From: owner-goths-digest@smoe.org (goths-digest)
To: goths-digest@smoe.org
Subject: goths-digest V1 #8
Reply-To: goths@smoe.org
Sender: owner-goths-digest@smoe.org
Errors-To: owner-goths-digest@smoe.org
Precedence: bulk


goths-digest        Friday, September 12 1997        Volume 01 : Number 008



                               Today's Subjects:
                               -----------------
  Re: genre                                              [DiscoVampr@aol.com]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 23:25:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: DiscoVampr@aol.com
Subject: Re: genre

Do we really have to label them? Why can't we just say, "They rule" and let
it be at that? 

I guess if you really wanted to label them you could call them one of these:
1. Alternative
2. Grunge (Maybe not, but it's an idea.)
3. Gothic 
4. Classical
5. Whatever else you think I missed.

Or, hey, here's an idea. Why don't we classify them under a new style? We
could call it...um, Rasputina? Maybe not, but let's throw ideas around.

- -The New King of (Un-)Dead Music,
The Disco Vampire

------------------------------

End of goths-digest V1 #8
*************************