From: owner-eda-thoughts-digest@smoe.org (eda-thoughts-digest) To: eda-thoughts-digest@smoe.org Subject: eda-thoughts-digest V2 #16 Reply-To: eda-thoughts@smoe.org Sender: owner-eda-thoughts-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-eda-thoughts-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk eda-thoughts-digest Saturday, January 16 1999 Volume 02 : Number 016 * If you ever wish to unsubscribe, send an email to * eda-thoughts-digest-request@smoe.org with ONLY * the word unsubscribe in the body of the email * . * PLEASE :) when you reply to this digest to send a post TO the list, * change the subject to reflect what your post is about. A subject * of Re: eda-thoughts-digest V2 #xxx or the like gives readers no clue * as to what your message is about. Today's Subjects: ----------------- ET: Varsity Blues [rockabye@juno.com (Scott- e Sykes)] Re: ET: OMG...am I talking about the tommy thing, too? [Uneaq1@webtv.net ] ET: A Must Read [beccahusky1@juno.com (Kristin A Maynard)] Re: ET: OMG...am I talking about the tommy thing, too? ["Kevin Pease" ___________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Get secure free e-mail that you don't need Web access to use from Juno, the world's second largest online service. Download your free software at http://www.juno.com/getit.b.html. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 16:22:50 -0500 From: "Kevin Pease" Subject: Re: ET: OMG...am I talking about the tommy thing, too? >Respectable is not detemined by the clothes you wear, but by the way you >carry yourself. I wear baggy jeans, flannel shirts, and my favorite >shoes are my combat boots. I belive that designer labels are simply >status signs and are actually somewhat discriminative. I don't know your >ful opinion, I'm not trying to change your veiw, I am simply stating >that I belive respectability is not something that is necesarily >determined by clothes. I've got to sort of agree / sort of disagree on this one. (Please, keep in mind that I'm also talking as someone who's working a full time job, and no longer in school... ) I will agree with Maggie's last sentence up there - respectability isn't something that is necessarily determined by clothes... I'd even say that respectability is something that's completely independent of the clothing you wear. Respectability is something that comes from attitude, not from clothing. If you act respectable, you are respectable... I've known people who buy exclusively from Abercrombie & Fitch and Tommy Hilfiger, who are (to put it plainly), complete asses - 'respectable' would be the last adjective I would ever pick to describe them. By the same token, I know people who like to dress like Marilyn Manson (not a slam against him, just that his mode of dress is rather... unique... :), who are completely respectable, intelligent, good people. The clothes don't determine the respectability. Unfortunately, not everybody thinks that way, and, at least in the working world, there *are* certain standards of "respectable" dress. Of course, it varies completely from job to job - I work as a software engineer... I can roll into work unshaven, wearing shorts, sandals, and a t-shirt during the summer (not all the time... but now and then I can get away with it... :)... but walk next door to the sales & marketing department, and they're dressed in suits (casual for them is ONLY a shirt and a tie) year-round. I don't deal with customers directly, so I'm not expected to dress up like the sales & marketing folks. However, if I was to come in some time, (and this is for example only... I wouldn't even know where to BUY these things, but I have seen them on people... :) wearing tight leather pants, a fishnet shirt, and combat boots, my hair dyed jet black & grown out long... I'd raise more than a few managerial eyebrows, and probably one of them would say..."Um... could you tone it down please?" That's not to say that there's not jobs where you COULD show up to work like that, but I think there's probably more jobs that you couldn't do that at. They don't expect you to buy all your clothing at Tommy or Abercrombie... but by the same token, corporate folks generally don't want employees dressing like they just stepped out of a rock video. :) I (like to) think I'm more or less respectable, and I get by most of the time with jeans, t-shirts, polo shirts, and sneakers... occasionally dockers & a dressier shirt & a better pair of shoes, but very little of my wardrobe is designer label. That stuff's too damned expensive, and the quality and durability is NOT worth doubling (or more than doubling) the price. My feeling is, for the price that designer labels ask for clothes, the things better damned well be made of Kevlar, and completely bullet proof. :) The point is this: respectability isn't based on a designer label. But, sometimes, you have to present a respectable image, and that *can* be hard to do when you're dressed like Marilyn Manson. It's not impossible, but it is harder... people like to categorize you by what they see - if they see a "punk rock-star wannabe", they're going to assume that you're a punk rock-star wannabe, and you've got to overcome that negative first impression as well as show them that you're respectable... like I said, it's not impossible, but it does tend to make things more difficult. Kevin ------------------------------ End of eda-thoughts-digest V2 #16 *********************************