From: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org (fegmaniax-digest) To: fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Subject: fegmaniax-digest V16 #29 Reply-To: fegmaniax@smoe.org Sender: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk fegmaniax-digest Wednesday, January 31 2007 Volume 16 : Number 029 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: every gig you take (0% rumor) [2fs ] Re: Hysterical Reenactment [2fs ] grrrrrr ["Brian Huddell" ] Re: Fwd: Hysterical Reenactment [kevin ] Re: grrrrrr [2fs ] Re: Hysterical Reenactment [Eb ] Re: every chronic you Easter (0% rumor) ["Bri N" ] Re: Hysterical Reenactment ["Lauren Elizabeth" ] Ebranosaurus Rex ["rubrshrk" ] Re: grrrrrr [2fs ] Re: Ebranosaurus Rex [Jeff Dwarf ] reap ["michael wells" ] feed your pride with boredom [ken ostrander ] Re: every chronic you Easter (0% rumor) [2fs ] RH-related content >= 0% ["Lauren Elizabeth" ] RE: My name is Eb and, uh, your ass-reaming subject line about me is flailing ["Michael Sweeney" ] Re: Incidentally.... ["Stacked Crooked" ] Reap ["Lauren Elizabeth (gmail)" ] Re: fegmaniax-digest V16 #28 [great white shark ] Re: Hysterical Reenactment [michaeljbachman@comcast.net] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:40:29 -0600 From: 2fs Subject: Re: every gig you take (0% rumor) On 1/30/07, Bachman, Michael wrote: > > _____ > > Rex came back with: > > So that was the year you switched Copeland allegiances? > > Summer of 1983, as I bought Let's Active's afoot and REM's Murmer > shortly after Chronic Town. > Mitch Easter and Don Dixon ruled back then. > Easter's got a new CD coming out within a few months (to be called _Dynamico_) - and Dixon released a new, fine CD last year (_The Entire Combustible World in One Small Room_). - -- ...Jeff Norman The Architectural Dance Society http://spanghew.blogspot.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:58:43 -0600 From: 2fs Subject: Re: Hysterical Reenactment On 1/30/07, Miles Goosens wrote: > > On 1/30/07, Nora B. wrote: > > http://images.yelp.com/photo?id=Fa-koYv2mZI2y-MKL5mgzQ&s=l > > That's brilliant. I need that on a t-shirt. Well yeah, but really, to be more accurate, it wouldn't be "their first album" but more like "their first self-produced 45" or "the first song they posted to their myspace site." Or "when they used to open up for The Flying Torn Anuses at the Plastic Surgery Disaster Club back when it was in that basement below the bondage-gear shop." (tee-hee) - -- ...Jeff Norman The Architectural Dance Society http://spanghew.blogspot.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:26:46 -0600 From: "Brian Huddell" Subject: grrrrrr I'm very very angry at certain people!! Why? Because of how much they suck, that's why!! +brian (trying to fit in) in New Orleans ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:02:31 -0800 (GMT-08:00) From: kevin Subject: Re: Fwd: Hysterical Reenactment Jezziz barking Christ, don't you dillholes have ANYTHING ELSE TO DO? I mean it's funny - the way watching a couple of cranky five-year-olds trying to beat each other up is funny - but honest ta gosh. Just sayin'. - -----Original Message----- >From: Spotted Eagle Ray >Sent: Jan 30, 2007 4:04 PM >To: fgz >Subject: Fwd: Hysterical Reenactment > >On 1/30/07, Eb wrote: >> >> Rex wrote: >> > I bother to point out your obnoxius behavior when it gets out of >> > hand (often), regardless of whether it offends me personally or on >> > principle. >> >> Right. Again, your resolution to destroy the list is restated. > > >And once again the fact that in your mind you *are* the list is >restrated. Believe it or not, a list without you *is* possible. >Increasingly desireable, I daresay. I can totally see how this never-ending >cycle must make peoples' heads spin, since you will take my pointing this >out (again) as a restatement of my desire to "destroy the list" (again). >With what? Dynamite? > >> partly because I've become almost as disliked as you over the past >> > few months, and have little to lose. >> >> Now there's some overdue realism. Casting yourself as the list's >> kamikaze pilot is quite accurate, and goes along quite well with my >> description of your approach in the previous post. > > >Erm, my reputation has little to lose, I shoulda said. I guess. It doesn't >occur to me that ideas like "destruction" or "kamikaze raids" might be >inferred from anything I say. A little melodramatic for my tastes. > >Oh boy, your desperation is turning truly pathetic. I lasted posted >> something from Kansan HOW long ago? > > >Turning pathetic? You and your psychiatric degree declared me legally insane >months ago. By your measure I've surely regressed to Cro Magnon status by >now. > > >> I lasted posted >> something from Kansan HOW long ago? >> > > >A) I thought you stopped posting Kansan to the list because he stopped >posting himself, and assume you would still be doing so otherwise; (B) I >hope you're now admitting that it was lame and annoying when you did, and >(C) my point is, for someone so concerned about the "health of the list" you >have historically shown a lot of contempt for subscibers by either >belittling them or doing shit like the Kansan-rampage long after many asked >you to know it off. > > >> Right. It's NOT all about me. But you are resolved to MAKE the list >> all about me by trying to start an overblown flamewar every time I >> disagree with someone else in a manner which "offends" you. Which >> basically means you will be flailing at me constantly for as long as >> we're both on the list. > > >It's official: "Flailing" is the new "hysterical", folks. > >Of course not. It's not as your intents are focused on debating >> anything but my personality. > > >No, your abysmal behavior. When you behave abysmally. Would it kill you to >own up to your own surliness and try to be, for lack of a better word, >nicer? I swear to God I wouldn't "flail" "hysterically" or anything. >Promise. > >Meanwhile, this statement comes from you >> a day or so after you were scoffing at me for taking your "music- >> related opinions" (such as "You fucking rule, Eb") personally. > > >You know, I fundamentally misunderstood a flawed point you were trying to >make. It never occurred to me that you thought that comments under subject >headings that had to do LYLAS or whatever but didn't address that band had >to be about those band. Of course my digs at you were towards you. But >they were never camouflaged as anything else... "You fucking rule, Eb" was >in no way a passive-agressive swipe at you via Of Montreal, it was a >plain-as-daylight swipe at you. Similarly, "I don't much like Dresden >Dolls" was not a swipe at you at all, but a statement of opinion about a >band. I sorta keep these things separate, hard as that may be for you to >grasp. > >And here's a surprise, you can armchair-analyze me until the cows come home, >but you don't have much to say about my dead-on characterization that you'll >never ever leave the list no matter how much you threaten because in your >ego of egos, that would be the ultimate failure? Every time a flame war >erupts, I end up asking you what you get out being this list, and you never, >never answer. Because we all know already and it'd be embarassing for you >to admit it. > >Love on ya, >Rex ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:17:08 -0600 From: 2fs Subject: Re: grrrrrr On 1/30/07, Brian Huddell wrote: > > I'm very very angry at certain people!! Why? Because of how much they > suck, that's why!! Oh yeah? Well you suck too!! Ha-ha! ps: Any info on the upcoming album from that Robyn fellow who for some reason attracts angry, disputatious fans on the web? - -- ...Jeff Norman The Architectural Dance Society http://spanghew.blogspot.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:22:15 -0800 From: Eb Subject: Re: Hysterical Reenactment http://masonc.home.netcom.com/rumen/kamikaze.jpg "Captain! Captain! We've sustained a douchebag-sized hit on the upper starboard deck!" Spotted Eagle Ray wrote: >>> I bother to point out your obnoxius behavior when it gets out of >>> hand (often), regardless of whether it offends me personally or on >>> principle. >> >> Right. Again, your resolution to destroy the list is restated. > > And once again the fact that in your mind you *are* the list is > restrated. Believe it or not, a list without you *is* possible. > Increasingly desireable, I daresay. I can totally see how this > never-ending > cycle must make peoples' heads spin, since you will take my > pointing this > out (again) as a restatement of my desire to "destroy the > list" (again). > With what? Dynamite? > >> partly because I've become almost as disliked as you over the past >>> few months, and have little to lose. >> >> Now there's some overdue realism. Casting yourself as the list's >> kamikaze pilot is quite accurate, and goes along quite well with my >> description of your approach in the previous post. > > Erm, my reputation has little to lose, I shoulda said. I guess. > It doesn't > occur to me that ideas like "destruction" or "kamikaze raids" might be > inferred from anything I say. A little melodramatic for my tastes. > > Oh boy, your desperation is turning truly pathetic. I lasted posted >> something from Kansan HOW long ago? > > Turning pathetic? You and your psychiatric degree declared me > legally insane > months ago. By your measure I've surely regressed to Cro Magnon > status by > now. > >> I lasted posted >> something from Kansan HOW long ago? > > A) I thought you stopped posting Kansan to the list because he stopped > posting himself, and assume you would still be doing so otherwise; > (B) I > hope you're now admitting that it was lame and annoying when you > did, and > (C) my point is, for someone so concerned about the "health of the > list" you > have historically shown a lot of contempt for subscibers by either > belittling them or doing shit like the Kansan-rampage long after > many asked > you to know it off. > >> Right. It's NOT all about me. But you are resolved to MAKE the list >> all about me by trying to start an overblown flamewar every time I >> disagree with someone else in a manner which "offends" you. Which >> basically means you will be flailing at me constantly for as long as >> we're both on the list. > > It's official: "Flailing" is the new "hysterical", folks. > > Of course not. It's not as your intents are focused on debating >> anything but my personality. > > No, your abysmal behavior. When you behave abysmally. Would it > kill you to > own up to your own surliness and try to be, for lack of a better word, > nicer? I swear to God I wouldn't "flail" "hysterically" or anything. > Promise. > > Meanwhile, this statement comes from you >> a day or so after you were scoffing at me for taking your "music- >> related opinions" (such as "You fucking rule, Eb") personally. > > You know, I fundamentally misunderstood a flawed point you were > trying to > make. It never occurred to me that you thought that comments under > subject > headings that had to do LYLAS or whatever but didn't address that > band had > to be about those band. Of course my digs at you were towards > you. But > they were never camouflaged as anything else... "You fucking rule, > Eb" was > in no way a passive-agressive swipe at you via Of Montreal, it was a > plain-as-daylight swipe at you. Similarly, "I don't much like Dresden > Dolls" was not a swipe at you at all, but a statement of opinion > about a > band. I sorta keep these things separate, hard as that may be for > you to > grasp. > > And here's a surprise, you can armchair-analyze me until the cows > come home, > but you don't have much to say about my dead-on characterization > that you'll > never ever leave the list no matter how much you threaten because > in your > ego of egos, that would be the ultimate failure? Every time a > flame war > erupts, I end up asking you what you get out being this list, and > you never, > never answer. Because we all know already and it'd be embarassing > for you > to admit it. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:53:45 -0800 From: "Bri N" Subject: Re: every chronic you Easter (0% rumor) > Summer of 1983, as I bought Let's Active's afoot and REM's Murmer > shortly after Chronic Town. > Mitch Easter and Don Dixon ruled back then. > Easter's got a new CD coming out within a few months (to be called _Dynamico_) - and Dixon released a new, fine CD last year (_The Entire Combustible World in One Small Room_). - -- ...Jeff Norman - ---------------------- And the fab Sneakers EP is re-released with many bonus tracks some of which I haven't heard yet. Easter fans, dB's fan rejoice! http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=Azw508qtfbtn4 - -Nuppy ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:42:53 -0600 From: "Brian Huddell" Subject: RE: grrrrrr > On 1/30/07, Brian Huddell wrote: > > > > I'm very very angry at certain people!! Why? Because of > > how much they suck, that's why!! > > Oh yeah? Well you suck too!! > > Ha-ha! So lame. I first discussed how much I suck in Fegmaniax Digest volume -6 number 127, several years before listservs were invented! You may admire me now. +brian (Broomaniax makes me giddy) in New Orleans ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:40:22 -0500 From: "Lauren Elizabeth" Subject: Re: Hysterical Reenactment Hi FegList, Nora B. says: > On 1/30/07, Eb wrote: > > > When you behave hideously, I call attention to it. Big difference. > > > > Right. Like when I "hideously" point out early posts I made about Of > > Montreal. What a grievous sin THAT was. > > That wasn't hideous or grievous behavior but it was pretty ridiculous > and petty. Somebody gave Stewart credit for turning them on to Of > Montreal and you just had to point out your into them way way back > when? That's just sad. > > http://images.yelp.com/photo?id=Fa-koYv2mZI2y-MKL5mgzQ&s=l Great comic :) But IMO it's not like it's not standard-issue behavior, especially for music geeks. Just mention Talking Heads in polite company and it still won't be long before someone can't resist telling you in what year they bought "Talking Heads 77". xo Lauren - -- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "People with opinions just go around bothering one another." - The Buddha ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:37:57 +0000 From: "rubrshrk" Subject: Ebranosaurus Rex I can't understand how this stays on the list, 'cause evidently I'm an idiot. So, if you guys won't get a room, can we do something else here? This has been lame. Tom, Nick, Glen, Russ, if you guys are still here, I realize in a battle of sharp wits, I'd probably be the piñata, but can we show them what a real insult fight is all about? I don't think it is Woj's responsibility that other people won't behave. He could start throwing us off the list if our slap fights aren't at least entertaining. Or we could have a new list for "WWE EbRex Rumble in The Bunghole Pay Per View Fight of the Century" and anybody who wanted to watch stuff could subscribe to that list. I know traffic here would go down drastically, but we might somehow figure out a way to exist without it. All that aside, and I do like reading other stuff that Eb and Rex have contributed over the years, could you kids bury the hatchet and get back together for the sake of the children? Thanks, - -the Old Man (thanks Viv) ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:12:13 -0600 From: 2fs Subject: Re: grrrrrr On 1/30/07, Brian Huddell wrote: > > > On 1/30/07, Brian Huddell wrote: > > > > > > I'm very very angry at certain people!! Why? Because of > > > how much they suck, that's why!! > > > > Oh yeah? Well you suck too!! > > > > Ha-ha! > > So lame. I first discussed how much I suck in Fegmaniax Digest volume -6 > number 127, several years before listservs were invented! Waaah! Waaaah! Waaaaaah! - -- ...Jeff Norman The Architectural Dance Society http://spanghew.blogspot.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:17:26 -0800 (PST) From: Jeff Dwarf Subject: Re: Ebranosaurus Rex rubrshrk wrote: > All that aside, and I do like reading other stuff > that Eb and Rex have contributed over the years, > could you kids bury the hatchet and get back > together for the sake of the children? Great, you just had to bring up children.... "I believe in the marketplace of ideas even if the other guy doesn't have any." -- Keith Olbermann . ____________________________________________________________________________________ Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:26:45 -0800 From: "michael wells" Subject: reap With Eb otherwise occupied, someone has to keep track of all these folks dying. TV writer, producer and alleged author Sidney "I Dream of Jeannie" Sheldon, 89. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070131/ap_on_en_ot/obit_sheldon ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:12:21 -0800 (PST) From: ken ostrander Subject: feed your pride with boredom ok, i know i'll get thrown out of the hipster treehouse for this; but i didn't get my first police album until well after 'synchronicy'. i didn't like 'every breath you take' for a long time; but now i appreciate the dark possessiveness. i think i bought 'regatta' and 'zenyatta' first. got to say that i am pleased as punch that the boys will be breaking out the blonde dye again for the grammys. i am still a big fan of sumner and, while i have no desire to buy his luted album, i like the fact that he changes things up like that. what else? oh, i got 'talking heads 77' in '87. let's see, i got into bono & co (big fan...yes i know that popularity equates with selling out and i somehow live with myself) right around the live aid experience. i heard r.e.m. around 'reckoning' but wasn't into that (not) country sound at that point in my life. robyn hitchcock (who?) hit my radar around 'element of light'. let's see... i'd never even heard of of montreal until last week when their new album came out and it was featured on napster. i've been able to listen to some of their back catalogue and i'm wondering which "old sound" is the one with which to connect; 'cause it seems to me they change with every album? and wasn't it mangum who started that "double tracked strangle howl"? swept away by the brooms. it's hysterical laughter you're talking about, right? i imagine each of you cackling whenever you see another digest filled with your repartee. really ladies, you need to get a room or a cage and work this out. neither of you have any sense of decorum, decency, or self respect. i don't really care much about the lowbrow subject headings that make plain the resting place of the most holy grail; but obviously there are plenty of folks that can't bring themselves to change them. oh, and do we really have to copy the endless tirades for the one line comments? the only advantage rex has is that he posts on topic more than anyone else. that doesn't make this pathetic display any easier to swallow. i will say that i got warm and fuzzys when eb mentioned the huggies at the suzuki show. sometimes you suprise me. seriously, i don't want either of you to leave the list (and i wonder what you would do with yourselves if you did) but please take your jizz lobbing elsewhere. the circle jerk is now complete. for all i know i was at woodstock when i was one year old; but who really gives a shit? those years are lost in a lysergic tetrahydrocannabinol haze. ken "wipe his nose before he stings" the kenster np cibelle the shine of dried electric leaves (sumptuous) "the good thing about cocaine was that nobody claimed that it made you sort of a better person, you know. or that it would set you on a path to enlightenment... i mean, it's all a way of mortgaging your future. you get drunk tonight, you'll feel shitty tomorrow. i don't know of any enhancer--even the tv, people turn on the television to keep their kids quiet, but it just makes them that much more rambunctious when they turn it off again. you've got a bit of temporary opiate peace in exchange for a mad sociopathic spasm from your kids when the tv is off and they've suddenly got to relate to people again. it can't be helped." -senor hitchcock - --------------------------------- TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:20:58 -0600 From: 2fs Subject: Re: every chronic you Easter (0% rumor) On 1/30/07, Bri N wrote: > > > Summer of 1983, as I bought Let's Active's afoot and REM's Murmer > > shortly after Chronic Town. > > Mitch Easter and Don Dixon ruled back then. > > > > Easter's got a new CD coming out within a few months (to be called > _Dynamico_) Time flies when you SUCK: actually, that Easter CD is just now available for ordering: . - -- ...Jeff Norman The Architectural Dance Society http://spanghew.blogspot.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:40:39 -0500 From: "Lauren Elizabeth" Subject: RH-related content >= 0% Hi FegList, It seems like a good time for useless conjecturing about our hero. Have you all already played Guess Robyn's Myers-Briggs Type? If not... I would say ENTP. I would have guessed INTP because I find them tenacious, open-minded in many ways, and slightly heartless. Mostly, I respect the way they think. However, Robyn is a performer and as fascinated as he seems with his own mind, I couldn't justify an "introvert" label. Any other thoughts? xo Lauren, not a trained therapist P.S. Is Myers-Briggs popular places other than U.S.? - -- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "People with opinions just go around bothering one another." - The Buddha ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:26:00 +0000 From: "Michael Sweeney" Subject: RE: My name is Eb and, uh, your ass-reaming subject line about me is flailing [Leaping way late into the fray...] I dunno -- I kinda find it (re: Broome vs. Broome) all a bit amusing, in a time-wasting, something-extra-to-read-between-the-occasional-actual-RH-content way That said, Nora's add was spot on. (Also, RE: Steve Schiavo's Lindsey Buckingham show comment (almost all geezers; Mac-content seemingly preferred by geezer crowd), the show here in Chicago in Nov. was excellent and we were seated upfront behind a group of fetching young women (of many in attendance, not all with still-fetching moms in tow) who even knew conversationally who LB's longtime guitar tech Ray was...and the new stuff was enthusiastically absorbed...and some of the Mac stuff was cheered partially (by me, it seemed, as well as by others) because much of it was excellent "Tusk" era stuff that was a pleasant surprise to hear. We're heading down to St. Louis this weekend to see the 2nd leg....hope it's nearly as good!) (Oops -- better add some RH content: Gonna roadtrip to the Philly show in March at the World Cafe...any advice /suggestions for that venue -- or city? (my first time there)...thanks!) Michael Sweeney "I don't have to pick sides or hate them both, do I?" / "It's like watching a written car crash..." Chicago _________________________________________________________________ Get in the mood for Valentine's Day. View photos, recipes and more on your Live.com page. http://www.live.com/?addTemplate=ValentinesDay&ocid=T001MSN30A0701 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:24:20 -0700 From: "Marc Holden" Subject: Re: every gig you take (0% rumor) Miles pointed out: >My last live memory of the Police was when they reunited >for the '86 Amnesty International Tour. Mind you, I only >saw the gig that was televised on MTV, but the organizers >in their wisdom decided that the Police would headline, >since they had sold the most albums. >This meant that they followed U2. And Peter Gabriel. >Can you say "uh oh?" I knew that you could. Agreed for the most part, but still, you need to look at the situation a bit more in the original context. This was back in 1986, before the internet was the source of instant information updates. I was at the Amnesty Show at the Meadowlands (last show of that tour, and what wound up being the last actual set by the Police, other than the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction, and until these upcoming shows actually happen), and the crowd did not seem aware that the Police were going to play. Sting was scheduled to appear, and the first rumor of a Police appearance that I heard all day was when Sting came out and said something like "I brought a couple of friends along tonight." I had not read or heard about what happened at any of the other concerts until after the end of the tour. I'm not saying it was the best set of the day--Peter Gabriel, Stanley Jordan, and Lou Reed were all better. It was just a much needed surprise, after hearing that Pete Townshend (the main reason we were at the concert) had pulled from the show at the last moment because his father was gravely ill--Cliff Townshend passed away 2 weeks later. Besides being the last Police concert, I also got a chance to see a few sets that day that I wouldn't have gone out of my way for, at the time, but I'm now glad that I saw--Miles Davis, Joni Mitchell, Yoko Ono, and Peter Paul & Mary. Anyway, it all wound up being worth at least whatever we paid for our tickets (about $40, if I recall correctly). Marc If a kid asks where rain comes from, I think a cute thing to tell him is "God is crying." And if he asks why God is crying, another cute thing to tell him is "Probably because of something you did." Jack Handey ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:05:57 -0800 From: "Stacked Crooked" Subject: Re: Incidentally.... <...isn't it peculiar how pointing out when I first posted about Of Montreal is a major, objectionable infraction of list manners, but launching a never-ending string of threads with subject lines like "My name is Eb, now please ram your throbbing cock up my asshole and make me cum" is A-OK?> i would think you'd be flattered. but, i'll tell you what: if you publicly and sincerely apologise for having bitched me out for my having expressed the opinion that *Shrinkwrapped* is the best gang of four record -- even though you *had never even heard* said record (and for all i know, still haven't); then i'll nip the "my name is..." subject-lines in the bud. otherwise, it's throbbing cocks from here on in. (, if your memory needs refreshing.) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 04:47:12 -0500 From: "Lauren Elizabeth (gmail)" Subject: Reap Author Sidney Sheldon, 89 http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/story/493529p-415732c.html xo Lauren - -- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "People with opinions just go around bothering one another." - The Buddha ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:35:34 +1030 From: great white shark Subject: Re: fegmaniax-digest V16 #28 well I imagine that no one objects because a: its funny and B : perhaps a lot of people think that its just what you deserve ( this is pure speculation on my part not getting at you at all Eb ) der kommander On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:51 AM, fegmaniax-digest wrote: > ..isn't it peculiar how pointing out when I first posted about Of > Montreal is a major, objectionable infraction of list manners, but > launching a never-ending string of threads with subject lines like > "My name is Eb, now please ram your throbbing cock up my asshole and > make me cum" is A-OK? ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:29:51 +0000 From: michaeljbachman@comcast.net Subject: Re: Hysterical Reenactment - -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Lauren Elizabeth" > Hi FegList, > > Nora B. says: > > On 1/30/07, Eb wrote: > > > > When you behave hideously, I call attention to it. Big difference. > > > > > > Right. Like when I "hideously" point out early posts I made about Of > > > Montreal. What a grievous sin THAT was. > > > > That wasn't hideous or grievous behavior but it was pretty ridiculous > > and petty. Somebody gave Stewart credit for turning them on to Of > > Montreal and you just had to point out your into them way way back > > when? That's just sad. > > > > http://images.yelp.com/photo?id=Fa-koYv2mZI2y-MKL5mgzQ&s=l > > Great comic :) > > But IMO it's not like it's not standard-issue behavior, especially for > music geeks. Just mention Talking Heads in polite company and it > still won't be long before someone can't resist telling you in what > year they bought "Talking Heads 77". > > xo > Lauren Talking Heads 77 (Two Sevens Clash)? I think I got it after Remain In Light and Fear of Music, say sometime in 1982. Speaking of sevens clashing, My grandfather was buried on July 7th, 1977. Jamacains were so worried on that day that a lot of them stayed home, thinking that the end was near. Culture's great reggae album Two Sevens Clash, expressed that feeling of dread of the sevens clashing when it was released earlier in 1977. Michael B. ------------------------------ End of fegmaniax-digest V16 #29 *******************************