From: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org (fegmaniax-digest) To: fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Subject: fegmaniax-digest V10 #119 Reply-To: fegmaniax@smoe.org Sender: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk fegmaniax-digest Wednesday, April 11 2001 Volume 10 : Number 119 Today's Subjects: ----------------- a concern.... [Stephen Mahoney ] Re: Thomas Dolby & Robyn Hitchcock [Ben ] Re: minidisc time limit [Ben ] Re: hair, hair, hair [Ben ] Man out of Time [Viv Lyon ] Re: hair, hair, hair [Christopher Gross ] RE: minidisc time limit ["Thomas, Ferris" ] Re: minidisc time limit ["brian nupp" ] in pursuit of the truth about the hirsute [Jill Brand ] RE: fisheads and cones - Chicago show ["da9ve stovall" ] Re: in pursuit of the truth about the hirsute ["victorian squid" ] L A show [Marc ] the mystery deepens ["victorian squid" ] Re: minidisc time limit [GSS ] Attn Eurofegs: Northern lights display on right now? [overbury@cn.ca] the hygiene that invented itself ["victorian squid" ] feg-casting-call [*twofangs / randi* ] Re: Out of Time ["victorian squid" ] seligman's band [Melissa Higuchi ] Re: Out of Time [Viv Lyon ] Re: Out of Time [Tom Clark ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 12:26:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Stephen Mahoney Subject: a concern.... Sean "Puffy" Combs needs your help! seems that after his "run-ins" with the law the Puff-meister needs a new handle perhaps the creative group of Feggies could come up with something "fresh" and "fly" - -with just a hint of sarcasm, Stephen"I love bananas 'cause they got no bones" Mahoney Quote by Vonnegut: Just because some of us can read and write and do a little math, that doesn't mean we deserve to conquer the universe. Anagram of quote: A masquerade can cover a sense of what is real to deceive us; to be unjaded and not lost, we must, then, determine truth. Stephen Mahoney Multnomah County Library at Rockwood branch clerk stephenm@nethost.multnomah.lib.or.us 503-988-5396 fax 503-988-5178 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:38:29 -0400 From: Ben Subject: Re: Thomas Dolby & Robyn Hitchcock > Dolby plays "ocean" on the song "Love" on Robyn's _Black Snake Diamond > Role._ might play on a couple other tracks on it (and _invisible > hitchcock_ for that matter), but i'm at work so I can't go look at > them... Is it just me or does it sound like all Thomas is doing on this track is turning the volume up and down on some TV static? > np: "light my fire," some country song, and the ron&fez.com show. Rude and rude!!! ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:53:23 -0400 From: Ben Subject: Re: minidisc time limit > preparing his recording gear. At least I hope that what he was doing. He > tells me they are recording all the shows on minidisc. Just one mini disc > per show. So if the show is longer than 74 minutes, they lose what ever is > beyond this. For any minidisc concert recorders who hate that 74/80 minute limit since many concerts run longer than that (and who have some money to burn), Sony has released a new recorder that will record up to 320 min on an 80 min disc. I saw them on the site www.minidisco.com, for $279.95 and $349.95. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:56:41 -0400 From: Ben Subject: Re: hair, hair, hair > It's simple exaggeration of secondary sexual characteristics. Women have > less body hair than men, therefore the less body hair you have, the more > feminine you seem. Then why don't many women shave their heads? ;-) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:24:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Viv Lyon Subject: Man out of Time On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Spring Cherry wrote: > But if they did flashbacks to the late 70s, who would play a -young- Robyn? There was a Syd Barrett tribute night in Portland many months ago, and one band covered Octopus. Now, I love that song, so I would have enjoyed the rendition pretty much whoever played it, but my experience was enhanced at least threefold by the fact that this chap bore more than a passing resemblance to Robyn, circa '77. Yeow. Vivien - -don't know what band it was, though. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:16:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Christopher Gross Subject: Re: hair, hair, hair On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Ben wrote: > > It's simple exaggeration of secondary sexual characteristics. Women have > > less body hair than men, therefore the less body hair you have, the more > > feminine you seem. > > Then why don't many women shave their heads? ;-) BODY hair, my dear sir. We're talking about body hair here, not scalp hair.... Come to think of it, the whole "exaggeration of secondary sexual characteristics" principle works for scalp hair too. Men are much more likely than women to have thinning hair or go bald, therefore having plenty of scalp hair seems feminine, therefore many cultures throughout the world have considered long hair an important part of a woman's appearance. Yes, it all fits neatly together. Not bad for something I thought up on the spur of the moment! - --Chris, whose hair is equally unattractive to all sexes ______________________________________________________________________ Christopher Gross On the Internet, nobody knows I'm a dog. chrisg@gwu.edu ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:17:16 -0400 From: "Thomas, Ferris" Subject: RE: minidisc time limit - -----Original Message----- From: Ben [mailto:bpnicast@bulldog.unca.edu] ... Sony has released a new recorder that will record up to 320 min on an 80 min disc. I saw them on the site www.minidisco.com, for $279.95 and $349.95. ... - -----Original Message----- I saw that myself. I'm curious to know just what the extended play compression is like...it may very well be rotten. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:20:30 -0400 From: "brian nupp" Subject: Re: minidisc time limit >For any minidisc concert recorders who hate that 74/80 minute limit since >many concerts run longer than that (and who have some money to burn), >Sony has released a new recorder that will record up to 320 min on an >80 min disc. I saw them on the site www.minidisco.com, for $279.95 and >$349.95. Really? In stereo? Nuppy! _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:42:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Jill Brand Subject: in pursuit of the truth about the hirsute OK, so in some senses I am a total hypocrite because Robyn's monobrow doesn't bother me, but I won't put on a pair of shorts without hacking myself with a razor first. Susan is absolutely right when she said, don't you know that it's different for girls? I do have an analogy. Hairy men don't get flak, but somewhat heavy men who seem to have breasts? There is no end to the belittling that they suffer. So whoever said that the exagerration of a trait associated with one gender when borne by the other evokes disgust seems to have hit it on the head. Except...that this is a really American analysis. My husband is German and can't STAND the fact that women here (and he has been here for 23 years) shave their legs and armpits. He likes me furry in the winter. As for handsome....God, interesting-looking is so much sexier than GQ-looking. Women seem to feel that way much more than men, I think. So I stand by Ray Davies's gap-toothed grin and by Robyn's monobrow. BTW, my son said that in school they call it a unibrow, and that it is associated with the Neanderthals. What can we do with that? Jill B., who promises to try to stay on the subject of music for the next week ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:41:54 -0700 From: "da9ve stovall" Subject: RE: fisheads and cones - Chicago show > fisheads and cones ["brian nupp" ] >From: "brian nupp" >Subject: fisheads and cones > >Chicago: >So we got in cool and all. The place was packed! We went upstairs to check >out the sound. Pissed some people off cause it was so crowded. Sorry. Haw! That might've been my buddy Paul, who was standing at my right along the rail in the balcony. If so, no matter, you didn't disturb the recording process! >I went >down stairs to compare the sound. I thought down stairs about 20ft in front >of the stage, center was much better sounding than the balcony center. More >umph. So I'm curious to here Da9ve's recording. I'm pretty fegging happy with my recording, especially considering that the mics I'm using aren't exactly audiophile quality. The main thing I noticed about the sound in the balcony was that the bass was fairly muddy and indistinct. Max's recording of the NYC show has MUCH better bass - Irving Plaza > Metro. But, like I said, I'm pleezed with my recording - and there's a sample on the FTP site for anyone who wants to listen. I'll also reiterate my email to you, Brian: Since I've already traded this show extensively, I'll be glad to make B&Ps for you of any other shows I get that you're interested in, since I may have pre-empted a lot of your trading action. I'd also love to get a copy of your Chicago recording, just to compare. cheers, da9ve ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:13:08 -0700 From: "victorian squid" Subject: Re: in pursuit of the truth about the hirsute >OK, so in some senses I am a total hypocrite because Robyn's monobrow >doesn't bother me, but I won't put on a pair of shorts without hacking >myself with a razor first. Susan is absolutely right when she said, don't >you know that it's different for girls? Well, er, the thing is, see, it's not different for me in one sense. I don't really like hairiness. I hate facial hair. All beards. And moustaches. Unless it's on Laurence Olivier. The rest of it can go either way and that's where neatness comes in. To me the wild bushiness of the brows reads as a grooming fault. In my perception it's similar to a bad haircut or being in need of a trim. It's such a little thing and would take five minutes to do and that's why it bugs me so much. I don't see the charm in it the same way I don't see any charm in the Queen Elvis Mohawk. So I guess where that mini-rant came from was not so much"why does everyone love his bushy monobrow and think mine makes me look like Vampira?" (altho that's there too), but "why is it that there's this big outcry at the idea of this being neatened up?". I guess I'm a bit taken aback that you and Kay seem to equate male eyebrow grooming with -plastic surgery-. I just don't look at this the same way I look at nosejobs or whatever. I don't see it as being remotely the same sort of thing. Go figure. *shrug* Love on ya, Susan "I hope you're not going to interfere with the basic rugged concept of me personality, madame"- George Harrison to makeup artist Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account at http://www.eudoramail.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:13:11 -0700 From: Eb Subject: Soft Boys/Hollywood OK, I must admit: I didn't go to this show in a good frame of mind. I've had a lot of personal frustration/sadness lately, and I'm *still* mildly afflicted with my Richard Thompson cough. I'm nervous that it has flowered into the infamous Brown Mucus -- the symptoms (intermittent cough, yet no sneezing...otherwise full mobility) are eerily familiar. On top of that, this concert followed two fairly spectacular ones (Thompson, Nick Cave), so I was feeling a bit hard to please. I arrived at the venue, just after 8. I heard the show started at 8, but the Fellows didn't start playing until about 9:05. So, I got there a bit earlier than I would've wanted. First topic: handheld burdens. I brought an old Young Fresh Fellows/This One's for the Ladies record-store poster (recently uncovered in a major closet-cleaning), which I thought I'd casually "donate" to the merchandise table. But, that plan was sorta foiled because I didn't realize whom one of the merchandisers would be, and I didn't want to deal with it. So, I ended up carrying around this damn poster the whole night, and when I finally asked the YFF guitarist after the show if he might like it, he thanked me but said he already had two others at home. Ack. So, I ended up just wearily dropping the poster on a table as I was leaving, hours later. Blah...whatever. Similarly, I had my (Rykodisc) Underwater Moonlight jewelbox weighing down a pocket of my coat all night, but by the end of the night, I was too tired and headachy to wait around for all the gang to emerge. So, I didn't bother getting that signed, either. When I left, Matthew and Kimberley were on the floor, chatting with fans, but there was still no sign of Robyn or Morris. I believe Marc H. was still there, getting his usual shopping bag of records signed, so he can supply the waning, late-night details. But, I'm getting way, way ahead of myself. Mmm...maybe I don't need to write in much detail anyway, because there have already been such a heaping stack of tour reviews. I've been a Young Fresh Fellows fan for about 15 years, but I felt kinda blasi about their set last night. It's not really their fault -- it's mainly because the last time I saw them (with the Minus 5...at the very same venue) is still so fresh in my mind. Also, I was obviously impatient for the Soft Boys' entrance. The Fellows did their usual fun performance, but I guess I just wasn't in the mood for "zany" on this night. Watching 40something McCaughey in his wacky winged baseball hat, wacky beard, wacky hair, wacky sunglasses and clipped movie poster for "Heartbreakers" wackily taped to his chest, I was just thinking "Hmm......wacky." It's not as if the Fellows haven't recorded music with legitimate heart, y'know -- we're not talking They Might Be Giants, here. But, yeah, their set was typically energetic, spontaneous and (literally) bouncy. This performance was naturally shorter than the headlining slot I saw a month or so ago, so the setlist was much tighter and more planned. Yet, I think the song choices barely overlapped at all with the previous show (I could be wrong). Their off-the-cuff repertoire remains remarkable. Their set included one song from Kimberley Rew's solo album with guess-who as guest singer/guitarist, and also a neat closing cover of "A Day in the Life," which simulated the orchestra build quite well a la frenetic, Sonic Youth-style guitar scrapings. The latter also included a guest guitar appearance by Grant Lee Phillips. Other faces I spotted in the house, who didn't play: Jon Brion, Kevin McDonald ("The Kids in the Hall"), Adam Duritz of Counting Crows (I think???) and David Immergluck (once again, I found myself moaning over never seeing the Ophelias live, though he's much better known for session work with Cracker, John Hiatt, Counting Crows, Joan Osborne, etc. nowadays). Oh, one more neglected point of interest: Robyn did one of his Rambling Monologues to introduce the Fellows, beforehand. By midway through the Fellows' set, the sold-out house was really filling. Uncomfortably so. This is definitely the most crowded Knitting Factory show I've seen, as yet. It ended up being one of those shows where you pick one spot and stay *right there* for the entire night. I was in a nice centered spot about 10-15 feet from the stage -- the other listfolk were way over on the right in front, but I don't like standing directly in front of speakers. The people around me smelt like bologna, wheat toast and farts. Not necessarily in that order. Nauseated claustrophobia became a steady motif for me. Unfortunately, my spot also turned out to be *too* centered -- I barely saw Morris' playing at all, because frontman Robyn was blocking my view. Drat. That's life. I approached this show with a slightly different attitude, I guess. I wasn't particularly excited about a Soft Boys Reunion Show, per se -- I was more excited about simply seeing Robyn play a lot of his great, early songs which I haven't seen performed before. Rew did add significant spark to certain songs where he and Robyn traded lead licks, but otherwise, I didn't feel like this lineup had a "unique magic" far beyond other bands I've seen behind Robyn. And Rew's contribution is sorta *necessarily* unusual, since he's the only "lead guitar"-style player Robyn has ever used. (Uhh...isn't he?) I don't have a setlist, but I'm sure others will supply that. The big news for Fgz who saw other dates is that the band did include "I Got the Hots" as one of the encore tunes. Robyn preceded it with an apologetic introduction about not having played the song for XX years, and it being kinda rough. And it was. But by then, the three non-drumming Young Fresh Fellows were also onstage, and added plenty of juice to the performance. Ditto for "Queen of Eyes," "Give It to the Soft Boys," "You Have to Go Sideways" (well, this song only included *one* Fellow) and "The Face of Death." But, how did I get to the encore? I'm having trouble staying sequential, today. I felt like the Soft Boys' performance was strong, but noticeably uneven. The intensity went up and down, from song to song. Some tunes had the old fire, others just didn't. "Tonight," "I Wanna Destroy You" and "Kingdom of Love" didn't, sad to say. They just weren't wound tight enough, and my mind's eye (picturing a young, intense, glowering Robyn) was instead greeted with the older, casual, lay-back-and-swivel Robyn. Didn't quite work for me. (It also didn't help that one of the Bologna & Fart People behind me was loudly singing all the "IIIIIIIIIIIIIII's" in "Destroy You," with little regard for pitch. Ouch. Two other B&Fers also hooted and aggressively flipped off Robyn, when he introduced "Destroy You" with some anti-Dubya comments. Blah.) On the other hand, the band seemed to jump to life with the more rhythmically jagged tunes. "Leppo & the Jooves," "Old Pervert" (obviously the highlight of Rew's night), "Insanely Jealous" and "Only the Stones Remain" were all fantastic, for instance. If I'm thinking of the right song, Robyn really put his all into the latter tune, adding all sorts of illustrative (that's *illustrative*, not "quirky") hand gestures to the verses. There were also a few songs with inspired guitar duels between Robyn and Kimberley, but I can't quite name which ones they were. "Underwater Moonlight"? "Where are the Prawns"? That rare "Kennedy" song? I'm just not sure. I wasn't taking notes, on paper. Everyone who saw the previous dates knows which ones, anyway. Possibly "Astronomy Domine" -- *that* was exciting to see performed, though it could've been played better. I guess I don't have anything further to say. So many of the details are redundant from other reviews, anyway. Now I can say I've seen the Soft Boys, and that's the bottom line. The night's best heckle/request, yelled from the back of the room: "'ANGLEPOISE LAMP,' YOU GEEZERS!!" Heh. Eb ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 05:50:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Marc Subject: L A show Another incredible show. Robyn looked like he was having fun and smiled frequently. The Young Fresh Fellows were great. Grant Lee Phillips joined them for A Day in the Life (they called Robyn too, but he didn't show up until late in the song, and he just watched from the side of the stage). Curt Bloch (YFF guitarist) seemed to be very excited to be there--really animated all night. He played during the Soft Boys' second encore, including leading everyone on "Give It to the Soft Boys"--Robyn sang it again. The Soft Boys really nailed it tonight. Everything sounded great. The guitars were louder and vocals seemed stronger than in San Francisco. The encores were amazing-- included AD, WATP, IGTH (!), GITTSB, & FOD. Time to get some sleep now. I'm really looking forward to the Largo show tonight I'd rather be rich than stupid.--Jack Handey ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:34:44 -0700 From: "victorian squid" Subject: the mystery deepens Drew, concerning the prosthetic brow: >This I do not believe. Oh but think of it. The idea of him gluing one on in the morning and taking it off at night, day in, day out for 20 years. Going shopping for different colored ones as his hair greys and spending hours in front of the mirror worrying over whether or not they match. Agonizing about whether or not women will still find him attractive if he removes it. Taking it off so that he won't be recognized while making emergency runs to Trader Joe's for economy size jugs of guava juice. I'll be laughing about this all day! Yay! Love on ya, Susan hey, I'm running a fever and coughing up icky stuff, don't begrudge me my pathetic amusements :) Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account at http://www.eudoramail.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 17:36:10 -0500 (CDT) From: GSS Subject: Re: minidisc time limit On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Ben wrote: > For any minidisc concert recorders who hate that 74/80 minute limit since > many concerts run longer than that (and who have some money to burn), > Sony has released a new recorder that will record up to 320 min on an > 80 min disc. I saw them on the site www.minidisco.com, for $279.95 and > $349.95. Remember, that is 320 minutes of mostly lost-by-compression audio. On all the minidisc recorders I have used, you can set the record mode to mono which will double the time available. And since very few live shows are stereo and since most live taping situations will not allow sufficient separation of each mono mic, mono works great. I would wait before buying one of those new tiny, mechanically noisey, devices anyhow. Just remember what innovations have done to the first couple releases of these devices previously. In my last post, I mentioned the pirated CD I purchased at a local convenience store. This was the first time I had encountered pirated audio being sold in a commercial establishment, or at least the first time I have noticed. It seems like if this was stuff from RH or Nick Drake or even better, someone from this list losing money to shady convenince store owners, the reaction would have been more intense. But should that make a difference? Is there anything that should be done or should we just let stuff like this slide in all cases. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:40:55 -0400 From: overbury@cn.ca Subject: Attn Eurofegs: Northern lights display on right now? I should have thought of this a couple of hours ago, but any of you who are in darkness might want to look out your window. Solar particle measurements (Kp index) were up to 8 out of a possible 9 recently, and they were 6 at last measurement. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:56:19 -0700 From: "victorian squid" Subject: the hygiene that invented itself Gnat: >double-standard arose from. I seem to recall reading that Gillette or some >other razor company started convincing women back in the '20's that shaving >was more sanitary (or something), but I may be wrong. Undoubtedly there's something to what someone (Chris Gross?) was saying about that being roughly the time it was ok to see womens' legs. BUT even the flapperest of flappers still regularly wore stockings with everything at this point anyway, didn't they? When did it become ok to go barelegged? I'm curious about this now, I never really thought much about it. That being said, I don't put it past Gillette at all. I took a course in the history of advertising and it was -extremely- enlightening. I think the book we used was called....hrm....don't recall, "Advertising and The Modern Age". I really wish I could find it now, I think my parents lost it when they lost a bunch of books I was storing with them. Anyway, this book made a very persuasive argument for Listerine basically inventing bad breath as a social problem. Apparently someone came up with the idea after its sales as a medical antiseptic had declined significantly. Those early ads almost always show -women- too. They imply very strongly that you can be well-coiffed and well-dressed and a fabulous cook but you'll always lose in the end because girls with bad breath don't catchee husband. Fleischman's Yeast also ran a quite successful campaign to convince people of its uses as a "digestive tonic", and man, some of those 30s Lysol ads............they were promoting it as spermicide. It's just hysterical, because of course they couldn't -say- that right out in 1930. So the ads have the feel of some ads for tampons or vaginal creams, with a mother saying to her daughter "here, dear, this pamphlet will explain it to you" and an address where you could write to Lysol for more information. I swear I am not inventing this. >Who would play ME in the great feg movie? I don't look like anyone. *sob* Oh, thank you for saying this. I wanted to say this too. ME! Cast ME! :) >p.p.s. Here's a huge warm fuzzy outpouring of sympathy for Eclipse... Let me get in on that too. Love on ya (and specially to Ms. Eclipse today) Susan Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account at http://www.eudoramail.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:05:45 -0700 From: "Andrew D. Simchik" Subject: beauty convention center >From: "Thomas, Ferris" > >Earlier today Natalie intoned: >- -----Original Message----- >"Because it's OK for guys to be hairy, but not women....I'm not sure where >this double-standard arose from." >- -----Original Message----- > >It arose from hairy legs on women being danged unattractive, I think. I'm sure you realize you're paraphrasing the double standard and not explaining it. >From: "Spring Cherry" >My daughter recently announced to me that thanks to plastic surgery and >genetic engineering everybody in her childrens' generation would be >conventionally beautiful. That would assume that plastic surgery can produce "conventional beauty," and I don't think it can (or else I just don't like "conventional beauty"). It can produce some lovely statues, but for sex appeal I think it's essential to look natural, correcting only minor flaws at the most. But maybe I'm just a Luddite. >But I wonder. When we can have any sort of meat we >want, what sort of meat will we choose? Will we get bored with the generic? >Will an anti-fashion in ugliness spring up? Maybe we'll start trying to look like animals, like that one scary rich lady I read about in People. That might be cool, though I hope we do a better job than she did. Drew - -- Andrew D. Simchik, drew at stormgreen dot com http://www.stormgreen.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 19:32:29 -0400 From: *twofangs / randi* Subject: feg-casting-call > bayard suggested: carole: winona ryder Well, I may have picked WR to play me, but I say Winona as Carole would be great! I'll stick with my old stand-by - to play me: Marissa Tomei. Eddie, Carole, Karen, sharkboy, Tom, Cynthia, Susan, Doug, Nick, Daniel ... what do you think? I should start writing a script ... hhhmmm fading back into yesterday before tomorrow comes, Randi *what scares you most will set you free* ~ robyn hitchcock ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:35:27 -0700 From: "victorian squid" Subject: Re: Out of Time Spring Cherry: >I want the green pants too. And, like you, I have a florescent hot pink >shirt Id wear with them(plus its shatung silk, and thrifted. Love it, love >it.) Um Kay, the weirdest thing about this is that the shirt I was thinking of is also shantung silk. It's on sale at Nordstrom's right now and I've been trying to decide whether I should buy it now or wait and see if it ends up at the Rack. >Do you remember Robyn's hot pink shirt from the 80s? Do you think it >still exists (Loved it, loved it)? NO! Oh I would like to see that! I hope he still has it. And the Nehru jacket. It would be a crying shame if he got rid of that because he's the only guy I ever saw look good in one. >BTW, I still fell like your big sister;-)(how old does that make me, 13?) I think 16 and you're a bit calmer than I am because you're allowed to wear dark lipstick and car date :). >them(Alright--this ones going to be tall, dark, handsome ...and abit >different, so lets give him this one -particular- twist Ive been working >on.) Yes, I like this theory, but I think his nose is the twist. >Not Rickman for Robyn, Robyn for Robyn. >But if they did flashbacks to the late 70s, who would play a -young- Robyn? Johnathan Rhys-Davies. Have a look at http://www.bbcamerica.com/programs/gormenghast.html. I think the resemblance has been noted here before. Love on ya, Susan Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account at http://www.eudoramail.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 23:47:04 -0000 From: Melissa Higuchi Subject: seligman's band Help! I'm blanking on the name of Matthew Seligman's band name and the cd title. I know it was in a recent post but I can't find it. Thanks Mel ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:57:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Viv Lyon Subject: Re: Out of Time On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, victorian squid wrote: > >But if they did flashbacks to the late 70s, who would play a -young- Robyn? > > Johnathan Rhys-Davies. His lips are too lush and florid. And besides, you can't play Bowie _and_ Robyn in one lifetime. It just ain't fair. Vivien ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:56:58 -0700 From: Tom Clark Subject: Re: Out of Time on 4/11/01 4:35 PM, victorian squid at v.squid@eudoramail.com wrote: > And the Nehru jacket. It would be a crying shame if he got rid of that because > he's the only guy I ever saw look good in one. You obviously haven't seen my second grade class picture! - -tc ------------------------------ End of fegmaniax-digest V10 #119 ********************************