From: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org (fegmaniax-digest) To: fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Subject: fegmaniax-digest V9 #285 Reply-To: fegmaniax@smoe.org Sender: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk fegmaniax-digest Friday, October 13 2000 Volume 09 : Number 285 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: Iota gigs [shmac@ix.netcom.com (Scott Hunter McCleary)] Re: Just For Fun [Brett Cooper ] Re: Just for fun ["Russ Reynolds" ] Re: Just For Fun [Brett Cooper ] Re: Just For Fun [Brett Cooper ] Re: Idiot record companies fail again? ["Benalto" ] Re: Just for fun ["J. Brown" ] Re: Just for fun ["Russ Reynolds" ] he also invented the CD player [Bayard ] Re: Idiot record companies fail again? [steve ] Re: he also invented the CD player [steve ] Re: Just for fun [Eb ] Re: I don't remember [Berkshire] (aka Barleycorn Death Foretold) [Michae] Re: just for fun [Michael R Godwin ] Filing Foetus and Collaborator Significance [Gene Hopstetter ] Re: playing with Lennon in Traffic [Michael R Godwin ] Re: Iota gigs [Christopher Gross ] Re: just for fun ["J. Brown" ] houses on Friday 13th [Vivien Lyon ] Re: houses on Friday 13th ["brian nupp" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 23:12:09 -0400 From: shmac@ix.netcom.com (Scott Hunter McCleary) Subject: Re: Iota gigs In lieu of a CityPaper, I confirmed Sunday 8:30 show with the club this afternoon. I'll be the Walter Skinner lookalike (ask Bayard) in the FatBrain hat. ========= SH McCleary Prodigal Dog Communications PO Box 6163 Arlington, VA 22206 shmac@prodigaldog.com www.prodigaldog.com www.1480kHz.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 19:27:09 -0800 From: Brett Cooper Subject: Re: Just For Fun on 10/12/00 3:54PM, Bradley Wood at brad372@hotmail.com wrote: > Vince Furnier (See Alice Cooper) Shouldn't even be included since Alice has legally been Alice Cooper since 1974, and prior, as your pointed out, they were the group. Brett ******************************************** Cooper Collections http://home.gci.net/~coopercollections ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 20:31:02 -0700 From: "Russ Reynolds" Subject: Re: Just for fun Interesting (in an anal retentive sort of way). Lots of different answers and I'm not sure any two were alike (unless you count Eb agreeing with CG). I suppose those of you who are trained librarians are the ones who "got it right" but I don't think anyone is going to be reorganizing their collection as a result of this little study. > The Beatles > Alice Cooper > The Rutles > 999 > A Certain Ratio > The Ruts > 10cc > Eric Burdon & the Animals > ? and the Mysterions Obviously a lot of these are subjective. Is Alice Cooper a band or a person? I think by now he's a person but certainly the early a stuff was a band. I'd file everything under C. I'm a spell out the numbers guy, so 999 would be filed right before 997 if there were a 997. That's because I take the word "alphabetize" perhaps a tad too literally. No numbers in the alphabet, you see. Likewise, ? Gets filed under Q (not M for Mysterions) ....but Burdon & The Animals get filed under "A" in my collection (in the radio station I work at "Animals" and "Eric Burdon & The Animals" are actually split up in two sections, which is really probably correct since they were basically two different bands. Of course we've got Eric Burden and War filed in the B's too). Yet, I don't think anyone here would file RH & the Egyptians under E, would they? A Certain Ratio should be filed under "C" , just as The Beatles gets filed under B and not T. It used to drive me nuts that they were filed under "A" at my college station. These people were in college--they're supposed to have learned that stuff in third grade! But the one that intrigues me the most is Ruts/Rutles. Everyone who answered this put Rutles before Ruts. I would argue, however, that Rut comes before Rutle, therefore their plurals should be listed in the same order (Ruts coming before Rutles). Using this logic, The Cars would also come before Eric Carmen, since Cars is merely the plural of Car. After all, there is no separate listing for "cars" in the dictionary. I am probably using extremely misguided logic here here but so what. I would like to hear a difinitive word on that one from librarian types, though. - -rUss (who numbers and files his records chronologically as they are added to the collection, and keeps an alphabetical index near by) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 19:32:05 -0800 From: Brett Cooper Subject: Re: Just For Fun on 10/12/00 4:21PM, Eclipse at eclipse@best.com wrote: > out of curiosity, these are band names you're extrapolating from real > bands, right? i mean, afaik, "Alice Cooper Band" does not exist, nor has > Alice Cooper (the man) released material under his real name (Vincent > Furnier). Yes and no. If you include the tracks that were released when Alice was in high school (The Earwigs, who had a minor local hit with "Don't Blow Your Mind"), Vincent Furnier is listed as a contributor. This is close to 6 years before Alice Cooper appears. You have The Nazz phase after The Earwigs, where he was still Vince. > fwiw, all the Alice Cooper cd's in our house (and there are a > great many, since my husband is quite the fan) are just filed under "C" > for "Cooper", since Alice Cooper the man has continued to release material > under that name long since the original band members went their separate > ways. however, you could file Alice Cooper cd's chronologically and > they'd still be in the above order, since Alice Cooper's band never > re-formed after they broke up, and Alice continued to release material. Again, yes and no. Your husband should be aware of Billion Dollar Babies (the group, which formed in 1977 to release their album, Battle Axe, which consisted of Neal Smith, Dennis Dunaway, Michael Bruce, and the late Glen Buxton). > interesting tidbit: when the band Alice Cooper was originally signed by > Frank Zappa, he suggested they rename themselves to "Alice > Cookies". obviously, they declined.. :) And Alice, to this day, has never been able to figure that out. I think it was Frank's way of making them some prodigy of The Mothers of Invention or something. It's such a brutal planet... Brett ******************************************** Cooper Collections http://home.gci.net/~coopercollections ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 19:33:19 -0800 From: Brett Cooper Subject: Re: Just For Fun on 10/12/00 3:54PM, Bradley Wood at brad372@hotmail.com wrote: > Vince Furnier (See Alice Cooper) Shouldn't even be included since Alice has legally been Alice Cooper since 1974, and prior, as your pointed out, they were the group. Brett ******************************************** Cooper Collections http://home.gci.net/~coopercollections ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 21:40:42 -0500 From: "Benalto" Subject: Re: Idiot record companies fail again? This is really interesting, but could someone explain to me exactly what the SDMI watermark is, and what it's supposed to do? Then maybe I could respond to it being hacked.... Thanks, sorry for my ignorance. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "steve" To: "Fegmaniax" Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 9:13 PM Subject: Idiot record companies fail again? > http://www.salon.com/tech/log/2000/10/12/sdmi_hacked/index.html > > > - Steve > > __________ > "He's probably the least qualified person ever to be nominated by a major > party ... What is his accomplishment? That he's no longer an obnoxious > drunk? - Ron Reagan on George W. Bush > > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 20:50:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "J. Brown" Subject: Re: Just for fun On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Russ Reynolds wrote: > But the one that intrigues me the most is Ruts/Rutles. Everyone who > answered this put Rutles before Ruts. I would argue, however, that Rut > comes before Rutle, therefore their plurals should be listed in the same > order (Ruts coming before Rutles). Using this logic, The Cars would also > come before Eric Carmen, since Cars is merely the plural of Car. After all, > there is no separate listing for "cars" in the dictionary. I am probably > using extremely misguided logic here here but so what. I would like to > hear a difinitive word on that one from librarian types, though. Library wise Rutles comes before Ruts because the pluarlity of the words would not be considered. Jason Wilson Brown - University of Washington - Seattle, WA USA "Monkey in a Turban, Oh What Does it Mean?" -Frank Black ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 20:59:01 -0700 From: "Russ Reynolds" Subject: Re: Just for fun > Library wise Rutles comes before Ruts because the pluarlity of the words > would not be considered. I suppose I should have learned that in third grade... - -rUss ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 01:41:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Bayard Subject: he also invented the CD player > Oh, can anyone give me the exact quote/context in which Al Gore claimed to > invent the Internet? I always hear jokes about this, but have never seen > the source text. http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.htm This site is an excellent reference for checking on something you've heard "that's going around." =b ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 01:06:34 -0500 From: steve Subject: Re: Idiot record companies fail again? Benalto: >This is really interesting, but could someone explain to me exactly what the >SDMI watermark is, and what it's supposed to do? Then maybe I could >respond to it being hacked.... It's a little embedded signature used to prevent the copying of digital recordings. The SDMI is the industry group that was/is working on the watermarks. Working groups are how the electronics industry hashes out standards (sometimes it takes years). A few years back, the record companies wanted to put a "digital notch" on CDs to prevent copying - problem was that it clearly degraded the sound of the recording. (Insert digital sucks argument here). The same thing is almost certainly true of the new signatures. But there's no reason the use them if they can be cracked, so the SDMI put out a challenge (with reward) to the hacker community. Didn't take long to bust the system(s). - - Steve __________ "He's probably the least qualified person ever to be nominated by a major party ... What is his accomplishment? That he's no longer an obnoxious drunk? - Ron Reagan on George W. Bush ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 01:11:51 -0500 From: steve Subject: Re: he also invented the CD player >>Oh, can anyone give me the exact quote/context in which Al Gore claimed >>to invent the Internet? I always hear jokes about this, but have never seen >>the source text. http://www.salon.com/tech/col/rose/2000/10/05/gore_internet/index.html http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/08/04/gore/index.html - - Steve __________ "He's probably the least qualified person ever to be nominated by a major party ... What is his accomplishment? That he's no longer an obnoxious drunk? - Ron Reagan on George W. Bush ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 23:29:58 -0700 From: Eb Subject: Re: Just for fun Russ: >A Certain Ratio should be filed under "C" , just as The Beatles gets filed >under B and not T. It used to drive me nuts that they were filed under "A" >at my college station. These people were in college--they're supposed to >have learned that stuff in third grade! Well, the folks who compiled my Trouser Press Guide(s) must be stuck in third grade, too.... I'll stick with "A." If you file "A Certain Ratio" under C, this implies that the "A" is disposable. However, you would *never* say "I own some Certain Ratio albums" in the way you would say "I own some Beatles albums." The "A" article just can't be discarded/swapped in the same way. Starting a band name with "A" is an aggressive deviance from protocol, and I think the effort needs to be recognized as such. Since the band name breaks the rules, it shouldn't be *parsed* by those rules it defies. Eb, who doesn't recall ever being "driven nuts" by alphabetizing issues now pruning: Various Artists/"Angel Dust: Music for Movie Bikers" ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:10:46 +0100 (BST) From: Michael R Godwin Subject: Re: I don't remember [Berkshire] (aka Barleycorn Death Foretold) On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Eric Loehr wrote: > There are also two previously unreleased tracks from the [Traffic] sessions: > I Just Want You to Know > Sittin' Here Thinkin' of My Love SHTOML has quite a nice tune, but the lyric is rudimentary - Winwood sings "SHTOML" a few times, and not much else. IJWYTK is even less memorable. But 'Glad', 'Freedom Rider' 'John Barleycorn Must Die' and 'Stranger to Himself' are as good as ever, if not better. - - Mike Godwin ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:56:56 +0100 (BST) From: Michael R Godwin Subject: Re: just for fun To me augmented chords mean Chuck Berry - as in "School Days" and "No Particular Place to Go". But the Beatles certainly picked up on them. On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Eb wrote: > The period issue: A.C. Marias, before or after Able Tasmans? B.A.L.L. > before or after Badfinger? P.M. Dawn, before or after Painkiller? I was really annoyed when I looked for B.B.C. in my phone book recently and found that it said "See under BBC". All initials should come first, before words. > Ben Folds Five, under "B" or "F"? Always file under the first letter appearing on the label, with the exception of the definite article. So "B". W R T "A certain ratio", "A" isn't the definite article, it's the indefinite article, so file under "A". > Worry about the distinction between Beefheart & HIS Magic Band and > Beefheart & THE Magic Band? File them all under "his", assuming that "the" is a mistake by someone who doesn't care. I used to file them under "Beefheart" until I realised that I was breaking my own rule (see BFF above). > Charlie Mingus vs. Charles Mingus? Whatever it says on the label. I think there are a few John / Johnny / Johnnie / Jon problems along this line. > David Thomas albums: Chronological, or grouped by backing bands "The Wooden > Birds," "Foreigners," "Two Pale Boys" and "The Pedestrians"? Or similar > name-vs.-backing-band issues with Elvis Costello, Robyn Hitchcock, Graham > Parker, Neil Young... Difficult. My instinct is that some of these bands barely 'exist' in the sense of touring, regular recording outfits. I saw Elvis and the Confederates once, but I don't think they ever toured again. So I would vote for chronological if I didn't just stick them all in randomly under 'Elvis Costello'. Unless you want to file some of them under "Little Hands of Concrete"! OTOH, the Soft Boys are a distinct band from Robyn Hitchcock and the Egyptians. And Robyn Hitchcock is neither - he's a solo artiste - file separately, before RH and the E. > Wings Over America, under "Wings" or "McCartney"? Wings, I think. I think there's one Wings album credited to P McC and Wings, but I can't remember which, so I'd probably even file that one under Wings. > Which comes first, Richard Thompson or Richard & Linda Thompson? Bung them all in together. > File Tyrannosaurus Rex and T. Rex albums chronologically, or as > separate bands? Separate bands. Tyrannosaurus Rex is an acoustic 2-piece, T. Rex are an electric band with guitar, bass, drums, congas and keyboards. Further thorts: I thought the Nazz was Todd Rundgren, not Alice Cooper - who am I thinking of? Regardless of what they think themselves, Godley and Creme go under G (even when they think they're called Creme and Godley). > PS Mike, I don't believe "Traffic" and "Barleycorn" yet have been reissued > with the deluxe remaster/remix treatment, in the States. Something to look forward to ... > And my greatest-hits record on MGM is by "Eric Burdon & the > Animals"... no "New." Maybe they got old! - - Mike Godwin PS When he picked up a book of mine called "50 great Beatle songs", my mate Steve Emerson flicked through it and said "It should be called "49 great Beatle songs plus 'I'm happy just to dance with you' ". :-) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:21:53 -0500 From: Gene Hopstetter Subject: Filing Foetus and Collaborator Significance Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:52:35 -0700 From: Eb Subject: Re: just for fun Foetus albums, all filed under "Foetus" or by the individually embellished names? (And am I wrong in lumping Steroid Maximus under Foetus? Quoting Mr. Foetus from an interview I did with him (), "I did two albums under the name Steroids Maximus which were all instrumental." So, no Thirlwell, no Steroid Maximus. But that doesn't mean I put my Stereoid Maximus CDs with my J.G. Thirlwell CDs; they get their own section. Only iterations of the Foetus name go in the Foetus section. Collaborations in which he was the primary collaborator get their own sections (e.g., Wiseblood, Flesh Volcano), and the collaborations he's done in which he was not the primary collaborator, i.e., music he's done with Stephen Stapleton and Nurse With Wound goes with NWW, 'cause Stapleton's the primary collaborator (he *is* NWW, ya see?). However, this does not apply if the collaboraton is with Lydia Lunch, and Lunch is the primary collaborator, 'cause I think she's a talentless hack and doesn't deserve her own section. As for the compilations Thirlwell has released (Mesomorph Enduros, f'rinstance) go in my big Various Artists section at the end of my CD cabinet. But records which Thirlwell has recorded or produced (but not played on, if you can ignore the fact that he often *plays* the recording studio) go in their respective band's section, e.g., Einsturzende Neubauten's "Strategein Gegen Architecturen." I'm just as confused as you all probably are, too. Sorry, nevermind. Phew. So there's a new Elysian Fields record out? How is it? It's a shame Oren Bloedow doesn't get more exposure; I sure like his work. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:38:55 +0100 From: "Stewart C. Russell" Subject: Re: Idiot record companies fail again? steve wrote: > > http://www.salon.com/tech/log/2000/10/12/sdmi_hacked/index.html someone made the point that it was annoying that this was hacked before the "standard"(?) was ratified, so that the industry would have to backtrack in a comedy manner. They just have to rehash it now... ;-( ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:50:31 EDT From: "Asa Land" Subject: TLA tonight, fun playing with Lennon in Traffic Robyn's in Philly tonite-but does anyone know how much he's going to do? Hes got bottom billing, and I pray is wouldnt be just a 20 minute tease. My hubby and I (tall middle age couple, woman blond, husband brown-haired with beard, both in glasses(oooh-dont we sound fun))will be drinking at Manny Browns before the show in case anyone else is interested. Everyones getting into this--how do you file your stuff stuff, but with all our best intentions, --dont you find its a moot point? The only stuff that stays properly filed(whatever your system) is the stuff you dont listen to. The stuff you actually listen to is junked around the place organized by an internal logic only your unconsious knows for sure. Anyone have a clue to how this unsystematic -system- works? Or am I just a slob? You can hate Lennon's music(I guess, hypothetically, not that I can "imagine" it(alright, baaad word choice.)) But he was the most articulate, intelligent, sardonic and visionary of all the music-making hippie-dippies who, with us music-loving hippie-dippies, actually suffered the delusion for awhile that we could change the world. He is a historical figure who made a difference in how the times played themselves out. There was a good reason Nixon/Hoover wanted him gone. Plus, he was darn cute(must be said.) And his ability to give the sweetness of the Beatles's music its teeth--both lyrically and in the music...was why, among other reasons, they werent just a boy band. Honey--he was, in terms of what he produced and the magical effect it had/has on people--the best Rock n Roll has brought forth. Smarter than Elvis, more accessible than Dylan--have you seen his like since? I havent. Im coming into some extra money, and Im thinking of actually buying some CDs instead of just trading tapes. Im going to get the VU boxset--but all this talk of Traffic has 40 thousand sparking headmen fantasizing empty pages any day of the week bout magic goo in my snappy head. In short, what would be the best buying strategy to acquire the most of their stuff the most cheaply? And, from someone who understands little about recording(thou I do remember what a 4 track was) how the hell did they get the sound of the guitar solo in Mr Fantasy? It rises up your spine into a bubble that bursts right under the crown of your head, then slithers down the sides. Thanks K, tonite in seat 13 on Fri the 13th, Yeahhh! _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:18:05 -0400 From: Eric Loehr Subject: (aka Barleycorn Death Foretold),Nazz, just for fun At 12:10 PM 10/13/00 +0100, Michael R Godwin wrote: >SHTOML has quite a nice tune, but the lyric is rudimentary - Winwood sings >"SHTOML" a few times, and not much else. IJWYTK is even less memorable. >But 'Glad', 'Freedom Rider' 'John Barleycorn Must Die' and 'Stranger to >Himself' are as good as ever, if not better. I agree completely that the rest sounds sounds better than ever; I can never completely decide if Barleycorn or Traffic (the second album) is my favorite Traffic album -- but as they say, it's a nice problem to have. (Neither have been reissued here in the states, btw -- but I sprung for the imports when they came out; still haven't figured out which version of the first album I need yet.....) MRG also wrote: >Further thorts: >I thought the Nazz was Todd Rundgren, not Alice Cooper - who am I >thinking of? I also thought the Nazz was Todd R. - - either Mike and I are right or our memory cells are just at about the same rate of deterioration -- can anyone tell us what we're thinking? ;-}} Could Alice Cooper also have been called the Nazz? For what it's worth, I currently use the Archaeological Extrapolation method for filing CD's: anything I bought around the same time is filed in the same place, unless I've listened to it recently and not put it back where it came from. I should point out that at one time I did sorta/kinda put most (never got to doing all) of an artist's and relations (Lennon w/Beatles, etc.) CD's together, but the basic principal of disorganization is, when did I get it? These groupings have actually made it through several moves, although the system is starting to show strains. For anyone who cares/is still reading, I'm also a librarian, and if it better helps to understand my system, Yardbirds always comes before Zappa, but after Beatles ;-}} Eric "the Nazz Are Blue" ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:23:23 -0400 From: "Thomas, Ferris" Subject: Bragging. Saw Billy Bragg and the Blokes last night at Irving Plaza (NYC). With the exception of the tag-team low-brow idiot couple standing behind me (who felt compelled to either try to reply to everything he said or, failing that, just have a regular conversation) it was really quite brilliant. He and the band played for about two hours. I had seen him a few years back at the Guinness Fleadh and then this past Spring supporting the Guthrie works but he really impressed me last night. The new material (three or four songs) seemed...well...interesting. He's been obviously influenced by the Mermaid Avenue work. While they did play a good volume of that material (and at good volume, to boot--which affected the boot, I might add--) they also tore through his older material. Nice to see at 42 the old man can still rawk. Next week it's RH on the Thursday (maybe Tuesday, too) and Luna/Cinerama/Bettie Sweevert on the Sunday. ______________________________________ Ferris Scott Thomas programmer McGraw-Hill Education 860.409.2612 ferris_thomas@mcgraw-hill.com (email) "We keep you alive to serve this ship, so row well... and live" - Ben Hur ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:30:06 +0100 (BST) From: Michael R Godwin Subject: Re: playing with Lennon in Traffic On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Asa Land wrote: > all this talk of Traffic has 40 thousand sparking headmen fantasizing > empty pages any day of the week bout magic goo in my snappy head. In > short, what would be the best buying strategy to acquire the most of > their stuff the most cheaply? Well, I bought a double-CD 'Best of Traffic' set - but it didn't have some of the essential tracks on it (such as 'Giving to You'). So when the new UK reissues of 'Mr Fantasy', 'Traffic' and 'John Barleycorn' came out, complete with bonus tracks, I had to buy them as well. I don't feel so strongly about the 'added-rhythm-section' albums**, so my advice is get the first 3 albums, new UK release versions. > And, from someone who understands little about recording(thou I do remember > what a 4 track was) how the hell did they get the sound of the guitar solo > in Mr Fantasy? It rises up your spine into a bubble that bursts right under > the crown of your head, then slithers down the sides. You'll have to ask producer Jimmy Miller. But it's not just the sound, it's the musician that counts as well. My recollection is that Winwood played a Telecaster in those days, which was unusual in that Les Paul-dominated era. He also does a whirligig of a double solo on the live version of '(Sometimes I feel so) Uninspired' which is on the poorly-reviewed "On the road" album. > K, tonite in seat 13 on Fri the 13th, Yeahhh! - - Mike Godwin (buying a house on Friday 13th, for heaven's sake) ** Low Spark of High heeled Boys, Shoot Out at the Fantasy Factory, and Where the Eagle Flies; Have I missed one? I don't really count 'Last Exit', which is a mess. PS to Eric: 'Traffic' is the best one, because it has some first-class Dave Mason songs on it as well as the Winwood / Capaldi contributions. I saw the Black Crowes play 'Feelin' Alright' quite recently, and it still comes across. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:19:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Christopher Gross Subject: Re: Iota gigs Well, Robyn and Grant are playing at 8:30 both Sunday and Monday, according to Iota's ad in Washington City Paper, The. However, the City Paper's web site says Iota has nothing at all on Sunday and some band called the Hula Monsters on Monday. I guess we'll have to just go there and see what happens. (Neither ad mentioned any prices; but how can you put a price on a Robyn show, anyway?) Maybe I'll see youse Fegs there? I'd like to go to both shows, but I'm not sure yet if that's possible. - --Chris ______________________________________________________________________ Christopher Gross On the Internet, nobody knows I'm a dog. chrisg@gwu.edu ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:45:35 -0700 (PDT) From: "J. Brown" Subject: Re: just for fun On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Michael R Godwin wrote: > > Wings Over America, under "Wings" or "McCartney"? > > Wings, I think. I think there's one Wings album credited to P McC and > Wings, but I can't remember which, so I'd probably even file that one > under Wings. I classify them all under McCartney, Paul. Band on the Run and Red Rose Speedway are credited to Paul McCartney and Wings. The rest are just Wings. > I thought the Nazz was Todd Rundgren, not Alice Cooper - who am I thinking > of? The Nazz was Todd thats why alice cooper changed their name! Jason Wilson Brown - University of Washington - Seattle, WA USA "Monkey in a Turban, Oh What Does it Mean?" -Frank Black ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:03:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Vivien Lyon Subject: houses on Friday 13th in the "of no interest to anyone else" category of coincidences: > - Mike Godwin (buying a house on Friday 13th, for heaven's > sake) Weird! Jeme and I have to decide today whether or not we want to commit to the house we looked at last night. Vivien __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:20:23 EDT From: "brian nupp" Subject: Re: houses on Friday 13th Not to mention, this Friday the 13th is on a full moon! >From: Vivien Lyon >Reply-To: Vivien Lyon >To: fegmaniax@smoe.org >Subject: houses on Friday 13th >Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:03:38 -0700 (PDT) > >in the "of no interest to anyone else" category of coincidences: > > > - Mike Godwin (buying a house on Friday 13th, for heaven's > > sake) > >Weird! Jeme and I have to decide today whether or not we want to >commit to the house we looked at last night. > >Vivien > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! >http://mail.yahoo.com/ _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. ------------------------------ End of fegmaniax-digest V9 #285 *******************************