From: owner-ecto-digest@smoe.org (ecto-digest) To: ecto-digest@smoe.org Subject: ecto-digest V12 #114 Reply-To: ecto@smoe.org Sender: owner-ecto-digest@smoe.org Errors-To: owner-ecto-digest@smoe.org Precedence: bulk ecto-digest Friday, May 5 2006 Volume 12 : Number 114 Today's Subjects: ----------------- Re: Net Neutrality law? [raven@igc.org] dresden dolls [anna maria "stjärnell" ] RE: dresden dolls ["JoAnn Whetsell" ] CONGRATULATIONS TO HAPPY! (Take 2) ["Xenu's Sister" ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 22:50:17 -0700 From: raven@igc.org Subject: Re: Net Neutrality law? On 05/02/06 at 22:27:16 -0600, neal copperman wrote: > > I was surprised to hear about this issue today, > and that I hadn't heard about it before. You might find this Snopes article interesting: http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/neutrality.asp - -- John ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 01:25:29 -0700 (PDT) From: anna maria "stjärnell" Subject: dresden dolls Hi.. well it's taken the new dresden dolls this long to sink in..i'm very fond of it even if the debut is still the best. it seems sadder and more expericenced somehow. i'd recommend it to almost anyone though. anna Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 12:04:27 -0400 From: "JoAnn Whetsell" Subject: RE: dresden dolls Funny, it only took about 2 listens for me to absolutely love it. I was trying to figure out what the difference is between Yes, Virginia and their debut, and I think Woj hit it when he said it was more rock than cabaret and more like their live shows. But I also think the songs are less story-songs, and that's part of it. JoAnn -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: anna maria "stjdrnell" To: ecto@smoe.org Subject: dresden dolls Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 01:25:29 -0700 (PDT) >Hi.. >well it's taken the new dresden dolls this long to >sink in..i'm very fond of it even if the debut is >still the best. it seems sadder and more expericenced >somehow. >i'd recommend it to almost anyone though. >anna >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 17:54:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Xenu's Sister" Subject: CONGRATULATIONS TO HAPPY! (Take 2) As far as I know, there were no hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, typhoons, cyclones or other wedding-interuppting natural events in south Florida in the past few days, so I think I can say, Happy and Bob are almost certainly probably now married! Yay! Vickie - -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Music, all I hear is music, guaranteed to please... Happy's MySpace profile: http://www.myspace.com/happyrhodes Happy Rhodes song samples and rarities: http://wretchawry.com - -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 22:45:36 -0400 From: Dave Subject: Re: Net Neutrality >i think i understand. it's a marking on the packets to prioritize and >you would have to pay more for higher priority which supposedly makes >it scoot along the backbone faster. Why do I get the feeling that highest priority is generally going to go to packets with this marking: "buy viagra cheap!" ------------------------------ End of ecto-digest V12 #114 ***************************