the details, but >I remember the reference. Anyone care to comment on the terrorism camps >that Saddam has set up in Iraq, at least one with a 737 in the back yard >for aircraft hijacking exercises? > >The reality is that Saddam is a man who has overtly flaunted his promises >to the international community. He's had well over ten years to get his >act together. He's like the little child, who after being berated for >having his hand in the cookie jar, waits until his mother's back is turned >before trying again. This is a man who has oppressed the Kurds living in >Northern Iraq, and used chemical weapons on them. Rape squads, beatings, >you name it has been allowed to happen in his country. He hordes most of >the wealth for himself and his friends and lets the general populace >starve. There is no doubt that this is a very evil man. > >The question then becomes a question of what should the US do, if >anything? Personally, I think the US would be better off if we could find >a reasonable position in world events that did not make us the world's >police. I'd almost like to see what would happen when a government said >"America go home," and we did, dropping all aid, humanitarian and >otherwise. You have to wonder if so many people hate us, why are so many >of them doing whatever it takes to get in, whether it's in a cargo >container, through an underground tunnel, or walking miles and miles >through the western desert states. > >I have to believe that the US government has good reasons for what they are >doing. I don't think Bush made this decision lightly, but I also think he >probably could have handled some things better. He is not known for his >subtlety, which is surprising given the amount of deviousness his >detractors seem to credit him with. If anything, Bush is pretty much a >straight-shooter. He's got a hard enough time trying to say what he wants >to say without looking like a buffoon in the public perception, much less >engage in the crafty double-speak of his infamous predecessor (C:"I did not >have sex with that woman." Media:"Well, then, define sex."). Let's face >it, the war isn't doing anything for the economy, it's doing nothing for >international opinion, and it certainly isn't helping the president's >popularity numbers, so there's got be another reason. > >If it were me in the White House, I'd probably make sure Saddam knows >there's an ICBM submarine sitting somewhere off the coast ready and able to >take huge chunks out of his country, and that, just like in WW2, we're >willing to accept the high casualty rate to keep the final count down. In >the end, I think this war is an action designed to do just that - keep the >eventual body count down to an acceptable number. For whatever reason, our >government has decided that to allow Saddam to remain in power is a direct >threat to the citizens of the United States and our allies. To sit back >and do nothing as Clinton often did over 8 years would be a huge mistake, >that will come to haunt us as much as Spet. 11 has (for reference, during >Clinton's tenure, he had many opportunities to act that would have likely >averted 9/11). > >Greg > > > > >Greg Teltschik >gteltschik@mindspring.com ** ** ** ** ** ** I'm a famous artist. Honest!: http://smirky.com/ SmirkyStuff! - http://cafepress.com/smirkybooteek ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:10:41 -0800 (PST) From: John Gustilo Subject: Re: War...and a Happy Birthday My, oh my, did we have a little something to share with the rest of the world? I just wanted to respond to Greg's perspective on the whole war thing. I'm playing Devil's Advocate to his take on the declaration of war on Iraq. Basically, I believe that Greg is saying is "War is necessary, and the US politicians have probable cause to declare war on Iraq." And, to paraphrase, the rest of his views. Those who believe otherwise are brainwashed through our culture and social morays. Uh-huh. Well, it's definitely an opinion. I'll give Greg that. Hmmm, Greg by no standards or means is subjagated under any propaganda put forth by the US government. No way. Not one bit. Greg is not influenced by anyone. Instead, he acts and thinks of his own accord free of any suppositions. But, come on, it's WAR! Is one person's life relevant? Or the many? Them? Us? Whose life counts and matters? The few soldiers that die in war? The several thousands saved from those soldiers' efforts? You? I am largely apathetic to the world events. But you, Greg, take the cake. I don't care to point of protesting the war on the steps of the Washington Capitol. But I do care enough to recognize that lives will be lost directly from this war with Iraq. I don't need to preach to you that these are people's lives. Lives that once lost cannot be returned. I often rant that people shouldn't be all freaked over 9-11. In relative terms, people of the world countries lose that many in a week, some even in a day. Take for instance, South Africa. Almost 2000 deaths a day from war, famine, and disease. But I am still aware that many lives are lost. Lives are lost (period) I'm not saying I'm Mother Teresa. A person who is one single-man plight to change the world. I'm just a person who has a basic understanding of the preciousness of life and good living. And why the US is in Iraq? It's a culmination of reasons considered that brought us into war with Saddam and Iraq. Hopefully, the war will be like the US is a guy with a shotgun telling a man with a knife to drop it. Anyhow, the only feasible benefit of war is its end. Albeit, unconditional surrender or some sort of amnesty is imparted by reluctance of one or both parties. To the victor goes the spoils lest his brother die. Or should I say lets his brother die. As for your comment on the US being the world's police. I think not. I like to believe we're more information relayers protecting our investments. To insure the viability of the United States' people. We are not a fascist state where we impose rule onto the rest of the world. We are merely men apt to make mistakes and act to not repeat those mistakes. With nothing important been said on my part. Let me just say, "War should never be necessary." John. Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:38:49 -0800 (PST) From: Im sick Subject: Re: NEC: feist Thanks, Tab - I figured if anyone knew about Feist, it'd be you! I have the Tony Scherr EP, and "Monarch..." is one of my favorite albums. Feist is one of the most under-rated performers in canada - she deserves much more recognition. I have had the pleasure of seeing her many times solo and when she was performing with Royal City, Daddy Szigeti, Peaches, World Provider and Gonzales. I think she is one of the best canadian voices out there. If you get the chance, go see her! she is worth the price of admission and more. - --- Tab Siddiqui wrote: > JewelEDA21@aol.com wrote: > > >live album with some friends out soon, and b-a-c-k > in the studio for a > > >second release within a year (Hopefully) > > Hmm... Not sure where that info came from, but I > think the 'live CD' you're > referring to is a small one-off EP that she put out > at shows over a year and > a half ago (it was recorded at the Rivoli with her > pal Tony Scherr on > guitar, she was opening for Danny Michel). It's a > bare-bones little gem, > she only pressed about 300 and sold them at shows > (then again, she hasn't > really played any shows save for the occasional live > date at home and > opening slots for Peaches and Gonzales in Europe)... > > As for 'back in the studio', she's BEEN in the > studio - for over 2 years > now! ;) She did an initial session here at home at > a big farm studio in > Hamilton, but didn't really like those demos, so has > been sporadically > recording in Paris and Germany ever since with her > pal Gonzales (Jason Beck) > producing. She keeps *saying* it will be out within > the year, so here's > hoping. > > As for the 'new' sound, it's a little more spacey, > low-key, much quieter > than the "Monarch" stuff... I don't think you're > going to hear any 'rocking > out' on this record... Think Cat Power with way > better songs and vocals. ;P > > - Tab. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months > FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:59:24 -0600 From: Greg Teltschik Subject: Re: War...and a Happy Birthday At 04:10 PM 3/19/2003 -0800, John Gustilo wrote: >My, oh my, did we have a little something to share >with the rest of the world? I'll respond briefly, if only to clarify a few points. I recognize I could have been a little unclear. Basically, I believe that Greg is saying is "War is >necessary, and the US politicians have probable cause >to declare war on Iraq." And, to paraphrase, the rest >of his views. Those who believe otherwise are >brainwashed through our culture and social morays. I'm actually trying to say that sometimes, war is unavoidable. Was this one unavoidable? Maybe, but maybe not in the longer perspective. I don't even pretend to have the answer. Well, it's definitely an opinion. I'll give Greg >that. Hmmm, Greg by no standards or means is >subjagated under any propaganda put forth by the US >government. No way. Not one bit. Greg is not >influenced by anyone. Instead, he acts and thinks of >his own accord free of any suppositions. I know enough to recognize propaganda when I see it, from both sides. As people are wont to say, the world exists in shades of grey, not black and white. The question becomes where in the grey do you draw the line? Frankly, I don't listen enough to George Bush and the official government spokespeople to be "Subjugated" by them. I don't believe that they always tell us the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. I expect that a democratic government that is accountable to the people generally works toward their better good, although a few detours in the wrong direction are likely. In general, I'm tired of people who have nothing more to say than "I am against war" with nothing else to say. No opinion about what alternatives we should explore. No real rationalization that can be explained. Anything? If you're against the war, so be it. But if you have to say something about it, please explain to me the thinking behind that opinion, or you leave me with the option to think that there is no thought behind it. >But, come on, it's WAR! Is one person's life >relevant? Or the many? Them? Us? Whose life counts >and matters? The few soldiers that die in war? The >several thousands saved from those soldiers' efforts? >You? Yes, life is precious. But as you say, who's life do you consider the most dear? Many, many people will be affected whether this war happens or not. If we start a conflict, many people will die. If we walk away and do nothing, many people will die: some will die now, and some will die later. We walked away from Osama Bin Laden several years ago, and thousands of people in New York had their lives irrevocably ruined. Where would we be now if when Iraq invade Kuwait we had just said "Ok, take it, but you'd better stop." They tried that with Hitler and it didn't work. >I am largely apathetic to the world events. But you, >Greg, take the cake. I don't care to point of >protesting the war on the steps of the Washington >Capitol. But I do care enough to recognize that lives >will be lost directly from this war with Iraq. I >don't need to preach to you that these are people's >lives. Lives that once lost cannot be returned. How did you get apathetic? What did I say that made you think I could care less about the world? Would it help you to know that I *pay* for a subscription to the London Sunday Times, because I want to know what's going on in the world? The US press does a terrible job covering worldwide events. And usually, it's colored from an American perspective. I'm actively seeking the broader perspective. If I thought there was something I could do that would really make a positive difference, I would do it. In the case of this conflict with Iraq, I don't see it. Would a sign with "Go Bush!" or "Stupid dork-face!" really matter? >I often rant that people shouldn't be all freaked over >9-11. In relative terms, people of the world >countries lose that many in a week, some even in a >day. Take for instance, South Africa. Almost 2000 >deaths a day from war, famine, and disease. But I am >still aware that many lives are lost. Lives are lost >(period) Agreed. 9-11 didn't change my world view, and I wasn't even shocked. I guess I didn't have the false sense of security of many Americans. But then and now, I don't let it rule my life. And I certainly didn't buy into the media circus. >And why the US is in Iraq? It's a culmination of >reasons considered that brought us into war with >Saddam and Iraq. Hopefully, the war will be like the >US is a guy with a shotgun telling a man with a knife >to drop it. Anyhow, the only feasible benefit of war >is its end. Albeit, unconditional surrender or some >sort of amnesty is imparted by reluctance of one or >both parties. To the victor goes the spoils lest his >brother die. Or should I say lets his brother die. I don't just question the US presence in Iraq, I guestion it in many other parts of the world. Yes, we have many interests in many places, but we have a bad habit of doing things half-assed. We support one faction, then turn and support another. Or we just leave right in the middle of it and ignore it all. Different people hate us because we helped their enemies, because we abandoned them, or because we did nothing. It's almost a no-win situation. *IF* we chould find a way out of this position, I think we should find it. I'm not advocating a return to the isolationist policies that the US followed before WW1, but I think we need to reconsider how we engage in international relations. I think the British have done a pretty good job of positioning themselves, as have many other countries. >As for your comment on the US being the world's >police. I think not. I like to believe we're more >information relayers protecting our investments. To >insure the viability of the United States' people. We >are not a fascist state where we impose rule onto the >rest of the world. We are merely men apt to make >mistakes and act to not repeat those mistakes. The fact is, whenever there is a military situation in the world, it seems like US troops, or a consortium led by US troops, or a UN force comprised mainly of US troops ends up being involved. Through our ignorance or indifference we end up between a rock and a hard place. Yes, we've done a lot of good in the world, but in some respects we've done just as much evil. >With nothing important been said on my part. Let me >just say, "War should never be necessary." Agreed, but nor should we look upon it as always "avoidable." Sometimes the sin is in doing nothing. Greg Teltschik gteltschik@mindspring.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 20:13:37 EST From: DLynngarrett@aol.com Subject: House Concert Friday in Toledo, OH -Jessica Weiser Anyone in the Detroit, Ann Arbor, Toledo, Cleveland Area?? If so, come on out and celebrate the first day of Spring with us! Live In My Living Room..... Friday, March 21st at 8 pm JESSICA WEISER with Lyle Koehnlein opening local performer - Jeremy Crites Toledo, Ohio Suggested donation: $10 Beverages and Snacks Provided email me to reserve a spot. RSVP dlynngarrett@aol.com Coming in April! Tuesday, April 29th at 7 pm TERAMI HIRSCH ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 22:24:36 EST From: JewelEDA21@aol.com Subject: Re: NEC: feist i dig the new sound... but monarch was also really good -- very fragmented and beautiful.. but hell, she's so beautiful herself.. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 04:25:06 +0000 From: "secret agent kr" Subject: [none] no matter what your views may be on this war, i merely sent out the initial email to wish everyone well in whatever capacity they may be affected by whats happening. i dont think it's an outrageous statement to say that i one is anti war. and it's not a cop out either. anyway it's important to talk about. emm said something that i rather liked in her latest journal. something to think about at least.......... kr >makes you wonder if anyone cares about anything beyond money and power and ego - - all of the things that litter history's greatest mistakes investors will rejoice at the fruits that war will shower on the stock market but i will never understand how this decision makes us a richer planet, how it moves us forward, how it helps to erase the confusion, racism and prejudice that has been amplified in the past year and a half. - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect your PC - Click here for McAfee.com VirusScan Online ------------------------------ End of headline-girl-digest V6 #52 **********************************