From: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org (fegmaniax-digest) To: fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Subject: fegmaniax-digest V7 #102 Reply-To: fegmaniax@smoe.org Sender: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-fegmaniax-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk fegmaniax-digest Tuesday, March 17 1998 Volume 07 : Number 102 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: It's baaaaack. . . . . [dlang ] Re: Fw: (Fwd) FW: Van Gogh [Stewart Russell 3295 Analyst_Programmer ] Re: Big Lebowski [Capuchin ] Re: robyn's most embarrassing moment? [Capuchin ] Re: hello??? hello?? [dlang ] Re: bring home some t-bone ["Runion-1, Michael" ] Re: hello??? hello?? [lj lindhurst ] Re: robyn's most embarrassing moment? [John Barrington Jones ] Re: Robyn Hitchcock chat ["JH3" ] Country Robyn [Russ Reynolds ] SXSW meet? [firstcat@lsli.com] Re: Big Lebowski ["Capitalism Blows" ] Re: Catching up [Miles Goosens ] Re: SXSW meet? [chichi@io.com (Zelda Pinwheel)] Re: fegmaniax-digest V7 #101 [james.dignan@stonebow.otago.ac.nz (James Di] flesh cartoon? [dwdudic@erols.com (David W. Dudich)] Hey, I have an image for Gloss Flesh (?) [lj lindhurst ] Re: flesh cartoon? [Terrence M Marks ] Re: SXSW meet? [firstcat@lsli.com] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 19:49:44 +2909 From: dlang Subject: Re: It's baaaaack. . . . . Quail meeked unctuously from his lair: "There is absolutely no truth whatsoever to any of the ravings made by Feg Natalie, Feg James, or Feg Dave. There is no Quailspiracy, and the whole list is tired of this frivolous nonsense. It is time to put this to rest, permanently." No chance Quail , you know you're rumbled my fine fellow and as far as annexing the rogue fegs on the list you can forget it, we have Runion in our sphere of influence , his jocks were posted to him today . . "Therefore I make the suggestion that the following Feg dots be turned over to my control, and I be appointed Minister of Truth for the New Model Feg List. The Feg dots in question are: www5.palmnet.net/~mrrunion/fegmaps/australi.map?136,205 www5.palmnet.net/~mrrunion/fegmaps/australi.map?278,261 www5.palmnet.net/~mrrunion/fegmaps/usa.map?334,102" Your Fegiverse is crumbling around you Quail .The jigs up, so give yourself up before its too late, repent , see the evil of your ways and join us in the wondrous brave new world of fegfreedom which is just around the corner, . "Also, I would like to suggest that the following attire be pronounced unacceptable: any glow in the dark badge whatsoever, small wrap round eye masks of any sort, and, most of all, iridescent body stocking and so-called "superfeg" jocks. Anyone caught wearing these, or seen with these on Nick's FegPhoto page, will be transferred to the Liam Gallagher Friendship Gulag". So just what is so noxious about the above attire ?. I think I look very spiffy in my set thank you very much *Mr " fashion plate",Quail*. You're just jealous because you can't join the" Friends of Fegs " and you don't get to wear the outfit or to learn the secret hand signals. So there . Dave ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:55:11 GMT From: Stewart Russell 3295 Analyst_Programmer Subject: Re: Fw: (Fwd) FW: Van Gogh >>>>> "tanter" == tanter writes: >>>> >>The Van Gogh Family Tree Huh!? Am I missing something here? Van Gogh != Mango. Might as well write 'Robynhitch Gogh'... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:58:40 GMT From: Stewart Russell 3295 Analyst_Programmer Subject: Re: Robyn Hitchcock chat >>>>> "M" == MARKEEFE writes: M> I would be happy to *try* to do this. So, um, what do I M> do? Save the chat as text in a Word file? If I remember from my days as an AOL Host, you can open a chat log file, and the text will spool to it. It's just plain text, so you needn't touch Word. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 04:31:42 EST From: KarmaFuzzz Subject: Re: Robyn Hitchcock chat In a message dated 98-03-13 15:25:54 EST, MARKEEFE@aol.com writes: > hal said: >> Will someone please archive this and post it for us >> non-AOL-ers? > I would be happy to *try* to do this. So, um, what do I do? Save the > chat as text in a Word file? Sorry, I'm not as handy with these here > computer > things as some of you folks is! Anyone else on AOL better qualified than I > to > handle this task? Karmafuzzz? Well, should it turn out that I'm our only > hope, I promise to try my best :-) okay, within the Spinonline section, they have posted at least some transcripts of past sessions. it looked like 10 from last year, and one so far this year (sandra bernhard). i don't know if they have them all there, and how long it takes for them to be posted though. i certainly know i'm not gonna be able to personally participate since my modem is way to slow (2400, gasp), and i'm playing airport taxi at that time anyways. but i can check and see when (if?) the transcript is posted, and then send it out when it is. the spinonline section was obviously organized by a nincompoop btw. then again, it is aol....... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 01:38:30 -0800 (PST) From: Capuchin Subject: Re: Big Lebowski > In a message dated 98-03-10 11:54:12 EST, lj opened Pandora's box with: > << Did anyone else see "The Big Lebowski" yet? Any opinions? >> On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, MARKEEFE wrote: > It's *absolutely* worth seeing, but it > lacks the tension of most of their other works (aside from, of course, > "Hudsucker", which I happen to dearly love). Of course, it wasn't really > supposed to be all that tense, either. It wasn't supposed to be tense at all. It's a character piece like something from Gus Van Zandt or Kevin Smith or something. It's the Coen Brothers' Nineties Movie. Why else did they place in the ridiculous context of the Gulf War? Brilliant. And the rug... the shoes... it's all under foot. > I think they totally accomplished what > they set out to do, and I'd probably see it again if the opportunity presented > itself (Jeme? Ready for a third go of it yet?). Err... had that third go already, but fourth time, anytime! On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Aaron Mandel wrote: > john goodman > seemed a little reluctant to be saying "fuck" so much, though. I think you just watched Roseanne too much. He seemed fine with it. His character was just maybe apalled by the world around him that inspired such expletives and colorful metaphor. John Goodman can be a brilliant actor in some situations. He's very genuine and plays the part with consistency and believability. The subtleties of Coen writing and direction, though, can make almost anyone seem like they're not acting, but truly living. Even two-dimensional character parts like Brandt. Brilliant stuff. J. ________________________________________________________ J A Brelin Capuchin ________________________________________________________ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 01:44:31 -0800 (PST) From: Capuchin Subject: Re: robyn's most embarrassing moment? On Wed, 11 Mar 1998, Carole Reichstein wrote: > I've gone to Robyn shows since 1988, and *never* have witnessed anything > like this. I mean, it's not like Robyn draws the public displays of > affection that Morrissey always gets. What's the scoop? I hope I'm not the > only one who's secretly amused by this. :) Don't you remember the kid in Portland, September 23, 1992? This kid just appeared on stage at the end of some song that I don't recall and held out a black visor cap. Robyn looked at the boy and blinked and reached out to the cap. Just as his hand closed over the hat, someone grabbed the boy and pulled him off stage. Robyn stood there a moment longer holding the hat then turned back to the mic. Robyn put the cap over his left fist, held up to shoulder level. He then started talking to the cap as if it were a ventriloquist's dummy and talked back in a voice that was to be that of the cap. Mostly I remember the end: Robyn: Do you want to come back to England with me? Cap: Oh, yes. I hate living in Portland, Oregon. Robyn: Well, I don't have very many friends, but the ones I do have a really good. Something very close to that. Is this on your tape, JBJ? J. ________________________________________________________ J A Brelin Capuchin ________________________________________________________ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 23:03:23 +2909 From: dlang Subject: Re: hello??? hello?? It must be the Quail, hes finally struck, its all my fault, i must have riled him about the Friends of Feg costumery, and in a fit of pique he's removed almost the entire feglist. Come back, all is forgiven, i'll stop saying nasty things about you Quail ( until at least next week anyway) daveL ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 07:48:37 -0500 From: "Runion-1, Michael" Subject: Re: bring home some t-bone Miles says: > An amazingly successful trip to Phonoluxe today yielded, among other > wonders, a *new* CD issue of T-Bone Burnett's 1980 album TRUTH DECAY. > Since I haven't heard anyone else on these lists mention that this gem was > available again, thought I'd do the honors. I'll vouch for T-Bone Burnett as well. I picked up a copy of Truth Decay on CD about two years back, but I'm not sure what label it was on. Good record. I've also got a vinyl copy of The Talking Animals which is fair (a bit dated now perhaps?). My all time fave was his last one, The Criminal Under My Own Hat. A superb low-key album with some great acoustic numbers. My wife even sang one, "Anytime At All" at our wedding reception. Saw his name this weekend in The Big Lebowski credits..."Musical Archivist" or something like that. Mike Mike Runion EG&G S&MA Data & Analyses; ADoCS Office 867-3619 BOC-251 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 05:55:49 -0800 (PST) From: Dede Davis Subject: TITANIC Given the earlier "Titanic" thread, I thought everyone would enjoy this. *** (Scene 1) KATE WINSLET: Why, this is a fancy boat, isn't it? KATE'S WEASELLY FIANCE: Yes it certainly is. Here is the art you asked for. It is by an artist named "Picasso." I am certain he will amount to nothing. KATE: Ha ha ha. That is very funny to our '90s audience, because of course Picasso later amounted to quite a bit, after this boat sank. LEONARDO DICAPRIO: Hello, I'm Leonardo DiCaprio. Perhaps you have seen the many Internet sites dedicated to the worship of me. You are very pretty. KATE: Thank you. So are you. LEONARDO: I know. Prettier than you, in fact. I am going to put on my "brooding" face now, to ensure that women will keep coming back again and again to see this movie. Later, my white shirt will be soaking wet. KATE: While you're doing that, I will concentrate on standing here and looking pretty, to keep the men in the audience interested until the boat sinks and people start dying. WEASELLY FIANCE: Excuse me. I do not like you, Leonardo, even though you saved my fiancee's life. I am going to sneer at you and treat you like dirt because you're poor, and then I'll probably be physically abusive to my fiancee, and then, just to make sure the audience really hates me, and to make sure my character is entirely one-dimensional, perhaps I'll throw an elderly person into the water. AUDIENCE: Boo! We hate you! Even though all real people have at least a few admirable qualities, we have not been shown any of yours, and plus, you're trying to come between Leonardo and Kate, and so therefore we hate you! Boo! (Even though technically it is Leonardo who is coming between you and Kate. But Leonardo is handsomer than you, even though he is only 13, so we are on his side. Boo!) * * * (Scene 2) LEONARDO: I'm glad we snuck away like this so that you could cheat on your fiance. KATE: So am I. Even though I am engaged to him and have made a commitment to marry him, that is no reason why you and I cannot climb into the backseat of a car and steam up the windows together. The fact that I am the heroine of the movie will no doubt help the cattle-like audience forgive me of this, though they would probably be VERY angry indeed if my fiance were to do the same thing to me. AUDIENCE: Darn straight we would! Moo! We mean, Boo! LEONARDO: I agree. First I would like to draw you, though, so of course you will have to take off all your clothes. KATE: But can a movie with five minutes of continuous nudity be at all successful in, say, Provo, Utah, where the audiences might not stand for that sort of thing? LEONARDO: I would be willing to bet that for the first three weeks the film is in release, every single showing at Wynnsong Theater in Provo will sell out. NARRATOR: According to Wynnsong manager Matt Palmer, that is exactly what happened. KATE: All right, then. (sound of clothes hitting the floor) * * * (Scene 3) FIRST MATE: Captain, we're about to hit an iceberg. CAPTAIN: Great, I could use some ice for my drink. (sound of drinking) ICEBERG: (hits boat) FIRST MATE: That can't be good. CAPTAIN: Bottoms up! AUDIENCE: (silence) FIRST MATE: That was irony, you fools. AUDIENCE: Baa! Moo! Where's Leonardo? * * * (Scene 4) LEONARDO: I have been informed that this boat is sinking. KATE: That is terrible. LEONARDO: Would you like to engage in some more immoral-but-justified behavior? KATE: Certainly. WEASELLY FIANCE: Excuse me, I- AUDIENCE: Boo! Boo! WEASELLY FIANCE: (aside) I'm getting the raw end of the deal here. (to Leonardo) Listen, Leonardo, to cement my morally-dubious-yet-somehow-less-annoying-than-you personality, I am going to handcuff you to this pipe, here in a room that will soon be filling with water, due to the fact that we are sinking, which I believe has been mentioned previously. LEONARDO: Why don't you just shoot me? WEASELLY FIANCE: Because then you wouldn't be able to escape and save Kate from me. Of course, you're going to die anyway- AUDIENCE: Don't spoil it for us! Boo! LEONARDO: He's right, though. I am doomed. AUDIENCE: Aww, look how cute he is when he's doomed. WEASELLY FIANCE: I hate you people. * * * (Scene 5) 150-YEAR-OLD KATE: And that's when Leonardo rescued me from my evil fiance and helped me float on a board in the water. Of course, if it hadn't been for having to rescue HIM, I could have gotten on an actual lifeboat, and not frozen my legs nearly off. Anyway, he's pretty much dead now, and I'm well over a thousand years old, and whos making my supper? I need a bath. Turn down that Enya music, it's making my ears hurt. You kids today, with your loud music. Why, when I was - -- hey! Don't you walk away from me, Mr. Snooty-Patootie! I'd turn you over my knee, if I had one. I'll beat you in the head with this huge diamond! Come back here! (Fade to black; roll credits; play annoying Celine Dion song.) == Dede "Out of boredom/ I decided/ I'd get with it"--MCC _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 09:45:41 -0500 (EST) From: lj lindhurst Subject: Re: hello??? hello?? >It must be the Quail, hes finally struck, its all my fault, i must have >riled him about the Friends of Feg costumery, and in a fit of pique he's >removed almost the entire feglist. Come back, all is forgiven, i'll stop >saying nasty things about you Quail ( until at least next week anyway) >daveL what the hell is a "fit of pique" and how do I get one? ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:01:57 -0800 From: John Barrington Jones Subject: Re: robyn's most embarrassing moment? >Mostly I remember the end: >Robyn: Do you want to come back to England with me? >Cap: Oh, yes. I hate living in Portland, Oregon. >Robyn: Well, I don't have very many friends, but the ones I do have a >really good. > >Something very close to that. Is this on your tape, JBJ? >J. Jeme-- Why, yes it is!! I have long wondered what Robyn was doing during this part of the gig. I was way up in the balcony--furthest section away from the stage, and so it looked to me like Robyn had just decided to do a wacky between song puppetry bit. I had no idea that a kid was involved. Cool, John ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 11:11:33 -0500 From: Natalie Jacobs Subject: Catching up A fellow Coen Bros. fan says, >The Big Lebowski was enormously entertaining- soaks in a bit more >afterwards, like a good red sauce. I was mad that the new Elvis >Costello song snippet was only audible at external-to-headphone >level. I was mad, too. Fightin' mad! I thought the movie was a bit thin in terms of plot, but very funny and worth watching. It's no "Fargo," but then, what is? Key line: "It was darker than a black steer's tochis on a moonless prairie." Dolph dolphs, >Just wanted to share that I just bought the _Gotta Let This Hen Out!_ >video from the local Tower. Is this video easily available? Should I go look for it? LJ raves (re. Neutral Milk Hotel) >The songs are also embarrassingly sexual-- >and not necessarily in a *sexy* way, but in more of a *disturbing* way. >There is only one other artist I can think of who can pull that off, and >that is a fellow named Mr. Hitchcock. I dunno, Robyn's stuff doesn't really make me feel creepy the way some of NMH's lyrics do. Robyn is a little too light-hearted, and far too rational (although he has a somewhat different system of rationality than most people). I think a closer comparison might be to early Throwing Muses - dark, visceral, churned up from the subconscious and splattered across an equally disturbing musical canvas (e.g. "Once there were two Mexican women ran over the hill ripped off their skin and ate it up"). The Quail spumes, >3. There is absolutely no truth whatsoever to any of the ravings made by >Feg Natalie, Feg James, or Feg Dave. There is no Quailspiracy, and the >whole list is tired of this frivolous nonsense. Lies, lies, lies. Don't let this foul feathered fiend throw blinkers over your eyes, my fair Feggish friends! You know, deep in your hearts how far the tendrils of the Quailspiracy run - backwards and forwards in time, from the dense, glowing realm of the young universe to the ultimate entropy that lies at the end of all things. The Quail is everywhere - the Quail is mother, the Quail is father - and only the wily and the wise may escape his all-encompassing evil. Fear not, though; we, the Friends of Feg, are fighting tooth and nail against the doom that threatens to overtake us all. >Also, I would like to suggest that the following attire be pronounced >unacceptable: any glow in the dark badge whatsover, small wrap round >eyemasks of any sort, and, most of all, irridescent body stocking and >so-called "superfeg" jocks. I have to admit: for once, the fiend is correct. Iridescent body stockings are a *tad* conspicuous, and should only be worn during secret Feg gatherings. So, Quail, by banning our attire, you have simply added to our strength! You will be defeated! n. the fegtorious ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 11:52:15 -0600 From: "JH3" Subject: Re: Robyn Hitchcock chat I, too, will attempt to log the RH chat session on AOL, as long as I'm not called away on some sort of silly emergency on Friday. I probably will be.... John H. "please don't call me Reg" Hedges ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 98 11:41:00 -0800 From: Russ Reynolds Subject: Country Robyn here I go again jumping on another dead thread, but I just remembered Robyn's remark during the Portland Arms show, "If there's two things worse than country one of them is punk"...doesn't sound like he holds a very high an opinion of the genre. - -russ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 98 13:58:31 From: firstcat@lsli.com Subject: SXSW meet? Ok, so after tomorrow I'll be in Austin and not checking e-mail for the rest of the week....whats the word on a feg comglomeration? Where, When and how do we id eachother? Cheers Jay - ------------------------------------- Jay Lyall Channel Sales Director Livermore Software Laboratories, Intl. 2825 Wilcrest, Suite 160 Houston, Texas 77042-3358 1-713-974-3274 jay@lsli.com Date: 3/16/98 - ------------------------------------- Two-Hour Luxury Goods Commercial Also A Spy Film ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 13:47:52 PST From: "Capitalism Blows" Subject: Re: Big Lebowski i've seen it three times, and can't wait to see it again. unfortunately, i probably won't have the time to see it as often as i'd like. and then, there's the new sayles movie coming out as well... i'm no good at saying *why* i like things, as opposed to screaming out *what* it is i like. but, with the coens, all the usual elements are there. incredible acting (jeme, you mentioned brandt. that guy is just hilarious! i think they could make a movie about just him. his facial expressions are too much. ditto larry sellers. fuckin' perfect! oh, on a similar note, wouldn't y'all just love to read barton fink's screenplay? the one that lipnick rejected. i have a fantasy that they'll make a movie out of that. hey, h.i. mcdonough worked at hudsucker industries, and then they made a movie about hudsucker industries, so maybe it's not *that* farfetched,) amazing dialog. "you said it mon...nobody fucks with the jesus!" get outta here. awesome cinematography. badassed music. you know, everyone says they're all style and no substance. i think that's a load of crap. but even if their movies were just components without plots or emotions, they'd *still* be worth watching repeatedly, because the components are so perfect. and great final scenes/shots. i don't know why, but i find that shot of the guy rolling the strike followed by the fade to black, very touching. their final shot always stops me dead cold. the bird falling into the ocean in Barton Fink. gabriel byrne leaning against the tree in Miller's Crossing. well, *all* of them. even if one didn't want to watch the credits, you're forced to with the coens, because after the ends of their movies you're incapable of doing anything but just *sitting* there. uh, shit, i'm rambling, aren't i? gene siskel called Lebowski a "would-be comedy," and a major disappointment. he had his head up his ass, is all i can think. oh, since this is a music list, maybe i'd better mention that i think they out-tarantinoed quentin with the soundtrack. kenny rogers! ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 16:22:04 -0600 From: Miles Goosens Subject: Re: Catching up At 11:11 AM 3/16/98 -0500, Natalie Jacobs wrote: >A fellow Coen Bros. fan says, > >>The Big Lebowski was enormously entertaining- soaks in a bit more >>afterwards, like a good red sauce. I was mad that the new Elvis >>Costello song snippet was only audible at external-to-headphone >>level. > >I was mad, too. Fightin' mad! I thought the movie was a bit thin in terms >of plot, but very funny and worth watching. It's no "Fargo," but then, >what is? This strikes me as odd, since I found FARGO to be one of their weaker efforts. My favorite Coen flicks - - RAISING ARIZONA and now THE BIG LEBOWSKI -- *are* strongly plotted, IMO, but are so madcap and wonderful that it's easy to think that they're not. Their daffiness *is* their genius, and stuff like the long Jesus the Bowling Pederast sequence admittedly doesn't advance the plot one iota, but it's scenes like those that elevate it from "good" (the less-wacky MILLER'S CROSSING and FARGO) to "great" (RA, HUDSUCKER, and LEBOWSKI) status, IMO. Sorry for those on Loud-Fans who have already seen me say something similar. Oh yeah, and what Eddie Tews said. almost all alliteratively, Miles ====================================================================== "If a million people say a stupid thing, it is still a stupid thing." -- Anatole France Miles Goosens outdoorminer@mindspring.com http://www.mindspring.com/~outdoorminer/miles ====================================================================== ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 18:26:29 -0400 From: chichi@io.com (Zelda Pinwheel) Subject: Re: SXSW meet? At 1:58 PM 3/16/1998, Jay wrote>Ok, so after tomorrow I'll be in Austin and not checking e-mail for the rest of the week....whats the word on a feg comglomeration? Where, When and how do we id each other? Outside the Paramount Theatre at 6:00? After the film we can head over to the State Theatre and get to know each other before Robyn's show at 12:00. We can have an official Fegtogether on Friday if anyone's up for it at a bar near my place. Whaddya think? z ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This product is sold by weight, not volume. Some settling of contents may have occurred during shipping and handling. May contain peanuts. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 13:11:41 +1200 (NZST) From: james.dignan@stonebow.otago.ac.nz (James Dignan) Subject: Re: fegmaniax-digest V7 #101 ><ahead? (I expect Eb to have an answer to this....!) October. Happy St Pat's everyone! James Dignan (who is secretly glad his ancestors changed the spelling from O'Duibhgeannain) PS - what relation was the author Victor Hugh Gogh? James Dignan___________________________________ You talk to me Deptmt of Psychology, Otago University As if from a distance ya zhivu v' 50 Norfolk Street And I reply. . . . . . . . . . Dunedin, New Zealand with impressions chosen from another time steam megaphone (03) 455-7807 (Brian Eno - "By this River") ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 01:57:59 GMT From: dwdudic@erols.com (David W. Dudich) Subject: flesh cartoon? On Mon, 16 Mar 1998 02:36:17 -0500 (EST), you wrote: > >Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 02:44:58 -0500 (EST) >From: Terrence M Marks >Subject: Re: cartoons > >> has anyone mentioned Robyn's right hand man Captain Dry yet? >> > >No. >No one has taken me up on my offer to help write a Robyn Hitchcock-based >comic book either. Well, I'd write some text, but I can't do art work worth schitt. Can anybody out there? -luther ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 22:24:29 -0500 (EST) From: lj lindhurst Subject: Hey, I have an image for Gloss Flesh (?) Go to: http://www.echonyc.com/~ljl/pumpkinmen.jpeg I don't know who is putting this together, or if even that is the correct name (sorry, haven't been following), but if you want a high res version of this and some layout, just give me a holler. It's what I do. Holler, that is. lj ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 01:16:57 -0500 (EST) From: Terrence M Marks Subject: Re: flesh cartoon? > >No. > >No one has taken me up on my offer to help write a Robyn Hitchcock-based > >comic book either. > > Well, I'd write some text, but I can't do art work worth > schitt. Can anybody out there? > Someone whose name I can't seem to find right now has volunteered to help with the artwork. If there's an interest in producing such a thing, I suppose we'll go ahead. And if we do, I'm taking you up on that offer. Terrence Marks normal@grove.ufl.edu ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 17 Mar 98 09:27:47 From: firstcat@lsli.com Subject: Re: SXSW meet? Cool...I'll be the guy in the Planet of the Apes shirt ready to throw Milk Duds at record company lowlifes in the theater... - --- On Mon, 16 Mar 1998 18:26:29 -0400 Zelda Pinwheel wrote: >At 1:58 PM 3/16/1998, Jay wrote>Ok, so after tomorrow I'll be in Austin and >not checking e-mail for the rest of the week....whats the word on a feg >comglomeration? Where, When and how do we id each other? > >Outside the Paramount Theatre at 6:00? After the film we can head over to >the State Theatre and get to know each other before Robyn's show at 12:00. > >We can have an official Fegtogether on Friday if anyone's up for it at a >bar near my place. > >Whaddya think? > >z > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >This product is sold by weight, not volume. Some settling of contents may have >occurred during shipping and handling. May contain peanuts. > - -----------------End of Original Message----------------- - ------------------------------------- Jay Lyall Channel Sales Director Livermore Software Laboratories, Intl. 2825 Wilcrest, Suite 160 Houston, Texas 77042-3358 1-713-974-3274 jay@lsli.com Date: 3/17/98 - ------------------------------------- Two-Hour Luxury Goods Commercial Also A Spy Film ------------------------------ End of fegmaniax-digest V7 #102 *******************************