From: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org (fegmaniax-digest) To: fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Subject: fegmaniax-digest V10 #347 Reply-To: fegmaniax@smoe.org Sender: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk fegmaniax-digest Friday, September 14 2001 Volume 10 : Number 347 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: Am I nor Feg? [Capuchin ] phew! ["Natalie Jane" ] Re: more LJ pictures - (nice ones!) [steve ] Art comes charging to the rescue in non-existant chariot ["ross taylor" <] blues for allah [HAL ] Re: more LJ pictures - (nice ones!) [Brian Cully ] more nice WTC photos [Ken Weingold ] hmm... [Jim Davies ] [none] ["Colonel of Truth" ] more radio discussion in oz about WTC horror [minister of misinformation] Re: IRA ["Stewart C. Russell" ] Re: air marshals [Michael R Godwin ] Re: Art comes charging to the rescue in non-existant chariot [Christopher] RE: weird ["Bachman, Michael" ] Re: RH content [Michael R Godwin ] Forward from Rufus W. and then Mannlist [steve ] Escapism ["Viola Rockiss" ] RE: hmm... ["Poole, R. Edward" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:19:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Capuchin Subject: Re: Am I nor Feg? On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Viola Rockiss wrote: > I dont think that equality necissarily produces equity and equality without > equity -can- be a form of tyranny. As Blake said, the same law for the lion > and the ox is oppression. This is, of course, true. > Also, as for the theory that equal people have no power to lash out > against, consider this. What if I fell madly in love/lust with you. > But you, oh woe betide, had a heart true to Vivian. Ah, but love is power. But seriously, personal preferences create inequality. And that creates power struggles. Don't I know it. > It seems to me that while what you said had truth to it, it was abit of an > overstatement. Oh, absolutely. I _hope_ nobody is out there living by _my_ words. I have a hard enough time living _with_ them. > And overstatement can drive people away from what they might otherwise > welcome. I know personally it drives me away from ideas I could be > open to. And I find that very frustrating. It makes me feel > antagonistic when there is no real reason for such antagonism. Well, that's folks' reaction to me all over. They feel antagonized where there is no antagonism. J. - -- _______________________________________________ Capuchin capuchin@bitmine.net Jeme A Brelin ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:26:45 -0700 From: "Natalie Jane" Subject: phew! I've got a goddamn ticket back to Portland on Saturday morning. I'm taking a plane on United - I bet there's going to be some pretty spooked-looking folks on their flights, and I'm going to be one of them. Unfortunately a train is not an option. I'll report back on whatever fascistic security measures are in place at Buffalo/Niagara Falls International. I'm supposed to be there two hours ahead of time, which, in this case, means I have to arrive at 5:30am. I ain't complaining. Quail, LJ, Scary Mary, Ken, etc.... I will try to get some time off in the spring and maybe I can come see you then. I'm so glad you guys made it through the last few days relatively intact. I talked to my friends Bryan and Ceredwyn in Shreveport last night. Ceredwyn expressed distress that Bush had stopped at the Airforce base in Shreveport en route back to Washington - thus making Shreveport into a huge target. Bryan told of a horrific near miss: a guy named Steve whom I used to know in Ann Arbor (mainly famed for being obsessed with werewolves) worked in an office right near the WTC. On Tuesday morning, though, he just happened to have to pick up some papers at another office. Now he's going around in a daze, saying, "I'm alive...?!" anyway, n. p.s. My trip to Buffalo has yielded one fantastic spoil: an entire BAG of gold foil, given to me after breakfast by a kindly flight attendant. Unfortunately, it all smells like airplane food. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:55:36 -0500 From: steve Subject: Re: more LJ pictures - (nice ones!) On Thursday, September 13, 2001, at 05:25 PM, bayard wrote: > lj, for the last time, YOU'RE supposed to have sex with the male fegs! > I've been assigned the females. Gad, I thought we covered this.... > Of course, the whole sexual orientation thing makes it even more > complicated... but I'm sure everyone will be happy in the end, or I hope > they will be. > > =b "I did not have fegsual relations with that man, Ken Weingold..." This place is sounding more Subgenius all the time. But lest ye be fooled into thinking that Fegs get some kind of special dispensation (or all-purpose excuse) please be aware of this age-old tenet: If he hasn't seen your $30, you're still "Pink" to "Bob." Robyn might get a pass, provided he is entertaining enough. - - Steve __________ Our previous president studied at Oxford. This one was given a sightseeing tour of London and said it was ''diverse and clean.'' The Times also said Bush gave a ''pep talk'' to children about the advantages of reading over television. The children did not ask him to name the last book he had read. Just good manners, I guess. - Roger Ebert ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 23:54:51 -0400 From: "ross taylor" Subject: Art comes charging to the rescue in non-existant chariot Well I think "Love & Theft" is at least a pretty durn good Dylan album, and he's better than others. I wouldn't say it's in his top ten, but close. I think it's better than Planet Waves, which I quite like. Better than Time Out of Mind, over all. Nothing on it as brilliant as Highlands, but at least two or three as good as Not Dark Yet. There's at least a couple from Batman Bob. Batman Bob wrote some of his best stuff early on, but if you listen to it with late ears, or old ears, or the wrong ears it can sound like material for The Monkey's TV show. "Food was flyin' everywhere, I left without my hat." Wacky little scenes. Here, at least Tweedle Dee & Tweedle Dum, and Honest With Me. Honest With Me is old guy's hard rock. Not bad as such, but. There's a huge difference between the surreal- vignettes-strung-together-songs and the songs that remind me of spookily disconnected/ connected blues verses reminding me of Japanese Renga, or linked verse. There's quite a few of those here. I think it's what he's been aiming for ever since New Morning (when he wasn't trying to be another Leiber-Stoller), and I think he hits it best these last two albums. I should say I've missed or not listend carefully to much of his stuff for the past 15-20 years, plus I've never been on a Bob list. So. But I have hung w/ some Bob fanatics, including Brian Stibal of Talking Bob Zimmerman Blues fame (search for "the armpit tape" on Google). Anyway, listening to L&T was my 1st consistant smile for the last few days. Kay's right about the humor. Floater starts reminding me of some of Groucho Marx's late songs ("Mein Gott, how that woman could cook!"). With Summer Days he's finally done a song I could hear Chuck Berry singing, or even Presley, & you not thinking oh, they're doing Dylan. And the picture on the back is a more convincing return to his Jester mode than, when he was first in it. I hope it doesn't get undue attention -- it is backward looking & I want to see new stuff florish, but for now, like I said. Art comes charging to the rescue in it's non-existant chariot. Along those lines, an interesting story re recent stuff is "We See Things Differently" by Bruce Sterling. A brutal story, & the title underlines the different realities different groups live in. A word I'm hearing a lot is "maniacs." I think, by a medical definition of sanity, crazy people couldn't coordinate that well. I think the story is in his last collection, I forget its title. Ross Taylor "What were you wearing when you were happiest?" 1st Guy:"A Tuxedo." 2nd Guy:"I was wearing -- nothing!!" Me:"I was wearing headphones." Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account at http://www.eudoramail.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 23:35:16 -0600 From: HAL Subject: blues for allah This posting is NOT intended to elicit any anti-Dead rants. For those interested, however, GD lyricist Robert Hunter revived his long-dormant online journal (after a three-year hiatus) on September 10th. The events of the following day are now (of course) dominating his musings and are quite a fine read: http://www.dead.net/RobertHunterArchive/files/newjournal/50journal_9.10.01.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 01:46:38 -0400 From: Brian Cully Subject: Re: more LJ pictures - (nice ones!) On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:55:36PM -0500, steve wrote: > This place is sounding more Subgenius all the time. But lest ye be > fooled into thinking that Fegs get some kind of special dispensation (or > all-purpose excuse) please be aware of this age-old tenet: I took no small comfort, amidst all I was going through, that on the day I heard, I was wearing my "Bob"-on-a-lizard tee and listening to _My Favourite Buildings_. Even through the not-knowing of where my mother and brother were (who live and work around the ex-towers), it helped me get through the day. And for those of you in the city and around, no station helped me cope more than 'FMU (www.wfmu.org). They took just the right stance - acknowledging what happened, but doing their best as DJs to play the music that gave hope amidst the horror. And that, my friends, is all the extent of what I can feel at the moment, or have been able to feel throughout the last couple days: tragic sorrow and boundless hope. All the other stuff that's come along in the wake is just tangential. Regardless of your political views, your faith, or your race, the one thing I hope we can show as a people is that New York, America, and the human race cannot be stopped. We will mourn the dead with all our hearts, and with all our hearts we will continue with living. - -bjc ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 02:08:31 -0400 From: Ken Weingold Subject: more nice WTC photos http://www.hellrot.org/stuff/wtc/ - the chloe ones. They sent more. Even better perspective. You can see Tower 1 off to the left in 5 and 6. I went into Manhattan today. I needed to. I actually got to lower Manhattan, about 10 blocks from the WTC. Police and military EVERYWHERE. Freaky. But amazingly the police were extremely tolerant and cool. All we wanted to do was make sense of what happened to our home. And the military, mostly National Guard, were just a bunch of kids. Lots of Humvees, too, and at least one with Air Force painted on it. And other trucks carrying debris and some flattened cars. And dust everywhere. Upsetting picking up some dust from a car there, knowing that it was part of the WTC, and possibly even human beings. - -Ken ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 07:35:19 +0100 (BST) From: Jim Davies Subject: hmm... it's difficult, isn't it? can't say it's good or bad... subscribing to this list means that you get to see how good, how informed people can be... but you also get to see just how ignorant and blinkered they can be, too... usually it's different people, of course.... microcosm (p.s. that sinclair drivel was genuinely offensive, first thing that's pissed me off in ages, nearly unsubscribed on the spot) notwithstanding, thought you might be interested in this: the bbc just played a tape of a phone-in, with the English caller saying that, basically, they just felt like it was America's fault, and maybe this will make them think before bombing other people's cities. The reporter then said that as well as stamping out terrorism, we would need to stamp out views like that. Can't say it's good or bad. Yeah, don't hold or air those views too widely. But stamping them out? Hmm. Anyway, time to go get on a plane. x Jim ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 01:06:40 -0700 From: "Colonel of Truth" Subject: [none] we bombed a sudanese pharmaceutical facility in that one, recall, taking with it half the country's pharmaceuticals. because, he claimed, we were using unscom as a cover for spying operations. the claim was denied, the bombs were dropped, and the claim was substantiated a few months later. yet we've been bombing iraq several times weekly ever since. <(And call me a jingoistic militarist, but I always thought trying to keep Saddam Hussein's regime from getting weapons of mass destruction was a pretty good fucking idea.)> un 632 *explicitly* calls for *region-wide* disarmament. instead; israel, egypt, saudi arabia, and turkey are among the largest recipients of u.s. military aid to this day. iraq was disarmed by december of 1998 (according to scott ritter). now, is it a pretty fucking good idea to begin dismantling israeli and american nukes? (hey, we could dimantle the russians' too, except that they don't seem to know where theirs *are*.) mossadegh, arbenz, aristide, sukarno, ortega, lumumba come to mind off the top of the head. there must be at least 15 more *since* 1945. uh, costa rica, grenada, brazil. don't forget, also, that the united states didn't permit the vietnamese plebiscite mandated by the geneva accords because (according to eisenhower) ho chi minh would have won in a massive landslide. and that the indonesian annexation and occupation of east timor (following its independence from portugal, and which resulted in the largest mass slaugther since the holocaust) was carried out almost entirely with anglo-american weaponry and with u.s. blocking in the u.n.. there was also cooperation with saddam in putting down the democratic rebellion inside iraq following the gulf war. we can guess that cuba would have been *at least* "vaguely democratic" had it not been under attack, by us, for forty years. and so on. william blum's Killing Hope is one of the better books on the subject, if you're interested. (also note that the inverse is overwhelmingly true: the u.s. has funded and armed the most repressive of dictators and regimes worldwide since 1945.) give some historical examples of what you consider justified use of u.s. military force. if, by radicals, you mean hamas, et al., then, okay. but note also that the radical israeli fundamentalists (a hefty percentage of them living in the u.s.) are equally intent upon destroying the palestinian people (and happen to be backed by mega u.s.-bucks). "israel is where the israelis live, not where some little line is drawn on a map," as golda meir once put it. i suppose i'm going to get flamed to kingdom come for this. but the more i think about it, the more plausible it seems to me. "it" being that the events of tuesday morning could well have been initiated and/or facilitated by the state department as a pretext for a.) massively increased military spending to jump-start the economy (after, what, seven fed reductions this year couldn't even cause a blip), and b.) a big-assed crackdown on civil liberties to cut the legs out from under the burgeoning anti-globalisation movement (which had already planned large actions for both this month and next in d.c., and which will now probably both be scrapped -- for starters). the Seattle Times business page is *already* running stories about what a "boon" the $40 billion (as of this writing) will be for boeing's "military units", for example. i have never in my life been more afraid of what this country might do than i am expecting it to do in the coming weeks and months. and here is the most frightening thing i've yet seen, a letter to the editor in wednesday's Times: Yet to be imagined We are at war. We can handle it. The weight of the attack on New York and Washington, D.C., will sink in over the next days. The war against terrorism for the U.S. has been going on for decades as a secret war, fought largely by our intelligence agencies and a relatively small number of military forces. Now, an open war has broken out and the United States has sustained a major attack. Thanks to our massive wealth, organization and technology, we can rescue the living, mourn the dead and praise the hundreds of heroes whom we already know about. We have a massive medical, engineering and transportation capability that will handle the unimaginable damage already received. Our defense establishment can bring the mightiest of force to bear against our enemies, once they are identified. Our defenses will go up and we will begin the planning of a vast offensive against terrorism in the world, the likes of which cannot yet be imagined. Here, the terrorists have made an ironic and gigantic error. It will lead to their undoing. By striking in so massive a way, causing so many deaths, the mostly innocent and politically naove population of this country will now forget the tax cuts and balanced budgets and tolerate any expense, no matter how lavish, in order to bring the enemy to justice and a fitting end. We will also tolerate new restrictions upon our national life. All this becomes possible because the American people now are so outraged and focused that we will endure the necessary for however long it will take. The civilized world will cooperate with the United States in this campaign. I can imagine even nuclear weapons might be used against terrorist camps in the future. We are at the point of beginning the open war against terrorism, and we have the resources and now the unity of purpose. There will be more casualties, but we can have little doubt about the end result. Kenneth Estes, Lt. Col, USMC, Seattle _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 17:46:53 +0930 From: minister of misinformation Subject: more radio discussion in oz about WTC horror I don't expect anyone is bothering to listen to these shows, it being outside the US , but what the hell , here it is anyway ,another discussion about the current situation , which is a fucking good one , lots about the reasons why we originally helped arm the people who are now coming back and hijacking our planes, etc and what will probably happen if the states respond with massive force .It has commentary and discussion by Islamic , US and UK commentators and is a balanced and well informed view of the situation, instead of the usual one sided perspective we get from the mainstream media , its a cut above the usual crap , probably because its a public broadcaster . why not give it a try instead of CNN ? http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/lnl/default.htm Sept. 13 Th. show. Commander Lang ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:20:01 +0100 From: "Stewart C. Russell" Subject: Re: IRA The Great Quail wrote: > > Come on, Stewart, you know what I meant, it's plain in black and > white. terrorists are good as long as they have nifty ideology? > What I stated *is* official IRA doctrine. I have already said > they do not always follow it, and there are numerous rogue and > splinter groups. The acts I mentioned were all claimed by the Provisional IRA. The pIRA have been around for as long as I've been remembering, and as the main direct-action group, are synonymous with the IRA. Splinter groups, like the ones responsible for the Omagh bomb, still operate under the IRA(tm) brand. > I am not condoning the IRA, supporting it, justifying it, believing > their policy whole-heartedly, or anything else but just *reporting* > what their doctrine is, and what the value in terms of their image > and sense of self. Their image to whom? One is defined by one's actions. Noble doctrine means nothing alongside ignoble deeds. Stewart (who didn't savour the experience of being stuck in a roadblock in Co Fermanagh in 1994 with three rifles trained on him.) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:45:06 +0100 (BST) From: Michael R Godwin Subject: Re: air marshals On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Walker, Charles wrote: > chas in LA replies; in the fifties they had air marshalls, essentially cops, > on every flight. there was no violence or hijacking until they took them off > and then in the 60's and 70's hijacking became an international sport of > some kind or other. Whether or not this was widespread, I expect something similar will be introduced soon. And has anyone mentioned that the most secure airline in the world is El Al? They do take plenty of precautions, but I understand that the passengers regard it as a necessary inconvenience. - - MRG ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:17:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Christopher Gross Subject: Re: Art comes charging to the rescue in non-existant chariot On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, ross taylor wrote: > Along those lines, an interesting story re recent stuff is "We See > Things Differently" by Bruce Sterling. A brutal story, & the title > underlines the different realities different groups live in. A word > I'm hearing a lot is "maniacs." I think, by a medical definition of > sanity, crazy people couldn't coordinate that well. I think the story > is in his last collection, I forget its title. It's in _Globalhead_. Good story, good if uneven book. - --Chris ______________________________________________________________________ Christopher Gross On the Internet, nobody knows I'm a dog. chrisg@gwu.edu ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:37:24 -0400 From: "Bachman, Michael" Subject: RE: weird - -----Original Message----- From: Glen Uber >A random thought: >I just realized how eerily inappropriate "My Favourite Buildings" is now. - -- >Cheers! >-g- Another would be "Manhattan Skyline" by Julia Fordham. The chorus goes "Oh, ya, ya, ya as broken as the Mahattan Skyline, as boken as the fragments of my mind". Michael Bachman ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:40:01 +0100 (BST) From: Michael R Godwin Subject: Re: RH content I will report back on tomorrow's Soft Boys gig down in Daarrset. Brian, looking forward to seeing you at Bath Station just before 7pm. Hope to see some other listies at the event. On a separate point, I was reading the recent Mojo article on the late Ollie Halsall's career, through Timebox and Patto to the Kevin Ayers band. It stated that Ollie (a brilliant left-handed guitarist BTW) was cast in the 1976 Rutles film as the forgotten fifth Rutle, whose name was (wait for it) - Leppo! Is this common fegknowledge? Did RH lift the name from this source - the timing seems about right? - - Mike Godwin ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:06:34 -0500 From: steve Subject: Forward from Rufus W. and then Mannlist > http://www.advocate.com/new_news.asp?ID=692&sd=09/14/01 > > Jerry Falwell blames gays for terrorist attacks > > The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force issued a statement Thursday > responding to antigay remarks made earlier in the day by the Rev. > Jerry Falwell on the Christian news show The 700 Club. When host Pat > Robertson asked Falwell to comment on Tuesday's terrorist attacks in > New York City and Washington, D.C., Falwell went on a tirade, naming > all the groups he deems responsible for setting the stage for such an > event to happen: "The ACLU's got to take a lot of blame for > this...throwing God out successfully with the help of the federal > court system, throwing God out of the public square, out of the > schools. The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this > because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy 40 million little > innocent babies, we make God mad. I really believe that the pagans and > the abortionists and the feminists and the gays and the lesbians who > are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle...all of > them who have tried to secularize America. I point the finger in their > face and say, 'You helped this happen.'" > > NGLTF executive director Lorri L. Jean issued a statement that read, > in part, "The terrible tragedy that has befallen our nation, and > indeed the entire global community, is the sad byproduct of > fanaticism. It has its roots in the same fanaticism that enables > people like Jerry Falwell to preach hate against those who do not > think, live, or love in the exact same way he does. The tragedies that > have occurred this week did not occur because someone made God mad, as > Mr. Falwell asserts. They occurred because of hate. It is time to move > beyond a place of hate and to a place of healing. We hope that Mr. > Falwell will apologize to the U.S. and world communities. Our hearts > go out to the victims of this week's tragedies and their friends and > family members." - - Steve __________ President Bush met privately with top officials from the Salvation Army in May to discuss his "faith-based" initiative while the White House was reviewing a request from the charity for a regulation protecting it from local workplace nondiscrimination laws based on sexual orientation. - Dana Milbank, Washington Post ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:24:28 +0000 From: "Viola Rockiss" Subject: Escapism In a quest for escapism I purchased 2 mags yesterday, Vanity Fair for stuff on "Harry Potter" and Wired for the same on "LOTR." The pictures alone in the Vanity Fair are worth the price, thou dont try to read the non Potter stuff, its grotesque. The casting and visuals look perfect(Maggie Smith as McGonagall exudes McGonagallness)( thou my husband humphed that Harry wasn't on a proper souped-up Nimbus broomstick(men and their equipment:-).) The Wired one dosn't seem quite as good, thou it plunges straight into the complex subjects of Secondary Worlds and Fandom. Havent finished it yet so not sure. Weary Kay "But cleanliness of the soul is important, dont you thee-ee-ink?" Robyn Hitchcock _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:23:27 -0400 From: "Poole, R. Edward" Subject: RE: hmm... Jim Davies: >microcosm (p.s. that sinclair drivel was genuinely offensive, first >thing that's pissed me off in ages, nearly unsubscribed on the spot) Go ahead and unsubscribe then! So, you are incensed that someone on a call-in show was shouted down for saying that the US brought this attack on itself, and you express hope that those with divergent views will be allowed to express their opinions, but you are "offended" and "pissed off" by the circulation of pro-American sentiment? (which, BTW, I forwarded because I expected to see several of the edited & misleading versions that have been widely circulated end up on the list). How is this not a valid contribution to the discussion that we are having? I, for one, have expressed my revulsion with the inappropriately-timed, and unfairly damning of the victims, expression of the "you got what was coming to you" viewpoints. So be it -- you hold your opinions and I'll hold mine. However, anyone who has the temerity to say anything pro-American is labeled a warmongering jingoist. As an American, I take pride in my country and its accomplishments. Even though I agree that the U.S. should be justly criticized for actions it has taken and, in particular, the way it uses its military supremacy, I'm sickened by the 100% negative reaction that my country receives around the world (and also within its own borders, by many). Whatever flaws this country has -- and there are many, as there is anywhere -- there is also generosity, compassion, respect for human rights, and civic virtue. While the US throws its weight around on the world stage to accomplish its own objectives (which, no doubt, you would deplore, and in some cases be right for doing so), it also uses its wealth, technology, and human resources to assist other nations and other people live a safer and freer life. I'm no simple-minded, flag-waving, "love it or leave it"-type Patriot, but when my country is attacked (and, for the love of God, Eddie, to spin the offensive tripe about the CIA or whatever bombing the WTC for the sake of the military's budget... You don't think Bush was going to give them everything they wanted -- and more -- without resorting to slaughtering its own citizens?) I will stand up for it, as a whole, warts and all. ============================================================================This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may contain material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person responsible for delivering this confidential communication to the intended recipient, you have received this communication in error, and any review, use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of this e-mail message and any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have received this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@dsmo.com Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP http://www.legalinnovators.com ------------------------------ End of fegmaniax-digest V10 #347 ********************************