From: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org (fegmaniax-digest) To: fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Subject: fegmaniax-digest V12 #290 Reply-To: fegmaniax@smoe.org Sender: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk fegmaniax-digest Tuesday, July 29 2003 Volume 12 : Number 290 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Rexmaniax! Part 2: The Part About Neil ["Rex.Broome" ] RE: Celebrity Screws Revisited [Catherine Simpson ] RE: Celebrity Screws Revisited [Eb ] Reap [Eb ] Re: Rexmaniax! Part One: The Part About Lucinda ["Maximilian Lang" ] Re: Rexmaniax! Part One: The Part About Lucinda [Eb ] Re: more robust yet strangely fuckable ["Glen Uber" ] Re: out of the mouths of baby lists... [Tom Clark ] RE: fegmaniax-digest V12 #289 ["Brian Huddell" ] Re: out of the mouths of baby lists... ["Glen Uber" ] Re: out of the mouths of baby lists... [Dolph Chaney ] you say it's your fegday ["Brian Huddell" ] Re: you say it's your fegday [gshell@metronet.com] Do you want to play a game? [steve ] Fwd: Breast Cancer [Marcy Tanter ] Re: Rexmaniax! Part One: The Part About Lucinda [Ken Weingold Subject: Rexmaniax! Part 2: The Part About Neil Okay, so, the "Greendale Concept Album" presented in full (if you don't know anything about this, you might want to check some other reviews)... well, I would have enjoyed this on one level just because, while I've seen Neil several times, I've never seen him in his flat-out "fuck with people and confound their expectations mode", and this was definitely that. Maybe not as tweaked and off-putting as the Trans tour, but up there in its own way with the barrage of new material that turned into "Time Fades Away", maybe. Let's just say that for most of the first hour and a half, the audience, while not hostile, seemed to be silently pissed that they were parked in and couldn't leave. Certainly Wife's Boss's Friend and his Wife's Boss's Friend's Wife were hatin' life badly, even before WBFW puked in her seat about three tunes from the end from a combo of bitterness and booze (told ya these guys were rowdier than me). Wife's Boss himself, though, kind of grooved on the oddness of it all, Neil played the entire upcoming song-story-cycle-album "Greendale" in sequence, accompanied by, yes, sets, props, video projections and a large cast of actors, many of whom lip-synched along with their "dialogue" as sung by Neil and acted out the "plot points" and stuff. (Umm, since this is kind of a "story", I guess you could consider this your "spoiler warning" if you're inclined to view it that way). Production value levels were very, very low (actors and sets could charitably described as "sub-Guffman") but ambitious in their way nonetheless... very large cast and lots of synched-up (yet shitty-looking) video footage and computer graphics. One must give the theatre troop some credit on the tech level: keeping that much stuff in that close synch with a band as loose as Crazy Horse is definitely an achievement. The band itself was a completely unaugmented 4-piece, a slightly reshuffled configuration of the same guys who have been the Horse since '75. Pancho Sampedro was confined to a barely audible electic piano for the entire Greendale set and seemed none too thrilled to be demoted from guitar duty. The rhythm section seemed enthusiastic enough. Neil himself was fully committed, playing all the guitar himself, "portraying" all the characters with very little vocal backup, and playing some really arresting harmonica (best I've ever heard from him) and a Les Paul other than his stardard "Old Black". It was essentially Crazy Horse as a three piece, and sounded great. How distracting was the acting ensemble? Very. How pretentious was the whole presentaion? Hard to say. Musically the vibe is somewhere between that of "Tommy" (inasmuch as the individual pieces are more "normal rock" than concept/prog pieces in themselves) and Lou's "New York" (although "Greendale" has more of a story it's still a bunch of basic rock about a heightened version of the artist's "home town", kind of, I think). And the presentation of it is... how to say it... an appropriately (not to say enjoyable) Neil-esque mixture of corn-pone* and hippy-dippy (that is, not at all mythological/futuristic/overblown etc., but resolutely small-town-theatre, more of a diluted "Our Town" than "The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway"). Usually it was just distracting, but a few parts of it worked once you got into the rhythm of the thing. My favorite bits involved the character of Grandpa Green, who at least twice appeared to be fully realize, and and be kind of annoyed by the fact, that he was living in a Neil Young song (when he's dying, he snarks at Neil, "I dunno where he comes up with this stuff", and it's one of a handful of moments where the presentation coalesces into something both funny and touching). Otherwise, well, it's shit, but it's shit like nothing you've ever seen before... I'll be interested to see what everyone else makes of it. The songs, on the other hand, are mostly pretty damned great. Sometimes the idea of propelling the story bogs everything down, but Neil really gets into his character's heads and does an excellent job of embellishing them with personal details. The "story" itself may or may not have its merits, but when he digs in for a character study, it really helps to raise his lyrics above the somewhat generic level of his last few albums. Neil the lyricist is back in business, and individually these songs feel like good examples of the meandering story-song tunes he does quite well indeed (think "After the Gold Rush", "Thrasher", "The Old Homestead", "Crime in the City", etc.) Among the best were an elegy for a dead cop (!), mostly delivered by his wife at his graveside... memories of a life together enlivened by details both funny and anguished, set to a "Cortez"-like dream-rock accompaniment. Beautiful stuff, as was the lone acoustic number, a similarly textured look back at a wasted life with a breathtaking chorus. A few of the other tunes were a little bit workaday (notably the ones designed to carry the narrative) and the closing anthem, another "Save Mother Earth" type of tune accompanied by the whole "cast" go-go dancing, I suspect was godawful, but it finally got the audience to its feet and rockin' out. Intermission followed by a standard stompin' Crazy Horse set that seemed to satsify just about everybody and justify what had come before. Neil was back with Old Black, Sampedro back on guitar, and as usual they cranked right into "Hey Hey My My" and never looked back. They started with most of the electric material from "Rust" (the video screen was playing clips from the "Rust" movie as they came onstage, which was risky as the whole band has, ummm, aged a bit since then and even Neil's getting a bit paunchy, and one must assume there's a reason for his wearing a baseball cap for the entire set). Other tunes included "Prisoners of Rock & Roll", which seems to have become a recent Horse staple despite being a weak track on what to me is the worst record Neil's ever made, and (to make up for it) the fiercest electric version of Mr. Soul I've ever heard, much better than the more laid-back renditions it's gotten recently. So it all ended well. Still trying to decide about the first bit. Let's say that I'm looking forward to the record and dreading the DVD. - -Rex ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:01:05 -0400 From: "Stewart C. Russell" Subject: Re: Battle of the Nudes (No RH) Eb wrote: > > But everything I've ever heard from the > Tragically Hip made me want to crawl under a > rock and die. You realize that your statement has just meant that the Canadian Taliban has just issued a "fatwah, eh" on you? You will be captured and force-fed doughnuts until you (are) like us. Stewart ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:24:51 -0700 From: "Natalie Jane" Subject: more robust yet strangely fuckable >So, turns out I'm younger in Feg Years than I would have thought... going >on >6 1/2. I just turned six on July 17th. The subject lines for that digest (http://www.fegmania.org/archives/fegmaniax/1997-1/v05.n168) included: Steve's Disgraceful Brain Re: A More Robust Globe Of Fegs! embarrassed by robyn flying hats and unfurnished rooms (re: feg digests #166-7) septicemia and meeting Robyn (The last being Randi's epic tale...) >so, anyway, >where Lucinda is concerned, I want to fuck her. Never one to pull his punches, that Rex... >Oh, and Rex, I think I speak for all of us when I request you use more >figurative terms to describe your concert companions. Might I suggest >"Japanese Lantern", "Innertube" and "Annoying Hangnail"? Tom, you fuckin' rule! - - Careless Bamboo Outhouse _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:32:12 -0700 From: Eb Subject: Re: Battle of the Network Nearly Nudes (No RH) >It was great. I sat there with the PowerBook on my lap, dialing up IMDB to >see what happened to all those "great young talents" that Cosell was >creaming over. Jan Smithers, Randi Oakes, Kristy McNichol (not to be >confused with Cristy MacNichol < http://us.imdb.com/Name?MacNichol,+Cristy > >, Willie Aames, etc... There was an amusing contrast between certain names who are still widely recognized or even "superstar level" (Letterman, Billy Crystal, Robin Williams, Jimmy McNichol), and some other names who weren't even *vaguely* familiar. Ditto for some of the shows represented. Yesterday, there was a prominently featured actress from "David Cassidy, Man Undercover" (laugh) named Wendy Rastattar? Plus, Caskey Swaim? Kathyrn Leigh Scott? Who??? Completely buried by time. Ha...the IMDB site says Helen Hunt was on a BoNS episode in 1982. Wish I had seen that one. >Oh, and Eb forgot that perennial favorite, Adrienne Barbeau. I was >constantly reminded of the old SNL parody "Battle Of The Network T&A", where >you could see "The biggest T's and the nicest A's!" Oh, you're right...how could I forget Barbeau's eyeball-bouncing jaunt through the obstacle course? They also showed a swimsuited Suzanne Somers jumping up and down at least twice (in slow motion!), and repeated a fairly exquisite shot of Lynda Carter pulling her wet swimsuit away from her torso to rearrange her pontoons. ;) (Yeah, I thought of that SNL bit too.) Eb ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:45:17 -0700 From: "Rex.Broome" Subject: Celebrity Screws Revisited Tom C: >>Hmmm, you mean you and your wife don't have one of those >>agreements whereby one night stands are ok if it's a celebrity? I >>guess it must be a little risky since you live in a celebrity-infested >>area. We sorta do, but we've never really codified it. We've kicked some names around, but we always hit a few hitches... several of her top choices are (most very probably) gay, so it does her no good to put their names forth. And then there's the bit where we're allowed to have a four-way with Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins, but *only* if it's a four-way. >>Oh, and Rex, I think I speak for all of us when I request you use more >>figurative terms to describe your concert companions. Might I suggest >>"Japanese Lantern", "Innertube" and "Annoying Hangnail"? Heh. Noted. Sorry about that. Using proper names can get you in trouble, as I've discovered, so that's why I do that. If anyone's psycho enough to hit the feg archives you can find my daughters' names, but for some time now they've just been "#1 Daughter" and "#2 Daughter". Just feels safer (I wish that I was just paranoid and all that). That said, I did take a flier that people are who they say they are and meet up with Mr. Glen Uber (and wife & friends) for drinks in Pasadena this weekend, and a good time was had by all. No competition in sheer numbers for the Toronto FegMeet, but I'd guess that we were actually showered by more beer and broken glass than the Canadians. Good times! Aside to Catherine Simpson: I can comfirm that, as has been mentioned, Glen's wife *does* have nice hair. It's also largely bright pink, but I didn't ask how it got that way, so you must draw your own conclusions on that front. (smiley emoticon here if I used them) - -Rex "urgh... ahhmm... :-)... there, how was that? I'm exhausted!" Broome ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:42:20 -0700 From: Catherine Simpson Subject: RE: Celebrity Screws Revisited From Rex: >>Aside to Catherine Simpson: I can comfirm that, as has been mentioned, >>Glen's wife *does* have nice hair. It's also largely bright pink, but I >>didn't ask how it got that way, so you must draw your own conclusions on >>that front. (smiley emoticon here if I used them) >>-Rex "urgh... ahhmm... :-)... there, how was that? I'm exhausted!" Broome See, now? Typing that little emoticon didn't hurt a bit, did it? ;) And as for Glen's wife's pink hair - well, I can see wanting to get up close and intimate with nice, pretty, pink hair... but I still think it should be respected as an object of beauty, and not defiled by, well, you know... Catherine ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:51:51 -0700 From: Eb Subject: RE: Celebrity Screws Revisited >well, I can see wanting to get up close >and intimate with nice, pretty, pink hair... but I still think it should be >respected as an object of beauty, and not defiled by, well, you know... Surprisingly, *that* was never a Battle of the Network Stars event. Though I'm sure it was discussed. Eb ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:07:27 -0700 From: Eb Subject: Reap [Lest any of you become confused by the name, I *am* still clinging to life....] The Associated Press LOS ANGELES (AP) - Erik Braunn, the Iron Butterfly guitarist who played one of rock's most recognizable riffs in the 17-minute anthem ``In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida,'' died of cardiac arrest Friday. He was 52. Braunn, who was born in Pekin, Ill., and raised in Los Angeles, was a violin prodigy who began his musical career at age 4. He joined Iron Butterfly when he was 16 and toured with the heavy metal band from 1967 to 1969, when the group was enjoying its greatest success. Braunn, Doug Ingle, Ron Bushy and Lee Dorman left their mark on musical history with the psychedelic ``In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida,'' released in 1968. It went platinum and stayed on the national sales chart for two years; a three-minute version became a Top 40 radio hit. Braunn occasionally reunited with the band for performances, and worked as a songwriter, musician and producer until his death. During a 1988 reunion, he commented to the Times about his experience with superstardom decades earlier: ``My first vacation I bought a car, a Jaguar, and parked it outside the hospital where I spent two weeks for ulcers and gastroenteritis.'' ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:27:25 -0400 From: "Maximilian Lang" Subject: Re: Rexmaniax! Part One: The Part About Lucinda >From: "Rex.Broome" >Subject: Rexmaniax! Part One: The Part About Lucinda >Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:24:16 -0700 >Now, about Lucinda herself, it >must be said-- and I hope that this can be accepted in the spirit of >Natalie >wanting to marry various cute guys in the bandsshe sees, and Eb rating >Britta Philips as the most beautiful performer he's ever seen-- so, anyway, >where Lucinda is concerned, I want to fuck her. Hey, Britta was mine first! I saw Luna twice this weekend at Maxwell's, they were great. On Friday Sean Eden took his pants off halfway through the set for $100.00 from the rest of the band. Tim Reed and I were standing right in front of him , I was frightened. No he is not a boxers man. Thank's to EB's J. Schlesinger REAP on Sat. morning I sent an email to Luna and got them to play Everybody is Talking in his honor. I wish Britta had removed her pants instead. Max _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:32:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Swedene Subject: 50th birthday So when is this show going to get "treed" out??? eh? Just curious.... Mike np-> "Angel Is A Centerfold" J. Giels Band ===== - --------------------------------------------- Rebuilding my websight: http://www34.brinkster.com/bflomidy/ _____________________________________________ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:33:08 -0700 From: Eb Subject: Re: Rexmaniax! Part One: The Part About Lucinda >Thank's to EB's J. Schlesinger REAP on Sat. morning I sent an email >to Luna and got them to play Everybody is Talking in his honor. > >I wish Britta had removed her pants instead. That might have been a fitting "Midnight Cowboy" tribute, too. ;) Eb ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:44:04 -0700 From: Tom Clark Subject: Re: more robust yet strangely fuckable Hey, what a coincidence - this subject line is exactly what's printed on my business cards! - -tc, who saw a grrls t-shirt yesterday that read "All You Can Eat" ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:47:57 -0700 From: "Glen Uber" Subject: Re: more robust yet strangely fuckable Tom earnestly scribbled: >Hey, what a coincidence - this subject line is exactly what's printed on my >business cards! > >-tc, who saw a grrls t-shirt yesterday that read "All You Can Eat" I want to make thongs that say "Go Vegan. Start Here!" and market them to all the Animal Rights groups. - -- Cheers! - -g- "You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline. It helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer." - --Frank Zappa ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:54:02 +1200 From: grutness@surf4nix.com (James Dignan) Subject: Re: fegmaniax-digest V12 #289 seems my first list post was on September 1st, 1994: - --- >Greetings, Fegs. how do you welcome someone to the list who's been a lurker for years? They're not exactly new here... but...good to hear from you s&th. James James Dignan, Dunedin, New Zealand -.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.- =-.-=-.-=-.- You talk to me as if from a distance .-=-.-=-.-=-. -=-. And I reply with impressions chosen from another time .-=- .-=-.-=-.-=-.-=- (Brian Eno - "By this River") -.-=-.-=-.-=-.-= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:01:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Capuchin Subject: Re: Rexmaniax! Part One: The Part About Lucinda On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Maximilian Lang wrote: > >From: "Rex.Broome" > >Now, about Lucinda herself, it must be said-- and I hope that this can > >be accepted in the spirit of Natalie wanting to marry various cute guys > >in the bandsshe sees, and Eb rating Britta Philips as the most > >beautiful performer he's ever seen-- so, anyway, where Lucinda is > >concerned, I want to fuck her. > > Hey, Britta was mine first! Guh. If the photo on the splash screen at is accurate at all, you can keep her. She looks like a burned-out old vice queen. I suppose if your goal is to get wasted and make out with an ashtray and then fuck like you'll both not remember it in the morning, then she's fine. To each his own. Of course, Lucinda Williams looks about the same on her site. Phew. Scrawny party girls just don't age well, I guess. J. - -- _______________________________________________ Capuchin capuchin@bitmine.net Jeme A Brelin ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:01:52 +1200 From: grutness@surf4nix.com (James Dignan) Subject: out of the mouths of baby lists... Decided to have a look through the archives at the very first post there. The first six digrest are missing, sadly, but the first message on Fegmaniax! vol 1 issue 7 (from one Jenni ) started with these prophetic sentences: "i do not know where this discussion will go. i see it having the possibility of turning into a big debate over the merits of a lot of bands that are not what this list is about." So... what is this list about again? James PS - the second message in that digest was from one Thomas Clark... James Dignan, Dunedin, New Zealand -.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.- =-.-=-.-=-.- You talk to me as if from a distance .-=-.-=-.-=-. -=-. And I reply with impressions chosen from another time .-=- .-=-.-=-.-=-.-=- (Brian Eno - "By this River") -.-=-.-=-.-=-.-= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:05:00 -0700 (PDT) From: John Barrington Jones Subject: Tomorrow I'll Be 9 It looks like my first post to the feglist took place on August 5, 1994. It had to be forwarded to the list because I was too damned newbian to find it on my own. I had discovered usenet first, you see. Does it still count? http://www.fegmania.org/archives/fegmaniax/1994/v02.n045 I can't seem to find a formal "hey, i'm john and i'm a robynholic" email. I just launched right in with the comments and questions. Nowadays a fellow can be lynched for less. =jbj= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:13:08 -0700 From: Tom Clark Subject: Re: out of the mouths of baby lists... on 7/28/03 4:01 PM, James Dignan at grutness@surf4nix.com wrote: > Decided to have a look through the archives at the very first post there. > The first six digrest are missing, sadly, but the first message on > Fegmaniax! vol 1 issue 7 (from one Jenni ) started > with these prophetic sentences: > > "i do not know where this discussion will go. i see it having the possibility > of turning into a big debate over the merits of a lot of bands that are not > what this list is about." > > PS - the second message in that digest was from one Thomas Clark... Something stupid and pretentious, I'm sure! - -tc np - Apu Nahasapeemapetilon "Who Needs The Kwik-E-Mart?" ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:16:45 -0500 From: "Brian Huddell" Subject: RE: fegmaniax-digest V12 #289 James: > seems my first list post was on September 1st, 1994: > > Hey, weird! I have a post in that digest, too (under a long-defunct address), so I was way off about June '95 being my first. How are people searching? Lycos doesn't seem to pull up anything before '95 for me. I know it doesn't matter to anyone else but I would like to know when my first post actually was. +brian (always reassuring to see James' eternal sig) in New Orleans ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:17:30 -0700 From: "Glen Uber" Subject: Re: out of the mouths of baby lists... Tom earnestly scribbled: >> PS - the second message in that digest was from one Thomas Clark... > >Something stupid and pretentious, I'm sure! If not stupid or pretentious, at least lecherous or obscene. ;) - -- Cheers! - -g- "In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments -- there are Consequences." - --R.G. Ingersoll ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:21:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Capuchin Subject: RE: fegmaniax-digest V12 #289 On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Brian Huddell wrote: > How are people searching? Lycos doesn't seem to pull up anything before > '95 for me. I know it doesn't matter to anyone else but I would like to > know when my first post actually was. Just download the archives and grep 'em. J. - -- _______________________________________________ Capuchin capuchin@bitmine.net Jeme A Brelin ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:30:50 -0500 From: Dolph Chaney Subject: Re: out of the mouths of baby lists... Me: , Mon, 30 Jan 1995 20:54:27 -0600 (CST) ...in which my enthusiasm led me to write a message with subject line 'AT LAST I'VE FOUND YOU!!!' and to sign off 'slipping you all the Midnight Fish', freaking some people very much out. - -- dolph ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 19:12:43 -0500 From: "Brian Huddell" Subject: you say it's your fegday Me: > > How are people searching? Jeme: > Just download the archives and grep 'em. Yes, duh, thanks Jeme! So I turn 9 on September 2nd. And I still don't feel like I ever found an adequate answer to the question I asked on September 2, 1994: why the Kershaw CD and Hen Out aren't more clear about the fact they contain the same performance of "Heaven". But why that question had me "freaking", well that's one for my pharmacist, I guess. +brian (thinks Lucinda Williams is very hot) in New Orleans ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:45:48 -0500 (CDT) From: gshell@metronet.com Subject: Re: you say it's your fegday > +brian (thinks Lucinda Williams is very hot) in New Orleans was much hotter, but then weren't we all. we can all refantasize thursday night at 11c while watching her on pbs. well, at least KERA. gSs np. greenville, l. williams ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:04:35 -0500 From: steve Subject: Do you want to play a game? > WASHINGTON - The Pentagon is setting up a stock-market style system in > which investors would bet on terror attacks, assassinations and other > events in the Middle East. Defense officials hope to gain intelligence > and useful predictions while investors who guessed right would win > profits. http://tinyurl.com/ic58 This looks to be a bit more serious than the city planning game we played when I was in urban studies. Maybe it will become bigger than fantasy football. - - Steve - ---------- The Republican myth of a "judicial crisis" is punctured by the facts, which show the lowest judicial vacancy rate in 13 years -- lower than the national jobless rate of 6 percent. - Patrick Leahy, May 9, 2003. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:58:02 -0500 From: Marcy Tanter Subject: Fwd: Breast Cancer >Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:45:02 -0500 >From: Julie Chappell >Subject: Breast Cancer >X-Sender: chappell@tarleton.edu >To: rgorsch@stmarys-ca.edu, hatem@ix.netcom.com, marie@filmworks.com, > tanter@vms.tarleton.edu, lhollow@frc.mass.edu, carlyle@ukans.edu, > engks@leeds.ac.uk, msjneal@yahoo.com, ellerbyj@uncwil.edu, > CHreporter@aol.com, > exus100@hotmail.com, annarae@holly.colostate.edu >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) >Original-recipient: rfc822;tanter@tarleton.edu > > >Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 22:39:39 -0500 > >From: stanley@tarleton.edu > >Subject: Breast Cancer > >X-Sender: stanley@tarleton.edu > >To: jbarrett@vms.tarleton.edu, chappell@vms.tarleton.edu, > > robitai@vms.tarleton.edu, pzelman@vms.tarleton.edu, > > Esterchild@scs.cmm.unt.edu, esterchild@sbcglobal.net, stantzoo@swbell.net, > > gyeatonm@gundluth.org, mwo@acsne.com, ljones@vms.tarleton.edu, > > key@vms.tarleton.edu > >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) > > > >>Subject: breast cancer (hunger site, child health > >>site) - PLEASE take one moment to HELP!! > >> > >> > >>Please tell ten friends to tell ten today. The Breast > >>Cancer site is having trouble getting enough people to > >>click on it daily to meet their quota of donating at > >>least one free mammogram a day to an underprivileged > >>woman. It takes less than a minute to go to their site > >>and click on "donating a mammogram" for free (pink > >>window in the middle). This doesn't cost you a thing. > >>Their corporate sponsors/advertisers use the number of > >>daily visits to donate a mammogram in exchange for > >>advertising. Here's the web site! > >> > >>Pass it along to 10 people you know. > >>http://www.thebreastcancersite.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:57:20 -0400 From: Ken Weingold Subject: Re: Rexmaniax! Part One: The Part About Lucinda On Mon, Jul 28, 2003, Maximilian Lang wrote: > Hey, Britta was mine first! I saw Luna twice this weekend at Maxwell's, > they were great. On Friday Sean Eden took his pants off halfway through > the set for $100.00 from the rest of the band. Tim Reed and I were > standing right in front of him , I was frightened. No he is not a boxers > man. I have no idea what Captain Sensible wears, since when I saw him with no pants he was completely naked. Disturbing. It was at the July '89 Damned "Fairwell Tour to America" show at The Ritz in NY. I saw a few fairwell tours of theirs afterwards as well. - -Ken ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:13:36 -0500 From: Jeffrey with 2 Fs Jeffrey Subject: Re: more robust yet strangely fuckable Quoting Natalie Jane : > I just turned six on July 17th. So, uh, what techniques are you folks using for finding these fegdays? I don't think everyone's been circling their fegnatal day every year on every calendar since, have you? Anyway, I vaguely recall that I sub'd for a while and then didn't, and then did again. So I'm sorta all Grover Cleveland. I *think* (unless proven otherwise) that my first post was on January 7, 1996. It was, aptly, in response to "T.L.R. III"s post on MST3K. (I did try googling my name limiting the site to fegmania.org, but that doesn't seem to have worked.) The subject lines for that digest were: Alvin Lives In Leeds Twelve Bar Club Jan 5th Skinny RH ref MST3K (was Re: little boy on y&o ) Heaven Eh. Rather prosaic. ..Jeff J e f f r e y N o r m a n The Architectural Dance Society www.uwm.edu/~jenor/ADS.html :: it's not your meat :: --Mr. Toad np: my first (!) hearing of the second "Skellington" thingy by Julian Cope. Uh, was it here that I suggested Celine Dion cover things like that? And wouldn't you know, current selection "Wayland's Smithy Has Wings" is actually rather Robynesque, in a very Copey way. ------------------------------ End of fegmaniax-digest V12 #290 ********************************